Posts Tagged ‘william field’

CRUNCH TIME FOR CUP PLANNING

Monday, July 13th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
Nominators to the Breeders’ Cup program and the Members and Trustees they elected in June have spoken loudly and clearly, and the 13-person board of Directors has five new members from the six positions that were voted on last week. Only one of six incumbents up for re-election managed to retain his position on the board of Directors. That’s a pretty strong statement from the nominators and the 48 Members and Trustees who select the board of Directors.

There may be distinct differences in the two factions that have sought control of the Breeders’ Cup, in areas like governance, transparency and accountability to the stakeholders. There may even be differences in defining who Breeders’ Cup stakeholders or customers are.

But the election cycle is over until June 2010, and whatever differences existed between the two camps—within both the board of Members and Trustees and the smaller operating board of Directors–should be set aside for now, so that the important work on the long-term strategic plan can be done in a collaborative and cooperative manner.

The plan, presented to the Members and Trustees last Thursday, is in itself an example of what can be accomplished if individuals, who may have differences of opinion in many areas, focus instead on what they have in common: namely, a desire to support breeders by promoting the growth of the Thoroughbred racing industry through the staging of the Breeders’ Cup competition. That, in fact, is the new mission statement of the Breeders’ Cup, and I, for one, am glad to see the organization look beyond its late-season championship event.

It’s not enough for the Breeders’ Cup to have a successful day (or two) of racing. Given the ineffectiveness of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association and other organizations like the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, the Thoroughbred Racing Associations, or the Jockey Club, the Breeders’ Cup may be the only entity that has the critical mass to better organize and promote the sport on a national basis.

Though the 400-page strategic plan has not been released and author William Field of the international consulting firm Value Partners said it is a broad strategy that does not include tactical details, it was revealed that one of the keys to this plan will be to strengthen the road to the championships. This is something that’s been tried before without any measurable success.

Satish Sanan, who deserves a great deal of credit for the cat herding he did as chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee, said racetracks have to be looked upon as partners for a racing series to be effective. “In any business, if you are going to be successful and form long-term relationships, the word partnership means you must be willing to share long-term risks and rewards,” Sanan said in a conference call with Breeders’ Cup nominators and the racing media on Friday. “Your goals really have to be aligned…I think all of the conflicts you hear about really will go away, particularly if it is an all-encompassing partnership. There is a big strategic difference in how we have done it and how we plan to do it in the future.”

That may be easier said than done, which is why it is so important for the Breeders’ Cup board of Directors to support its management team as it attempts to connect the dots the strategic plan has laid out for them. Putting together a financial and implementation plan that includes long-term partnerships with the tracks is on the shoulders of Breeders’ Cup president Greg Avioli and the other Breeders’ Cup executives. Considerations for the plan include what to do with the millions of dollars currently being used to supplement stakes around the country, whether to turn the Breeders’ Cup championships back to a one-day event, to reduce the number of races, or to cut purses. Those are big questions, and they have until December to answer them and finalize a detailed, tactical plan.

There will be time down the road to discuss the issues that divide some of the Members and Trustees and individuals on the board of Directors: election procedures and eligibility, transparency and bylaws. However, the priority between now and the end of the year has to be on turning the strategic plan into something tangible that can help the Breeders’ Cup, racetracks and the sport as a whole.

It’s crunch time.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value.
Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

PAULICK LIVE BLOGS BC STRATEGIC PLAN TELECONFERENCE

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Beginning shortly after 2 p.m. (Eastern), Ray Paulick will be live blogging the Breeders’ Cup teleconference where the organization’s new long-term strategic plan will be outlined by Cup president, Greg Avioli; Satish Sanan, a member of the board of Directors and chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee; and William Field of Value Partners, the international consulting firm that developed the plan in conjunction with the committee.

Nominators to the Breeders’ Cup program will be allowed to ask questions about the plan, as will members of the media.

2:05 p.m. … Greg Avioli, Breeders’ Cup president, says the Breeders’ Cup "has experienced tremendous change in just the past three years" after few changes in the first 20 years, then outlines the changes: two days instead of one, higher purses, more races, the Challenge Series, and increased betting handle in a down market. Sanan and the board, he said, decided this was not a time "to rest on our laurels," and then introduced Sanan, who was named chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee last August.

2:08 p.m. … Sanan said racing and the Breeders’ Cup has been "outpromoted by other sports" and said the long-range plan (and he emphasized long range) was developed to help the Breeders’ Cup and the industry grow. "It’s one of the most comprehensive projects undertaken by Breeders’ Cup" and credited management, the board of Members and Trustees and industry stakesholders worldwide for bringing input into the process. He then introduced Field to outline the plan.

2:10 p.m. … Field said the process included four workshops, a detailed survey of the Trustees, a shorter online survey of nominators, interviews with international industry leaders. "What we tried to do here is look at the Breeders’ Cup at a slightly new way." Field said he was struck by the affection people have for the Breeders’ Cup and that it truly is the world championship. "It is something that is recognized by many people around the world as the pinnacle of world racing." That’s not to say there’s not more that can be done to make it better, Field said. "We certainly think there are many markets in the world where racing is facing challenges similar to what you are facing in North America, but there certainly are opportunities." He said there is no other "brand" like the Breeders’ Cup internationally.

"North America is the No. 1 priority, but you have a great international aspect," Field added, citing more participation and increased international handle. 

Field said there is a proposal for a new mission and vision for the Breeders’ Cup. Mission: to support breeders by promoting the growth of the Thoroughbred racing industry through the staging of the Breeders’ Cup competition.  The vision is to be the most prestigious and popular competiton in world racing, reflecting in  the quality of the horses, the  event as well as total wagering. 

A third point Field wanted to make is that the BC has to serve a lot of different groups in the industry. "We think it is very important that the Breeders’ Cup needs to refocus more on the customer" — the horseplayers, casual fans and television viewers. 

Related to that, the Breeders’ Cup "is a great brand name" said Field. Great recognition in sports, though not necessarily with the general public, he added. Streamlining of the brand might help with the general public recognition. Building on the Challenge Series and creating races that will determine which horses will run in the championships, he said was one way. "We would like to see that whole process be reinforced…so we are not just thinking about the event in November."

Strengthening the Challenge Series would promote the brand and help increase betting, he added.

Alongside the Challenge Series, Field said, was an opportunity to build some strong alliances with racetracks across the country. "There is an opportunity to work (with the tracks) as partners," he said, citing the fact that racetracks are looking for ways to increase their business.

"We would love to draw some of the major tracks into long-term partnerships," something he said is much more difficult if done on a short-term basis.

The road to the Breeders’ Cup (Challenge Series) and the championship itself has to be promoted as one brand, Field added. "We need to reach out through partners if we are going to reach the customer."

Avioli said the recommendations delivered to the board have been given to management to take to racetracks and come back to the board by the end of the year with an "actual working document" that will explain exactly how the Challenge Series will look.

2:25 p.m. … Sanan reiterated that it will be a long-term plan and that once management reports back to the board there will be more details to be made public: He then repeated the four key points of the plan:

1) the new mission and vision of the Breeders’ Cup 

2) unified and enhanced BC competition to run throughout hte season

3) improve and build long-term strategic relationships with racetracks to put together a framework for long-term relationships

4) redefining our customers and putting our customers at the heart of everything so that we have an unyielding focus on the customers.

2:30 p.m. … The teleconference is open to questions. First, Bill Landes asks why only 80% of Members and Trustees responded to the surveys and asked who the 20% were that did not fill out the surveys. He added that he wants more disclosure from the Breeders’ Cup on meeting attendance and other issues that are not shared with nominators or the public. In response, Avioli began by explaining who the boards are and that 100% of the board of directors responded to the survey. Landes wasn’t happy with that, saying there are still 10 Members and Trustees who didn’t reply to the survey and thinks their names should be published.

Avioli said he would begin publishing the list of attendees of future meetings.

2:35 p.m. … Landes was the only nominator with a question. I began the media round with a couple of questions, one on the past programs that might  have been more short-term than long term in strategy, and the other on what will be different now about how the BC and tracks work together. Field said he preferred not to focus on the past, although he had studied the various programs (special stakes, stakes supplements, challenge series, etc.). 

On the second question, Avioli said that one of the recommendations from Value Partners is to try more of a collaborative approach. "In the past, they’ve said,  ’Here’s our series, would you  like to participate?" Avioli said. "The mindset is going to be different. we’re not going to develop something and try to sell it. We want to first identify tracks that want to work with the Breeders’ Cup on a number of levels (including being a host site)," and then work with those tracks to develop the programs. Field said one of the big challenges is fragmentation and that there will "always be and always have been issues and niggles between tracks and Breeders’ Cup, but I was very surprised to hear the enthusiasm the tracks have for the Breeders’ Cup. If we can approach it on the basis that Greg just described, I am certain that a lot of tracks are going to be very keen on this."

Sanan said "In any business, if you are going to be successsful and form long-term relationships, the word partnership means you must be willing to risk long-term risks and rewards…your goals really have to be aligned…I think all of the conflicts you hear about really will go away, particularly if it is an all encompassing partnership. There is a  big strategic difference in how we have done it and how we plan to do it in the future."

2:40 p.m. … A question about the budget and the current year operating deficit. Sanan said he hopes the long-term plan will reduce the heavy reliance on nominators, that increased wagering and sponsorships are part of the plan moving forward. 

2:45 p.m. … There is a question about holding the Breeders’ Cup overseas. Field said there were a number of suggestions that the BC consider being held internationally. "We wouldn’t absolutely rule it out forever but we don’t think it is the desirable thing to do." Field said there were a number of suggestions in the plan about the rotation. There isn’t any urgency to doing anything other than North American tracks, he said, "though you never say never. …. It’s not part of the plan we propose." Sanan said it was discussed and debated but felt the consensus was that it needed to be perfected at home first before looking overseas. "Take it slowly, perfect it North America…and maybe we will revisit it a few years from now. If it makes good business sense perhaps we would undertake it."

2:50 p.m. …. Another question from a nominator: What will BC do to encourage new nominators and get old nominators to return? Does the BC only want the "heavy hitters?" Avioli said the BC wants as many nominators as possible and cites the current stakes supplement  program as a reason for their participation….he said the strategic plan includes the continuation of stakes races but that there will be more of an emphasis on quality in the future. "I don’t think you will see any decrease in the amount of money the Breeders’ Cup puts out there for nominators. I think there will be an increase in the money for nominators," said Avioli.

2:52 p.m. … Will future  championship purses be decreased, Avioli is asked. He said the plan did not take a position on that. "What we’re trying to say is we don’t know what the appropriate level the championship purses will be until we have a better idea of what the entire program will entail." Sanan said Avioli wasn’t the question, but that the answer won’t be known until the strategic plan develops into an implementation plan and financial plan. "When we have that,, that’s the only point at which we can make a decision: do we increase or do we decrease." Avioli and Sanan confirmed that there will be no change in 2009 championship purses.

2:55 p.m. … Are there any more specific recommendations you can detail at this time, one media rep asks? "Regrettably, the answer is probably ‘no,’" said Avioli, "because what we’ve been given is a very high-level strategic plan." There are broad concepts but no specifics. "They don’t exist right now," said Avioli, who said he hopes to have details in December.

3:00 p.m. … Will the Breeders’ Cup consider reducing the number of races or drop back to one day? Field said "the issue of how many races is a tactical issue and not one we focused on as part of the long-term strategic plan. We didn’t want to be distracted by issues such as that. The important thing that the event in November is regarded as the event (horse owners) want to bring their horses to."  Avioli said it will be hard to get the general sporting public to focus on 14 different divisions. "It doesn’t mean you wouldn’t have a full complement of races on championship day but that you wouldn’t focus"  on all of the divisions on the series throughout the year. Sanan said: "It’s largely going to depend upon when we start the series, how many tracks and how many days. … It may just be limited to what we used to have." Avioli said: "To clarify, the concern is how do we lead into 14 different races, 14 different divisions." He said there will not be a series focusing on 14 different divisions leading up to the championships.

3:05 p.m. … The participants are asked how the Breeders’ Cup plans to bring horseplayers and customers into the process. Avioli mentioned that there have been panels with large bettors or "whales" that have been consulted with, and Field said focus groups have been conducted and will continue. "We also have the benefit of a large bettor who leads this committee," Avioli said of Sanan, who is known as a big gambler. Sanan said Breeders’ Cup has not done a good job taking care of horseplayers in the past but said he is recommending between now and the end of the  year when the plan is finalized that a workshop with handicappers/horseplayers be included to get their feedback.

3:15  p.m. … Final comments from the participants. "What I’d like to leave you with is that we are just beginning the process," said Avioli. "We know the challenge we are facing here. We are cognizant of the various attempts to organize alliances in the past. We are confident we are going to come up with something that is well received."

Sanan said the Breeders’ Cup had a choice to be defensive or be "bold and creative and innovative and help management develop a long-term strategic plan  …. to look into our crystal ball and see what’s going to happen five years from now and capitalize on that."

Field emphasized that this plan was not written by "just a group of consultants,", that industry stakeholders played a big role.

3:15 p.m. … That’s it from the Breeders’ Cup teleconference. It will be interesting to see how this plan unfolds in the next six months, what tracks will be brought onboard as partners, how the stakes supplements and Win and You’re In Series is altered or consolidated, and whether or not the strategic plan, which obviously will be an ambitious effort to create a meaningful series of races, will have an impact on the structure of the year-end championships.

My own comment: From the standpoint of someone who has been following the Breeders’ Cup closely for many years, I think this approach is the most significant and it is hoped the most effective strategic process the Breeders’ Cup has undertaken since its inception. There have been many programs introduced, given a short-term chance to make a difference, and then modified or allowed to linger without any meaning or impact. If the Breeders’ Cup commits to the strategic plan, develops an implementation and financial plan along with significant track partners, this could be a significant boost for the Breeders’ Cup and the sport of racing and business of breeding. I congratulate those who brought the plan to this stage and encourage management and racetracks throughout the country to find a way to make this work.

If it fails to do so, the long-term strategic plan for the Breeders’ Cup will join the scrap heap of so many other well-intentioned efforts of the past, from such things as the American Championship Racing Series, the national office of the Thoroughbred Racing Associations, the creation of a "league office" at the National Thoroubhred Racing Association, the merger of the NTRA and Breeders’ Cup, and the Thoroughbred Championship Tour, among others

Let’s hope for the former. The Breeders’ Cup and racing needs something horseplayers, casual fans and industry stakeholders can understand, support and participate in.–Ray Paulick

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value. Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

BREEDERS’ CUP TO HEAR STRATEGY FOR ITS FUTURE

Monday, May 4th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
What’s in store for the Breeders’ Cup over the next five to 10 years? Will racing’s championships remain a two-day event? Will it consider a move to Europe, Dubai,or Hong Kong to incorporate more of an international audience? How will the organization’s revenue expand beyond its two primary sources of funding: stallion and foal nominators and North American horseplayers? More fundamentally, what should the Breeders’ Cup mission and vision be?

Answers to some of those questions may begin to crystallize this morning when the Breeders’ Cup Strategic Planning Committee, meeting formally for the third time, hears the draft conclusions and recommendations from William Field of the international consulting company Value Partners. Today’s meeting, Field told committee members in a memo, will provide a forum for them to discuss the staretegic plan’s draft conclusions and recommendations before they are formally presented to the Breeders’ Cup board in July.

Field and others from Value Partners have been digesting the data and information gathered from a process that began late last summer and included a lengthy survey of the 48 members and trustees of the Breeders’ Cup, interviews with nominators , horseplayers and fans, and two ideas-generating workshops. (Click here to read a previous Paulick Report article on the process.)

Thirty-five people are expected to attend today’s meeting, scheduled from 9 a.m.-3 p.m. at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Lexington. Fred Pope, a Lexington advertising executive and the founder of the National Thoroughbred Association who has been a vocal proponent for changing horse racing’s business model for simulcasting, will make a presentation at the outset of the meeting.

The question some members of the Strategic Planning Committee are asking is whether they will be getting an uncensored version of the recommendations from Field and Value Partners, or if the board of directors, led by chairman Bill Farish, along with Breeders’ Cup president and CEO Greg Avioli, have hijacked the process from committee chairman Satish Sanan before its conclusions were presented. Avioli met with Field in London recently and a second meeting with the consultant in Lexington last week included Farish and Avioli but not Sanan. Governance, sources have told the Paulick Report, remains a significant issue among members and trustees as measured by the members and trustees surveys, yet there are concerns the issue will not be addressed in Field’s recommendations to the committee.

Nevertheless, Sanan said he is confident the draft recommendations made by Field will not have been edited by the controlling powers of the Breeders’ Cup board.

“I am optimistic that the process has been very transparent and it’s gone very, very well and has received overwhelming support from the attendees,” Sanan told the Paulick Report. “I am extremely confident that what comes out of the strategic plan will be the combined input and recommendations of the people who have been involved in the process.”

Another committee member concurred with Sanan that the longtime established powers on the Breeders’ Cup board have not tried to control the process. “I felt no reluctance on the part of the ‘old guard’ or efforts to steer the process,” the committee member told the Paulick Report. “It’s been a very good, open-minded exercise. It’s come down to acknowledging revenue sources: gambling and nominations. We’ve got to make both groups happy, but need to figure out the right strategy to grow this thing. The bottom line is we need to have a five or 10-year plan. Operating year to year as it’s been done is just too tough.”

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for
all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick