Posts Tagged ‘past-post betting’

By Ray Paulick
For the second time in five days, wagering on a horse race at an American racetrack was allowed to continue until after the contest had been run. The latest incident, which involved Wednesday night’s second race at Penn National in Pennsylvania, came on the heels of a tote system failure at Hollywood Park on Saturday.

The Penn National tote failure was similar to the Hollywood Park problem in that a stop-betting signal was not communicated when the race began. United Tote, which has the contract at the Penn National Gaming racetracks, experienced a system-wide failure, allowing on-track and simulcast wagers to continue during and after  the running of the race. The Hollywood Park stop-betting signal from Scientific Games Racing tote equipment was not received by 33 simulcast sites.

John Pricci first wrote about the Penn National problem at Horse Race Insider.

United Tote personnel informed track officials about a communications router failure just as the second race was beginning, Chris McErlean, vice president of racing for Penn National, told the Paulick Report. “The stop betting command which is initiated here did not go out on track or anywhere in the network,” McErlean said. “The pools remained open and were opened well past the finish of the race.”

It was apparent wagers were made after the start of the race, but because United Tote cannot see details on every wager made, track officials were unable to segregate the late bets from those made before the race began, McErlean added. “We discussed with them the various scenarios and the best thing we could do was call the race a no-contest,” he said. “We took the position that the pools had been compromised, and based on the information we had at the time we took the most conservative path and made what we thought was the right decision.”

In Hollywood Park’s past-posting incident on Saturday, all  wagers from the 33 sites where the stop-betting signal was not received were thrown out of the pari-mutuel pools and the money refunded to bettors who retained their tickets.

A total of $164,000 was wagered on the race, which McErlean said may have been a little higher than normal but not exceedingly so. All wagers were refunded, though horseplayers were kept in the dark for some time as to why the race was not declared official. Those who had losing bets may have discarded their tickets before the  race was declared "no contest."

McErlean admitted that the decision was not communicated as well as it should have been across the wagering network. “I will say in terms of communication there was confusion,” he said. “The race was never made official. From a display point of view, the television monitors may have displayed official without tote prices. That was obviously not.”

The Pennsylania Horse Racing Commission and Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau were notified of the problems, McErlean said.

To his knowledge, this was the first time since McErlean joined Penn National Gaming in December 2006 that any of the company’s six tracks have experienced this type of problem. “It appears to be either networking or equipment failure involving a communications router ,” McErlean said. “The issue that has to be discussed and talked about is where is the potential safety valve if one system fails or one part fails. What is the backup or Plan B?”

Good question, and one racing regulators must demand from the tote companies that are jeopardizing the integrity of the wagering systems that are the foundation of this game. 

Be sure to vote in today’s Daily Paulick Poll asking whether you have confidence in the security of the U.S. pari-mutuel wagering systems.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

By Ray Paulick
There was a table-pounding moment Tuesday afternoon at the annual convention of the Association of Racing Commissioners International when Ed Martin, president of the group seen widely as a do-nothing organization, admonished its members to do something.

I felt, for the first time in over 20 years of reporting on the RCI, that it actually might have a pulse. I flashed back to the cherubic Tony Chamblin, whose primary job as longtime head of the RCI was trying to keep his own job. When he could no longer win that battle, he left behind a legacy of a civil war among regulators, one that resulted in two national organizations, RCI and the splinter group North American Pari-Mutuel Regulators Association. Racing industry veteran Lonny Powell replaced Chamblin in 2001, and in his tenure helped put Humpty Dumpty back together. Martin finished the job in 2005, when he succeeded Powell as president of RCI, and the merger of the two organizations was completed in 2006.

So, a cynic might say, we once again have just one useless national organization of regulators with no real authority, instead of two.

Martin is hoping to change that image of the RCI, but it was clear in his rising voice and pointed words that his frustrations are growing. Betting scandals and pari-mutuel pool tampering continues, Martin said, but regulators do nothing. The industry spends $35 million on drug testing to little avail, he said, but virtually nothing on wagering security, the economic foundation of the business. Regulators  at the RCI convention hear proposals for how wagering security can be improved and then go home and do nothing. Tracks, he said, say they want to do their own thing but end up doing nothing.

Professional horseplayer Mike Maloney outlined ongoing problems with past-post betting and pool tampering and said regulators exacerbate the problems and suspicions about the integrity of wagering by shielding the incidents from the public. There must be transparency before you can insure integrity, Maloney said.

I had the opportunity to address the regulators at the RCI convention and tried to impress upon them that horseplayers are fed up like I’ve never seen before. I asked readers of the Paulick Report to tell me what they think should be the top priorities of state racing commissioners, and owners, breeders, trainers and horseplayers responded with legitimate and well-reasoned concerns. Foremost among them were calls for tougher enforcement of medication violations and uniform rules from one state to another, something that might not have been important 25 years ago when racing was a localized sport. Today, with interstate simulcasting accounting for nearly 90% of pari-mutuel handle, it is imperative that the rules are the same across the board: on medication, drug testing, penalties, wagering, and licensing.

There is cheating going on, and people in this industry know it, whether it’s medication violations by trainers and veterinarians who know how to game the system (and only get a slap on the wrist when they’re caught) or gamblers using off-shore account-wagering businesses that are not adequately regulated.

Your comments (all of which are being made available to RCI members) helped me convey to regulators how critically important it is for them to take serious action. If they don’t, I suggested, the federal government will.

That point was driven home earlier in the day by Keeneland president and CEO Nick Nicholson, who is also chairman of the American Horse Council and as a former U.S. Senate aide knows how Washington can work. “This particular Congress is not concerned where the problem is but they are determined that they will be part of the solution,” Nicholson said. “This Congress is going to be activist.”

Nicholson brought the Council of State Governments into play last year in hopes of creating an alternative to federal intervention, using interstate compacts, something that is common to other industries. RCI’s president, Ed Martin, also sees interstate compacts as a realistic solution to the challenge of having 38 state regulatory boards walking in lock-step with one another. But it’s going to be up to the individual state racing commissions to make a compact work.

John Mountjoy, director of policy and research for the Council of State Governments, explained to RCI members how interstate compacts work and outlined their various benefits. Among other things, Mountjoy said, interstate compacts offer a federal solution “without Washington.” Uniform rules, operations and training can be achieved through an interstate compact, he said, while allowing flexibility and state sovereignty.

Interstate compacts can’t happen overnight, he added, indicating it could take several years to have one fully operational.

This much we know. There is a crisis of confidence in this industry among the biggest stakeholders–the horseplayers who fund the economic engine with billions of dollars of bets each year. But those stakeholders wagered fewer dollars on U.S. racing in 2008 than in any year since 1998, and this year’s handle promises to be even lower.

Racing commissioners from different states have shown over time they are incapable of taking the necessary steps to address the fundamental problems. There may be a pulse at the RCI that I didn’t sense 10 years ago, and there are good people involved at RCI and many state racing commissions. However, I’m afraid that when most of the commissioners and their paid staff return home from the RCI 2009 convention, it will be business as usual and nothing significantly will change.

That will open the door to Congress and let the federal government come up with its own solution.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

By Ray Paulick

Under normal circumstances, handle on the 2008 Breeders’ Cup World Championships would blow past all previous betting records. But the economic crisis gripping the United States and many other countries is anything but normal.

This year’s World Championships take place over two days at Santa Anita Park Oct. 24-25 and includes 14 Breeders’ Cup races, up from the 11 held at Monmouth Park in 2007 when the event was first expanded to two days.  Last year’s two-day handle was a Breeders’ Cup record $147 million ($31.5 million on the Friday card and $115.7 million on Saturday), but the total was below expectations by at least 10% because of the extremely wet weather conditions. The previous all-sources wagering record was set in 2006 when $140.3 million was wagered on eight Breeders’ Cup races on a single day at Churchill Downs.

Ken Kirchner, the president of FalKirk International and the longtime wagering consultant to the Breeders’ Cup, wouldn’t make any predictions about this year’s handle. “It’s hard to say where the economy is going to be in 10 days,” Kirchner told the Paulick Report. “Everybody has been down between 10% and 20% in wagering all summer and fall. Things can change quickly, but certainly the trend isn’t good.”

Kirchner hopes some fans have been stockpiling a bankroll for the big event. “It’s not a positive situation,” he said, “but we’re going to have very strong and full fields and some people may just be waiting for this as opposed to betting the run-of-the-mill races.”

Holding the Breeders’ Cup’s traditional dirt races on a synthetic surface doesn’t bother Kirchner. “The new (Pro-Ride) track seems to be playing fair,” he said. “If the horses show up, the bettors will follow.

Kirchner did say scheduling the Breeders’ Cup on the last weekend of the month is a disadvantage because of consumer spending habits. “Having it at the beginning of the month (when Social Security and other fixed income checks arrive) makes it 3% to 5% stronger,” he said.

The Breeders’ Cup had the first $100-million wagering day in North American racing history Nov. 6, 1999, at Gulfstream Park. That was the year the Filly & Mare Turf was added, making it an eight-race championship.

By comparison, Kentucky Derby day betting topped $100 million for the first time in 2000, and it’s grown significantly since. Churchill Downs now holds the North American record of $175 million established on the 2006 Kentucky Derby program. Add wagering from Friday’s Kentucky Oaks program ($33 million in 2006), and the total tops $208 million.

It’s clear the Breeders’ Cup braintrust is trying to emulate the success of the Friday Oaks/Saturday Derby format at Churchill Downs by bundling all of the filly and mare races on this year’s Friday program (and by requiring fans to purchase seats for both days as Churchill Downs has done with the Oaks and Derby). The Breeders’ Cup doesn’t have the cachet of the Kentucky Derby (or the Oaks for that matter), though that doesn’t mean the new format will not work.

With the additional Breeders’ Cup races, better weather and a more traditional big race venue (Santa Anita vs. Monmouth Park), handle will increase this year. My prediction is for $175 million in wagers over the two championship days. Without all the economic uncertainty, $200 million would seem realistic.

SPEAKING OF BETTING, REMEMBER THAT JUNE 28 RACE AT PHILADELPHIA PARK when wagers were allowed at some Florida simulcast sites after the race had been run? The Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau issued a report and sent it to the tracks involved – Philadelphia Park and Tampa Bay Downs – but according to Peter Berube, Tampa Bay’s vice president and general manager, he still doesn’t understand exactly how the Philly Park past-post bets occurred.

“I have the report,” Berube told the Paulick Report last week. “It’s highly technical but draws no conclusions and places no blame on anybody. Apparently it was a sequence of events that took place between the tote companies.”

Scientific Games (formerly Autotote), which handles wagers for Philadelphia Park, was experiencing technical problems with its system that day at races from Philly and Delaware Park. Tampa Bay Downs and 11 other North Florida wagering sites (dog tracks and jai-alai frontons) use AmTote. A communications breakdown between the systems failed to send a stop-bet signal to AmTote.

Joe Wilson, chief operating officer of Philadelphia Park, did not return phone calls seeking a comment.

According to Berube, the past-post wagering was limited to his track, with most of the past-post bets placed by one customer, who is known as a big bettor at Tampa Bay. “What’s in the report would lead me to believe that there was no abnormal spike in bets overall,” Berube said. “We were the 14^th ranked site in terms of total bets (on the fourth race, the race in question), but first in cashes. We were the only site that had a negative settlement (with more winnings that money wagered).”

Berube said he interviewed the horseplayer who allegedly made the past-post wagers but allowed him to collect on his winning bets. “We brought people in and spoke with them but after Philadelphia Park priced the race I couldn’t tell them to give us the money back.

“I’ve been here 15 years and have never experienced anything like this before,” said Berube, whose father, Paul Berube, is the former head of the TRPB.

Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.