Posts Tagged ‘RCI’

INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION POSITIONS ON SLAUGHTER

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

By Ray Paulick

(UPDATED OCT. 10 TO REFLECT NEW POLICY FROM MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT)

When the Judiciary Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives held a markup hearing on Sept. 17 to discuss H.B. 6598, the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008 that would ban slaughter and criminalize the transportation of horses for the purpose of having them slaughtered for human consumption, a letter from National Thoroughbred Racing Association president and CEO Alex Waldrop said his organization took a neutral position on H.B. 6598 despite supporting previous anti-slaughter legislation.

Waldrop’s position statement, read into the record by Republican Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, outraged a number of prominent Thoroughbred industry participants, including Pin Oak Stud’s Josephine Abercrombie, who wrote a letter signed by more than 40 individuals that was sent to the leadership of the Judiciary Committee stating that the NTRA did not speak for them on the issue. The Judiciary Committee passed the legislation on Sept. 23 and sent it to the full House.

On Oct. 3, however, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) referred the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act to the Agriculture Committee, giving that committee until Jan. 3, 2009, to take action on the bill. Since the 110th Congress has adjourned, the bill will not pass unless it comes up during a lame duck session, which is highly unlikely.

Agriculture Committee chairman Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and ranking Republican Goodlatte both have been recipients of contributions from the NTRA PAC, most recently receiving $5,000 for their 2008 campaigns. Peterson is a member of the Congressional Horse Caucus and Goodlatte has been a strong ally of the NTRA’s lobbying efforts concerning Internet gambling and tax incentives for breeders. Goodlatte has been an opponent of slaughter legislation. (Abercrombie, incidentally, is a “champion” level NTRA Horse PAC donor, giving $5,000.)

In the wake of the Judiciary Committee’s action on anti-slaughter legislation and the NTRA’s neutral position (the American Horse Council is also neutral), Paulick Report readers suggested we contact other major Thoroughbred industry associations and businesses to see if they have taken a position on the issue of slaughter and on the specific legislation (H.B. 6598).

Listed alphabetically by organization, here is what we learned:

ASSOCIATION OF RACING COMMISSIONERS INTERNATIONAL: According to RCI president/CEO Ed Martin, the RCI “normally does not take positions on pending legislation in Congress and has not been asked by any of its members to address the issue.”

BREEDERS’ CUP:  Greg Avioli, president/CEO, said the Breeders’ Cup “has not issued a formal policy statement on the slaughter legislation before Congress. However, it is the strong consensus of our board that slaughter is inhumane and any and all reasonable options other than slaughter should be pursued. In furtherance of this position, proceeds from this year’s Championships will go to multiple retirement organizations.”

CHURCHILL DOWNS INC. Officials did not reply to requests for a position statement. Churchill Downs Inc, created the Greener Pastures program in conjunction with the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation and supports other retirement and retraining programs.

FASIG-TIPTON: Did not reply to requests for a position statement. Under the leadership of the late John Hettinger, Fasig-Tipton’s majority shareholder, the company created Blue Horse Charities to offer support to various retirement and retraining organizations. Hettinger was the industry’s leading anti-slaughter advocate.

JOCKEY CLUB: Spokesman Bob Curran gave no position on H.B. 6598 but said the official breed registry “is opposed to the slaughter or processing of Thoroughbreds for consumption by humans or animals. This includes the sale and/or transportation of Thoroughbreds for slaughter or processing for consumption by humans or animals.” The Jockey Club is a member of the Unwanted Horse Coalition.

KEENELAND ASSOCIATION: Did not reply to requests for a position statement. Keeneland and its foundation have supported Thoroughbred retirement and retraining organizations, including the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation and Rerun.

KENTUCKY EQUINE EDUCATION PROJECT: A statement from executive director Patrick Neely said: “It has been a topic of discussion in some of KEEP’s industry working groups but no formal position has been taken at this time.”

KENTUCKY THOROUGHBRED ASSOCIATION: Did not reply to requests for a position statement. KTA lists several Thoroughbred retirement organizations on its Web site.

MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT (owns Santa Anita, Gulfstream, Laurel, Pimlico, Lone Star Park, Remington Park, Golden Gate Fields): Does not have a position statement on slaughter or current anti-slaughter legislation, according to an official with the company. OCT. 10 UPDATE: MAGNA INSTITUTES NEW POLICY. CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS.

NATIONAL HORSEMEN’S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: CEO Remi Bellocq said he could not provide a yes or no answer to whether the organization supports a ban on slaughter or H.B. 6598 because of the diversity of the 30 HBPA affiliates across North America. “Our horsemen and horsewomen fall across the spectrum on this issue,” Bellocq said. The National HBPA is a member of the Unwanted Horse Coalition. Bellocq said “this shouldn’t be defined necessarily as a ‘slaughter for human consumption’ issue but, rather, an ‘unwanted horses’ issue. To a person, if given a choice, horsemen would much prefer finding a home and/or second career for their horses as opposed to slaughter. Unfortunately, no matter what legislation (state or federal) is passed, the real problem – the number of unwanted horses – will still exist. To stem the number of unwanted horses, education and awareness are a key first step to successfully bring the number down.

“To that end, in 2005 National HBPA was one of the founding members of the Unwanted Horse and we continue working actively within the UHC to better educate horsemen about the options including, should all else fail, humane euthanasia. The UHC has set-up a big tent under which all the wonderful horse rescue programs can work together. If we truly made an industry-wide effort to centralize, for example, an ex-racehorse outplacement / adoption program, I am convinced many could be placed with willing owners. Why not, for instance, establish a national site modeled after Petfinder.com? Already, organizations like the Illinois HBPA have created similar approaches with success (see Illinois HBPA’s Horses Wanted link.”

NEW YORK RACING ASSOCIATION: Did not reply to requests for a position statement. NYRA offers support to the Exceller Fund, which helps place retired horses and has supported the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation.

THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN’S ASSOCIATION: CEO Alan Foreman said the organization has not taken a position on the current legislation. “There will be a new Congress in January and we will visit the issue then,” Foreman said.

THOROUGHBRED OWNERS AND BREEDERS ASSOCIATION:  Position statement from TOBA president Dan Metzger: “We are categorically opposed to the slaughter of Thoroughbreds, and urge all those involved in the Thoroughbred industry to support rescue and adoption efforts and to work together to find humane means of dealing with the problems presented by Thoroughbreds no longer suitable for racing or breeding.” Metzger did not indicate whether or not TOBA has a position on H.B. 6598. TOBA is a member of the Unwanted Horse Coalition and is affiliated with Thoroughbred Charities of America, which supports numerous horse retirement and retraining operations.

THOROUGHBRED OWNERS OF CALIFORNIA: Did not reply to requests for a position statement. TOC’s Web site offers advice to a horse’s “last owner” and pushed for a first-of-its-kind charitable fund, the Calfornia Retirement Management Account  (CARMA), to solicit and distribute purse checkoffs for retirement and retraining programs. Transport for slaughter is illegal in California.

THOROUGHBRED RACING ASSOCIATIONS: Executive vice president Chris Scherf said the organization of North American racetracks has adopted no official position.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world

LIVE BLOGGING KENTUCKY’S RACING TASK FORCE ON INTEGRITY

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Ray Paulick is live blogging the Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing’s subcommittee on integrity of racing and pari-mutuel activities from the offices of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission Monday afternoon, beginning at 1 p.m.

Edward (Ned) Bonnie, a member of the racing commission, is chairing the meeting, which is called to order at 1 p.m. "Hopefully we are going to be able to move this peanut down the sidewalk and take some action, however modest, by the end of this meeting."

1:05 p.m. … Hold your horses, Ned! There are six members of the subcommittee and four are needed for a quorum to take any action, acccording to racing commission executive director  LIsa Underwood. Unfortunately, there are only three "voting members" of the task force on hand at the beginning of the meeting. Does that say anything about the task force’s commitment to integrity? Hmmmmmmm.

1:10 p.m. …Sounds like Ned Bonnie may be filibustering till someone else shows up to give this group a quorum. Bonnie is talking about various white papers he has written on integrity issues in Kentucky. Earth to Ned: No one with authority has acted on those white papers. Try a different color.

Bonnie states that Keeneland employs the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau (TRPB), the so-called “security arm” of the Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America (not to be confused with the National Thoroughbred Racing Association). However, it is revealed Turfway Park, which is owned in part by Keeneland, does not use the TRPB. Is no one on this task force subcommittee curious why Keeneland doesn’t use TRPB at Turfway?

Bonnie says Kentucky’s racing regulators have been understaffed for many years in the area of security. “Feet on the ground is the most effective way to produce security on the backside,” he says. Bonnie says New York has 12 investigators. When vets show up at the back gate at a New York track, Bonnie says, the security chief for the New York State Racing and Wagering Board assigns an investigator to ride with them. New York’s security arm recommends that each state have a good security staff, well paid, but that the industry also needs a group, not unlike the Big Event Team that provides stable area security at major events. “If we are going to have the integrity the industry accepts the need for, then we are going to have to have the tools to get that done," Bonnie says.

1:20 p.m. … First up is Isidore Sobkowski, an entrepreneur who said he has developed a system for wagering security in conjunction with the Association of Racing Commissioners International Integrity Services. Sobkowski said he used to nail insider traders on Wall Street and was an interim consultant to the NTRA on wagering integrity back when the organization hoped to have an Office of Wagering Security. Sobkowski told Bonnie he spent two years trying to sell his pari-mutuel security system to the NTRA, but it “became clear” they weren’t going to buy it. As of Jan. 1, 2009, Sobkowski said, totes will be subject to a rule in New York State for “independent monitoring.” He said California, Oregon and other states will follow suit. Totes may be able to pass on costs TO THE CUSTOMER (see 2:15 p.m. update), Sobkowski added.

Izzy (easier to type than his full name) has some proprietary software called MonitorPlus that he said detects “potentially inappropriate activity in the transactional stream and security database.”

1:25 p.m. … Bad guys who want to break into the tote systems are getting smarter, Izzy says. Reminds me of "when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns."    He is offering a "turn-key solution. " Izzy says, "Plug it in, it works, take the plug out, it stops working."

1:30 p.m. … Still no quorum for this meeting.

1:35 p.m. … Sobkowski and RCI president Ed Martin came up with the idea of RCI Integrity Services at a diner outside of Saratoga. Now he is filibustering, talking about "artificial intelligence" and all the people who were too stupid to buy his services until now. 

1:40 p.m. ,,, Denny Oelschluger (an associate of Izzy’s … can’t they hire someone with an easy name to type?) talks about some of the actual results the MonitorPlus system has detected. Examples: an advance deposit wagering account with computer assisted wagearing that has a rate of return of 1.5 on all bets (the normal is less than 0.80); in looking at 862 races (5,800 wagering pools, over six days), Monitor Plus detected multiple instances of cancel delays (bets canceled after the close of wagering). The canceled bets are losers, suggesting a similar pattern to past post wagering on winning bets; win pool odds are being manipulated by canceled transactions. The system also picks up suspicious wagering on "fixed" or "boat" races, Denny says.

 1:50 p.m. … "How do we stop this?" Bonnie asks. I believe that’s why we are here, sir. I assume he is talking about the illegal wagering, but maybe he is talking about the presentation of MonitorPlus (see below).

2:00 p.m. …  "We are not going to serve dinner here tonight," Bonnie says. In other words, isn’t 45 minutes enough time to deal with this issue of integrity? Please sir, just a little more time, Izzy begs after that remark. To her credit, Lisa Underwood steps in to say that it would be a good idea if the system could be explained further for the members of the task force subcommittee.

2:05 p.m. … It just occurred to me that this MonitorPlus system does not have the stamp of approval of the Jockey Club (no Jockey Club officials are at the meeting), which in my opinion is going to severely impact its chances of approval. Those Jockey Club tentacles have a long reach.

2:08 p.m. … Izzy does a quick "how the system works" presentation. It includes a national database that analyzes wagers everywhere. Bonnie questions whether a national data base has jurisdiction on account wagering systems based off-shore in places like St. Kitts (where many of the rebate shops are located).  Izzy says on Oct. 18 those off-shores are going to be "read the riot act" in a meeting in Oregon. Not sure why. Again, it looks like this could meander down the path of "lack of national authority." Izzy says national legislation would help but then adds that the industry doesn’t seem to want that. 

2:10 p.m. … "Clustering" is explained by Izzy as unusual things that happen in a betting stream. Once clusters are found, they are analyzed with such things as a SNA or social network analysis that looks at who is involved (jockeys, trainers, owners), what is their record, who are their associates …a who, what, when, and maybe a why the unusual cluster of betting activity occurred. 

2:15 p.m. … Customers will be paid by the month; fees will be assessed by how much the MonitorPlus system is used, and its price is based on the handle. Mike Maloney, the horseplayer on the task force, asks how costs are passed on to customers. Industrywide it would cost $6 million, Izzy says, with the increase to be added to takeout (approximately .0004% of handle, based on $15 billion in national handle). Maloney says takeout is too high already, but that the small additional amount doesn’t bother him. A lot cheaper than the $50 million IBM wanted to charge a few years ago, Izzy says.

2:25 p.m. … Frank Kling, a member of the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority talks about the work his committee had done regarding problems related to the tote system before Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear disbanded the authority and replaced it with the racing commission and mostly filled it with people who helped get him elected. Sounds like any good work that committee may have done will soon be forgotten.

2:35 p.m. … Horseplayer Mike ($10 million in bets a year) Maloney takes the floor. "I’ll rely on my 30 years of hard knocks at the racetrack to help expalin this." Maloney refers to a white paper he wrote for the commission and says a year ago no one was talking about wagering integrity. "We’re at the very beginning of this process," Maloney says. "This is an opportunity for Kentucky to take the lead. No one has really stepped forward." Maloney believes that increased wagering security will lead to greater confidence among bettors, who may bet more in the future. "Our wagering system is flawed," he says. "I hope everyone on this task force agrees with that. … Any reasonable person would have to agree with that." Maloney sees problems with past posting (accidental, part of a sophisticated plan, larceny, incompetence, human error). There are delayed cancellations. "When they are used to take advantage at the racetrack, it’s basically stealing," he says. "Since we don’t have a national authority, every bettor, every participant depends on the state racing commission to protect their interests. Today we fall far short of that mark, and it’s in the hands of the racing commission. The racing commission is the protector of the bettor’s rights."

"Tracks don’t record (in minutes and seconds) when their races begin," Maloney says. "Betting sites are allowed to participate in our wagering pools without proper oversight. In order to protect all bettors’ rights, no one should be allowed to participate in any Kentucky racing pool unless they agree to a certain level of oversight."

2:45 p.m. … Maloney is stunned that no American track (until recently) records the actual start time of a race, in order to compare it to when the betting is cut off, then says an average group of eighth graders would make that as a requirement if they were to set basic rules for racing. Tote companies do record when the betting stops, Maloney said. Kling said that Nick Nicholson of Keeneland added the start time to television monitors for Keeneland’s races. The times between tote companies and racetracks are not currently synchronized. "Lacking a national body of oversight I don’t know where we start on this," Maloney says. "How hard is it to do that?" Maloney asks. "You’d think we could do that with a conference call in an hour. We’re not asking to reinvent the wheel or split the atom."

2:50 (at least according to my clock) p.m. … Maloney is still stuck on time. He relates how Sunday at Keeneland a clock on Keeneland’s monitor showing the time in hours/minutes/seconds and a monitor with a Belmont Park race showing hours/minutes/seconds each had a different time of day. He relates to how the Nevada Gaming Control Board closely monitors the game of Keno and how that regulatory agency would crack down on the kinds of problems that horse racing has. "In racing we know we have these problems," he said, "we just let it go on. Nobody pays a fine, nobody loses their license. Who takes the brunt of that? The bettor. And the game of racing. The industry is hurting itself by not policing itself."

2:58 p.m. … Maloney still going after them, saying that past-posting incidents only come up when they are discovered by the press. The tracks and the tote companies won’t admit it until they have to, he says. It’s up to the commissions he repeats. His solutions: 1) "invest in technology to make the longest wagering cycle no more than 15 seconds" (he refers to a five-year old study done in the wake of the 2002 Pick Six scandal at the Breeders’ Cup that called for the 15-second cycle, and said it hasn’t been done yet); 2) "use technology to directly link the pressing of the starter’s button to the closing of the wagering system" (currently stewards push a button to close betting); 3) "require tracks to record when their races start. I would like to see that be in the regulations"; 4) "require all tracks and tote companies to synch their time systems to one industry standard." Maloney said he is "so encouraged" after years of banging his head against the wall on these issues.

3:05 p.m. … Bonnie looks a bit deflated when he says the subcommittee can’t take action on anything today for lack of a quorum.

3:10 p,m. … Bonnie asks Maloney why something hasn’t been done yet. "The industry lacks oversight," Maloney tells him. Duh. 

3:13 p.m. … Owner/breeder Gary Biszantz, a member of the subcommittee speaks up. "I’m not sure why I’m here today," he says, then goes on to tell the story of how he told officials at the New York Racing Association five years ago that there was past posting going on and they said he was crazy. Biszantz pushes for a non-technological solultion. Close the pools at post time, before the horses are loaded into the gate, he says. "As a bettor, I’d have absolutely no problem with that," Maloney said. "But the tracks wouldn’t go for that," Biszantz answers back, then goes on about all the problems the industry faces because of the lack of oversight at nearly every level. "It’s total chaos," Biszantz emphasizes.

3:18 p.m. … Bonnie calls for a break. Maybe he can round up another committee member and get a quorum.

3:30 p.m. … Frank Fabian and Curtis Linnell from TRPB are introduced. Fabian, a former G-man who worked in the terrorism division of the FBI, is a smooth talker. He applauded the TRPB’s own wagering analysis program that the TRA funded to the tune of $600,000 and eventually fell into the lap of the Jockey Club. "For two years now, we have been doing quite a bit," he told Maloney. "We’ve been quite successful," Fabian said, adding the TRPB has the full support of all the Kentucky racetracks. Fabian said wagering anomalies have been identified and "reports have been filed" with the racetracks where those anomalies occurred. Maloney doesn’t look very convinced, and I am reminded of the reaction of one industry leader to Fabian’s similar presentation at a Jockey Club Round Table a couple of years ago in Saratoga Springs, N.Y. "That was total b.s." this person said to me after Fabian’s Round Table presentation. 

"I think TRPB is doing all it can to bring the engagement of wagering integrity in the environment we are in now," Fabian told the commission subcommittee. Fabian said the TRPB has analyzed off-shore wagering activities and is putting these betting shops through a due diligence process, but would not comment when questioned on whether or not anything found in that analysis was "alarming." Malone presses Fabian on whether or not RGS (a major rebate shop) has agreed to a due diligence process. Fabian employs an artful dodge, then introduces Linnell.

3:45 p,m. … Linnell gives a history lesson about how the NTRA blew through $3 million after the Pick Six scandal of 2002 without solving the wagering problems it was charged to examine.

3:50 p.m. … Linnell focuses his report on "stop betting," showing the varous ways and times betting can be stopped. As a representatiive of the racetracks (it should be remembered), he reminds the commission that betting should be left open as long as possible. A nifty bar graph on the close of betting shows that 23% of the entire win pool of a race is wagered between the "off time" when a race is scheduled to go  and the final close. Linnell calls it "counterproductive" to close wagering pools early because "betting device technology is improving."

4:00 p.m. … During a Q&A session on some of Linnell’s presentation, Biszantz complains that we are listening too much to the tote companies instead of doing the right thing. Malone shakes his head in agreement. Linnell returns to his presentation and focuses on factors that slow down the posting of final odds (which infuriate horse players who see the odds change midway through a race). One factor is the cancel-delay — the time that bets can be cancelled after betting has closed. Cancel delays are sometimes allowed for pari-mutuel clerks to make. Double hops from betting hub to betting hub can also slow odds, Linnell said, as can tracks who are not on-board an "almost final" tote update. (It’s all too complicated, which is probably the point of his presentation.)

4:05 p.m. The TRPB is investigating past-post incidents, Linnell said, using its wagering analysis tools. Those investigations are launched as a result of multiple points of contact, whether from tracks, commissions, major horseplayers and even England’s BetFair betting exchange, which takes bets on U.S. races. Linnell then explained several reasons for how past-post betting can occur, including human error or technology and hardware or software failure. Linnell is losing me again, talking about master systems, slave systems, and clones. It must mean something to someone.

The committee then discusses mistakes by tote companies that allow past posting and how they should be penalized in some way if the tote companies make a mistake similar to the kind that occurred several months ago when past-post wagering took place at Tampa Bay Downs on a race at Philadelphia Park that had already been run. "Every bet made was a winning bet!" Linnell joked.

4:20 p.m. … Linnell gave his solutions to the problems of the stop-betting issue: conduct daily testing of stop betting system; have a back-up to the stewards/judges function that currently stops betting; have a second stop-betting command; get rid of all cancel delays; and  have tote time recorded on the video feed from every track.

4:25 p.m. … Maloney wants more accountability and transparency regarding the public disclosure of past-posting incidents and their causes. "I see this as a big problem with the confidence of bettors," he said. Linnell didn’t disagree, laying out a series of actions that TRPB recommends in the event of past-posting incidents, including more disclosure and transparency on the incidents, and the extent of wagering that took place after a race began.

4:35 p.m. … Linnell wraps up his presentation, and I’m afraid that Bonnie didn’t live up to his promise to move the peanut up the sidewalk. No quorum, no peanuts, and no sidewalks are in sight. 

4:50 p.m. … Bonnie asks Fabian how Kentucky can improve its backstretch integrity related to the use of performance enhancing drugs in horses. "It’s through (on-track) investigators that helps us focus (TRPB’s) scant resources to work with commissions to have targeted investigations and targeted searches," Fabian said "We have to get back to some of the basics for our investigatve techniques. We have fallen short on having quality investigators."

5:00 p.m. … After a meandering discussing about the need for backstretch security to deal with catching cheaters who use performance enhancing drugs, Bonnie closes the meeting. "When we have a quorum we’ll take some action," he says.

Let’s hope someone holds the commission to that.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world

UNDERFUNDED IN KENTUCKY

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008
By Ray Paulick

The horse business is Kentucky’s signature industry, employing tens of thousands of people, generating over a billion dollars of revenue throughout the year, and putting the international spotlight on the Commonwealth each spring at the Kentucky Derby. Yet, in many ways, legislators and other government officials have been dealing with the industry almost as an afterthought.

Tax breaks given to lesser industries have not been granted to farmers whose agricultural product happens to be a horse instead of a cow. Kentucky’s legislature was late to the party to create an incentive fund to reward breeders for doing business in the Bluegrass State rather than shipping their breeding stock (and jobs) out of state where more lucrative incentives have been created. And now, one of the most troublesome challenges the racing industry faces – questions about the integrity of the sport and its pari-mutuel wagering foundation – has been hampered by ongoing budgetary shortfalls at the state agency that regulates racing.

Simply put, the integrity of racing in Kentucky is being jeopardized by indifference by some at the legislative and executive level to properly fund the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.

The problem goes back nearly eight years ago to the administration of Gov. Paul Patton, who cut $1 million dollars – nearly one-third – out of what was then known as the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority. Frank Shoop, then the chairman of the regulatory body, told the Paulick Report he thought the cuts were temporary and would be restored; they weren’t. Instead, the Racing Authority began assessing racetracks as much as $3,500 a day to pay for many of the functions that would previously have been funded by the state. “It’s so important to the signature industry of the state,” Shoop said. “They should have proper money to regulate the industry: transportation, insurance and other departments have proper regulatory budgets. This department has been short of money and short of money for years.

“I don’t know what the proper funding action should be,” Shoop added, “but something needs to be done that the legislature and governor can agree on.”

If something isn’t done, the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission will run out of money by Jan. 1, according to Tracy Farmer, a Thoroughbred owner and breeder and high-level operative in the Democratic Party that helped elect Gov. Steve Beshear last November. Farmer was named by Beshear to the current horse racing commission, where he serves as vice chairman, and is heading up a special Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing examining numerous issues related to racing and breeding.

Farmer told the Paulick Report that Kentucky’s General Assembly had $2 million set aside for the racing commission for the current fiscal year but they subsequently “raided our accounts to balance the (state) budget.” Farmer said he and others are looking at ways to fund the commission through such revenue items as the tax on claiming horses, which he estimated generates $2 million per year. “Money is being generated that’s not being put back into the industry,” Farmer said. “We’re looking at several different methodologies and will recommend one of them. This is the largest industry in the state. We have to fund the people who oversee it.”

State Sen. Damon Thayer, a Republican from Georgetown and a consultant in the racing industry who helped create the breeders’ incentive fund through existing revenue drawn from the tax on stallion seasons, pushed for legislation that would have Kentucky’s General Fund provide for the commission’s budget. That legislation failed, Thayer said, despite bi-partisan efforts to get it passed.

“The racetracks are struggling, the commission is without money, and the state is in a budget crisis,” Thayer said. “We need more money for the commission to have boots on the ground to do their job. And we were saying this before Eight Belles and Big Brown.” 

The death of Eight Belles in this year’s Kentucky Derby and the admission by trainer Rick Dutrow that Derby winner Big Brown raced on anabolic steroids (then legal) has prompted an outcry for tighter regulations, stricter medication rules, and more comprehensive drug testing. Anabolic steroids have recently been banned in Kentucky and several other states, and that ban requires additional testing be added to the existing drug testing program.

Thayer plans to introduce new legislation during the next session of the General Assembly.

“What needs to happen is Gov. Beshear needs to get behind legislation drafted by Sen. Ed Worley (D-Richmond) and me that would set up a reliable, recurring source of revenue for the racing commission so the tracks do not pay for drug testing and their own regulation. The racing commission needs to be funded by the pari-mutuel excise tax so we can expand drug testing to a respectable level.”

According to Thayer, the pari-mutuel tax currently helps fund the Kentucky Thoroughbred Development Fund, equine drug research and the University of Louisville’s equine business program.

The lack of funding came to a head at a recent meeting of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission when it was disclosed testing was not conducted for performance-enhancing milkshakes (TCO2 levels or bicarbonate loading) at Ellis Park this summer because of a personnel shortage. Since that disclosure, the commission’s chief veterinarian resigned his position.

“We were shocked to learn that no testing was conducted,” said Farmer.

It may have taken weeks for commission members to learn that there was no testing for milkshakes, but trainers probably knew instantly, permitting cheaters to prosper. The absence of testing shook the confidence of many horseplayers about whether the state is doing enough to stop performance-enhancing drugs from giving an edge to some trainers.

The racing commission’s executive director, Lisa Underwood, who was hired during the previous administration of Republican Gov. Ernie Fletcher, has plans to expand the size of the staff if funding is provided. She has submitted a plan to add investigators, state veterinarians and other full and part-time staff to better regulate racing and ensure its integrity.

Ed Martin, president of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, told the Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing when he became aware of how little was committed to Kentucky’s commission that he was “shocked at how low a priority the integrity of racing apparently was, especially considering how important the racing industry is to the state’s economy and identity.

Martin compiled a study of how much is committed to integrity issues in other major racing states and found that Kentucky, “instead of being first, is last.”

His study showed Kentucky commits $7,692 per race day, less than half of the $17,948 committed by Florida for integrity enforcement. Martin said the Kentucky commission is sorely lacking investigators to monitor backstretch activities. Kentucky has two investigators, he said, compared with 14 in New York, 15 in Pennsylvania, 17 in Florida, and 18 in California.

Perhaps the most glaring weakness in the funding can be seen in the fact that no resources have been dedicated to policing the pari-mutuel system,” Martin said.“Kentucky in the past has dedicated nothing in this area while other major racing states have made a considerable commitment in this area, not only in terms of staff, but to ensure that an independent computerized monitoring system is deployed to protect against past posting, odds manipulations, cyber crime, and larceny. In public forum after public forum, large bettors have expressed a growing concern about the lack of commitment to wagering security.

While some states have committed as many as six people to wagering security and made arrangements for independent monitoring, Kentucky has yet to commit one.

Many bettors are convinced the technology used in today’s pari-mutuel wagering system is archaic and able to be exploited by techno-savvy players who are making bets after the gates to a race have been opened. One member of the Kentucky Racing Commission who asked not to be named agreed: “There is no question people are betting after the horses are out of the gate,” he said. “They are somehow getting into the pool. It’s frightening.”

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world

MIKE MITCHELL’S CALIFORNIA RAPSHEET

Friday, September 19th, 2008

By Ray Paulick

Californian Mike Mitchell has produced a steady stream of winners – mostly in the claiming ranks – since taking out his trainer’s license in 1974. He also has been cited quite regularly for various rules violations, including numerous medication and medication procedural infractions, by track stewards and the California Horse Racing Board, the latest being a positive test for the Class 3 drug Procaine in Scat Thief, third-place finisher in a race at Del Mar Aug. 3.

Procaine is commonly found in the antibiotic Pencillin G.

The longtime California claiming king consistently ranks among meeting leaders at Santa Anita Park, Hollywood Park and Del Mar, and he usually cracks the top 50 in the national standings by earnings. Horses he trains have won $3.5 million thus far in 2008, and he’s winning at a 24% clip. Mitchell makes semi-frequent forays into graded stakes, as he did in 2007 when the $50,000 claim Sun Boat won Del Mar’s Grade 2 San Diego Handicap. Sun Boat died a month later after contracting laminitis.

Earlier this summer, Thoroughbred Times reported that Mitchell received 10 notifications for anabolic steroid positive tests during the transition period to ban the substance in California. The only trainer with more notifications, according to the article, was Del Mar’s leading trainer, John Sadler, who reportedly received 18 notifications. The article said there was a total of 38 notification letters to all trainers, which means Sadler and Mitchell allegedly accounted for 74% of them.

Those reported anabolic steroid notices do not go on Mitchell’s record at the CHRB or into the database of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, which compiles rulings from around the country. The RCI’s compilation of rulings involving Mitchell are shown below.

One of the more interesting rulings in the list of violations is a $5,000 fine in 2004 against Mitchell for an Acepromazine positive that occurred in 2003. Apparently, then CHRB executive director Roy Wood cut a deal with Mitchell for a fine and no suspension before the case even reached track stewards. According to a 2004 article in Bloodhorse magazine by Michael G. Wagner, Wood bargained for fines and no suspensions with trainers whose horses tested positive in order to save the racing board money spent on attorneys. 

According to the article, when stewards conducted a hearing on the matter with Mitchell and asked him to discuss how the case was resolved, he told them: "Talking to some of the (CHRB) investigators, they said, ‘You know they really don’t like to suspend anybody now — if you acknowledge the fact that it happened, and you want to pay the fine.’ … So I went through Roy Wood, talked to him. … I felt I just — you know, a 30-day suspension just would have been devastating to me. It would have been terrible. The fine was great."

Wood is no longer with the CHRB.

A hearing for Mitchell has been scheduled Oct. 11 at Santa Anita on the Procaine charge.

Below is Comprehensive Ruling Report on Mitchell from the RCI.

 Rulings Against: MICHAEL RAY MITCHELL 

46 total ruling(s) listed.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: LATS090 Date: 3/16/2007
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: LOS ANGELES TURF CLUB
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ALTERATION OF SEX OF HORSE
________________________________________

Ruling Number: LATS083 Date: 3/14/2007
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: LOS ANGELES TURF CLUB
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 3000 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: 06HP192/TC02 POSITIVE
________________________________________

Ruling Number: OTTS001 Date: 10/1/2006
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 500 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: 06DM072/1629 LATE DECLARATION
________________________________________

Ruling Number: OTTS005 Date: 10/1/2006
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 1000 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: 06DM075/1843 DICIOFENAC
________________________________________

Ruling Number: HRTH104 Date: 6/29/2006
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: HORSE INELIGIBLE TO START
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10101543 Date: 6/29/2006
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED AN INELIGIBLE HORSE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10092082 Date: 5/5/2005
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: SANTA ANITA PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: METHOCRBAMOL - "ALPHABETIC", 2ND RACE, 3-72-05.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10080229 Date: 11/11/2004
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: IMPROPERLY SHOD FOR TURF COURSE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10090571 Date: 11/11/2004
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: 04SA179/E0681/IMPROPERLY SHOD
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10073956 Date: 3/27/2004
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Promazine Promazine
Fine Amount: $ 5000 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: PROMAZINE, "SWEET STEPPER," 3RD RACE, 9/7/03.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10075126 Date: 2/29/2004
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Prednisolone Prednisolone
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: METHYPREDNISOLONE, "AREYOUTALKINTOME", 1ST RACE, 12-20-03, WINNER.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10065309 Date: 7/26/2003
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: LATE TO THE RECEIVING BARN.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10054303 Date: 6/27/2002
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: LATE TO RECEIVING BARN.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*10023128 Date: 3/17/2001
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: PENALTY FOR LATE DECLARATION.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*339217 Date: 5/8/1998
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Flunixin
Fine Amount: $ 300 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: EXCESS FLUNIXIN.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85390 Date: 6/8/1996
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO FILE A DECLARATION AT THE PROPER TIME.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85389 Date: 10/22/1995
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Methocarbamol Methocarbamol
Fine Amount: $ 750 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TWO POSITIVE TESTS FOR METHOCARBAMOL.
________________________________________
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85372 Date: 2/13/1991
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - EMPLOYMENT OF UNLICENSED PERSON.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85391 Date: 2/13/1991
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - EXCESS BUTAZOLIDIN FOUND INSAMPLE TAKEN FROM "SILVER STRAND", 2ND RACE ON 2-1.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85398 Date: 7/31/1990
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - FAILURE TO FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS OF AND DISRESPECT TO PADDOCK JUDGE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85373 Date: 9/7/1989
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $500 - FOUND EQUIPROXEN IN "BELLE MO", 1ST RACE, 8-30.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85374 Date: 9/1/1989
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $500 - FOUND EQUIPROXEN IN "SPEEDRATIC", 8TH RACE, 8/17/89.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85375 Date: 7/15/1989
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - FOUND ROBAXIN IN "SUCESS FORMULA", 3RD RACE, 7-4.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85376 Date: 1/28/1989
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Hydrocortisone Hydrocortisone Hydrocortisone
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1844 (MEDICATION-HYDROCORTISONE).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85399 Date: 8/22/1988
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - EXHIBITING CONDUCT UNBECOMING TO A LICENSEE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85377 Date: 7/9/1988
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - EMPLOYMENT OF UNLICENSED PERSON.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85392 Date: 12/5/1987
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - NEGLIGENCE IN RACE DAY BLEEDER MEDICATION PROCEDURES.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85378 Date: 11/25/1987
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: 00$200 - FAILURE TO DELIVER HORSE TORECEIVING BARN AT PROPER TIME.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85393 Date: 1/15/1987
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $300 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1844(C) (AUTHORIZED MEDICATION; MORE THAN ONE APPROVED DRUG SUBSTANCE, SECOND OFFENSE).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85400 Date: 1/3/1987
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1843(D) (MEDICATION IN EXCESS OF PERMITTED LEVEL - BUTAZOLIDIN).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85379 Date: 10/3/1986
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1843(D) (MEDICATION IN EXCESS OF PERMITTED LEVEL - BUTAZOLIDIN).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85401 Date: 6/11/1986
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1843(D) (MEDICATION IN EXCESS OF PERMITTED LEVEL - BANAMINE).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85380 Date: 2/22/1986
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - MEDICATION IN EXCESS OF PERMITTED LEVELS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85381 Date: 3/28/1984
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: SANTA ANITA PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - MEDICATION IN EXCESS OF LIMITS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85382 Date: 9/7/1983
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $200 - VIOLATION OF RULE #1845(E) (BLEEDER LIST).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85383 Date: 7/8/1982
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - FAILURE TO HAVE HORSE, A CONFIRMED BLEEDER, TREATED FOR RACE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85402 Date: 6/21/1981
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $300 - NEGLIGENCE IN PROCEDURE OF RACEDAY BLEEDER MEDICATION CONDITIONS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85384 Date: 5/29/1981
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - NEGLIGENCE IN PROCEDURE OF RACE DAY BLEEDER MEDICATION CONDITONS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85394 Date: 9/14/1980
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: DEL MAR
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $50 - FAILURE TO BE PRESENT AT PADDOCK TO SUPERVISE SADDLINGOF HIS HORSE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85385 Date: 5/23/1980
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $300 - NEGLIGENCE IN PROCEDURE FOR RACE DAY BLEEDERMEDICATION CONDITIONS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85395 Date: 2/17/1979
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: SANTA ANITA PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $300 - NEGLIGENCE IN PROCEDURE OF RACE-DAY BLEEDER MEDICATIONCONDITIONS.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85386 Date: 1/25/1979
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: SANTA ANITA PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - NEGLIGENCE IN PROCEDURE OF RACE-DAY BLEEDERMEDICATION.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85403 Date: 5/26/1978
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: HOLLYWOOD PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - FAILURE TO PROPERLY REGISTER A HEEL NERVED HORSE.
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85387 Date: 1/2/1978
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: SANTA ANITA PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $150 - VIOLATION OF RULE 1895 (UNLICENSED GROOM IN RECEIVINGBARN).
________________________________________

Ruling Number: *N*85388 Date: 12/10/1975
Issued By: California Racing Commission Facility: BAY MEADOWS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $50.00 FOR VIOLATION OF CHRB RULE 1629 (PENALTY FOR LATEDECLARATION). 

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report 

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for
all the latest news throughout the racing world

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

JONES SUSPENDED FOR CLENBUTEROL POSITIVE

Thursday, September 18th, 2008
By Ray Paulick

Stewards at Delaware Park have suspended trainer Larry Jones for seven days, fined him $500 and ordered a purse redistribution following a hearing on Tuesday concerning the discovery of a higher than permitted level of Clenbuterol in a post-race test for Two Bucks Stable’s Stones River, who won a June 8 allowance race at Delaware Park.

John Wayne, executive director of the Delaware Thoroughbred Racing Commission, told the Paulick Report that Jones indicated he would appeal the ruling, which was handed down on Wednesday. The commission is expected to hear the appeal on Oct. 21. Jones was granted a stay until that time.

The ruling against Jones was the first of any kind during the trainer’s 25-year career, according to the data base at the Association of Racing Commissioners International.

The penalties assessed Jones are significantly lower than the model rules recommended last month by RCI, which Wayne said call for a suspension of 60 days to six months and up to a $1,500 fine for Clenbuterol, a Class 3 drug according to RCI guidelines. The seven-day suspension and $500 fine is in line with other first-offense Clenbuterol rulings in the Mid-Atlantic reguib, according to Wayne.

“The testimony given would be taken into consideration by the stewards,” said Wayne, who did not attend the hearing. Wayne said mitigating circumstances also may be taken into consideration by stewards when ruling on medication violations.

The Stones River case gained national attention when Jim Squires, co-owner with wife Mary Anne of Two Bucks Stable, issued a statement after being notified of the positive test, saying that it was a “highly suspicious” case and suggested it may have involved sabotage of the horse or drug test. Squires was notified of the result two days before a Congressional hearing examining drugs and welfare issues related to Thoroughbreds; a one-time member of the Kentucky Racing Commission, Squires has been an outspoken critic of the drugging of horses. An author and former editor of the Chicago Tribune, he also wrote a blog for the New York Times during this year’s Triple Crown in which he called for a ban on anabolic steroids.

Squires also wrote a New York Times commentary citing the need for widespread industry reforms in the wake of the death on national television of the Larry Jones-trained filly, Eight Belles, after she finished second to Big Brown in the Kentucky Derby. No illegal drugs or anabolic steroids were found in the filly’s system during post-mortem testing.

 
“That a Two Bucks Stable horse in his care has become the first drug positive in his career in the highly charged atmosphere during the week of a congressional investigation focusing on drugs and safety in horse racing is highly suspicious,” Squires said in the written statement in June . “It reeks of a deliberate effort to impugn our credibility on the subject of drugs and damage the reputation of a highly successful trainer who has been unfairly and mistakenly blamed by a few critics outside the industry for the death of Eight Belles. … Larry Jones and I have both been prominent in the media voicing our support for the banning of steroids in the Thoroughbred industry and of more vigorous, uniform regulation of therapeutic drugs such as Clenbuterol, which can have steroidal effects.
 
“This test result on Stones River appears to be another miscarriage of justice in the offing, which we plan to challenge in every legal way possible,” the statement continued. “Holding Jones responsible for something beyond his control only aids and abets criminal behavior by people intent on hurting a competitor in particular or our industry in general. It will demonstrate once again how easy it is in Thoroughbred racing to impact a trainer’s livelihood and discredit both a horse and its owners.

“We have faith in the integrity of Delaware racing authorities and their interest in fair treatment. But we also are aware how staff and budget resources limit the ability of regulators to conduct thorough, successful criminal investigations. If this were a case of cheating in NASCAR or the NFL, there would be a commissioner with full authority and investigative expertise to step in and get to the bottom of it. In view of the highly charged public atmosphere surrounding the credibility of racing, the full resources of the Jockey Club, the NTRA, Breeders’ Cup and the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association should be offered to the Delaware Racing Commission and the Department of Agriculture to assure a fair and credible resolution of this matter. If necessary, the entire purse from the race should be used to supplement required resources. As an owner, Two Bucks Stable is far more interested in the credibility of our horse, our trainer and our industry than we are the money.”

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

ROID RAGE

Thursday, August 21st, 2008
By Ray Paulick

The definition of the term “illegal” has always been a bit fuzzy in the horse racing world, especially among trainers. Several years ago I asked a very prominent horseman point blank if he was giving the blood-doping agent EPO to his horses as racing’s rumor mill had it. His response was a non-answer. “It ain’t illegal.” I assured him that the drug was, in fact, quite illegal, and that there were harsh penalties for anyone who got caught using it.

His reply surprised me. “How can it be illegal if they can’t test for it?” he asked.

Reminded me a little of former President Bill Clinton’s testimony to a grand jury about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” Clinton said, explaining why he told White House aides there was nothing going on between he and the intern.

The definition of what’s illegal and when are legitimate questions concerning the phased-in ban of anabolic steroids by the California Horse Racing Board. Monday’s search of the barn of Del Mar’s leading trainer John Sadler and comments by state regulators indicate not everyone has been on the same page in regard to the ban on steroids. The CHRB and its medical director, Dr. Rick Arthur, hoped all trainers and veterinarians would follow the guidelines suggested during the process of reclassifying anabolic steroids from Class 4 to Class 3 drugs (according to Association of Racing Commissioners International guidelines). That apparently hasn’t been the case.

Sadler said he and his attorney, Donald Calabria, have discussed possible litigation as a result of the barn search.

The first directive was issued by the CHRB May 12. That was followed by a May 26 informational Q&A that suggested, among other things, that trainers and veterinarians “not use anabolic steroids beyond this point.” But the Q&A also said there would be a period beginning July 1 when testing for steroids would be conducted but nothing more than a warning letter would be sent for positive tests. On July 24, CHRB executive director Kirk Breed issued a directive saying, effective Aug. 1, the board would begin to “strictly enforce all regulations concerning anabolic steroids and will no longer issue ‘unofficial notices’ when the test samples reveal unauthorized levels of anabolic steroids …complaints will be filed against trainers or other licensees alleged to have violated the regulations.”

Then, on Aug. 8, Breed issued another advisory saying the CHRB “will begin enforcement of the amended (steroids) rule” effective with races run Sept. 4.

From my reading of those directives and advisories, steroids became “illegal” on Aug. 1, with violations going on a trainer’s record, but there would be no penalty for positive tests until Sept. 4 because of California’s bureaucratic process of adopting new regulations. Trainers would effectively be on an “honor system” between those two dates. That’s kind of like saying it’s illegal to go over the speed limit on a highway this month, but the police will only give you a warning if they catch you speeding. But next month, when they start issuing tickets with penalties, you’d better slow down!

“We are trying to implement this enforcement regulation in the most logical, timely way,” CHRB chairman Richard Shapiro said in one of the advisories. “We have given notice to the owners, trainers, veterinarians and other track personnel. It is part of the process. The administration of all anabolic steroids to horses in competition must stop immediately. Complaints will be issued. The hammer is coming down. In this way, we are protecting the public and all of those who are playing by the rules.”

Apparently it’s a velvet hammer that chairman Shapiro is wielding until Sept. 4. And I wonder how the public is being protected by having rules that have no teeth for enforcement. While most trainers followed the guidelines, some apparently have not, and the betting public has no way of knowing who is and who isn’t giving steroids to their horses.

One of Sadler’s principal owners is Gary Barber, who with his brother, Cecil, has won more races at Del Mar this season than anyone else. (Another of Sadler’s owners is CHRB commissioner Jerry Moss.) Barber was extremely upset about the barn search and any suggestions that Sadler is doing anything illegal.

“John is a stand-up guy and there is no reason to believe that there is anything he’s done beyond what’s in the rules and regulations,” Barber told the Paulick Report. “It’s quite shocking to me that these people without any evidence or knowledge have gone on a witch hunt and are trying to recover from the mistakes they made themselves.

“It’s all about steroids,” Barber continued. “I’m a total supporter for getting rid of them. We’re all for cleaning up the game. Lots of people have been receiving letters (warning of positive tests for steroids). These letters are purely notifications that in the future this will not be tolerated.

“You either should ban something or not;  there’s no in between. They should have said ‘no use, period.’ But now they regret the decision they made and are trying to find scapegoats. Wait till Sept. 4 and go after everybody at the same time. Write the rules and abide by them.”

CHRB executive director Breed, commenting in a published report, admitted it was a “mistake” to phase in the ban on steroids.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report


Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

VINERY SACKS ASMUSSEN

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Tommy Simon’s Vinery Stable has moved 21 horses from the barn of trainer Steve Asmussen, not long after an allegation of a positive test for traces of the therapeutic anesthetic  lidocaine from an Asmussen-trained  horse that won a maiden race at Lone Star Park in Texas May 10.

Tom Ludt, general manager of Vinery, confirmed the move to the Paulick Report but would not comment on why the change was made. Ludt said the horses have been distributed among the half-dozen other trainers Vinery employs: Josie Carroll, Larry Jones, Doug O’Neill, Todd Pletcher, Michael Stidham and Michael Trombetta.
Jones is currently awaiting results of a split sample in the wake of an alleged positive test in one of his horses that raced in Delaware for the therapeutic bronchodilator clenbuterol, a Class 3 drug according to the Association of Racing Commissioners International.
Asmussen received notice from the Texas Racing Commission late last month that Timber Trick, a 2-year-old filly owned by Gainesway Stable, tested positive for lidocaine, a Class 2 drug that can be used as a “blocker” but also is found in many non-pharmaceutical products. Texas prohibits any trace of the drug in test samples and is classified as a "zero tolerance" state. Asmussen has retained the legal services of prominent owner Maggi Moss, a trial attorney who put her law practice on hold several years ago to concentrate on her racing stable.
According to the Association of Racing Commissioners International database, Asmussen has a total of 74 rulings involving him, including a number of medication violations, dating back to 1990. He served a six-month suspension in late 2006-early 2007 for a mepivacaine positive in one of his horses racing in Louisiana.

Asmussen, the leading North American trainer by wins and earnings in 2008, is also the conditioner for 2007 Horse of the Year Curlin.

By Ray Paulick

Copyright ©2008, The Paulick Report

 
 
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick.

RCI RULINGS: ASMUSSEN NIPS DUTROW, 74 TO 72

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

 

The Paulick Report has obtained a copy of rulings involving trainer Steve Asmussen that are in the database of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, dating from December 1990 through May 2008. There are a total of 74 rulings in the RCI report, which may not include rulings in some states that are not members of the RCI or do not report rulings to the organization.

A similar RCI report on trainer Rick Dutrow shows 72 rulings. Each trainer is in the news because of complaints for recent alleged medication violations reported in the last 48 hours, Dutrow for a clenbuterol positive in Kentucky and Asmussen for a lidocaine positive in Texas. The Paulick Report has a separate article on the uses of these two medications.

The two men are high-profile trainers by virtue of their association with the two leading horses currently in training in the United States: Dutrow trains Kentucky Derby winner Big Brown and Asmussen trains 2007 Horse of the Year Curlin, whose majority owner, Jess Jackson, recently spoke at a Congressional hearing on a variety of subjects, including the problem with drugs in horse racing.

By Ray Paulick 

Copyright ©2008, The Paulick Report

Comprehensive Ruling Report
Rulings Against: STEVEN MARK ASMUSSEN
Legal Name: STEVEN MARK ASMUSSEN
 
 
74 total ruling(s) listed.
 
 
Ruling Number: 08-034 Date: 5/30/2008
Issued By: Arkansas Racing
Commission
Facility: OAKLAWN PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVE ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY FINED TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR BEING LATE TO THE PADDOCK WITH
"EXCLUSIVE PRAYER" FOR THE FIFTH (5TH) RACE ON SUNDAY,
MARCH 30, 2008, NECESSITATING A LATE SCRATCH.
 
 
Ruling Number: 16530 Date: 4/11/2008
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Failure to Bring Horse
to Test Barn
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s): Unknown
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: Failed to have horse in prerace testing area.Caused late scratch of Ide
of the Storm from 9th race 4/10/2008
 
 
Ruling Number: SHRP4076 Date: 3/22/2008
Issued By: Ohio Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Employing Unlicensed Help
Division: Horse Breed: Mixed
Drug(s): Unknown
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: GIVEN WRITTEN WARNING FOR EMPLOYING ARNOLFO
CAMACHO AS A GROOM FOR APPROXIMATELY FOUR WEEKS
WITHOUT ENSURING THAT HE WAS PROPERLY LICENSED
 
 
Ruling Number: LSP2107 Date: 6/23/2007
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Unknown
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: Possession of unlabelled/mislabelled drug– during compliance
inspection at Lone Star Park on 6/9/2007
Ruling Number: 07-005 Date: 3/4/2007
Issued By: Arkansas Racing
Commission
Facility: OAKLAWN PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVEN ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY FINED TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR FAILIRE TO HAVE REGISTRATION
PAPERS ON FILE PRIOR TO THE RUNNING OF THE FIFTH (5TH)
RACE FOR "DOWN HOME BOY" NECESSITATING A LATE
SCRATCH.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10101511 Date: 6/26/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: By Order of Commission
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 2500 Fine Paid: Yes
Suspension Start: 7/10/2006 Suspension End: 1/10/2007
Description: RE #ED15074, 5-18-06 UPHOLD STEWARDS RULING; SUSPENDED
6 MONTHS EFFECTIVE 7-10-06, FINED $2500
Ruling Number: *N*10100945 Date: 5/20/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE HORSE PROPERLY SHOD.
 
 
Ruling Number: 15080 Date: 5/20/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: Trainer STEVE ASMUSSEN, is hereby fined the sum of two hundred
dollars ($200.00) for failure to have his scheduled starter "MEESHIANO"
properly shod for the turf resulting in a late scratch from the 10th race
Friday
 
 
Ruling Number: 15074 Date: 5/19/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Penalty Stayed Upon
Appeal
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s): Unknown
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: SUSPENSIVE APPEAL GRANTED
 
 
Ruling Number: 15074 Date: 5/18/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: The Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, official
chemist for the Louisiana State Racing Commission, reported that
blood/urine sample #DD 31999 taken from the four year old filly "NO
END IN SIGHT" the unplaced
 
 
Ruling Number: 15074 Date: 5/18/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Positive Test/With Split
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s): Mepivacaine
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 5/22/2006 Suspension End: 11/21/2006
Description: NO END IN SIGHT LAST PLACE FINISHER OF 6TH RACE 3/24/2006.
tRAINER SUSPENDED SIX MONTHS AND REFERRED TO RACING
COMMISSION.PRESENCE OF DRUG CONFIRMED BY REFEREE
LAB.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10099827 Date: 4/10/2006
Issued By: Arkansas Racing
Commission
Facility: OAKLAWN PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVE ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY FINED ONE HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($100.00) FOR FAILURE TO HAVE THE REGISTRATION
PAPERS FOR "W.W. CONQUISTADOR" ON FILE IN THE RACING
OFFICE PRIOR TO THE RUNNING OF THE SECOND (2ND) RACE
ON 03-25-06 NECESSITATING A LATE SCRATCH. VIOLATION OF
ARC RULE #1248.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10099104 Date: 2/25/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE FOAL PAPERS ON FILE.
Ruling Number: 14916 Date: 2/25/2006
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: paid fine
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10098574 Date: 12/31/2005
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVE ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY FINED THE SUM OF
$200.00 FOR ENTERING AN INELIGIBLE HORSE "QUIET PATRIOT"
IN THE FIRST RACE DECEMBER 30, 2005 RESULTING IN A LATE
SCRATCH (UNCOUPLED ENTRY).
 
 
Ruling Number: 14815 Date: 12/31/2005
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: paid fine at LaD 12.30.2005
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10095902 Date: 9/16/2005
Issued By: Kentucky Racing
Commission
Facility: TURFWAY PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 250 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE FOAL PAPERS ON FILE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10082761 Date: 2/7/2005
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE FOAL PAPERS ON FILE.
 
 
Ruling Number: 14156 Date: 2/7/2005
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: pd fine fg 2/12/05
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10079795 Date: 10/13/2004
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: HAWTHORNE
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: OWNER/TRAINER STEVEN M. ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY ASSESSED
A CIVIL PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR
FAILING TO HAVE HIS HORSE ARABIAN NIGHTS TATTOOED
PRIOR TO THE FIFTH RACE ON OCTOBER 10 2004 WHICH
NECESSITATED THE LATE SCRATCH OF HIS ENTRY.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10074748 Date: 5/3/2004
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: EVANGELINE DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILURE TO HAVE FOAL PAPERS ON FILE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10074079 Date: 4/4/2004
Issued By: New Mexico Racing
Commission
Facility: SUNLAND PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: UNLICENSED HELP FOUND IN BARN.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10073934 Date: 3/20/2004
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Acepromazine
Fine Amount: $ 1000 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ACEPROMAZINE, "MAMBOALOT," 8TH RACE, 2/15, WINNER.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10073609 Date: 3/14/2004
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED AN INELIGIBLE HORSE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10073610 Date: 3/14/2004
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED AN INELIGIBLE HORSE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10074674 Date: 2/14/2004
Issued By: New Mexico Racing
Commission
Facility: SUNLAND PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: LATE TO PADDOCK.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10074350 Date: 1/8/2004
Issued By: New Mexico Racing
Commission
Facility: SUNLAND PARK
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Oxyphenbutazone
Oxyphenbutazone
Phenylbutazone
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: GIVEN A WRITTEN WARNING — PHENYLBUTAZONE,
OXYPHENBUTAZONE, "CIELO GIRL", 10TH RACE, 12-16-03,
WINNER.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10074323 Date: 12/12/2003
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Clenbuterol
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 12/18/2003 Suspension End: 1/1/2004
Description: CLENBUTEROL, "CITY SLEEPER", 9TH RACE, 8-16-03, WINNER.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10066219 Date: 7/5/2003
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN A PROPER MANNER.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10070708 Date: 7/4/2003
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: LOUISIANA DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: RULING ISSUED IN ERROR SEE RULING #12768
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10065524 Date: 7/3/2003
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 1500 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 7/7/2003 Suspension End: 7/13/2003
Description: PROMAZINE, "LAHINCH," 7TH RACE, 4/19.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10063540 Date: 5/28/2003
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: ARLINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVEN M. ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY ASSESSED A CIVIL
PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR FAILING TO
HAVE THE FOAL PAPERS OF HIS HORSE FORTY NINE DEEDS ON
FILE IN THE RACING OFFICE NECESSITATING THE LATE
SCRATCH OF HIS ENTRY FROM THE SEVENTH RACE
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10061800 Date: 3/21/2003
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED A CLAIMED HORSE IN ANOTHER JURISDICTION.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10060911 Date: 2/1/2003
Issued By: New Mexico Racing
Commission
Facility: SUNLAND PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO COMPLETE THE LICENSING PROCESS FOR HIS
OWNER.
 
 
Ruling Number: 321000464 Date: 1/23/2003
Issued By: Florida Division of
Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Facility: JEFFERSON COUNTY
KENNEL CLUB
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 500 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 2/16/2003 Suspension End: None
Description: 321-Gulfstream Park Racing Association Resp, Lic. #1415413 Horse:
IRISH BOOTS Drug: Dimethyl Sulfoxide Cl 5 (Third DMSO positive in
2003) Sample: 918425 Lab: 94223K Board of Stewards issued Ruling
#321-000464 against respondent and fined him $500.00. Fine paid
2/16/03 by Ck. #7322.
 
 
Ruling Number: 321000463 Date: 1/20/2003
Issued By: Florida Division of
Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Facility: JEFFERSON COUNTY
KENNEL CLUB
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 250 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 2/16/2003 Suspension End: 3/2/2003
Description: 321-Gulfstream Park Racing Association Resp. Lic. #1415413 Horse:
FATHER MARTIN Drug: Dimethyl Sulfoxide (2nd DMSO positive in
2003) Sample #918374 Lab #93259K Board of Stewards issued Ruling
#321-000463 against Respondent; fined $250.00. Fine paid 2/16/2003
by Ck. # 7321.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10060969 Date: 1/19/2003
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE HORSE PROPERLY SHOD.
 
 
Ruling Number: 321000456 Date: 1/5/2003
Issued By: Florida Division of
Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Facility: JEFFERSON COUNTY
KENNEL CLUB
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 2/1/2003 Suspension End: 2/16/2003
Description: 321-Gulfstream Park Racing Horse: BELLENGRATH Resp. Lic.
#1415413 Drug: Dimethyl Sulfoxide CL 5 Sample: 916057 Lab: 90283K
02/01/03 Rec’d Stewards Ruling #321-000456, finding Respondent in
violation of 61D-6.011, #1, 2, d1, which resulted in paying a fine of
$100.
 
Ruling Number: 916057 Date: 1/5/2003
Issued By: Florida Division of
Pari-Mutuel
Wagering
Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 2/1/2003 Suspension End: 2/16/2003
Description: 321-Gulfstream Park Racing Horse: BELLENGRATH Resp. Lic.
#1415413 Drug: Dimethyl Sulfoxide CL 5 Sample: 916057 Lab: 90283K
02/01/03 Rec’d Stewards Ruling #321-000456, finding Respondent in
violation of 61D-6.011, #1, 2, d1, which resulted in paying a fine of
$100.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10052545 Date: 4/28/2002
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO SATISFY THE CLAIMING ELIGIBILITY REQUIRMENTS.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10051389 Date: 3/26/2002
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE THE REQUIRED 60 DAY WORKOUT.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10051409 Date: 3/21/2002
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE THE REQUIRED 60 DAY WORKOUT.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10045062 Date: 3/20/2002
Issued By: Arkansas Racing
Commission
Facility: OAKLAWN PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED AN INELIGIBLE HORSE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10051430 Date: 3/2/2002
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE FOAL PAPERS ON FILE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10037013 Date: 12/21/2001
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: DISRESPECTFUL TO A STEWARD.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10036584 Date: 12/8/2001
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: POSSESSION OF IMPROPERLY LABELLED MEDICATION IN THE
BARN AREA.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10033870 Date: 9/3/2001
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: ARLINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: OWNER/TRAINER STEVE M. ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY ASSESSED A
CIVIL PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR
FAILING TO HAVE A PUBLISHED WORK FOR THE HORSE INSTANT
CHARMER NECESSITATING A LATE SCRATCH FROM THE THIRD
RACE ON SEPTEMBER 3 2001 AT ARLINGTON P
 
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10028773 Date: 6/29/2001
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FIRST WARNING — FUROSEMIDE, "HAIL TO PRINCESS," 9TH
RACE, 6/7.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10023134 Date: 3/19/2001
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Flunixin
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FLUNIXIN, "DEVIL ROYALE," WINNER, 5TH RACE, 3/9.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10019733 Date: 1/15/2001
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Clenbuterol
Fine Amount: $ 1000 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: CLENBUTEROL, "DIXIE BUST," WINNER, 2ND RACE, 12/21.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10019954 Date: 12/30/2000
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FUROSEMIDE, " J’S SILVER DOLLAR," 9TH RACE, 11/26.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10030224 Date: 12/30/2000
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERING INELIGIBLE HORSE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10019380 Date: 12/27/2000
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 200 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO ENSURE HIS HORSE WAS EQUIPPED PROPERLY
(TURF SHOES).
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10033288 Date: 11/26/2000
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: HIRING UNLICENSED HELP — 2ND OFFENSE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10033433 Date: 11/26/2000
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: HAWTHORNE
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: ENTERED INELIGIBLE HORSE CAUSING LATE SCRATCH.
 
 
Ruling Number: 00-RP-126 Date: 9/15/2000
Issued By: Oklahoma Horse
Racing Commission
Facility: REMINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Failure to Have Current
Negative Coggins on
File
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s): Unknown
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Yes
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: VIOLATED OHRC RULE #325:35-1-5 TRAINER RESPONSIBILITY.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10014992 Date: 6/21/2000
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 750 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: POSITIVE FOR FORSEMIDE, "PROMISE OF WAR," 8TH RACE, 5/17;
"MADDIES PROMISE," 10 RACE, 5/20; "EQUISTAR," 9TH RACE,
5/24.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10005339 Date: 6/17/1999
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 50 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: POSSESSION OF UNLABELLED MEDICATION. (PROPERLY
LABELLED SAME DAY).
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10004593 Date: 6/4/1999
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FOUND POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL IN "WE ARE STRIKING," 9TH
RACE, 5-22.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10003575 Date: 4/22/1999
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 11/25/1999 Suspension End: 1/9/2000
Description: RE: 3-8 — RULING UPHELD.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10002779 Date: 3/8/1999
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Ketorolac
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: 3/10/1999 Suspension End: 4/23/1999
Description: TESTED POSITIVE FOR KETOROLAC FROM "ELMIRA GULCH", 9TH
RACE, 1/28.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292522 Date: 4/1/1998
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: SPORTSMAN’S PARK
Ruling Type: Positive Drug Test
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s): Phenylbutazone
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: WARNING (FIRST OFFENSE) FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF
PHENYLBUTAZONE AND OXYPHENYLBUTAZONE.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292523 Date: 3/18/1998
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: SPORTSMAN’S PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: HIRING UNLICENSED HELP.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*10070707 Date: 3/12/1998
Issued By: Louisiana Racing
Commission
Facility: FAIR GROUNDS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 0 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: TRAINER STEVEN ASMUSSEN IS HEREBY FINED THE SUM OF
$50.00 FOR FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH SECURITY.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292524 Date: 11/19/1997
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: HAWTHORNE
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: INADVERTENTLY MEDICATING HORSE.
 
 
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292521 Date: 11/1/1997
Issued By: Kentucky Racing
Commission
Facility: CHURCHILL DOWNS
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF HIS
HORSE "ALWAYS HOT".
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292519 Date: 6/19/1997
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: Lone Star Park
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FAILED TO HAVE HORSE IN THE PRE-RACE HOLDING BARN.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292518 Date: 4/9/1996
Issued By: Arkansas Racing
Commission
Facility: OAKLAWN PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: EXPIRED COGGINS.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292516 Date: 10/17/1995
Issued By: Texas Racing Commission Facility: SAM HOUSTON RACE
PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FOUND TO BE IN POSSESSION OF UNLABELED MEDICATION.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292515 Date: 6/18/1994
Issued By: Illinois Racing Commission Facility: ARLINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - ENTERED AN INELIGIBLE HORSE (ON BLEEDERS’ LIST),
LATE SCRATCH.
 
 
Ruling Number: 92-RP-083 Date: 4/1/1992
Issued By: Oklahoma Horse
Racing Commission
Facility: REMINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Disrespectful to Racing
Official
Division: Horse Breed: Thoroughbred
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Yes
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: FINED FOR USING PROFANE LANGUAGE TO A RACING OFFICIAL.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292514 Date: 4/1/1992
Issued By: Oklahoma Horse
Racing Commission
Facility: REMINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - USED PROFANE LANGUAGE TO A RACING OFFICIAL.
 
 
Ruling Number: *N*292520 Date: 12/2/1990
Issued By: Oklahoma Horse
Racing Commission
Facility: REMINGTON PARK
Ruling Type: Unknown
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: $100 - WAS INVOLVED IN A VERBAL ALTERCATION WITH A
PARKING LOT ATTENDANT.
 
 
Ruling Number: 90-RP-208 Date: 12/2/1990
Issued By: Oklahoma Horse
Racing Commission
Facility: Unknown
Ruling Type: Altercation
Division: Unknown Breed: Unknown
Drug(s):
Fine Amount: $ 100 Fine Paid: Not Submitted
Suspension Start: None Suspension End: None
Description: fined $100.00 for involvment in verbal altercation. The fine has been
paid.

FIRST-TIME OFFENDER?

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

The wise guys are out in force: “Knock me over with a feather,” they are saying in response to the latest news about Rick “No Show” Dutrow, who will be handed a 15-day suspension from the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority, which also will redistribute the $20,000 second-place purse won by Salute the Count in the Aegon Turf Sprint Stakes at Churchill Downs May 2. The former claiming horse owned by Michael Dubb and Robert Joscelyn tested positive for an extremely high level of clenbuterol, a bronchial dilator that has come into vogue as a training aid among many horsemen over the last 10 years but is not permitted on raceday.

The violation came one day before Dutrow-trained Big Brown won the Kentucky Derby.

Why just 15 days for Dutrow, who according to the Association of Racing Commissioners International has at least 72 previous rulings against him for a variety of violations since 1976? The New York Times, which broke the story, quotes former trainer John Veitch, the chief state steward for the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority , as saying 15 days and forfeiture of the purse would be Dutrow’s penalty for a first offense, according to Kentucky rules. Veitch told the paper the level detected (and confirmed by an independent lab of Dutrow’s choosing) was two times that of the legal threshold and the highest he had seen in four years as Kentucky’s top racing official.

First offense?

If I get speeding tickets in 25 states and am then caught in Kentucky going 10 miles over the limit, I hope I can get the same kid-glove treatment and am looked upon as a first-time offender. Somehow, I doubt that will happen. Why, then, is Dutrow’s track record of rules violations in multiple states being ignored in Kentucky?

Larry Jones, the trainer of star-crossed Kentucky Derby runner-up Eight Belles, recently had a positive test for clenbuterol in Delaware on a horse owned by Jim Squires. By all accounts, if confirmed in a split sample, this would be Jones’ first medication violation in 25 years of training. According to Delaware Park stewards, the standard penalty for a first offense would be a $500 fine, forfeiture of purse and a seven-day suspension of the trainer. Not much different than the sanctions that will be imposed on Dutrow.

Considering the number of violations Dutrow has had during his career (including a 2004 case involving clenbuterol in New York), the Kentucky penalty given him would be the proverbial slap on the wrist.

This is the kind of problem that federal lawmakers looked into last week, when Dutrow was among a group of owners, trainers, veterinarians, regulators and racing officials asked to testify before a House of Representatives subcommittee hearing on Thoroughbred racing and breeding. The trainer was the only no show, however, claiming to be ill. During the hearing, House members zeroed in on racing’s inability to enforce national standardized rules and penalties due to the structure that has 38 different state racing commissions regulating the sport and the absence of a league office that other major league sports have.

If the Congressional inquiry made racing industry leaders look impotent then, how do they look now, in the wake of the wrist slap against Dutrow?

This case is only going to further motivate Congress to take action, unless someone in the Thoroughbred industry moves beyond forming committees, making recommendations and pontificating about “consensus building” and the “power of persuasion.”

It is clear the Thoroughbred industry, as presently structured, is incapable of policing itself adequately.

By Ray Paulick

Copyright ©2008, The Paulick Report