Keeneland presents American Graded Stakes Standings: Family History Guides Janney’s Success

  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X


  • click above & share!
    X
  • click above & share!
    X

Thoroughbred racing is a sport that links generations.  The horses, of course, pass on their genes and create new generations of runners.  But the people in the game do something similar.

A parent takes her children to the racetrack, and they become fans.  A trainer’s son becomes a trainer.  A breeding farm stays in the family.

So, as we remember the great filly Ruffian this week – she was born 40 years ago on April 17, 1972 – it seems appropriate to highlight the recent success of breeder/owner Stuart S. Janney III.  His parents, Stuart S. Janney Jr. and Barbara Phipps Janney, bred and owned Ruffian.  They also raced Private Terms, who competed in the Kentucky Derby and Preakness after sweeping the Gotham Stakes and Wood Memorial in 1988.  Stuart Janney Jr. died later that year in a car accident at the age of 81.

Stuart Janney III carried on his parents’ tradition of top-end breeding with Coronado’s Quest, who won the 1998 Haskell and Travers and finished fifth in the Breeders’ Cup Classic during that same 3-year-old campaign.  Janney has produced other notable runners, including Carriage Trail and Criminologist.

But coming from racing lineage doesn’t assure consistent success.  There were some lean years, and Janney admits he made some mistakes.

“I was kind of hurt by Coronado’s Quest,” Janney said.  “I did breed quite a few to him, and things didn’t work out too well.  That put a dent in things for a while.”

But Janney’s record has certainly shined since the turn of this decade.  His runners’ earnings nearly doubled from 2009 to 2010 and again from 2010 to 2011.  Last year, those winnings topped $1.1 million as Janney produced a 27% win percentage and three graded stakes victories.  This year, he already has three graded stakes trophies with three different horses, including Data Link, who won last Friday’s Grade 1 Maker’s 46 Mile at Keeneland, and Hymn Book, who captured the Grade 1 Donn Handicap at Gulfstream Park in February.  Both runners’ dams have the same mother.

“I bought a filly called Sunset Service at the sales, and she ended up hurting herself and became a broodmare,” Janney said.  “That family’s been very live.”

Data Link’s mare, Database, will be bred back to his sire, War Front, this year.  Same goes for Hymn Book’s parents – Arch and Vespers.

“Database and Vespers are not show-stoppingly good-looking mares,” said Janney.  “I have some mares that are good-looking, and they are not even in the top half.  But they had pretty decent race records, and they were tough.  Plus, they had families.”

In addition to seeking out those positive familial patterns, Janney is relying on something else he learned from his parents.

“Have a few people that you trust and have long-standing relationships with,” he said.  “Foster an atmosphere of trust and that can make a real contribution to what you’re doing.  That’s the kind of relationship I’ve had with Claiborne and Shug.”

Janney keeps all of his mares at Claiborne Farm, and the go-to trainer for his stable of about 15 runners is Hall of Famer Shug McGaughey.

“Shug has trained most of the grandmothers of these horses, and Seth Hancock has seen all of these families develop the same way.  The three of us put our heads together to see who we could breed to.  We’ve had some luck, but we’ve identified sires that work pretty well with these mares.”

Take War Front, whose stock soared last year with a 3-year-old group that included The Factor, Summer Soiree and Soldat.  That first crop has produced more than $5.6 million in earnings worldwide.

“Shug had a high regard for War Front, and he encouraged me to take a hard look at him,” said Janney.  “You could see it out in the field when his foals were eight weeks old.  They all looked terrific, and they all looked like him.”

Janney also places a high value on stallions he believes raced as medication-free as possible.  As chairman of the Jockey Club’s Thoroughbred Safety Committee, Janney has said the end of race-day medication “cannot come soon enough.”

“We’ve got to get to a point where the horse arrives at the starting gate free of medication,” Janney said.  “Until we get ourselves away from over-medicating our horses, we’re in danger of losing the sport.”

But Janney believes all is not lost.  He applauds the American Graded Stakes Committee for pursuing a ban of race-day medication for juvenile stakes, even though the committee later postponed the effort due to the difficulty of getting cooperation from state racing commissions.

“Perhaps the unintended benefit of backing off was to create an outcry and refocus people on the issue,” said Janney.  “We’re going to continue working with the various racing commissions.”

On the track, Janney’s graded stakes record could get a boost with the return of the Smart Strike turf specialist Air Support.  The 4-year-old had a shoe problem in an allowance race this month at Keeneland, where he was returning from a nine-month layoff.  Air Support won the Grade 2 Virginia Derby and the Grade 3 Transylvania last year.  The great-grandmother of Air Support’s dam, Gaze?

Shenanigans, the mare that foaled Ruffian.

New to the Paulick Report? Click here to sign up for our daily email newsletter to keep up on this and other stories happening in the Thoroughbred industry
  • Jasonfeldman

    On the track the, the chairman of a Jockey Club committee seeking to ban raceday medication (Read Lasix) races all of his horses on Lasix. Hey Stuey, why don’t you give back the trophies and the money ? MOST IMPORTANTLY, tell the people at Claiborne that you won’t be breeding any of these medication contaminated animals so hopefully they can find them homes as backyard pets.

    Enough with the hypocrisy already.

  • BuckyinKentucky

    It’s all about the blood, the right blood. Amazing what a few billion will do to keep the family legacy going!

  • RayPaulick

     That’s certainly an adult response Mr. JasonFeldman. Did someone take your take your rattle away this morning?

  • Tiznowbaby

    I don’t blame him for wanting to compete on a level playing field. Lasix is a performance booster, and those on it have a competitive advantage. If his colts aren’t competitive, who is going to breed to them? Will his “loser” fillies be accepted to the books of better studs? Unless you’re rolling in the dough, who can afford to be at that kind of disadvantage? 

  • gottafeed

    Mr. Janney puts his money where his mouth is. How much skin do you have in the game, Bucky?

  • Jasonfeldman

    No Ray,

    Did someone take away yours ? It is amusing to me that you castigate anyone that challenges the veracity of the call to ban Lasix. It is also amusing to me that you pander to this group of fanatics despite all evidence to the contrary.

    If the Janney’s and Barry Irwin’s of the business want to take a proactive stance on creating a level playing field to solve their claims of poor public perception, than their rallying cry should be to eliminate the undetectable, illegal performance enhancers, the ones that make a horse going head and head after a sub :44 half rebreak and run away from the field. They should be testing for and banning the illegal medication that makes a horse suddenly and inexplicably run out of their skin. These are the types of things that create a public perception problem, not the use of a time tested, regulated and reported therapeutic medication that anyone with a first hand horse experience will tell you that is the best currently available solution to this defect in horse psyiology.

    The problem with getting serious about testing is that the Jockey Club members are in fear of uncovering some very unpleasant realities, such as that maybe some of their most favored sons arent quite as on the level as they would like people to believe. Further, the appropriate follow through of ridding the game of those that can’t follow the rules is the only real way to restore any perception problem.

    Lasix isn’t any more the cause of the games problems than dirt tracks are.
    These breeders calling for banning medication ought to look in the mirror, because the trouble with a weakened breed lies squarely at their doorstep. 25 years ago they were falling all over themselves to sell the best of a century’s worth of bloodstock to foreign buyers. With the cream of the crop gone, the breeders set out to mass produce what is left,

  • RayPaulick

     Thanks for keeping this comment on the subject at hand. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the interests of the vast majority of owners, including Jockey Club members, are to ensure the very kind of drugs you are referring to are not part of the game. I think that’s one thing that the pro-Lasix and anti-Lasix people believe in. As Bob Beck said at the conclusion of the KHRC meeting on Monday, the Lasix rule was the first step he’d hoped to take in terms of reforming medication rules.

  • Jasonfeldman

    CONTINUED FROM ABOVE

    ….a substandard available pool of breeding stock which has been further diluted by two decades of overbreeding unsound, poorly conformed mares to equally unsound, poorly conformed stallions all in the name of economics, without regard for quality. The logical result four or five generations down the line is what you have today, a more frail weaker animal. Then add in all the corrective surgery and is it any wonder that the thoroughbred of the 21st century is what it is. Banning a therapeutic medication isn’t going to alter the facts no matter what these delusional individuals say or think.

  • jorge

    I think Jason is on to something, lasix is not the problem. The blood dopers are the problem . Taking away lasix will just give them a bigger edge. Testing is the way to go!

  • Garrett Redmond

    Ray,

    DISQUS will not allow me to checkmark that I like your comments.  I do.

  • Jasonfeldman

    But they have chosen the wrong next step, and all they’ve succeded in doing is alienating people. Banning steroids was a good first step, although I still believe a dose of winstrol from time to time was helpful, especially to some older geldings. The use of steroids for example, wasn’t necessarily a bad thing, the abuse of them was.

    As for a next step, both from a horse welfare and a public perception angle should be the ban of or strict controls on the use of cortisones. The rule they have in Pennsylvania is a good model, as it eliminates the joint tapping right on top of a race forcing people to not try and squeeze one more start out of a sore one. This rule seems to have the desired effect.

    If the reformers would think more along these lines, the lines of doing what is best for the horses, there would most likely be less opposition and most importantly some long term good.

  • http://Bellwether4u.com James Staples

    TY Sir…as “THE GAME” gains more & more EXPOSURE the Amercian public (85% no nothing about Horse Race n) will demand that the “CHEATERS/REPETERS” b removed & some could b locked up things WILL CHANGE…this LASIX thing is pure BS…TY again…

  • BuckyinKentucky

    Plenty!

  • dh

    Jasonfeldman speaks nothing but the TRUTH. Its the cheats with their undetectable drugs that are ruining the game, not Lasix, the sooner the bigshots in the game and the racing writers figure this out and start doing something about it the better, otherwise it’ll be nothing but bigshots vs. the cheats.

Twitter