Considering I’ll Have Another’s legacy

  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X


  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X

The wrap up of another Triple Crown season always brings a certain feeling of melancholy. The excitement and build up to each of the races is incredible, especially when a potential Triple Crown is on the line.

Now that racing has gone yet another year without that Triple Crown victor, it gives us time to reflect and wonder what I’ll Have Another’s legacy will be.

» Read more at MSNBC
New to the Paulick Report? Click here to sign up for our daily email newsletter to keep up on this and other stories happening in the Thoroughbred industry
  • dh

    Melancholy would have set in had IHA won the Triple Crown thus justifying the cheats of the game and wondering which cheat will have a horse for next years Derby. But when Union Rags wins the Belmont for such class acts as Phylis Wyeth and Mike Matz it gives us hope that the good guys still have a glimmer of hope in this once great game.

  • stillriledup

     Couldnt agree more.

  • Greg Jones

    Perfectly stated dh…

  • Jersey Josh

    I find it all pretty funny since the ONLY ONE trainer that had a horse in the Belmont has never been suspended.  Kelly Breen is the only one.  All the others have had a fine and or were given days.

  • Dantana

    Will Dennis O’Neill google  ”Tendon”?

  • James Staples

    ITS THE GREATEST GAME ON EARTH!!!…& ALWAYS WILL BE…PERIOD…

  • Don Reed

    “Legacy”?  None.  Wrong word. 

    “1. Money or property bequethed to another by will.  2.  Something handed down from an ancestor or a predecessor or from the past…” 

    To justify the premise of the above, we’d need a third definition.  How’s this?:

    “A ‘hype’ word promiscuously used in the sports world, often in conjunction with the fatuous & insincere effort to glorify what is merely good or moderately significant, usually in conjunction with an effort to financially profit from the art of deliberate exaggeration.”

  • Stanley inman

    The clouds roll away, the sun comes out,
    …Story has a happy ending

  • ktq1

    My sentiments exactly!

  • Barney Door

    Phsssst!

  • Ohio Bred Girl

    Legacy?  Not on the strength of 7 races, even if he did win 5 of them.  Maybe his legacy will be the damage that racing sustains when trainers are repeatedly fined and wrist-slapped.  Maybe his legacy will be the creation of a nationwide medication and penalties policy.  Ferdinand brought horse rescue/aftercare to the public eye.  Barbaro and Eight Belles had a big impact on research funding.  Maybe we can have national rules titled “We Won’t Put Up With Another.”

  • Skip Ean

    Totally agree–the spotlight on O’Neill is becoming more active for other trainers who play games with horse’s lives.  Inhumane tricks used by greedy owners and trainers have brought TB racing down.  The spotlight and scrutiny of O’Neill can make things better for our horses in the future and make the bad boys on the backside think twice before cheating.

  • Idavis

    It’s tiring to hear the negative press on Doug O’Neill when we have Dutrow, Pletcher, Baffert, Asmussen, the late Frankel, etc…who all were found guilty one time or several times, for similar or worse charges.  Doug is guilty of basically using baking soda…not a DRUG, not harmful to the horse. Yet these same fools who think we should throw O’Neill
    under the bus for using bicarbonate of soda have no issues w/trainers using Lassix, which is indeed a DRUG and is definitely a performance enhancer as a diuretic (horses lose 20 to 30 lbs of fluid when on it); and those trainers who wish not to use Lassix, are basically forced to use it; otherwise, they have a huge disadvantage from the get-go! Lassix and other DRUGS are bad for our horses and Thoroughbred racing in this country…not Doug O’Neill’s use of baking soda. If the entire world can go w/o race day Lassix, why can’t we do the same and improve the breed instead of harming it.  Guess that makes too much sense, since common sense is so very uncommon these days.

  • Barry Irwin

    Let me explain something that may bring this issue into sharper focus for you. The entire issue of whether somebody is cheating should be based not on technicalities, but on intent. When somebody has an overage for a legal drug, I don’t think this is cheating. This is simply an error. But when somebody uses any form of milkshaking, the intent is to take and edge and to cheat. You can minimize the components of milkshaking all you want to and make fun of the ingredients, but milkshaing remains one of the two most potent methods to move a horse up. The other is any form of enhancing the delivery of oxygen to the lungs. Buffering lactic acid and enhancing oxygen delivery are the gold standard of cheating to improve the performance of a racehorse.

    I have read some nonsense about how Doug O’Neill is not a bad guy because he has never had a positive test for a Class 1 drug like a narcotic.

    Pain management is mostly an issue that concerns lower level horses and there are plenty of ways to deal with painother  than having to resort to a narcotic. The fact that he has not had a positive test for a narcotic in no way should minimize the fact that he has been caught for horses in his care having elevated levels of TOC2.

  • brussellky

    His legacy will be determined by how well he performs as a stallion.  That will outweigh all other factors.  Think about it, Point Given was almost certainly a better racehorse than Bernardini (both Preakness winners) but which has the better “legacy”?

  • Barry Irwin

    Two entirely different careers. One does not have ANYTHING to do with the other. Majestic Prince and Arts and Letters were terrific racehorses, but they were marginal as sires. Doesn’t detract from what they did on the track. This is just your opinion. Under your definition, Citation was a bum!

  • Don Reed

    This constant attempted end-run around the issue of Doug O’Neill – by accusing & indicting the ENTIRE ["etc."] trainer roster – is absolutely vile & cowardly. 

    Only habitual (& quite often, paid) apologists for cheating, lying, stealing and perjury would even THINK of making such a statement.

    Can this get worse?  Yes. 

    Once again, an anonymous accuser has deliberately abused the Paulick posting system by stating that all of the trainers – “Etc.” can very well mean any number you want it to mean - are corrupt, in an infamously unethical attempt to bail out Doug O’Neill.

  • Barry Irwin

    I wonder how long these claques will be on the payroll?

  • David

    The story of this year’s TC that perhaps surpasses IHA is Bob Baffart.  I always thought Las Barrera somehow getting BOLD FORBES to stay a mile and a half was amazing; Baffart proves he can spot a fast horse from the space shuttle and, that, is today’s TC name of the game.  This guy changed the TC game and he continues to rule it.

  • James D. Jimenez

    Three fantastic races with three incredible finishes. Solid Triple Crown threat. Trainer finishes second in all 3 Triple Crown races. Great Mario Gutierrez story. Seems this year Triple Crown had so many positives for the sport to build upon, hope it does!

  • Don Reed

    I am tempted to say that, having seen their work, the highest they’ll ever get in the system is “unpaid intern.”

    In reality, forever.  Rotten money never decomposes.

  • Barry Irwin

    The real story is that racing dodged a major bullet.

  • Jimculpepper

    Bullets are always major for those prone to shooting themselves in the foot. The fan base will continue to erode till the horses are clean.

  • Idavis

    I don’t even know Doug O’Neill but believe in giving him the benefit of the doubt…….do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  What I do know is what I read about all trainers throughout the years and since we’ve owned horses in partnership on the East Coast, we’ve spoken w/several trainers, breeders and horsemen over the years as well. To deny that many of our best trainers have had charges brought against them is ludicrous. Additionally, I intended no ill will against those trainers and quite honestly have a great deal of respect and admiration for them.  The point is that on any given day, the most careful of trainers can come up w/a violation.  Each horse, just as humans, is different and reacts differently when given meds.  I recall the Brass Hat debacle in Dubai some years ago.  Supposedly, the owner/trainer of Brass Hat followed all the rules.  Unfortunately, a small trace of meds was found in his system and he was disqualified following the race. 

    I love Thoroughbred racing and hate to see so many folks in their blogs, on RP Report, etc…constantly tear down the sport. To be so negative and vengeful does not reflect well on the sport of Thoroughbred racing. 

    With regard to the issue of Lassix, that is one issue that many owners/breeders/trainers shy away from.  Why is that?? If we put the horse first, as we should (and as the Jacksons do, for example), Lassix should have been banned years ago.  Why are we the only country using race day Lassix?  It’s wrong, it’s harmful to the breed from all the evidence and reports I’ve read, so why can’t we do away with it? Reports have stated that there is a very small percentage of horses that would not be able to race, because they are bleeders…if they are bleeders, they shouldn’t be racing anyway. 

    When you go back to the 70′s decade..with Secretariat, Slew, Affirmed…these were phenomenal athletes and there was no Lassix on race day.  We need to begin breeding healthier, stronger Thoroughbreds so once again we can actually witness another Triple Crown.  It appears hypocrisy runs rampant throughout the industry, and no one wants to admit that it’s about the money, not the horse, but sadly, it appears to be so.

  • James D. Jimenez

    You are a very bitter man Mr. Irwin! You knock me for posting and yet while running an international company you have the time to clutter these boards with your bitterness. 

    With all the good that has come your way you seem more intent on spreading around nothing but negativity. 

    I will prey that some happiness comes into your life and that you can become a more pleasant person.

  • Barry Irwin

    Davis, I agree with everything you have just posted, but as I tried to explain to you, when a horse tests positive for an elevated level of TCO2, the ONLY logical explanation is that the trainer of that animal tried to take an edge by manipulating its carbon levels. This is not like giving a drug like bute and having an overage. Milkshaking is not legal. Anybody that tries to run horses like this is cheating. That is the difference. Do you get it yet? People that continually do stuff like this do not deserve the benefit of the doubt, because there is no doubt.

  • brussellky

    I agree with you but I think you misunderstood me.  Although they are 2 entirely different careers, if he does well in his stud career it will keep the memory of his racing career alive in the minds of many more average fans than if he doesn’t.  Had Monarchos been a good sire I would wager that many more average fans would know he ran the 2nd fastest Derby in history.  Legacy and objective fact are often mutually exclusive.

  • Barry Irwin

    Prey…couldn’t have written it better myself.

    Don’t look for me to let up until racing starts to get rid of the drug cheats.

  • Barry Irwin

    I know exactly what you mean. This is a common thread among people in the game, fans and pros alike. But the fact remains that few great horses make it at stud and it should not diminish their stature as racehorses.

  • Olebobbowers

    BafFART? lol.

  • James D. Jimenez

    I used the correct word!!!!

    In my travels I have learned that you are not very well liked. You also point fingers like you’re a saint and that is FAR from the truth. The stories of your dealings proceed you by the length of the stretch. A person with so many skeletons in the closet should keep their finger pointing to a minimum!

  • Don Reed

    “PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT LITTLE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!”

    Barry, I was waiting for the facade of the cool, articulate and urbane “James D. Jimenez” to crack.  It happened.

    “In my travels I have learned that you are not very well liked.”

    This peer-pressure tactic was the DOOR prize from a kindergarden heist.  I had no idea they were shoeing kids that young, but there we have it.

  • Jimculpepper

    I suspect you guys have been around rascals so much that you may well be too hard on James; meanwhile, any who are less than fawning over damned fools  could be less than welcome in most racing circles.

  • Barry Irwin

    Nice try Jimenez, or whomever is using your name on these boards or feeding you lines. Lambasting me will not lessen my credibility, because I am talking issues and youhave not and cannot respond to them, because you have no clue or you are blind to the truth. I have not attached you or Mr. O’Neill and have been very careful not to make any of this personal. I am talking issues and facts.

  • Upstart

    Were you at King Umberto’s Saturday night James?  If not, the trainer who finished second in all three Triple Crown races,  with his second wife,  did not seem all that happy with his second, times three, results.  Maybe it was karma…

  • Upstart

    “…cool, articulate and urbane”…what comments have you been reading? 

  • Upstart

    James D. is incapable of talking issues Barry.

  • James D. Jimenez

    Why do you and your merry band of followers insist that multiple people use my name? You have indeed attacked me personally and continue to do so by insinuating that I’m part of some PR plot. And as soon as you post one of your many negative post, here come your fans, employees, or family (whatever they are). Right after you post a comment the song Here Comes The Clowns should start playing because yours are in full force. Tell me, do you pay by the post or just a monthly fee? Barry, is your house so clean that you really feel it’s OK to be blasting anyone? People on three tracks in three states say it ain’t so clean!

  • Don Reed

    Good point,  Since JDJ has posted some 300 comments in the past 4 weeks [James, please do not reply with an exact count], who knows?

    I for one have noticed the following features: The polished writing, the natural solicitude of the instinctive politician, the desire to conduct impersonal adult conversations sans recriminations, etc.

    A regular Parisian courtier in the Court of Louis XIV – which, of course, would be an unlikely member of a racing track’s support staff (to wit, a self-proclaimed farrier).

    Now, fangs bared, we encounter Talleyrand, hissing that due to his unpopularity, Barry will no longer be welcome in the offices of the Emperor.

  • Upstart

    Dear Moderator,

    Were you at King Umberto’s Saturday night?  How would you know who was there if you were not. Atleast admit it.

  • Upstart

    IHA is not a cripple.  As Dr Bramledge said this is a very minor injury.  No doubt many other horses racing on Saturday continued on with this same injury.  IHA could have been rested/healed and returned maybe for the Breeders Cup, but definately as a 4 year old (with his fan base no doubt helping racing. Listen to Bill Finley’s commentary…and don’t care what you think about Bill) but this owner/trainer combo opted to retire and try to take the money…any one thinking otherwise…just a joke.

  • Upstart

    Be careful, you will upset James D. and the Moderator…if they understand your delightful comment…

  • Ace

    I am so tired of people-like you-who do not have a clue.  Listen to me, you no thing whiner-a top class horse with a minor injury can become a major breakdown when racing-even after healing.  Those of you who have never trained, or owned a horse do not understand that you must consider the risk when making the decision to continue or retire.
    To make it clearer-could you ever look in a mirror again if you brought this horse back from an injury and he had to be put down after a race?
    And in the words of Rod Kaufman, a longtime horseman who has passed, but not before imparting the greatest words of wisdom I have ever heard-
    “It’s easy to train someone elses horse.”

  • James D. Jimenez

    Again Barry’s clowns attack! The last 4 weeks I was at Pimlico and Belmont and rarely posted. The writing should be the same high school educated type post. You’ll found some spelling and grammar errors like Ray did with the, can and may, a few weeks ago, lol. You are obviously college educated and very smart as I’ll admit some of your post are over my farriers head.

    I’m just a hard working farrier that pays his bills, never declared bankruptcy, and supplies a service at a fair non inflated price. And if someone were to give me let’s say $3,000,000.00 to give to another person or persons they would receive the full $3,000,000.00! You see there are many forms of cheating, aren’t there?

    Of course, I’m sure that everyone that post here would also do all of the above.

  • Jaybird

    “kindergarten”.We don’t want these kids to feel shorted.

  • Don Reed

    “Here come your fans, employees, or family…”

    JDJ, just for the record, I for one have no connection to Barry Irwin.

    I have never met him; have never worked for him; have never been paid by him; am not his friend; and as far as I know, he is not my father (or any other member of my family, including my mother, I may safely add).

    Independently, we happen to agree on the issue of Doug O’Neill being a trainer who, among other things, has helped to ruin the image of his fellow trainers and the sport of racing in America.

    Do you really think that people have to be PAID to voice their objections to trainers who do this to a sport we love?

    That will clean up one of your dozens of reprehensible & increasingly childish accusations.

    *****

    You know, you’re not doing Mr. O’Neill any good with these posts. 

    In fact, given the current state of paranoia about anonymous Paulick posts, people are going to draw the following  conclusion:

    You’re actually trying to damage O’Neill by posing as his supporter – and then, intentionally, further damaging O’Neill’s reputation by saying the things that you’ve said.

    THEY MIGHT NOT BE WRONG.

    Seriously, don’t you have some horses to shoe?

    Good evening.

  • Don Reed

    P.S.  I am also not very merry.

  • James D. Jimenez

    As you said it’s evening and all my work is done. Funny that you and Barry want the right to voice your opinions but when I or others voice an opinion that differs you attack. You, Barry and others have directly attacked me and others because the way we read the ruling indicates environmental issues, training, and lasix caused the high reading. You and the others have continued to use the “milkshake” angle because it’s what you want to believe. You are not looking for the truth or an answer you’re looking to say someone is cheating. We differ in opinions but you guys or girls threw the stones, not me!

  • James D. Jimenez

    Let’s start with my first post on this article, nothing but positive things. Then here comes Barry, then you Don Reed, and then upstart with the negatives and attacks at me! How can anyone even think to attack my original post?

  • Upstart

    Was any of this a consideration when Lava Man was brought back.  Don’t presume to know what I do or how long I have been doing it…just plain ignorant.

  • Don Reed

    [In reference to the below posting by JDJ]

    Barry, in case I am inadvertantly on your payroll of this alleged merry mob of media mendicants, I would like to be “demobed” (English slang, sorry).

    Please consider this to be my respectful letter of resignation.

  • James D. Jimenez

    Well you just showed a complete ignorance of horses! Race horses rarely return to 100% of their original running ability with a tendon. Why would the owner and trainer want to devalue IHA as a stud by running him against the best when he will likely not be at his best. Also, a tendon will easily take six months to one year to fully heal which means he would miss the start of the 2013 breeding season. 

    These kind of ill informed comments just show you the true knowledge of some of the people that post here.

    P.S. Ace (below) if you can quote Rod Kaufman you’re OK in my book!

  • May Flower

    IF JDJ is Jim Jimenez, IHA’s farrier, when did he stop posting on the PR pre-Belmont?

  • James D. Jimenez

    Union Rags is classy!

    Union RagsGreetings dear friends,For today is Belmont Stakes day. I drew post number three for the Grade 1 Belmont Stakes on June 9th. I will be piloted by John Velazquez, carrying 126 pounds. I am most excited to start in the last Triple Crown race of 2012. I wish the greatest of luck to all, and may everyone come home safe.This will be my second start at Belmont Park where I won the October 8, 2011 Champagne Stakes (gr. 1).”Obviously we’ve been a little disappointed but we feel that Union Rags hasn’t really run his race (this year),” said owner Phyllis Wyeth. “We think he can do the mile-and-a-half and he’s training very, very, well. We’re all very confident.” “I just hope, in this race, he gets a clear chance to run,” said Michael Matz, the trainer of Union Rags. “I’d like him to get a clear trip, so he can show what he can do.”My deepest condolences to Doug O’Neill, Paul Reddam, and Mario Gutierrez the connections of I’ll have another. My team and I can only imagine your disappointment. Happy retirement I’ll Have Another, may your future foals shine as bright as you, and leave their mark on this world. I hope to provide all of you with thrills, chills, and winning ways, this Saturday afternoon at Belmont Park! I will look forward to seeing you then!=-) I bid you good day- Union Rags

  • RayPaulick

    I’m not sure where you are getting your information about what Dr. Larry Bramlage said or did not say, but here is a direct quote from him about the difference between taking part in the post parade and in the Belmont Stakes itself: 

    Dr. Larry Bramlage: “I’ll Have Another’s ability to lead the post parade for tomorrow’s Belmont Stakes is an illustration of the character of his injury. It is absolutely of no concern for sub-maximal exercise, but would be a concern at a mile-and-a-half at full speed. Therefore, I have no concern for his appearance on the racetrack at the head of theBelmont field.”

    This does not make him a “cripple,” but it also points out the danger of running a horse of this caliber (who one gives 100% at the top level of competition) with this condition. 

  • RayPaulick

    We reserve the right to moderate, edit, or delete comments, and block individuals from posting comments.

  • Don Reed

    Nor shoed by JDJ, I assume.

  • Don Reed

    I specialize in obscure historical references.  No one in these circles has ever heard of Talleyrand, which, by the way, was also the winner of the Arkansas Derby, three years running (1819-21). 

  • Don Reed

    I specialize in obscure historical references. No one in these circles has ever heard of Talleyrand, which, by the way, was also the winner of the Arkansas Derby, three years running (1819-21).

  • James D. Jimenez

    Maybe you’re not so intelligent after all, it’s shod!

  • Don Reed

    “To deny that many of our best trainers have had charges brought against them is ludicrous.”

    Once again, someone tries to dilute the smell of corruption by dragging in the issue of THE OTHER TRAINERS.

    The issue is DOUG O’NEILL.  There is ONLY ONE trainer who answers to that name.  He is the ONLY trainer in America who starting on July 1st is going to serve 45 days for a serious violation of the horse racing rules.  He is the ENTIRE point of the conversation.  NO OTHER trainers, in this context, exist.  NONE.  NO ONE.

    Please remember these things.  They enhance the respect you can earn when people read what you’ve written, the tone of which is quite admirable.

  • Don Reed

    This (event #3) was posted as a reply to Idavis’s (very) long response (event #2) to one of my posts (event #1).

    As you can see, it is not attached to his/her/it’s response.
     
    Thanks to this chaotic Disqus system, we’re going to have go back to the basic rules of correspondence -

    Starting off by addressing our replies these as “To [Sample Name, in this case, "Idavis"], in response to [type in the first few words of the post written by Idavis, for reference]

    - So that if our replies end up being posted elsewhere than where they belong, at least there’s a possibility of some connection between Post & Reply & Reply to Reply being established.

    Also, I would urge everyone to date and time each post (“06/12/12 9:21 pm”), since the idea of chronological continuty in San Francisco (Disqus’s home office) – other than that members of Congress are re-elected every two years – has yet to sink in.

    Why pick on California?  Tonight, TVG is replaying a “Classic,” one of the Dubai Duty Free races.  Year?  Date?  Who cares?  Did ya hit the exacta?

  • Jimculpepper

    Good point on addressing our replies. TVG replays? Why not? Instant racing allows drunks to bet on old races, in the hope they’ll win this time.

  • Carol

    LOL

  • Carol

    Mr Irwin has a lot of ‘skin in this game’ so to speak and he also has chosen a trainer that never cheats and never has a positive. That says a lot about him and he is entitled to an opinion. There are many many cheaters out their and it needs to be controlled

  • Carol

    I thought he didn’t have a tendon. Just tendonitis

  • Carol

    excuse my typo ‘there’

Twitter