WHO OWNS KEENELAND?

By Ray Paulick

In the 46 years since the Breeders’ Sales Company – a co-op established by Central Kentucky breeders — was handed over to Keeneland, the Lexington, Ky., auction house/racetrack has gross receipts of more than $13.5 billion through its sales of weanlings, yearlings, 2-year-olds in training and breeding stock. During that time, the Paulick Report estimates Keeneland has earned commissions of approximately $750 million from horses sold and from buybacks (based on 5% commission from 1962-2000, and 4.5% from 2001 to the present).

That estimated three-quarters of a billion dollars in revenue does not include entry fees from the thousands of horses sold each year (UPDATE: see comment section for a clarification on entry fees) or Keeneland’s portion of the takeout on live racing, simulcasting and account wagering.

What does Keeneland do with all that money?

Because it pays no dividends to its shareholders the way most publicly-held companies do, Keeneland distributes its sizable profits in other ways. For starters, it supplements overnight purses during its two race meetings in the spring and fall, making those meetings among the highest in daily average purses among all North American tracks. The 2008 spring meeting offered total purses of $10,016,860, a daily average of $626,054.

Keeneland makes frequent upgrades to its physical plant, for example adding luxury suites in the early 1990s and expanding its sale pavilion in 2004. It recently contracted with HOK Sport, a leading stadium architecture firm, to examine the possibility of expanding Keeneland to accommodate larger crowds and possibly host future Breeders’ Cup championships. It is currently too small to host a Breeders’ Cup.

Finally, Keeneland makes charitable contributions to the local community and to the horse industry. Since 1936, according to its media guide, Keeneland and its Keeneland Foundation have given more than $15 million to various charities.

As detailed in the Paulick Report’s first installment of this history of Keeneland, the track was funded by Kentucky horsemen and local citizens through an offering of preferred, non-voting stock and common stock that gave shareholders voting rights in certain company affairs. At some point, certainly as early as the 1950s, Keeneland general manager W.T. Bishop began approaching stockholders and requesting they return their shares of common stock to Keeneland. That effort went on for years and was largely successful, in part, some sources say, because Bishop and other Keeneland directors or executives persuaded the stockholders that the shares had no real value, since dividends were not permitted under the 1935 articles of incorporation. As an enticement to return the shares to the association, sources have said Keeneland may have offered lifetime membership in the Keeneland Club or coveted clubhouse or grandstand boxes.

At any rate, of the 3,500-plus shares of Keeneland stock originally sold, only a few remain in the hands of individuals. Those individuals are entitled to attend the annual shareholders meeting, which usually is held in October. At that meeting, shareholders are given an opportunity to inspect the financial records of the company, but no financial materials are distributed.

The vast majority of shares given back to Keeneland are controlled by three trustees who make all of the critical decisions for the company. Keeneland’s board of directors is viewed as a “rubber stamp” board, according to several board members who spoke with the Paulick Report. “It’s usually ‘Here is what we’re going to do, and thank you for coming,’” one longtime board member said. Another said financial documents distributed at Keeneland board meetings are skeletal compared with those of other boards.

The current trustees are Will Farish, Louis Lee Haggin III and William M. Lear Jr. An attorney who is not active in the horse business, Lear only recently replaced another attorney, William T. “Buddy” Bishop III, the son of the longtime Keeneland general manager. Buddy Bishop, who died earlier this year, was named a trustee in 2005 following the death of Charles Nuckols Jr. Farish was named a trustee in 2005 as a replacement for James E. “Ted” Bassett III, who had to step down because of age requirements. Bassett has been associated with Keeneland since 1968 and served as its president and board chairman.  Haggin is the longest-running trustee.

There is little known about if, how or when a voting trust was established to represent the shares turned back to Keeneland. It also isn’t known how that trust might have been established, or whether it may have been created by a specific document. It is also unclear if there is a beneficiary to the voting trust, and who or what that beneficiary might be.

Phone messages and a fax to Bassett from the Paulick Report asking specific questions about the voting trust were not answered.

In 2002, a new holding company, called Keeneland Trustees, Inc., was incorporated in Kentucky as a non-profit corporation. The articles of incorporation of Keeneland Trustees Inc. state that the purpose of the corporation is “to operate for any lawful purpose or purposes, including, but not limited to, holding shares of stock of Keeneland Association, Inc. or ownership interest(s) in any other entity(ies) and perpetuating the purposes for which Keeneland was formed, including promoting the sport of horse racing, improving the breed of Thoroughbred horses and conducting annual race meetings. The Corporation is authorized to exercise any powers conferred upon corporations formed under the Kentucky Nonprofit Corporation Acts as may be necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the above-described purposes.” The officers of that company coincide with who serves as Keeneland’s trustees.

In other words, the Keeneland Association is now owned by Keeneland Trustees, Inc.

If Keeneland Trustees, Inc. is viewed as a non-profit company by the Internal Revenue Service, its IRS Form 990 is to be made available for public inspection as required by section 6104. However, Keeneland vice president Harvie Wilkinson and treasurer Jessica Green told the Paulick Report upon a request to view IRS Form 990 that Keeneland Trustees Inc. is not a non-profit company.

The Keeneland Association is a for-profit company and has been since the late 1950s. Its earnings are taxed, but the IRS apparently does not have the benefit of a second level of taxes that it enjoys with public companies whose shareholders pay an individual tax on dividends. Keeneland retains a large portion of its annual earnings after subsidizing purses and contributing to its Foundation. Its cash reserves, sources have told the Paulick Report, are in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

“They don’t know where to spend all that money,” one longtime Keeneland consignor said.

Some have suggested the retained earnings could present a tax problem, and that is one reason Keeneland is looking at an expansion project that could take a huge bite out of those cash reserves. Potential legal issues might also help explain why the last two individuals appointed Keeneland trustees are attorneys.

Breeders who have sold the billions of dollars of horses that have helped Keeneland earn that approximately $750 million since the Breeders’ Sales Company dissolved in 1962 might want to have a say in how some of those earnings are spent. Is it, for example, in the best interest of those breeders for Keeneland to expand its facility at great cost in order to attract the Breeders’ Cup? That’s a big investment for one extra day of racing every few years.

Nick Nicholson, the track’s current president, thinks not just breeders but others should have a say in Keeneland’s direction. In announcing the recent deal with HOK Sport to look at expansion, Nicholson said: “The citizens of our community, the state, and the Thoroughbred industry have a sense of ownership in Keeneland, and we respect and embrace that. Keeneland is an important part of Central Kentucky’s history and landscape, and we feel all should have a voice in its future.”

Keeneland was formed because of the widespread support of horsemen and the local community, and it became an extremely profitable company because of the many Thoroughbred breeders who sell their horses there.

It would be a refreshing change to see more than three people have a say in Keeneland’s future.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report 

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

13 Responses to “WHO OWNS KEENELAND?”

  1. Richard Coreno Says:

    Very important questions and an analysis that is equally timely and urgent.

  2. john greathouse Says:

    ummm Ray…the Entry Fee gives one a free ride on the first $20,000 the horse brings …so that statement or yours is incorrect

  3. john greathouse Says:

    I might also add that the Nov Sales in Ky are the best when the Breeders Cup is run in this State. Let’s try not to forget that there is NO WAY Keeneland could give away close to $650,000 per day without benefitting from the Sales

  4. Ray Paulick Says:

    John…Thanks for pointing out that distinction on entry fees and the absence of commissions on the first $20,000. I appreciate it.

  5. Priscilla Peabody Says:

    The $900 free ride for the first $20,000 is so trivial it hardly merits mentioning, however I would like to point out that Keeneland also charges 8 bucks a day in stall rent when the meet is not on (raised from $7.50 last year). That is quite a bit to add on to the already expensive cost of training a horse. Does Keeneland really need that money?

  6. LCM Says:

    Ironically, it is now Fasig TIpton that will require Keeneland to change!!! I am sure Fasig will decrease the commission rate structure and therefore make it far more attractive to consign a horse at Fasig rather than Keeneland. Seeing as Dan Pride has close ties with Duncan Taylor (Taylor Made) I will expect the conversation to go like this “Hi Duncan, it’s Dan. What would you like us to do here in order to secure the majority of your consignments”? Being the aggressive, savvy businessman that Duncan Taylor is, I’m sure he’ll have a slew of ideas!!!!! I also have to wonder about the relationship between sheikh Mohammed and Keeneland, as the late Buddy Bishop was also the President of Darley America before his death. Who is the President of Darley now?

  7. michael baughman Says:

    My first visit to Keeneland was in 1955. Thanks Mr Paulick for enlightening us.

  8. Garrett Redmond Says:

    Mr. Greathouse’s assertion the entry fee gives a “free ride” is amusing. The Entry fee is $1,000. Because KA does not charge ADDITIONAL fees on the first $20,000 of selling price does not make anything free. Moreover, it must be noted that KA charges that thousand bucks regardless of the selling price or if there is no bid. Consequently, a consignor may actually pay up to 100 per cent commission.

    Keeneland has other odd practices. One example being $1,000 is charged everyone, but a privileged few are allowed to have the sales day of their choice. When Mr. Nicholson was asked why ten horses by the same sire were in the particular Hip No. order, he did not know the answer, but said he would find out and report. That was several years ago - still no report! (Incidentally, he agreed it was not related to the dam’s name)

    With Dubai running one sale company and a “Secret Society” running the other, maybe breeders will realize they need the protection of a cooperative. The other advantages of a cooperative are too many to list here. In sum, it would give breeders the balance of power.

  9. Not John Greathouse Says:

    This post raises more questions than answers. We’re only.stratching the surface here. Keeneland runs a sound sale and solid racing operation for six weeks They have shown a modicum of leadership in some areas, notably polytrack, although they probably spend more time worrying about whether the iron gates are the right color of green. With the very future of American horse racing on the line and their own sales market domination and gravy train about to be challenged by Fasig-Tipton, can their insular, ivory tower, secretative Skull and Bones approach to business succeed for their own survival or the greater good of the industry at large?
    The answer is pretty obvious.

  10. john greathouse Says:

    #9
    well at least I had the guts to post my name
    # 8 all sale Co’s charge a commission…what’s new?
    #5 do you know any training centers that provide free training facilities for anyone?…
    people..please…I love both sales Co’s…one is for profit and for good reason….although some of that may be changing…the other …has supported our Industry for years…if you can’t appreciate what has been built and what is there for all to enjoy…then this debate has ended
    Ray…I do enjoy the banter

  11. Garrett Redmond Says:

    Refer John Greathouse’s #10.

    Yes, all sales companies charge commission, my point is the amount and what you get for it. One thousand for Day One and the same for Day Fourteen is just not equitable.

    One way or another, it certainly is not freebie.

  12. LCM Says:

    Keeneland needs to stop pretending it’s NON=PROFIT Mr. Greathouse. Can you justify their status as NON=PROFIT? It’s absurd! Why are they sitting on untold hundreds of millions of dollars?

    Ray, have you had any luck getting a copy of that 990 form? Maybe someone from the IRS can help you out!

  13. Paulick Report » Blog Archive » TOP TEN THINGS YOU MAY HAVE LEARNED ONLY BY READING THE PAULICK REPORT Says:

    [...] all of its original investors to turn their shares over to the association; in 2002, it quietly formed a new non-profit holding company called Keeneland Trustees, the de facto “owner” of the Keeneland run by three people: Will Farish, William Lear, [...]