Posts Tagged ‘rob whiteley’

GOOD NEWS FRIDAY sponsored by Liberation Farm - SCRATCHING THE SURFACE

Friday, October 2nd, 2009


By Ray Paulick
This has been a very difficult year, not just for people in the horse industry, but in communities across the United States and throughout the world that have been adversely affected by the global economic crisis. For the international community involved in the breeding, raising and selling of Thoroughbred racehorses, the hardships were never more evident than in the recent 14-day Keeneland September yearling sale.

But what a resilient community we have. As yearling prices spiraled downward day after day, we heard slivers of optimism from breeders who felt something good may come out of this depressed market: more opportunities for horse buyers; further downward adjustments in the number of mares being bred to help balance supply vs. demand; smaller books for stallions and more selectivity in the process.

Those slivers of optimism and points of light are what led Brad Cummings, my partner in the Paulick Report, and me earlier this year to create a new feature celebrating “good news” in the industry and bring it to our readers each Friday. Liberation Farm’s Rob Whiteley, whose voice message on his office phone tells callers they can leave a message “if you’ve made the world a better place today,” loved the initial Good News Friday feature on Father Chris Clay, the son of Runnymede Farm owner Cateby Clay who gave up an opportunity to run that historic farm and follow a higher calling that led him to the priesthood. Rob liked it so much, in fact, he asked if Liberation Farm could sponsor the Good News Friday feature, but wondered if we could find and relate enough good news out there to sustain it each week.

“Yes,” I said without hesitation, though if truth were to be told I had the same concerns as Rob. Is there really enough good news and enough people and organizations in the industry making a positive difference to make this feature last?

“Yes,” I can say again without hesitation, and this time—as the Paulick Report this week celebrates its six-month anniversary for the Good News Friday feature—I really mean it.

Forgive me for getting a bit personal here, but the search for good news has been an enlightening journey of discovery. Researching and writing these features has been great therapy for me, and I can confidently say that Brad and I have barely scratched the surface of the wealth of people and organizations performing meaningful and sometimes profound service in so many different ways.

Who knew? Certainly not me.

During this process, we’ve learned and shared stories about individuals like Mary Jo Pons, the tireless matriarch of Maryland’s Country Life Farm who for the past 30 years has volunteered countless hours reading to the blind on the Radio Reading Network of Maryland, and Southern California jockey David Flores, who has given so much back to the impoverished children of Tijuana, Mexico, where he launched his riding career; focused on little-known programs like the Fred Russell-Grantland Rice scholarship program for aspiring journalists started long ago by Oaklawn Park’s Charles Cella and administered by the Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America; gone behind the scenes at special events like Keeneland’s Military Appreciation Day, a wonderful and unique event for those who serve our country; and explained the critical work being done by numerous charitable organizations, including the Jockey Club Foundation, the Permanently Disabled Jockeys Fund, the Race for Education, Horse Farm Workers Educational Assistance Fund and Boys’ Haven

If it wasn’t for Good News Friday, I wouldn’t have had any idea how important the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy is to my local community in Lexington, Ky., and I certainly wouldn’t have shown up and learned how to be a blackjack dealer at last night’s “Racino Grande” annual fundraiser at Keeneland. And, no, Kentucky’s Senate president, David "Blackjack" Williams did not attend, or if he did, he didn’t play cards at my table (pictured, left).

But to conclude on a serious note, all the individuals and organizations doing good work to make our industry stronger, better and more responsible have enriched my life in ways they’ll never know, and I thank all of them for it. We’ll be back next Friday with more good news, as always, sponsored by Liberation Farm.

Liberation Farm celebrates the many horsemen and horsewomen who strive each day to make things better for horses and those who work with them.  To learn more about Liberation Farm, click here.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

GOOD NEWS FRIDAY sponsored by Liberation Farm - HORSE FARM WORKERS’ EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FUND

Friday, September 18th, 2009
Stuart serves as scholarship coordinator of the fund, which recently awarded 32 scholarships for 2009-2010, bring to 384 the number of annual scholarships (at an average of $2,000 apiece) handed out since the program began in 1996. Approximately 125 recipients have been graduated from college or technical programs, several with honors and many on the Dean’s list, including a 4.0 valedictorian.

The students must apply by July 1, and the scholarships are based on need, merit, essays and personal interviews with Stuart and the board members in late July. They are required to re-apply and interview each year during college. To be eligible, the applicant must have at least one parent working at a Kentucky Thoroughbred farm.

“These kids have these huge work ethics,” Stuart said, “and because most of them have never had family members go to college, it’s a whole new life experience. Some of them are shocked that they are actually getting the chance to go to college. It’s so gratifying for us because we get to hear their hopes and dreams, and it’s fun to see their confidence grow year to year. They have so much presence and are just the greatest kids.”

The idea for the scholarship fund came from Liberation Farm’s Rob Whiteley, who serves as president of the Horse Farm Workers Educational Assistance Fund, and Tom Evans of Trackside Farm, the fund’s vice president and treasurer.

“Horse Farm workers are the backbone of the Thoroughbred industry,” said Whiteley, “and these young people are a source of great pride to their parents who have worked so hard in order for their children to enjoy a fulfilling and productive quality of life. The scholarships are an investment in truly motivated individuals who possess initiative and great potential. And the best news of all is that many of them intend to pursue careers in the Thoroughbred industry. In this way, supporting the Fund also makes practical sense, as it helps to build a stronger horse industry in the future. Several graduates are already distinguishing themselves in horse related endeavors, including one who is currently serving as Director of Racing at a major North American track.”

Board members include Whiteley; Evans; Judge Wilson of Wyatt, Tarrant and Combs,, the fund’s secretary; Dan Pride of Fasig-Tipton; John Stuart of Bluegrass Thoroughbred Services; John Sikura of Hill ‘n’ Dale Farm; and Chet Blackey, DVM. Churchill Downs Inc. chairman Carl Pollard serves as an informal advisor.

“I would like to thank all of the board members for their time, caring and commitment, as well as the many individuals who have generously supported and valued this remarkable group of young scholars since the Fund’s inception,” said Whiteley. “We are especially grateful to the Carl Pollard Foundation, Thoroughbred Charities of America, Hill ‘n’ Dale Farm, Darley America, Fasig-Tipton, Keeneland, the Crafty Prospector syndicate, the Kentucky Thoroughbred Farm Managers’ Club, and the Kentucky Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders for their substantial contributions. In addition, I am appreciative that six of our female scholars for 2009-2010 will receive awards funded by the generosity of the Charlotte R. Schmidlapp Fund, Fifth Third Bank, Trustee.”

This year’s scholars have a working parent at one of the following farms: Beech Spring Farm, Bradyleigh, CASA (2), Cedar Ridge, Claiborne (4), Crestwood, Darby Dan, Darley America (4), Denali, Fab Oak, Golden Age, High Point, Indian Creek, Loch Lea, Manchester, Niknar, Pin Oak, Six Winters, Stonehaven Steadings, Sunnyside, Three Chimneys (2), Wimbledon, and Winstar Farm.

The 2009-2010 Horse Farm Workers’ Educational Assistance scholars and the schools they will be attending are as follows:

Kaitlyn Alexander - Morehead State U.
Megan Brady - Morehead State U.
Lindsay Brumley - Thomas More College
Sarah Burton - Mary Baldwin College

Monica Calleja – BCTC
Cheli Castillo – BCTC

Brett Courtney – BCTC
Josh Davis - Morehead State U.

Pamela Deegan - Murray State U.
Liz Fiero - Murray State U.

Shane Goforth – U. of Kentucky
Megan Hephner - Middle Tennessee State

Ashley Herrera – U. of Kentucky
Mary Koch – U. of Kentucky

Kathleen Layton – U. of Kentucky
Megan Lynn – BCTC
Linzay Marks – LSU
Sean Parisel - U. of Kentucky

Steven Powell - Western KY U.
Justin Purvis – BCTC

John Rankin - Morehead State U.
Trey Rankin - Thomas More College

Jose Salazar – BCTC
Viridiana Salazar – BCTC

Hanna Sams - Morehead State U.
Lyndsay Sams - Eastern Kentucky U.

Sarah Shaw - Eastern Kentucky U.
Stephanie Sosby - U. of the Cumberlands

Miller Thornbury - University of the South
Parker Wornall - Western Kentucky U.

Lindsay Zahn - Eastern Kentucky U.
Elizabeth Zajic - Eastern Kentucky U.


–BCTC = Bluegrass Community and Technical College

–Two of the scholars who will be attending the University of Kentucky are also UK Pollard Scholars, and another is a UK Jamal Mashburn Scholar. The Scholarship Fund is a 501(c)(3) organization run on a volunteer basis, with over 92% of donated monies flowing through to recipients. Tax deductible contributions may be made to the Horse Farm Workers’ Educational Assistance Fund, 2938 Four Pines Drive, Lexington, KY 40502-2969. Applications for the 2010-2011 school year will be available in May, and inquiries may be made to (859) 269-1719

. Additional information may be viewed at www.horsefarmworkerseducationfund.com.

Liberation Farm celebrates the many horsemen and horsewomen who strive each day to make things better for horses and those who work with them.  To learn more about Liberation Farm, click here.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

 

“Year after year, hard working, extraordinary young people continue to impress the board with their ability, accomplishments, and enthusiasm,” said Whiteley. “They have internalized the work ethic of their parents, and most of them help pay their way through school by working one or more jobs in addition to carrying a full load of classes. Thus, the goal of the fund is to provide enough money to these deserving students so that their school work can be their number one priority.”

By Ray Paulick
Muffy Stuart calls it the “most inspiring day of my life.” It’s the day she and the board of directors of the Horse Farm Workers’ Educational Assistance Fund in Kentucky get to meet the young people who have applied for college scholarships. In many cases, the teenagers will be the first in their families to attend a college or university.

OLDER CAN BE BETTER

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009
Commercial breeder Rob Whiteley addresses the issue of older broodmares and the bias that some yearling buyers have against foals out of aged mares in a piece that originally ran in the Thoroughbred Daily News. As always, we appreciate TDN’s Sue Finley giving us permission  to re-publish Whiteley’s article as the Keeneland September yearling sale approaches. Whiteley, who formerly operated Foxfields for Carl Icahn, runs Liberation Farm and can be contacted at liberationfarm@yahoo.com. — Ray PaulickLet’s examine the facts, starting with my personal experience. In the mid-1990s, I purchased Blush With Pride and Rokeby Rose as older mares for Foxfield with the intention of breeding them to Deputy Minister and Silver Deputy, respectively. Those matings produced Better Than Honour when Blush With Pride was 17, and Silverbulletday when Rokeby Rose was 19. Better Than Honour became a graded stakes winner, produced consecutive Belmont winners (Jazil and Rags To Riches), and sold recently for a world-record $14 million. Two-time champion Silverbulletday won 13 graded stakes, bankrolled over $3 million in earnings, and was inducted into racing’s Hall of Fame this year. Although these fabulous horses are the creme de la creme of my adventures with aging broodmares, they are exceptional only in their superiority. Many other stakes winners have been produced by other older ladies I have been blessed to own over the years.

My experience is not unique. High-level success from older mares is commonplace. Grade I winners produced by other breeders from older mares reads like a Who’s Who of the American turf. Buyers who dismiss foals out of older mares would have walked past Secretariat, 15 Breeders’ Cup champions (including Go for Wand, Capote, Ouija Board, Miss Alleged, Royal Academy, Artie Schiller, etc.), and a very long line of major stakes winners. (For a more detailed accounting, please read the CBA booklet Buying Sales Yearlings: Plain and Simple at www.consignorsandbreeders.com or www.liberationfarm.com.

Nor is consistent high-level success by foals out of older mares merely a North American occurrence. Andrew Caulfield recently authored an article titled, “Breeders dismiss elderly mares at their peril.” (Thoroughbred Owner and Breeder/Pacemaker, August 2009). Andrew’s feature could also be titled, “Buyers dismiss foals out of elderly mares at their peril.” The subtitle reads: “Oaks and other Group 1 races recently are evidence that mares who produce in their 20s are still capable of delivering top-class winners.”

The subtitle turns out to be an understatement when we digest the stunning fact that six of the last 12 winners of Epsom Downs’ historic Oaks have been fillies out of older mares. Ramruna’s dam was 21. Eswarah, Ouija Board and Shoutoush all had mothers who were 19. Imagine’s and Light Shift’s dams were 17 and 16, respectively. In addition, Dar Re Mi automatically qualified for this year’s Breeders’ Cup Filly and Mare Turf with a decisive victory for John Gosden in the recent Yorkshire Oaks. Dar Re Mi’s dam, Darara, was 22 when Dar Re Mi was foaled.

Evidence is overwhelming that the stigma against foals out of older mares is without merit. My guess is that the mistaken belief is somehow a result of confusion caused by the fact that pregnancy and foaling rates are lower for older mares. (Broodmares as a group will be empty or otherwise unproductive approximately 30 percent of the time over their careers, and more “missing” years occur in later years). Therefore, because mares’ reproductive reliability generally declines with age, some people may incorrectly assume that the viability of the resulting foals will be automatically diminished. This is simply not the case. Just as with humans, mares age at different rates according to a mix of genetic and environmental factors, and wide-ranging individual differences exist. Some mares will develop compromised reproductive environments relatively early, while others will remain normally functional and productive well into their 20s.

Evaluation of an older mare’s status as a producer of quality stock is relatively simple. Older mares will tell you when they are no longer getting it done. True horsemen can see it when they look at the foal.

In short, if an older mare is “over the hill,” the resulting foal will show it. Therefore, if the foal (or yearling) in front of you looks the part, remember that a horse’s genetic make-up does not change over time, and rest assured that its potential has not been compromised.

I am continually and recently reminded of this fact whenever I think of my mare Tipsy Girl (now co-owned with Chris Elia of Oratis Thoroughbreds), who has produced six stakes horses, including two who have won or placed in the last two weeks. Greeley’s Conquest won the Remington Park Sprint Cup Aug. 22, and two-year-old filly Never Quicker placed in Monmouth Park’s Junior Champion Stakes in her very first start Aug. 29. Tipsy Girl, now 23, was a stakes performer until the age of six, has amazingly given me 16 foals, including a sharp 2009 Stormy Atlantic filly, and is back in-foal to sprint champion Midnight Lute. Her athletic yearling colt by Grand Slam will be at Keeneland in September as further proof for all to see that Tipsy Girl is still getting it done, despite being in her 20s.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence, however, some people will still argue studies show that younger mares produce a higher percentage of stakes winners than older mares. This is true in general; however, please look more closely at what it actually means. David Dink performed the most comprehensive multiyear study of stakes winners from foals by age of mares and found that younger mares do in fact produce a slightly higher percentage of stakes winners. Dink’s large group of subject mares produced 137,184 foals and 4,804 stakes winners, or 3.5 percent. Mares aged four through 10 produced 3.87 percent stakes winners. Mares aged 11-15 produced 3.32 percent stakes winners (although it is interesting to note that the 15 year olds, at 3.66 percent, came in higher than the average for all mares and higher than those aged 11 to 14). Mares 16-20 produced 2.33 percent stakes winners. The overall trend is obvious, but the conclusion is not.

In order to accurately interpret Dink’s data, three important observations must be made: (1) The small percentage differences between age groups may be statistically significant in a technical sense, but the differences are so negligible (less than a percentage point) that they are not useful for decision making; (2) group statistics have nothing useful to say about evaluating a specific yearling; group data cannot describe the quality, athleticism, heart, or potential of any individual horse; and (3) the trivial group performance differences between younger and older mares can be easily explained by differences in opportunity. For example, if a thorough study were performed relating average stud fee and age of mare, it would clearly show that younger mares are generally bred to higher-class stallions (as measured by stud fee), and therefore would be expected to have better results simply based on an opportunity advantage related to which stallions they were bred to.

False beliefs die slowly in our business. Yet, in the current marketplace, savvy horsemen have an edge because they realize that a well made, athletic looking yearling out of an older mare has virtually the same success as one out of a younger mare. The challenge for us, therefore, is to discard the baseless hearsay and bogus baggage that floats around the sales year after year and, instead, develop the confidence to look clearly at the individual before us and see it for what it is. Sherlock Holmes said, “I have trained myself to notice what I see.” We need to do the same.

Copyright (c) 2009, Thoroughbred Daily News

 

By Rob Whiteley
Riddle: What do Sea the Stars and my sister, Sherry, have in common? On the surface, not much, although both have demonstrated precocity and great talent, and both are achievers at the highest level.

Sea the Stars is the top-rated horse in the world with four Group 1 wins this year. He is the first horse since Nashwan in 1989 to accomplish the 2000 Guineas/Epsom Derby/Eclipse Stakes triple. And his recent wins in the Juddmonte International and Irish Champion Stakes add to his candidacy as one of the great racehorses of the modern era.

Sherry Whiteley is senior vice president of human resources for Intuit Corporation, which brings us financial software such as QuickBooks and TurboTax. Intuit receives high marks each year as one of the best companies in the nation to work for, and Sherry’s ministrations to approximately 8,000 employees has a lot to do with the high quality corporate culture and overall employee satisfaction and well-being.

So, here is the answer to the riddle. Both are out of older mares. Sea the Stars’ dam, Urban Sea, was 17 when she delivered the top horse in the world. My mother was 48 when she delivered Sherry, the star of our family. Worlds apart, they each provide hard evidence that older can be better.

Nonetheless, the puzzling stigma against offspring of older mares persists on the Thoroughbred sales scene without any rational basis. Some buyers quickly dismiss an individual simply because it is “out of an older mare.” Some buyers won’t even look at foals or yearlings out of older mares. This attitude or belief is simply wrong.

It is a result of misinformation, perpetuated by the offhand mouthing of a baseless perception, from one poorly informed person to the next.

(UPDATED JUNE 3) PAULICK ENDORSES BREEDERS’ CUP CANDIDATES

Monday, June 1st, 2009
By Ray Paulick

(UPDATED JUNE 3 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN RECOMMENDATION FOR GEORGE ISAACS)

The 25 candidates running for election to the Breeders’ Cup board of Members and Trustees may have different backgrounds, income levels and positions within the Thoroughbred industry, but I think they all share a common thread: a desire to help the Breeders’ Cup grow. All are to be commended for their interest in helping achieve that goal, even if their philosophies do not follow the same path.

There are, however, only 13 positions for these 25 individuals on the board of Members and Trustees, whose principal role within the Breeders’ Cup organization is to elect the 13 members of the board of Directors at an annual meeting, scheduled this year for July 9. The smaller board of Directors makes all major decisions regarding the operations and governance of the Breeders’ Cup and elects a chairman and vice chairman each year. 

So who nominators elect to the board of Members and Trustees is critical in shaping the smaller, operating board of Directors. The six individuals whose two-year terms on the board of Directors expire in July of this year are: Reynolds Bell, Donald Dizney, Tracy Farmer, Don Robinson (who served out the remainder of B. Wayne Hughes’ term after Hughes’ resignation), G. Watts Humphrey Jr., and Robert T. Manfuso. Only elected Members and Trustees may run for the smaller board of Directors.

Fifteen of those running for the board of Members and Trustees submitted answers to questions from the Paulick Report or statements about their candidacy (click here to see their responses in an easy-to-read or print PDF document). Biographies of all the candidates can be viewed here at the Breeders’ Cup election web site.

I have covered the Thoroughbred industry for nearly 30 years and have seen a number of these candidates in board-room settings, talked with others about issues of interest to the Breeders’ Cup and Thoroughbred racing and breeding in general, and consider many of them friends. Some are or have been advertisers of this web site. In making the following comments and voting recommendations to nominators, I have done my best to remain objective in rating the various candidates without regard to friendships or business relationships.

Here is my summary of each candidate, along with a voting recommendation:

JOHN AMERMAN: Skilled businessman who as retired chairman and CEO of Mattel certainly understands consumer products and traditional marketing. I’ve not seen great leadership or fresh ideas spring from Amerman in his various industry roles and cannot recommend a vote for him on the board of Members and Trustees.

NADIA SANAN BRIGGS: Daughter of the outspoken but highly successful businessman Satish Sanan, who has played a major role in the Breeders’ Cup as chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee. Briggs has her own independent streak and would bring a fresh, young perspective to the board. She is bright, totally committed to the industry, and would make an outstanding member of the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.

JACK BROTHERS: Has played a major if understated role in the success of Frank Stronach’s Adena Springs breeding and racing operation after virtually growing up in the horse business. Doesn’t claim to have all the answers for resolving the challenges at the Breeders’ Cup, but I doubt there would be a more fair-minded or harder-working individual on the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.

BILL CASNER: Few people in the industry have shown the courage to stand up to the failed, old-guard industry leadership like Bill Casner has. He understands racing from the standpoint of the blue-collar horseman and now plays the game at the highest level while not forgetting his humble beginnings. Recommend for election.

CASE CLAY: One of the up-and-coming “next generation” industry leaders, Clay is the son of Three Chimneys Farm owner Robert Clay but was not heavily involved in the farm’s operation or the industry until the last five to seven years. I do have concerns that as one of three candidates with close ties to Three Chimneys (see below), there may be an effort to “stack the deck” for a future agenda, and for that reason cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees at this time.

LINCOLN COLLINS: One of three individuals (along with Case Clay and Tracy Farmer) closely allied with Three Chimneys Farm. Collins has a good reputation for honesty and integrity in his Kern Thoroughbreds bloodstock agency, though seems light on service and industry experience. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

DONALD R. DIZNEY: A member of both the board of Members and Trustees and the smaller Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, Dizney has done little to distinguish himself as more than a rubber-stamp voter for the status quo. There have been suggestions among some at the Breeders’ Cup that Dizney has not been as engaged through his board or committee attendance as others, but a request for attendance records of board meetings from Breeders’ Cup secretary Jim Philpott was ignored. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

TRACY FARMER: Politically powerful in Kentucky through his work and fund-raising with the Democratic Party, Farmer has been a close ally of Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and was appointed to the Kentucky Racing Commission, on which he serves as vice chairman. Farmer serves on both the board of Members and Trustees and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, where sources say he has not distinguished himself as an independent voice. The Paulick Report requested minutes of Breeders’ Cup board meetings to analyze the involvement of each board member, but secretary Jim Philpott denied the request. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

H. GREG GOODMAN: Houston native has been a partner with Lane’s End Farm’s Will Farish, which doesn’t necessarily suggest he will be a “yes” vote for a potential Farish-orchestrated board of Directors slate. However, his non-response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and his vague personal statement on the Breeders’ Cup voting web site does not build confidence in his independence. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

GEORGE ISAACS:(UPDATED JUNE 3, FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF RESPONSE TO PAULICK REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE) Veteran horseman is well respected throughout the industry for his work as general manager at Bridlewood Farm in Florida. Relatively new to national industry organizations, but in his responses to the Paulick Report questionnaire demonstrated a commitment to adding value to Breeders’ Cup nominations and increasing accountability and transparency within the organization. i believe it is also important to have representation among Florida breeders. Recommend for election.

TOM LUDT: One of the most independent-minded, cut-to-the-chase people I’ve seen in this industry in recent years. Has distinguished himself on the Kentucky Racing Commission, having been appointed by both a Republican and Democratic governor (and without being a major financial contributor to either of their campaigns), on committees at the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors. Recommend for election.

REILEY McDONALD: Has many years of experience in the auction arena, most prominently as co-owner of Eaton Sales. Has not been as involved in industry leadership positions as I would like to see for someone with his knowledge and insight, though it is encouraging to see him step up at this critical time. However, I cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

MICHAEL McMAHON: One of the individuals running who is completely invested in the Thoroughbred industry and its future, McMahon may lack in national industry organizational experience but more than makes up for it in passion. My instinct is he will add a truly independent voice who takes his responsibilities seriously. In his reply to the Paulick Report questionnaire, McMahon repeatedly spoke of the importance of increasing participation at the grass-roots level among breeders, by adding value to the program for nominators. Recommend for election.

CLEM MURPHY: Coolmore principals and associates are often guarded in what they say to the media, but I’ve found Murphy to be accessible and a source of innovative thinking when it comes to both the Breeders’ Cup and the racing industry. Recommend for election.

OGDEN MILLS PHIPPS: The phrase “lead, follow, or get out of the way” comes to mind. The Jockey Club chairman has had his opportunities to lead (New York Racing Association declined during his years of power), has not shown much interest in following, and that leaves one alternative. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

DAN PRIDE: Believes in accountability and transparency, and has brought fresh ideas and enthusiasm to Fasig-Tipton since joining the auction company from Darley. Pride does a good job representing a younger generation of leaders that have real-world experience. Recommend for election.

ANDRE REGARD: For a relatively young man, Regard has a broad base of knowledge, and I think there is little doubt that he will be a growing influence in future years as he gains experience in the industry and its various organizations. One to keep an eye out for in the future, but at this time cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

RICHARD SANTULLI: An enormously successful businessman, Santulli is a no-nonsense kind of guy who brings independence, integrity and a serious commitment to the Breeders’ Cup because of his passion for the Thoroughbred game,first as a fan and horseplayer and later as an owner and breeder. Last year’s effort by the old guard to keep Santulli off the smaller board of Directors represented a low point in the history of the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

JOSEPH V. SHIELDS JR. Has served on the board of Members and Trustees and board of Directors, but has not publicly articulated a clear vision for how the Breeders’ Cup can grow. Closely associated with old-guard Members and Trustees who have lacked innovation. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

JOHN SIKURA:
Fiercely independent and driven to build his own business, Sikura has a vision to grow the Breeders’ Cup to become an even more important world championship by incorporating horses from different parts of the globe. He is one of those “all in” horsemen who do not look at the Thoroughbred industry as a part-time hobby but as a full-time commitment of his time and financial resources, and his personal success is tied to the growth of events like the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

OLIVER TAIT: Represents Darley USA, one of the most important contributors to the Breeders’ Cup in terms of nominations and participation in the world championships. Tait may not be a household name in the U.S. at this stage of his career, but he has accumulated extensive international experience in Europe and Australia. Recommend for election.

DUNCAN TAYLOR: Listening to your customers seems like a logical approach to any business, but I don’t think that has been a strong suit of the Breeders’ Cup board of Directors or management in the past. Taylor Made has developed into the industry’s leading sales agency because of its customer-centric approach, an approach that can only help the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

ROBERT TRUSSELL JR.: Was a member of the Gainesway Farm team when John Gaines created the Breeders’ Cup in the early 1980s, so he has a great depth of knowledge and history of the organization. However, it is difficult to grasp where he stands on issues of importance given his lack of response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and the absence of a personal statement accompanying his biography on the Breeders’ Cup election web site. (In the original version of this article, I reported the Breeders’ Cup web site did not include a biography of Trussell; that has since been added here.) Cannot recommend a vote at this time for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

ROB WHITELEY: If you are in favor of maintaining the status quo, Whiteley is not your candidate. He was an outspoken critic of the decision last December to suspend the stakes supplement program, and I believe his leadership on that issue led to a quick reversal by the board of Directors. Strongly believes in accountability, transparency and fiscal responsibility. Recommend for election.

JACK WOLF: Knowledgeable about the importance of the Breeders’ Cup in the industry and bullish on the role the organization can play to increase the popularity of the sport, something it has not yet been able to do. Refreshingly candid, independent and with outstanding credentials both in racing and in the outside business world. Recommend for election.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

(UPDATED JUNE 3) BREEDERS’ CUP CANDIDATES: WHERE THEY STAND

Monday, June 1st, 2009

By Ray Paulick
The 25 candidates for the 13 open positions on the Breeders’ Cup Board of Members and Trustees were asked by the Paulick Report last week to respond to six questions about themselves, their priorities and recommendations for the organization, and their thoughts on Breeders’ Cup governance issues.

Thirteen individuals responded in time for inclusion in this report to be published on Monday, June, 1, the first day Breeders’ Cup nominators had the opportunity to cast their ballots in the 2009 Members and Trustees election. Additional comments, from John Sikura, Clem Murphy and George Isaacs have been added; we hope other candidates who have not had the opportunity to respond will do so and the Paulick Report will publish any of their answers in the coming days.

In addition, I have offered my thoughts on the various candidates, along with recommendations on how I think nominators should vote in this election.

Click here to see the comments of the candidates in a chart form (UPDATED JUNE 3) that allows easy comparison.

Click here to read or print out a PDF document with all the responses (UPDATED JUNE 3), which are listed alphabetically.

Additionally, click here to access the biographies supplied to the Breeders’ Cup by each of the candidates. Nominators who have not received a customer number and passcode with voting instructions should e-mail the Breeders’ Cup nominations department or call (859) 514-9423.

Click here for a listing of all nominators and the number of votes they are eligible to cast in the election. Each vote can be used for up to 13 different candidates (for example, an individual entitled to 10 votes may cast 10 votes for as many as 13 individuals, but may not used 130 times  for one individual). There are a total of 40,258 eligible votes. Breeders’ Cup has not published tabulated results of previous elections, but approximately 12,000 votes were required to be elected, according to sources in the organization.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

GUEST COMMENTARY: MAY FOALS THE SECRET TO DERBY TRAIL?

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

I’ve always been surprised at the habits of many buyers at yearling sales…they sometimes remind me of lemmings marching to the sea, making decisions without logic or rationality. I once asked a leading buyer why he often spent so much money on yearlings by unproven first-year sires, a practice that is common enough to inflate the yearling average for those new sires. His response was simple: “They haven’t failed yet.”

That philosophy makes no sense to me, for it would seem far more pragmatic to look for undervalued proven stallions than to roll the dice on a group of newcomers whose chance of succeeding are somewhere between 5-10%.

Another unexplainable practice of yearling buyers is their disdain of foals born in the month of May. On average, it would make sense that May foals would be smaller than their January-April counterparts, so perhaps buyers at summer or fall yearling sales are simply unable to project how that smaller horse might look as a 2- or 3-year-old.

Some years ago, statistics accompanying an article I wrote for Bloodhorse’s MarketWatch newsletter, showed that May foals were only marginally behind earlier season foals in performance standards (stakes wins, money won), but their average yearling prices were much, much lower. Where I come from, that makes May foals a bargain.

Rob Whiteley, who operates the successful Liberation Farm breeding operation, came to the same conclusion in an article he wrote this week for the Thoroughbred Daily News. From the winning Kentucky Derby exacta of May foals Mine That Bird and Pioneerof the Nile to a review of May foals that have won Breeders’ Cup races, Whiteley makes a compelling argument that buyers should pay far more attention to May foals than they traditionally have. We’d like to thank Sue Finley of TDN for granting reprint rights of Whiteley’s article. – Ray Paulick

By Rob Whiteley
As a populist horseman, it makes me smile when a relatively obscure horse comes out of the hinterlands and beats up on a bunch of fashionably bred horses who are sired by generally over-priced, over-hyped, and over-bred stallions. And it turns my smile into a broad grin to observe that Mine That Bird is a mid-May foal.

To be fair, the valiant runner-up, Pioneerof the Nile, is regally bred and fully deserving of his cost of production. His bloodlines and hefty stud fee came through in a brave display of talent and determination, and those who played him unsuccessfully in the exotics only have themselves to blame for not taking home a big piece of the track. Like the item we look past in the front of the refrigerator, it was right there to see. Pioneerof the Nile is also a May foal, and if you had played a May foal exacta, you would have received $2,074.80 for a $2 exacta box.

(Ed. Note: A $2 exacta box with all of the May foals in the Derby would’ve cost $40. Atomic Rain (Smart Strike), Regal Ransom (Distorted Humor) and third-place finisher Musket Man (Yonaguska) are all May foals as well. A $1 triple box on the quintet would’ve set you back just $60, and returned $20,750.30)

In light of the continuous racing success achieved by May foals year after year, I am at a loss to rationally understand how that success fails to translate into the sales scene where May foals, as a group, bring approximately 35 percent less than their counterparts. For some in-grained reason, rooted in hearsay and perpetuated by the typical word of mouth momentum that spreads other horse industry falsehoods and myths, May foals get a bad rap at the sales, and are often discounted accordingly in the ring. This is such nonsense. The stigma on May foals that floats around on the winds of ignorance has no basis in fact.

It can even be persuasively argued that May foals actually have a slight advantage over other foals, as May foals are born according to a horse’s innate and natural spring-time predispositions, and with the most favorable environmental conditions.

Savvy buyers who keep up with the details of racing know that May foals, as a group, race as successfully as foals born in other months, and better than foals born in January. And the sharpest horsemen and pinhookers know that a few days or even weeks generally make little difference in a horse’s early development.

The most important factors in a horse’s ability to perform early involve genetically based precocity, balance, athleticism, and mental maturity, not date of birth. Each horse has its own genetically wound clock, and horses have wide-ranging differences in the rate that they develop, no matter which month they might be born in. Like foals born in January or February or any month, some May foals may be forward enough to zip along at two-year-old sales, while others may not be mature enough to race effectively until the middle of their three-year-old years, or later. Horses, like humans and other mammals, follow their own genetic blueprint.

When it is their time to perform, however, May foals truly hold their own, even as two-year-olds.

Except for the month of January, the fewest number of foals are born in May, yet they account for 10 percent of Breeders’ Cup Juvenile colt and filly champions. Furthermore, as May foals mature, their success rate in certain top level venues can be jaw-dropping. May foals have won a stunning 50 percent of the last 10 Breeders’ Cup Distaffs (including, Azeri, Round Pond, Spain, and Escena). And May foals have won over 25 percent of all Breeders’ Cup Mile races.

Despite the impressive frequency with which May foals find the winner’s circle in big races, however, a May foal may not win the Preakness this year. Instead, a magnificent January foal named Rachel Alexandra may be brilliant enough to outrun the boys, no matter when they were born (if she can adjust to a new groom, a new trainer, and new routines). But the Belmont, please take note, is entirely a different matter because of the extraordinary potency of the May foal factor.

The May foal factor is the strongest available predictor of Belmont success–far stronger than the most sophisticated figs or Beyer numbers–because May foals, incredibly, have won nearly 40 percent of the last 15 runnings of the Belmont (including, Afleet Alex, Lemon Drop Kid, Thunder Gulch, Touch Gold, Victory Gallop, and Mine That Bird’s own daddy, Birdstone). Therefore, given the historical dominance by May foals in this mile-and-a-half event, and given the Bird’s paternal family connection and the probable presence of steadfast Pioneerof the Nile, we could even be looking at the same May foal quinella we witnessed in the Derby. In any event, it is time we give May foals the respect they deserve, at the sales and on the track.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick.

GOOD NEWS FRIDAY sponsored by Liberation Farm - BLUE GRASS FARMS CHAPLAINCY

Friday, May 8th, 2009
Do you know an individual or organization who you think we should consider for an upcoming “Good News Friday” feature? Then please e-mail info@paulickreport.com with the name of the individual or organization and a brief description of why you think they should be featured. Additionally, we’d like to thank Rob Whiteley and Liberation Farm for encouraging us to bring to light some of the industry’s positive stories and for sponsoring this exclusive Paulick Report feature.


By Ray Paulick

Her name is Mary Lee-Butte, but many who have benefited from her work with the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy call her “Mary Christmas.” Whether it’s helping organize the chaplaincy’s annual “Festival of Christmas,” an event that brings joy to hundreds of children from needy, horse industry families, or stopping by a nursing home to visit and drop off the latest copies of Blood-Horse and Thoroughbred Times magazines to former horse industry workers, Lee-Butte has a heart, as track announcer Trevor Denman likes to say, as big as the racetrack.

But the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy, as the name implies, serves a community much larger than the track. “When we started this organization,” said industry consultant Lonny Powell, the chaplaincy’s founding president, “we saw that it was an enormous challenge. With a racetrack chaplaincy, you draw a square and define the stable area as your community. With the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy, we’re serving several counties in Central Kentucky. But it’s worked, and it’s given me great satisfaction and pride to see how many people have benefited.”

The chaplaincy was formed in 2003 by a group of individuals in Central Kentucky that included Powell, David Foley of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, the Jockey Club’s  Dan Fick, Tom Thornbury of Keeneland, Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association CEO Remi Bellocq, breeder Ben Walden, Bobby Maxwell of Sallee Horse Vans and Bethlehem Farms’ Sandra White. (Click here to learn more about the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy.)

“Back in the early days, we’d hired a part-time administrator and a part-time chaplain to get this kicked off,” recalled David Foley, a past president and current treasurer of the chaplaincy. “We used to meet several times a month the first few years trying to get the ministry going. Both of these positions ended up going full-time and we were covering a lot of ground; however, fundraising was always a challenge. Then, along came Mary–as the song goes. She came to us initially as a volunteer a few years back, began participating and then inquired about setting up a Ladies Guild to assist the chaplaincy with additional needs and to help with fundraising. She was ‘on fire’ for this ministry, back then and remains so today.”

When the chaplaincy’s original executive director left Central Kentucky and resigned her position, Lee-Butte was working virtually full-time as a volunteer. The executive director job was offered to her, and she stepped in to help the organization through a transition without missing a step. It’s grown under her leadership and expanded its outreach to the community in many ways. Lee-Butte is one of three employees, along with the chaplain Claudio Toro and executive assistant Deanna Widaman.

“On a day to day basis, we are able to take care of any emergency needs the workers have,” Lee-Butte said, “whether it’s physical, spiritual, financial or medical. It’s a one-stop resource center.”

The chaplaincy, which was previously affiliated with the Racetrack Chaplaincy of America but ended its ties with that national organization earlier this year, opened an Enrichment Center at its Lexington office in the last year.  The center is used as a classroom, where courses on safety and English as a second language are taught. The center will be used this summer for a new children’s reading program, and it also hosts a mentoring program for mothers who either have husbands working on horse farms or themselves are farm employees. A computer lab is being created, thanks to a gift of eight computers from Darley Farm. Classes will be taught to help farm workers develop word processing and basic computer skills that will help them on the job. Lee-Butte hopes to arrange for regularly scheduled medical and dental services to also be available for those in need.

“Our greatest achievement last year by far was opening the Enrichment Center,” said Fritz Widaman of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association, the chaplaincy’s current president. Its development, Widaman said, would not have been possible without the generosity of many people in the industry.

Lee-Butte echoed Widaman’s sentiments about the widespread support, saying funding comes from all levels of the industry, from wealthy farm owners who make substantial donations to individuals who send in $5 or $10.

“Taylor Made Farm has been phenomenal in their support,” she said, “Beau Lane of the Lane Foundation has supported the chaplaincy for a long time and has been one of our major donors. Keeneland and Fasig-Tipton have been supportive, and so has the Blood-Horse family, especially at Christmastime. Darley has been very supportive, both with funding and with the recent donation of computers.”

The heart and soul of the chaplaincy’s fundraising, however, comes from the Ladies Guild that Lee-Butte helped start.

“The Ladies Guild is a very cohesive, supportive group of women who are cheerleaders for the industry and for each other,” Lee-Butte said. “It raises money, but it’s also an outreach for people who want to be involved in doing something. That’s what drives me; volunteer work is very rewarding.

“We needed a group of ladies to raise funds to do the legwork,” she added. “We all know that women are the ones who will go out there and do the work and set up the fundraisers. I can do a lot, but if I can get a group of women together we can do anything.”

The Ladies Guild’s annual fundraiser, Nags, Bags and Rags, is scheduled for Oct. 1 at Keeneland’s Keene Entertainment Center on the eve of the opening of the fall race meeting. The theme for this year’s event is Racino Grande, which will create a Roaring ‘20s atmosphere, with roulette, a wheel of fortune, raffles, auctions, celebrity dealers, a paddock marketplace and cabaret music.

But the work of the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy is far from all fun and games. Lee-Butte has led several memorial services recently, and the chaplaincy offers bereavement and grief counseling for families that have lost loved ones. The chaplaincy works with local funeral homes to seek discounted rates for families that can’t afford funeral costs, and Lee-Butte or chaplaincy volunteers will show up with food and household goods at the home of horse industry families that have suffered a loss.

Just this week, Lee-Butte dealt with the tragic death of a 24-year-old young man from the Ukraine, who was serving as an intern at a local veterinary hospital at the time of his death. His family could not afford to have his remains shipped home, and Lee-Butte quickly raised the necessary funds to help bring some degree of closure to the young man’s grieving parents.

There are many worthy organizations that serve the industry’s human and equine participants, and it’s become increasingly difficult to raise funds during the current challenging economic conditions. But Lee-Butte maintains an incredibly upbeat and optimistic viewpoint.

“We just have to have faith in God,” she said. “I think we’re probably one of the industry’s best-kept secrets, but people call us when they need us. So far we’ve never had to turn any legitimate need away, and that to me is mind boggling.

“I don’t see challenges, but I see opportunity.”

Readers have an opportunity help the Blue Grass Farms Chaplaincy continue its good work. Click here to make a donation.

Liberation Farm celebrates the many horsemen and horsewomen who strive each day to make things better for horses and those who work with them.  To learn more about Liberation Farm, click here.

Previous Good News Friday subjects: Father Chris ClayThe Race for Education, Military Appreciation Day at Keeneland, Kentucky Oaks Pink Out for the Susan G. Komen Foundation.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

MAJOR BREEDER CALLS FOR BREEDERS’ CUP RESIGNATIONS

Monday, December 15th, 2008

The following commentary on the Breeders’ Cup announcement to suspend funding of 2009 stakes supplements was written by Rob Whiteley, who for 18 years ran Carl Icahn’s Foxfield commercial breeding operation and now owns Liberation Farm, one of the Thoroughbred industry’s largest and most successful breeding entities. He can be reached at liberationfarm@yahoo.com. As with any guest commentary we publish, the views do not necessarily represent those of the Paulick Report.

By Rob Whiteley

The decision by the Breeders’ Cup management to completely drop the supplemental stakes program, totally confirms that the inmates are running the asylum. Dropping all 121 supplemental stakes clearly shows how encapsulated and insulated executives, who lack a comprehensive understanding of the industry or a conscientious concern for fiduciary responsibility to its broad-based constituents, can make ill-conceived judgments without proper oversight and supervision.  My friend John Gaines must be turning over in his grave at this level of arrogance and incompetence.

For Foxfield or for Liberation Farm, I have accounted for over $1 Million in fee support to the Breeders’ Cup and much more than that when pro-rated fees for stallion interests are included. My partners have contributed close to another million. The amount returned to myself and co-breeders has been far less than 10% of that contribution. Meanwhile, those of us who pay through the nose to put on the show still have to pay inflated fees for standard tickets while regular race-goers at host tracks get kicked out of their boxes.  Who makes these decisions?  Why do we tolerate this treatment? Now we have this stunning, surreal announcement.

Breeders’ Cup is not only mismanaged, Breeders’ Cup is misnamed.  Breeders’ Cup is an oxymoron.

How was this stunning decision arrived at? Who was consulted? Was the entire board polled and given an opportunity to provide input? Was comment sought from those of us who provide the funding for the program and for the hefty executive salaries? What, truly, are the fiscal realities of the balance sheet? How many million dollars of our money is the Breeders’ Cup sitting on that could be used to maintain all or most of the supplemental program? How much were these non-stake holding executives’ salaries cut back in the midst of what Greg Avioli called a ‘challenging environment?’ What percentage of executive positions or lavish perks were eliminated, and how much overhead was cut?

Furthermore, why has this announcement been made shortly after we nominated our 2008 foals, rather than before? Have we simply been making donations? It seems to me that by paying our fees each year based on established expectations, we have an implicit but clearly understood agreement or contract that has now been violated? Whether this astonishing announcement represents mismanagement, fraud, or some other form of malfeasance, I for one want my 2005-2008 fees returned.

This final absurdity is a tipping point for me. Until the present Breeders’ Cup management is gone, the Breeders’ Cup Board is restructured in a competent way, the supplemental program is reinstated, our money is properly respected and wisely allocated, and the Breeders’ Cup is redesigned to serve breeders, I will no longer nominate my 160+ annual foals to the Breeders’ Cup program.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.  

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.

MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK: BREEDERS BLEEDING RED INK

Monday, October 6th, 2008
By Ray Paulick

When Rob Whiteley managed the Foxfield commercial breeding operation for corporate raider Carl Icahn, he had to justify every dollar on the ledger sheets for the real-life Gordon Gekko. You couldn’t pull the wool over Icahn’s eyes on fiscal matters.

Today, free from Icahn, Whiteley runs his own operation, Liberation Farm, breeding and selling Thoroughbreds for the commercial market. He applies many of the lessons and disciplines he learned from his old boss. Coming out of the recent Keeneland September yearling sale, the most important marketplace for commercial breeders, Whiteley examined the profitability of the business he has dedicated himself to since leaving academia 25 years ago (his pre-racing resume includes Stanford, Rutgers, Harvard and the University of California at Berkeley).

The resulting article was published in the Thoroughbred Daily News last Friday, Oct. 3. If you haven’t read it, and you have any interest in the future of this business, Whiteley’s analysis is a must-read. (The TDN is a subscription-only site, but there is no charge for an online subscription.)

What Whiteley found may have been shocking to some, though not necessarily surprising to the many small, blue-collar breeding operations scattered across the rural landscape of Central Kentucky: breeders are bleeding red ink. Many of them face uncertain futures, even without the greater financial crisis brought on by tighter credit markets from the Wall Street/banking meltdown.

Whiteley found that fewer than one in five yearlings catalogued to the Keeneland September sale led to a break-even or profitable result for its breeder. He detailed the example of how a yearling produced through a $20,000 stud fee and selling for $70,000 at public auction (3.5 times the stud fee) does not cover all the expenses associated over the 30 months it took to plan, produce, raise and bring the horse to market.

The most profitable days of the September sale, of course, came at the front end, when not quite two of five yearlings catalogued (38% on days one and three, 37% on day two) broke even or sold for a profit. After the first eight sessions of the 15-day sale (in other words, all of the second half), profits were as thin as a Parisian runway model – the high was 14% of horses catalogued on day nine and the low 0% on day 15.

Worse, Whiteley’s expense assumptions in his profit-loss formula may be on the conservative side. He doesn’t factor in the general and administrative expenses that most businesses absorb or the three in 10 chance that a mare will have a non-productive year (barren, slipped or dead foal).

The problems breeders face are mounting. The price of hay, feed, fencing and vanning are quickly accelerating. Auction prices are retreating, and there is little being done on the national level to bring new end-users (horse owners) into racing. The industry is retracting on many fronts.

Not all breeders are affected equally. For those operations that are secondary businesses or hobbies for multi-millionaires or billionaires who inherited their money or made it in other industries, the losses may be used to write-off profits made elsewhere. Major breeders who stand high-end stallions have that lucrative end of their business to hold them up.

But where this hits especially hard is the backbone of the industry, the small mom-and-pop operations that may own a half-dozen mares, sell their best yearlings and race the rest. They don’t have income from other industries or trust funds to balance their spreadsheets, but they do, collectively, have a huge impact on the overall infrastructure of the horse industry.

Whiteley isn’t whining, and no one put to a gun to his head to buy all those mares he now owns (or co-owns with a bank). He also understands that free-market economics, and the laws of supply and demand, need to run their course. He didn’t publish his complaints without also coming up with what he believes is a short-term solution.

The article describes the industry’s “big three” as sale companies, the veterinary community and stallion owners, and suggests they will be the next group to suffer if the economics for breeders do not improve, and they are forced out of the industry. Fewer breeders will result in lower demand for stallion and veterinary services, and certainly lower profits for Keeneland and Fasig-Tipton.

Whiteley calls for an economic stimulus plan to be borne by the big three: for 2009 only, a 50% reduction in stud fees, a 50% reduction in the cost of services (and medication markup) provided by veterinarians and a 50% reduction in the commission collected by sale companies.

Of course the chances of this actually happening are somewhere between slim and none. Stallion owners will say their fees are based on demand, and veterinarians will cite their rising costs and the investments they’ve made in equipment and education. Sale companies will say they’ve got to making a living, too.

Something, somewhere has to give, or we will see a major exodus from the industry of small businesses. That won’t be good for anyone.

MORE BAD NEWS ON THE RACING FRONT. Turfway Park closed its fall meeting with significant declines in business, both on and off-track, where handle fell 18% and 20%, respectively. There were circumstances to the numbers being so far down (aren’t there always?), but they add yet another chapter to a very troubling sequence of bad economic news for the pari-mutuel side of the Thoroughbred industry.

Keeneland did a very good thing when it purchased Turfway Park and perhaps kept it from being developed for commercial use, though I’m not sure why it is necessary for the cash-rich company to have a partner in Turfway that has no interest in the success of horse racing (a casino company). Many blue-collar Kentucky breeders race their horses at Turfway Park, and the decline of the track since its purchase by Keeneland and partners has been yet another blow to those breeders, who are now shipping their horses to race out of state in increasing numbers to places like West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

Turfway needs an injection of capital and creative or intellectual investment that Keeneland so far is not providing. Investing in Turfway is one way of helping Kentucky’s breeders.

 Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world