ROID RAGE

  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X


  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X
By Ray Paulick


The definition of the term “illegal” has always been a bit fuzzy in the horse racing world, especially among trainers. Several years ago I asked a very prominent horseman point blank if he was giving the blood-doping agent EPO to his horses as racing’s rumor mill had it. His response was a non-answer. “It ain’t illegal.” I assured him that the drug was, in fact, quite illegal, and that there were harsh penalties for anyone who got caught using it.


His reply surprised me. “How can it be illegal if they can’t test for it?” he asked.


Reminded me a little of former President Bill Clinton’s testimony to a grand jury about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” Clinton said, explaining why he told White House aides there was nothing going on between he and the intern.


The definition of what’s illegal and when are legitimate questions concerning the phased-in ban of anabolic steroids by the California Horse Racing Board. Monday’s search of the barn of Del Mar’s leading trainer John Sadler and comments by state regulators indicate not everyone has been on the same page in regard to the ban on steroids. The CHRB and its medical director, Dr. Rick Arthur, hoped all trainers and veterinarians would follow the guidelines suggested during the process of reclassifying anabolic steroids from Class 4 to Class 3 drugs (according to Association of Racing Commissioners International guidelines). That apparently hasn’t been the case.


Sadler said he and his attorney, Donald Calabria, have discussed possible litigation as a result of the barn search.


The first directive was issued by the CHRB May 12. That was followed by a May 26 informational Q&A that suggested, among other things, that trainers and veterinarians “not use anabolic steroids beyond this point.” But the Q&A also said there would be a period beginning July 1 when testing for steroids would be conducted but nothing more than a warning letter would be sent for positive tests. On July 24, CHRB executive director Kirk Breed issued a directive saying, effective Aug. 1, the board would begin to “strictly enforce all regulations concerning anabolic steroids and will no longer issue ‘unofficial notices’ when the test samples reveal unauthorized levels of anabolic steroids …complaints will be filed against trainers or other licensees alleged to have violated the regulations.”


Then, on Aug. 8, Breed issued another advisory saying the CHRB “will begin enforcement of the amended (steroids) rule” effective with races run Sept. 4.


From my reading of those directives and advisories, steroids became “illegal” on Aug. 1, with violations going on a trainer’s record, but there would be no penalty for positive tests until Sept. 4 because of California’s bureaucratic process of adopting new regulations. Trainers would effectively be on an “honor system” between those two dates. That’s kind of like saying it’s illegal to go over the speed limit on a highway this month, but the police will only give you a warning if they catch you speeding. But next month, when they start issuing tickets with penalties, you’d better slow down!


“We are trying to implement this enforcement regulation in the most logical, timely way,” CHRB chairman Richard Shapiro said in one of the advisories. “We have given notice to the owners, trainers, veterinarians and other track personnel. It is part of the process. The administration of all anabolic steroids to horses in competition must stop immediately. Complaints will be issued. The hammer is coming down. In this way, we are protecting the public and all of those who are playing by the rules.”


Apparently it’s a velvet hammer that chairman Shapiro is wielding until Sept. 4. And I wonder how the public is being protected by having rules that have no teeth for enforcement. While most trainers followed the guidelines, some apparently have not, and the betting public has no way of knowing who is and who isn’t giving steroids to their horses.


One of Sadler’s principal owners is Gary Barber, who with his brother, Cecil, has won more races at Del Mar this season than anyone else. (Another of Sadler’s owners is CHRB commissioner Jerry Moss.) Barber was extremely upset about the barn search and any suggestions that Sadler is doing anything illegal.


“John is a stand-up guy and there is no reason to believe that there is anything he’s done beyond what’s in the rules and regulations,” Barber told the Paulick Report. “It’s quite shocking to me that these people without any evidence or knowledge have gone on a witch hunt and are trying to recover from the mistakes they made themselves.


“It’s all about steroids,” Barber continued. “I’m a total supporter for getting rid of them. We’re all for cleaning up the game. Lots of people have been receiving letters (warning of positive tests for steroids). These letters are purely notifications that in the future this will not be tolerated.


“You either should ban something or not;  there’s no in between. They should have said ‘no use, period.’ But now they regret the decision they made and are trying to find scapegoats. Wait till Sept. 4 and go after everybody at the same time. Write the rules and abide by them.”


CHRB executive director Breed, commenting in a published report, admitted it was a “mistake” to phase in the ban on steroids.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report



Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick


Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.


Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
New to the Paulick Report? Click here to sign up for our daily email newsletter to keep up on this and other stories happening in the Thoroughbred industry
  • Sandy Brownell

    I am so disillusioned with this sport. We hear a lot of babble from and on behalf of owners, trainers, assorted governing boards — the benefactors. But who speaks on behalf of those doing all the work — the horses.

    Horse racing has set itself up for failure. It’s only a matter of time.

  • http://www.northamericanequine.com Dave Johnson

    Through the years I’ve had the opportunity to teach ethics to lawyers, trainers and others in the horse business.

    The fact that a banned substance cannot be tested does not relieve the miscreant from the responsibility. The fact is that the trainer KNOWS himself that what he’s done is forbidden; isn’t that enough? Are we all supposed to wait “to be caught” before we fess up?

    I guess I’m very old school since I acknowledge my own conscience and listen to it. What a horrible thought to think that we’re off Scott free if we’re not caught.

    Our own duty to be personally bound ought to be enough but sadly its not….but nobody said that leading an ethical life was easy. What a miserable example we show to our young people.

    The old movie, “To Kill a Mockingbird” showed just how important a man’s duty to himself was. I guess that’s just too old fashioned in these modern days….sad, isn’t it?

    Dave Johnson

  • http://gallopfrance.com G. Rarick

    I fear racing is beyond repair when most of the “professionals” involved in the sport don’t question the need for a drug, just whether or not it tests. I applaud California for trying, but clearly, the only solution is a total ban on ALL race-day medication in all states now.

    Sorry, Ray, I’m a broken record on this point, but I so strongly believe that the medication laws are the root of all evil in U.S. racing, and it seems just OH SO SIMPLE to fix it! You’re doing a fantastic job – I’m spending way too much time online following the updates here.

    gina rarick
    http://www.gallopfrance.com

  • http://none Garrett Redmond

    When a lawyer was asked to define “illegal” and “unlawful” and explain any difference between the two terms, he said: “Unlawful means it breaks the law. It is against the law.
    Illegal – that is a sick bird.” And so it goes.

  • Priscilla

    It is my understanding that the board has the right to search any barn anytime, so what legal action does Sadler plan to take against the board? Or is he just posturing? The shocked Gary Barber claims the board has no evidence, despite all the positive tests for steroids that Sadler has this meet, but whether or not they have evidence is irrelevant since the board can raid any barn it chooses anytime. A trainer who has nothing to hide should welcome such a search. Do we want a weak agency that ignores the flagrant disregard of the rules? The board is already being criticized in this column for using a “velvet hammer” with “no teeth”.

    Most of the horsemen appreciate the board for its understanding in implementing the new rules and giving them the proper time to clear steroids from the systems of horses who may have come to them recently through sales or claims without making them wait 45 days to run the horse back. Their intent was to avoid being too harsh for an honest mistake with a positive test, but they put too much faith in the honesty of some trainers.

    BTW, Dave, your old fashioned ethics are refreshing.

  • http://thoroughbredbrief.wordpress.com Kerry

    Not sure what the big to-do is about the barn search. Most trainers’ license applications and racing condition books create a contract where trainers consent to having their barns searched. That’s the way it is in KY, not sure about Cal., but I do know the CHRB rules say that CHRB, stewards, etc. have ultimate jurisdiction over all areas of the track, including the barns.
    I can only think of one California case where the trainer protested a barn search, and the court ok’d it. Good issue, though. I might look into it.

  • Noelle

    It makes little sense to put people who have no honor on the honor system.

    At the same time, while California’s implementation may be flawed, I give them credit for trying, even if the only punishment power they have at the moment is the power of (apparently well-deserved) public humiliation.

    Barber’s defense of Sadler is discouraging, if (like me) you’ve been favoring the idea that owners should take a central role in the future governance of the sport. Contrast Barber’s “it’s not fair – they got us on a technicality” attitude with Jess Jackson’s un-coerced decision, made months ago, to keep all his horses steroid-free.

    When Jackson made the argument before the June congressional hearing that owners should be made responsible to install centralized national governance for racing, it made sense, considering Jackson’s character and motivation. But Barber is an owner, too. I would hope that some owners will be more equal than others if the Horseracing Act is revised from “horsemen” to “horse owners.”

  • Al

    Sadler is guilty as sin for taking advantage of the phase in period. His actions mirror those of Stepanie Beattie in Pennsylvania who has acumulated 13 steroid condemnation letters for horses since the reprimand period has begun. Fedreal oversight would be most appreciated in order to finally take regulatory control obver this runaway industry.

  • http://www.sportzia.com/blog/Horse-Racing/2008/08/22/todays-top-priced-runners/ Horse-Racing » Todays Top Priced Runners

    [...] ROID RAGEThe definition of the term “illegal” has always been a bit fuzzy in the horse racing world, especially among trainers. Several years ago I asked a very prominent horseman point blank if he was giving the blood-doping agent EPO to his … [...]

  • Little Fan

    Water seeks it own level. Owners choose trainers who are the perfect match. It is interesting to see how certain trainers have their lawyers on speed dial. If some still doubted that anabolic steroids were performance enhancers, this latest saga will hopefully wake them up. These and other chemicals must be banned.

    The problem is far worse than what Alan Foreman calls public “perception”. It is real and it stinks.

    Racing needs a national commission with maximum authority and without potential incestuous situations such as a racing commissioner having horses in training in a barn about to be raided.

    Such commission would control surveillance, security systems, it would deploy security guards and investigators nationwide and rotate them regularly from state to state with full support of the FBI. Certain infractions, including gross equine abuse should become criminal acts. State vets would be free to stop all sore horses from racing and the number of races would be based on the number of available racing sound horses. Aside of banning drugs on race day, teams of officials vets and qualified retired horsemen should inspect horses frequently including during training hours and mandate rest and retirement as needed to protect horses and trainers who are afraid to loose owners if they ask to do what is right to protect their horses. The commission would use a single state of the art testing lab with top chemists and equipment. Positives and punishments would be severe and potentially career ending. All legal challenges from racing states would be handled by a single, impartial legal team.

  • baja_racing

    gimme a break, ALL trainers are ALWAYS trying to get an edge on the field, just like in any sport. Sadler has been a very successful trainer for 30 years.
    The day the CHRB takes action on Sadler, and (either suspension or fine) is the day he’s guilty. If it’s illegal, why is no action being taken? The board is the problem here. They do NOT know how to attack this problem appropriately. Look, all trainers want to win, and they will do everything in their power to do so (semi-legally). Keep in mind, Sadler has had the most positive tests, but he has also run the most horses!! I’m not backing Sadler 100%, it may turn out he’s guilty, but I believe he is applying the rules the same as all the other trainers.

Twitter