Posts Tagged ‘new york state racing and wagering board’

GILL’S GANG OF MISFITS

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

By Ray Paulick
It was no dream team that Michael Gill assembled to run his racing operation in Pennsylvania over the past year, at both his farm in Oxford, Pa., and at Penn National race course near the state capital of Harrisburg. In fact, the cast of felons and rule breakers working for Gill has proven to be a regulatory nightmare for the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission charged with policing the sport in the Keystone State.

In the wake of the highly publicized decision Jan. 23 by Penn National jockeys to boycott races with Gill-owned runners, track management has asked the moribund racing commission to investigate allegations by the jockeys that horses prepared by Gill’s two principal trainers present a safety risk and have suffered a high number of catastrophic racing injuries. But, by law, there’s only so much the racing commission can do, even if the commissioners and top executives took their jobs seriously.

The commission can conduct post-mortem examinations on the horses that died while racing at Penn National. It can search the barn and interview employees at the track where Gill’s horses were, until the Jan. 23 incident, trained by Darrel Delahoussaye. But it cannot conduct any kind of investigation at Gill’s Elk Creek Ranch, where as many as 140 racehorses have been stabled and trained since Gill, a New Hampshire-based mortgage executive, reemerged as a racehorse owner in the second half of 2008 after a two-year hiatus. The commission, a division of the state’s Department of Agriculture, has no jurisdiction over “private property.”

Elk Creek Ranch is centrally located in Chester County’s horse country in southeast Pennsylvania, roughly 90 minutes from Philadelphia Park, Penn National, Laurel and Charles Town racetracks. It was purchased by Gill out of necessity earlier this decade when an increasing number of tracks opted not to give stalls to Gill or his trainers because of his aggressive claiming tactics. Gill unsuccessfully tried selling the property when he got out of racing in 2006, the year he received an Eclipse Award as the outstanding North American owner. The award recognized the 2005 racing year, the third consecutive year Gill led all North American owners by races and money won. He added a fourth title in 2009, when his stable piled up $6,670,490 in earnings after his horses won 370 of 2,247 starts.

But the 54-year-old Gill has done more than accumulate wins and money from horse racing purses. To go along with his own checkered past in the sport, Gill has assembled a team of trainers, veterinarians and affiliated bloodstock agents that have shown an almost habitual disregard for the rules of racing.

Here are some examples, based on law enforcement records and rulings from the Association of Racing Commissioners International:

-Gill, in the 1980s, was suspended or ineligible for licensing in Massachusetts and New Hampshire on different occasions for financial obligations. He decided to train his own horses in 1995 and was nailed for having injectable drugs, syringes and needles during a barn raid at Rockingham Park. The New Hampshire Racing Commission suspended Gill for three years. When he returned, he left the training to others. Gill’s RCI rulings.

-Anthony (Tony) Adamo, Gill’s 38-year-old racing manager and one of his trainers, compiled 11 separate violations in 2009, with fines of $3,300—mostly for entering ineligible horses in various races. Adamo, however, has no suspensions or major medication violations on his record during or prior to his association with Gill. Adamo’s RCI rulings.

-Trainer Darrel Delahoussaye, a 47-year-old trainer fired by Gill after Laughing Moon’s breakdown on Jan. 23 became the catalyst for the jockeys’ revolt at Penn National, paid at least $1,500 in fines following eight separate rulings in 2009 against him by the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission.

Delahoussaye had his license revoked by the Louisiana Racing Commission in 1984 following a felony conviction and did not become eligible for reinstatement until 1993. Since then, he has been suspended twice for possession of needles, syringes and injectable drugs—once in Ohio in 1998 and once in Michigan in 2000.

The Ohio Racing Commission also suspended Delahoussaye for one year in 1998 after he was ruled to have “mistreated, abused or engaged in an act of cruelty to a horse; used appliance other than whip for the purpose of stimulating speed.” The appliance was described in court documents as a “wooden stick with stripped electrical cords stuck to it.” A veterinarian and two assistants testified seeing a horse at Beulah Park “jump two or three feet in the air” and then witnessed Delahoussaye unplugging an electrical cord from the wall. Delahoussaye appealed the case but ultimately lost. Delahoussaye’s RCI rulings.

-Cole Norman, 41, hired by Gill to train horses stabled at Elk Creek Ranch last summer, served nine months in jail for negligent homicide, a felony, and was released in January 2009. On Feb. 5, 2007, near Hot Springs, Ark., Norman drove head-on into a car driven by 86-year-old Virginia Heath,killing the woman who was a cousin of former President Bill Clinton. Norman, six-time leading trainer at Oaklawn Park, was found to be under the influence of prescription drugs, to which his attorney said he was battling addiction. Prosecutors said seven different drugs were found in Norman’s system at the time of the crash. Later that year while out on bail, Norman was again arrested for DUI and drug possession after reportedly sideswiping a row of mailboxes in Louisiana.

But Norman has also compiled a prodigious number of medication violations as a horse trainer. Since 1996, the son of the late trainer Gene Norman, has been assessed fines or suspensions in at least 30 cases involving medication violations in Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas and Oklahoma. In a rare foray to California in 2005, Cole was accused of milkshaking the horse Top Commander in the Grade 1 Bing Crosby Handicap at Del Mar. According to the California Horse Racing Board’s equine medical director, Dr. Rick Arthur, the total carbon dioxide level (39 millimoles per liter) found in Top Commander was the highest recorded of any horse in the 10 months milkshake testing had been conducted. “At 37, there can be some question (of how the TCO2 reached that level),” said Arthur, “but at 39 no one will argue with you that the horse was milkshaked.” Norman also had two TCO2/milkshake violations in Louisiana in 2006. Other rulings on his RCI rapsheet include possession of unlabeled medication in his tackroom and providing Oaklawn Park’s official clocker with incorrect names of horses working out. Norman’s RCI rulings.

-Veterinarian Kevin L. Brophy, 55, bases his practice at Penn National, but according to Tony Adamo is also Elk Creek Ranch’s principal vet. Brophy has 13 rulings in the RCI database, most recently a $500 fine from the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission for submitting “an inaccurate vet treatment report” for a Gill horse named Monsoor on Oct. 23, the night the son of Mt. Livermore won a $4,000 claiming race at Penn National. After his next race, a Nov. 11 victory carrying a $5,000 tag, Monsoor pulled up lame and has since been sold by Gill to trainer/bloodstock agent Mark Wedig for $1.

Brophy has been fined a number of times during his career for failure to file complete or accurate veterinarian treatment sheets, and on one occasion in 2004 for “submitting a fraudulent treatment slip.” Brophy’s RCI rulings.

-Veterinarian Louis A. Grasso, who recently started working on horses from Elk Creek Ranch, was the central figure in two criminal cases involving banned medication and has had to surrender his racing license or had it denied in New York and New Jersey. In 1991, the 53-year-old Grasso, primarily a Standardbred practitioner, was convicted of the federal crime of selling anabolic steroids to an undercover agent. Nine years later, on April 11, 2000, the New York-based Grasso was under surveillance in Delaware while visiting a private racing stable and agents with the office of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs attempted to stop him. A high-speed chase ensued on Delaware’s Highway 13, with Newcastle County police eventually pulling him over. According to a source, a “treasure trove” of prohibited drugs, including blood-doping agents, was found. Grasso pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest and put on probation with the threat that any violations may result in charges involving confiscated drugs.

On the matter of Grasso’s license being reinstated by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board in 2005, a hearing officer ruled against him, saying “undisputed evidence in the case discloses that Dr. Louis A. Grasso has been convicted of serious felony grade crimes and that he has violated the conditions upon which his license was based.” The refusal was based on Grasso’s “experience, character and general fitness” being “inconsistent with the public interest.” Grasso’s RCI rulings.

-Finally, Mark Wedig, a trainer from West Des Moines, Iowa, is listed on bills of sale as the purchaser of a number of Gill horses in December and January—at a cost of $1 each–that were described to the Paulick Report by a one-time Elk Creek Ranch employee as too lame or too slow to compete. Wedig, 54, had his license suspended for five years by the Iowa Racing Commission, from 2002-07, for “conduct detrimental to racing” for forging signatures on claiming slips and lying to stewards investigating the case. The commission said Wedig acted in a “premeditated, corrupt, deceitful and fraudulent” manner that reflected “negatively on the integrity or best interests” of racing. Wedig’s RCI rulings.

DRILLING HORSES INTO THE GROUND
According to an individual at one time employed at Elk Creek Ranch who spoke on the condition of anonymity, Gill’s horses have been “drilled into the ground” since the arrival of Cole Norman as the farm’s trainer last summer. “Cole is set in his ways,” this person said. “He trains the crap out of them. They breeze every seven days (track condition permitting). They tap the joints of the horses, sometimes right after a race, and they tap ‘em every week, again and again and again if they don’t get sound. They are going to the well too many times. You are not supposed to tap a lame horse.”

The Paulick Report checked the references of this Elk Creek Ranch whistleblower, confirming as many of the details provided as possible. We feel confident the information provided is accurate.

Adamo, this individual said, is often the one who does the injections of hyaluronic acid and/or cortisone—a contention Adamo disputes. “Tony only does the upper and lower knee joints and the ankle,” the whistleblower said. “He doesn’t do anything behind. He probably would if he had more experience.”

“That’s why we have vets there,” Adamo said in response to questions about whether he injects horses on the farm. “We’ve given pre-race shots, or if a horse is sick we’ve given Banamine, but that’s as far as I’m going to go.

“I’m at Penn National one day at Philly Park one day,” he continued. “Between me and Cole we’ll go over the horses and give a list to the doc. Hopefully he does everything on that list. But it’s tough to get him there ( to Oxford) every day.”

Adamo defended his record as a trainer as it relates to breakdowns. "I had five breakdowns on all my starts there," Adamo said of Penn National. "I run just as many horses at Philly Park and had one there. I’m not blaming the racetrack, and I’m not justifying it. One is too many."

‘I’M NOT DISCUSSING ANYTHING’
According to the Practice Act of Pennsylvania governing veterinary medicine, animal owners or their employees are exempted from the rules requiring that only licensed veterinarians treat an animal, at least on private property. However, racing regulations strictly prohibit a trainer from injecting a horse or to simply be in possession of needles and syringes on racetrack property.

Norman isn’t currently licensed as a trainer because of his felony conviction and it isn’t clear when he can be reinstated. For the time being, while he is on parole, he is able to train on the farm and send the horses to the track, where they race under Tony Adamo’s name as the trainer listed in the program. The racing commission, because it does not have jurisdiction over the farm, isn’t able to determine whether or not Norman is the one actually training the horses.

The veterinary supplies are said to have been purchased through Kevin Brophy, who declined to comment to the Paulick Report on any aspect of his relationship to Gill’s operation. “I’m not discussing anything,” Brophy said.

Grasso, reached in New York, said he only recently started working on Gill’s horses, adding that it doesn’t bother him that he can’t take his veterinary practice to the racetrack. “I don’t even go for it (his license),” Grasso said. “I’ve got my farm, got a clinic (in Orange County, New York). That’s all I need.”

The horses at Gill’s farm are well-cared for, the Paulick Report informant said. “If you walk in the barns, you wouldn’t say the horses are underfed or neglected. It’s more the medical treatments, the tapping or the training of sore horses. It’s a shame, because it’s a really good group of grooms that take care of the horses.”

That observation was backed up by Gail Emerson, a humane police officer sent in by the Large Animal Protection Society Jan. 29 for a surprise inspection of the Elk Creek Ranch horses after the organization received an anonymous complaint last week. “Everything was perfect,” she told the Paulick Report. “The horses were well fed, with plenty of water. Every horse I went by came to the front of the stall with their ears pricked.”

Yet there have been dozens of horses vanned off the farm to parts unknown in recent months, some of them described by the Elk Creek Ranch whistleblower as “three-legged lame” or with terrible skin or joint infections. “They joke about how these horses are going to the Girl Scouts in Nebraska or to the zoo,” the individual said, the latter a possible reference to the nearby Bravo Packing company in Carney’s Point, N.J., a company that makes food for zoo animals out of horse meat. When another employee complained about the jokes, the employee was told, “At least we’re not selling them at the (killer) sales; they’re going right to the factory.” The Paulick Report has not been presented with any evidence that a large number of Gill’s horses have ended up at a Canadian slaughterhouse or at Bravo Packing.

Mark Wedig, the Iowa trainer who described himself as a “small fry,” was listed as the buyer of a number of horses Gill sold for $1 each in December and January, including Monsoor, Shes a Cure, Cotton King, Sir Ray, Devil’s Squeeze, My Dance Partner, Phantom Regiment, Taxability, Hector the Connector and Rushing Stag.

Wedig told the Paulick Report he sold Cotton King, said to have a badly infected leg, along with “two mares” to a breeder he knew only as “Charles,” a man Wedig said plans to send the horses to Belize in Central America. Someone whose name he couldn’t remember said he wanted to breed Sir Ray to some mares in Iowa. A barrel racer in southwest Iowa got two of the Gill horses from Wedig, who said he didn’t have a name or phone number for her. Wedig said he plans to rehab the rest at the In Front training center near Mountaineer Park in West Virginia, then bring them back to the races.

When asked if he ever drove horses to slaughter plants in Canada, Wedig said: “Never.”

In an interview with the Paulick Report last week, Gill said “all of the horses go to retirement programs” when their racing careers end, though he didn’t specify which programs or where they are located.

“I don’t know if he is naïve, just doesn’t care, or thinks the horses are going to retirement and turns a blind eye,” the Elk Creek Ranch whistleblower said of Gill. “He may be a good businessman with mortgages, but he’s not with horses.”

Copyright © 2010, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value. Advertise in the Paulick Report.



Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

MULLINS TO IEAH: I WANT MY MONEY

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009
By Ray Paulick

Trainer Jeff Mullins has asked the general counsel for the New York State Racing and Wagering Board for assistance in getting paid $31,336 Mullins said he is owed by IEAH Stables from I Want Revenge’s victory and related expenses from the the $750,000 Wood Memorial at Aqueduct April 4. IEAH bought a 50% interest in the son of Stephen Got Even from David Lanzman 10 days before the Wood.IEAH campaigned two champions (Big Brown and Benny the Bull) and 11 Grade 1 winners in 2008, finishing one vote shy of an Eclipse Award as outstanding owner.

There is precedent for the New York Racing and Wagering Board getting involved when owners may have failed to meet their financial obligations. Ernie Paragallo, now at the center of an animal abuse criminal case in New York, had his owner’s license revoked in 2005 because he had not paid a bill from the University of Pennsylvania New Bolton equine hospital.

Mullins was suspended for seven days by the New York Racing and Wagering Board for an incident that occurred inside the Aqueduct detention barn prior to an earlier race on the day of the Wood.

Following is the text of Mullins’ letter to Robert Feuerstein, general counsel for the Racing and Wagering Board:

Dear Mr. Feurstein,

I write to you on the advice of my attorney, Karen Murphy who met with New York State Racing and Wagering Board Steward, Carmine Donofrio, June 4 on a matter regarding IEAH Stables.

I am very concerned about IEAH Stables’ business practices as it relates to Thoroughbred racing, specifically their lack of meeting financial obligations to all concerned with the training, riding, care and services provided to I want Revenge, a horse trained by me who won the April 4 Wood Memorial.

From the day IEAH Stables purchased a 50% share of I Want Revenge from David J. Lanzman, last March they have failed to pay my bills, the travel expenses of jockey Joe Talamo, and the bills from veterinarians, lay-up farm, horse transporters, etc. To this day they have yet to pay me their 50% share of the 10% of the purse earnings from the $750,000 Wood Memorial. As you know, the race was run on April 4 of this year, making the bills four months outstanding. My accountant/bookkeeper has contacted them and their attorney on numerous occasions and they have repeatedly promised payment to no avail. It is my understanding that the New York State Racing and Wagering Board can assist me in assuring that these owners meet their financial responsibilities as they continue to race horses in New York and throughout the country.

IEAH Stables is scheduled to start several horses during the Saratoga meet including, Benny the Bull in the $250,000 Alfred G. Vanderbilt, August 9 and Court Vision in either the $500,000 Sword Dancer, August 15 or the $200,000 Bernard Baruch H, August 28.

It is unacceptable that a racing operation such as IEAH Stables be allowed to continue racing in New York or anywhere for that matter without first meeting their financial responsibilities to horsemen and the providers of services to their horses.

I urge the New York State Racing and Wagering Board and NYRA to immediately put a freeze on their horseman’s account in an effort to assure that all of their past due financial responsibilities are met before they are paid any purse monies.

I will list below those I know who have not been paid along with their contact information and the amounts owed to them. I will also be happy to furnish you with copies of bills/invoices from all. In addition to those out of state listed, owner David Lanzman spoke with Belmont Vet Group, Sallee Horse Vans and Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital and they are all owed quite a bit of money as well. Because they are all are owed such a significant amount of money they fear if they take any action right now, in an effort to get paid they will anger them and lose any chance of getting paid. Lanzman only contacted people directly involved with I Want Revenge and can only imagine how many other people they owe money to. Rumor in California has it that they owe backstretch horsemen in New York in excess of $500,000. It is unconscionable that they are allowed to continue racing.

Jeff Mullins………………..……………Trainer………….$31,336,04
(the above amount includes $20,625.00 which is their share of the purse money owed to me for the win in the Wood Memorial and training/board and travel expenses related to the Wood Memorial and Kentucky Derby)

Dr. Foster Northrop…………………..Vet…………….…..$1,754.74

Joe Talamo/Access to Travel……..Jockey……..………$3,312.90

La Croix Farm…………………..…….Lay-up………….…$3,150.00

Dr. Melinda Blue………………………Vet…………..………$559.10

Please advise me as to what the next steps, if any may be necessary to take in assuring that I, along with the parties listed above are paid.

I thank you in advance for your help and attention to this matter.

Sincerely
Jeff Mullins

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value.
Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

PARAGALLO TRYING TO PULL FAST ONE IN DELAWARE?

Thursday, April 30th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
UPDATED FRIDAY, 3 P.M. 
The two horses mentioned in the story below have been scratched. Click here for details.

Two horses that previously raced for the Paraneck Stable managed by Ernie Paragallo, who was recently charged with 22 criminal counts of animal cruelty at his Center Brook Farm in upstate New York, have been entered to race at Delaware Park on Monday under the name Nob Hill Stable.

Paragallo and Paraneck Stable are being investigated by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (SRWB) and its horses are banned from racing at New York Racing Association tracks until a new authorized agent is named to run the stable. Paraneck is listed with the SRWB as being owned by Jennifer and Kristin Paragallo, Ernie Paragallo’s daughters. Paragallo had his owner’s license revoked by the SRWB in 2005 because of financial irresponsibility but he was allowed to retain a license as authorized agent to the stable. NYRA is insisting Paraneck retain a new agent who is not related to the Paragallos in any way or has been an employee of the operation. Paraneck has been a leading owner at New York tracks for more than a decade.

The Paulick Report has learned that Robert Savitsky, a Melville, N.Y., attorney, has applied with the SRWB to be the authorized agent for Nob Hill Stable.

John Wayne, executive director of the Delaware Racing Commission, said there is “100% reciprocity” in Delaware regarding the New York ban on Paraneck horses and said his office is currently investigating whether or not NYRA’s requirements have been met.

Wayne said he began looking into the matter Wednesday when he first saw the entries for Monday’s racing program at Delaware Park. The Nob Hill Stable name listed as owner of the two horses, Another Hades and Pink Viper, is spelled differently than the Knob Hill Stable founded by the late Steve Stavro of Canada. Kristin and Jennifer Paragallo are listed as owners of Nob Hill Stable. Paraneck’s private trainer, John P. Campo Jr., is listed as trainer. (Note: Daily Racing Form past performances spell the owner’s name Knob Hill Stable.)

“Before anyone would be permitted to race horses whose connections have had a previous problem," Wayne said, "the owner and trainer in their application would have to file a sworn statement saying that they have no connection with the former connections of the horse. Those statements have to be notarized and signed under a threat of perjury. Once that affidavit comes back to me, I’ll review it and have it looked at by an investigator.”

Wayne said it was his understanding that no new authorized agent has been approved for Paraneck in New York. “As far as I know, there’s an application filed with the (New York) wagering board and I don’t think that process has been completed.” 

"An application has been filed which has not been acted on," SRWB spokesman Joseph Mahoney said, though he would not confirm Savitsky as the applicant. "It is being reviewed. We have a subpoena out for certain records involving the financial affairs of Mr. Paragallo, Center Brook Farm, and Paraneck Stable, trying to find out if he was the actual owner of the horses when he was only licensed as an authorized agent. We are also looking at questions involving what the daughters’ role has been with Paraneck. It is an intensive investigation. But we have certainly not acted on the application or approved it."

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for
all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick


UPDATED: COULD MULLINS (AND JONES) SUSPENSION MOVE MORNING-AFTER PRESS CONFERENCE?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

By Ray Paulick
UPDATED 1:10 P.M.: 

If Jeff Mullins serves a seven-day suspension from New York authorities scheduled to begin May 3, he could be the first winning trainer in Kentucky Derby history who isn’t able to go to the stable area at Churchill Downs to check on his horse the morning after the race.

I Want Revenge, trained by Mullins, is the likely favorite in this year’s Kentucky Derby, to be run May 2. Mullins’ suspension is in connection with New York Racing Association detention barn rules he was found to have violated while administering an herbal product to Gato Go Win prior to the Bay Shore Stakes April 4, necessitating that the horse be scratched by stewards. It was at least the 22nd ruling by racing officials against Mullins since 2000.

UPDATE: After this report was published, we were reminded that Larry Jones, trainer of Louisiana Derby winner Friesan Fire, also will begin a seven-day suspension on May 3. That suspension resulted from a positive test for the bronchodilator Clenbuterol in a horse that won a June 8, 2008, allowance race at Delaware Park. It was the first ruling of any kind against Jones, according to the Association of Racing Commissioners International.

Suspensions generally prohibit licensed personnel from having access to secure areas of a racetrack, including the stable area. It is expected the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (and Delaware Racing Commission) ruling will be recognized by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.

If I Want Revenge (or Friesan Fire) wins the Kentucky Derby, perhaps Churchill Downs will schedule a press conference at Wagner’s Pharmacy, a popular breakfast spot for trainers just down the road from the stable gate. Dozens of reporters and camera crews traditionally flock to the barn of the winning Kentucky Derby trainer the morning after the race to get quotes for follow-up coverage. This year, they might be able to get some scrambled eggs to go with their stories.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

THOROUGHBRED MEDIA: MAYBE WE CAN BLAME THE MESSENGER

Monday, April 13th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
When launching the Paulick Report last June, I promised readers that we would provide unvarnished coverage of the Thoroughbred industry, reporting on the large reservoir of news left uncovered by the trade magazines and breaking stories other publications avoid. And I believe the fact traffic on the site has more than doubled in less than a year shows this promise has at least somewhat been fulfilled.

I received call at the time of our launch from a Central Kentucky breeder who wields a great deal of clout in both industry leadership positions and advertising decisions. “Good,” he said about the philosophy behind the Paulick Report. “It’s about time. I think the Thoroughbred media is in part to blame for the mess we’re in. It’s been too afraid to cover the tough issues.”

That comment stung, since he was saying that for the 15 years I was at Bloodhorse magazine I was part of the problem. As the editor of a publication owned by the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association and controlled by an old-guard board of trustees dominated by Jockey Club members, I had to pick my spots carefully when I felt the industry’s feathers needed ruffling. Criticism of the TOBA’s Graded Stakes Committee and calls for more transparency at Thoroughbred auctions didn’t go over real well. “You’re turning the magazine into the National Enquirer,” one Bloodhorse board member said to me after I wrote an editorial questioning the integrity of the auction process. “How are we ever going to get new people interested in buying our horses if you keep printing negative things?”

“Maybe if the auction process is cleaned up and more transparent, people will have increased confidence that it’s a fair marketplace,” was my naïve response.

I came away from that conversation convinced this particular individual wasn’t enamored with the idea of a free press, no matter what the U.S. Constitution says. Great guy to have on the board of trustees for a magazine.

I thought of that board member last week when the industry was awash in bad news on several fronts and Bloodhorse.com was putting a happy face on every story.

– Quality Road, the winner of the Florida Derby, was being treated for a quarter crack, something his trainer, Jimmy Jerkens, said is “always serious.” The Bloodhorse headline read: “Quality Road Quarter Crack Not Serious.”

– Trainer Jeff Mullins was allegedly seen by security personnel treating Gato Go Win with a prohibited substance in Aqueduct’s detention barn in a stakes race on the undercard of the Wood Memorial, a race won by the Mullins-trained I Want Revenge. Kudos to Throughbred Times for breaking the story. But California horsemen and fans familiar with Mullins’ history could only shake their heads when Bloodhorse.com ran a headline that said, “Mullins: NY Incident Honest Mistake.” To put an even happier face on the subject, Bloodhorse.com then ran a commentary under the headline: “Lets Look on the Bright Side of Mullins Incident.” If that wasn’t enough, Bloodhorse.com ran a third article saying: “Owner Not Angry With Mullins.” I’m sure that was reassuring to horseplayers.

– Undernourished and lice-infested horses owned by owner-breeder Ernie Paragallo were found at a New York livestock auction’s kill pen, and allegations of malnourishment of dozens more were first reported in the Paulick Report and by Joe Drape in the New York Times on April 3. Yet it wasn’t until four days later that the first staff-written account of the deplorable situation made its way onto Bloodhorse.com, and that story was mostly generated by press releases from the New York State Racing and Wagering Board and Jockey Club. ThoroughbredTimes.com did no better on this one, writing its first story on the Paragallo investigation that same day, well after the story had been picked up by other mainstream publications.

(To be fair, Daily Racing Form’s Matt Hegarty wrote an outstanding and balanced article on the issue of horse slaughter, spurred on by the Paragallo investigation.)

Was the hesitation on the part of both Bloodhorse and Thoroughbred Times due to the fact that Paragallo is co-owner of Unbridled’s Song, who stands at stud in Kentucky at Taylor Made Farm, a major advertiser with both publications?

I can speak from personal experience that fear of advertising repercussions by bean-counting publishers is at the heart of some editorial decisions at horse industry trade publications. There is a fear by these publishers, unwarranted in my opinion, that advertisers are not interested in reading the truth about their industry.

I think a majority of the advertisers are more like the breeder who called when I launched the Paulick Report and encouraged me to be tough, honest and fair in what I write. They understand that without a strong and independent press, we will continue to sweep our problems under the rug, something this industry can ill afford.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
 

AN ‘HONEST MISTAKE’ BY MULLINS?

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

By Ray Paulick
Following his alleged violation of detention barn rules in New York, Jeff Mullins may be claiming ignorance of the rules of racing regarding medications or treatments that can be given to horses on raceday. The trainer was allegedly seen by New York Racing Association personnel giving a substance that came in a bottle marked Air Power to Gato Go Win in the Aqueduct detention barn last Saturday, necessitating the late scratch of the horse from the Bay Shore Stakes, 

Mullins, who trains likely Kentucky Derby favorite I Want Revenge, was quoted in published reports saying it was a treatment that he routinely gives to his horses before a race. He called it an “honest mistake” (has anyone ever heard of a “dishonest mistake”?), and some apologists are buying his act, saying it wasn’t that big of a deal and the media is blowing it out of proportion.

Mullins has previous rules violations. Click here for a list of rulings against him.

If it’s true that he routinely gives Air Power to his horses on raceday in California, where he is based, then Mullins is routinely violating the rules of the California Horse Racing Board. The raceday rule was specifically communicated to all licensed California trainers in 2007. Presumably, Mullins was one of those trainers who read the memo.

On Sept. 7, 2007, just after the conclusion of the Del Mar meeting, veterinarian Rick Arthur, the Equine Medical Director for the CHRB, sent a memorandum to all trainers reminding them of what can and can’t be given on raceday. The memo’s subject line, which seems relatively easy to understand, read: “WATER ONLY ON RACE DAY.”

The memo was written, widely posted and distributed to trainers after three horses had to be scratched during the Del Mar meeting because several trainers apparently were unclear on what can and can’t be given to a horse on raceday. One of those trainers was Hall of Famer Jack Van Berg, who administered a substance described as a peppermint mouthwash to the filly The Golden Noodle shortly before the Del Mar Debutante. It was something Van Berg said he had been doing for years. The Golden Noodle was scratched after security observed the filly being given the substance.

“This suggests there is considerable misunderstanding as to what is permitted under the rules and what is not,” Arthur wrote in the memo.

“To be clear, this rule prohibits the administration of any drugs or other substances except as provided in the rule. There are few exceptions. Only water may be administered on race day to wash a horse’s mouth. Throat flushes, no matter how innocuous their ingredients, are not excepted. This includes old-time remedies containing menthol, oil of wintergreen, oil of eucalyptus, camphor or any similar products, ‘natural’ or otherwise including peppermint.

“The rule is simple: WATER ONLY. Mixing prohibited products with water does not make them permitted. If this is observed the horse will be scratched.”

Air Power contains honey, apple cider vinegar, aloe vera, menthol, oil of eucalyptus, lemon juice, ethyl alcohol, according to the manufacturer.

Click here to read the entire memo, which includes the applicable CHRB rule, 1843.5: “Medication, Drugs and Other Substances Permitted After Entry in a Race.”

California trainers should have a pretty clear understanding of the rule.

Arthur opted not to comment to the Paulick Report on the Mullins investigation being conducted by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board. In 2005, however, he made the following observations about Mullins to John Scheinman in the Washington Post, saying Mullins was a good trainer who didn’t have a clear sense of ethics: “It’s an attitudinal problem, and those things are hard to overcome,” Arthur said. “It’s basic ethics is what it is. The bottom line is [Mullins] basically lives in his own world, and you can tell by his comments that’s the case. He’s oblivious to everything around him and does things his own way and thinks it’s right.”

It looks like not that much has changed since 2005.

Honest mistake? I don’t think so.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report 

Sign up for our
Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

 

PARAGALLO OWNER’S LICENSE REVOKED IN 2005

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
Something is rotten in the state of New York, and it involves the licensing of Thoroughbred owners.

Back in July of 2005, the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, which oversees licensing and the rules and regulations of pari-mutuel racing in the Empire State, revoked the owner’s license of Ernie Paragallo for financial irresponsibility. The wealthy New Yorker who in 1996 raced the Kentucky Derby favorite and now leading stallion Unbridled’s Song owed money (reportedly $18,000) to the University of Pennsylvania’s New Bolton equine hospital, apparently for veterinary work done on one or more of his Thoroughbreds.

But that ruling didn’t appear to slow Paragallo down, whose horses race in the name of Paraneck Stable. Paragallo’s daughters, Jennifer and Kristen, are licensed in New York as the “owners” of Paraneck Stable, which is among the leading owners in New York. Ernie Paragallo is licensed by the SRWB as an “authorized agent.” When I spoke with Paragallo last week about the mares from his Center Brook Farm that were found in a lice infested and malnourished condition at a New York livestock auction’s kill pen, he said he “runs” the stable as an employee of his daughters.

Why, then, does the New York Racing Association’s media guide list Ernie Paragallo’s biography as the owner of Paraneck Stable and everyone associate Ernie as the voice and face of Paraneck? Is this one of those wink-wink nod-nod things where the rules are made to be broken, or least overlooked?

“If I wanted to be licensed I’d have to prove to the board that I’ve satisfied the bill,” Paragallo said.

The University of Pennsylvania isn’t the only business that had to go to extremes to collect money owed by Paragallo. When the SRWB revoked his license, he reportedly owed $500,000 to the Ocala Breeders’ Sales Co. That bill was said to be paid.

I can say from personal experience that Paragallo (or a business entity he controlled) wasn’t quick to pay for advertising invoices to at least one Thoroughbred trade magazine , either. On at least one occasion, a publication I was affiliated with was forced to hire an attorney and threaten to take legal action to collect money owed on advertising for Paragallo’s stallions.

I wonder if other businesses have had similar problems.

Five years ago, in July 2004, Paragallo announced he was going to sell all of his racing and breeding stock by the end of that year because of unspecified health problems. It’s a shame he didn’t.

Now I know that I’m going to be castigated for that statement by some people in the industry who will be quick to point out all the good things Ernie Paragallo has done: the $1 million given to the NTRA Charities New York Heroes Fund in 2001, the seasons to Unbridled’s Song and other stallions he has donated to charities, and the money he spends in the industry.

Racing does need Thoroughbred owners, and it needs more owners than it currently has. But it needs owners who act responsibly regarding the care and treatment of their horses. Based on what I’ve learned about the horses under Paragallo’s care, at least those at his Center Brook Farm, I don’t believe he fits into that category.

Of course, Paragallo isn’t even licensed as an owner, is he?

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report 

Sign up for our
Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

MULLINS NO STRANGER TO CONTROVERSY

Monday, April 6th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
The investigation by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board into possible violations by Jeff Mullins in the detention barn prior to the running of Saturday’s Bay Shore Stakes at Aqueduct is the latest in a string of controversies involving banned medications by the California-based trainer. Gato Go Win was scratched by the stewards after security personnel alleged Mullins was attempting to give an over-the-counter cough formula, Air Power, to the horse while in the detention barn.

A short time later, Mullins saddled I Want Revenge for an impressive victory in the Wood Memorial, setting him up as the potential favorite for this year’s Kentucky Derby.

Twice in the last 4 ½ years, Mullins-trained horses tested for a higher than permitted level of sodium bicarbonate (commonly called milkshakes) in California, forcing his starters to undergo 24-hour pre-race surveillance for a specified period. Last year, Mullins was also suspended 90 days, with 70 days stayed, after a horse he trained tested positive for mepivacaine at Hollywood Park in 2006.

After Mullins received his first sodium bicarbonate warning in 2005, he created a firestorm when quoted by a Los Angeles Times columnist calling horseplayers “idiots.” He went on TVG a few days later to apologize for the comments, even though he said he was quoted out of context. Earlier that year, Mullins was fined $1,000 for a positive drug for a horse running in a stakes race at Fair Grounds in Louisiana.

According to the Association of Racing Commissioners International, Mullins had his first medication violation at Wyoming Downs in 1986 when RCI shows that he received a one-year ban and $1,500 fine for a positive test for prednisolone.

Mullins is currently ranked 14th among North American trainers by 2009 earnings. He’s won 38 races from 150 starts (25%), with $1,443,330 in purses through April 5.

Following is a list of rulings against Mullins since 1986, compiled from the RCI and California Horse Racing Board databases:

September 2008, necessitated late scratch at Del Mar, $300 fine

August 2008, excessive levels of sodium bicarbonate at Del Mar, horses put under 24-hour pre-race surveillance

June 2008, late to the receiving barn with a horse at Hollywood Park, $100 fine

May 2008, late to the receiving barn with a horse at Hollywood Park, $100 fine

January 2008, mepivacaine positive at Hollywood Park (in 2006), suspended 90 days, ,with 70 days stayed

September 2007, ineligible starter at Los Alamitos, necessitating late scratch, $300 fine

February 2007, prenisolone positive at Santa Anita, $400 fine

June 2005, Bute overage at Hollywood Park, $300 fine

February 2005, ranitidine positive at Fair Grounds, $1,000 fine

January 2005, excessive levels of sodium bicarbonate at Santa Anita, horses put under 24-hour pre-race surveillance

November 2004, failed to deliver horse to receiving barn at Bay Meadows Fair, $200 fine

October 2004, Methocarbamol positive at Oak Tree, $300 fine

October 2004, failed to comply with official veterinary directive at Oak Tree, $100 fine

July 2004, horse improperly shod for turf course at Hollywood Park, $100 fine

April 2003, late to the receiving barn at Santa Anita, $100 fine

December 2000, entered ineligible horse at Turf Paradise, $100 fine

October 2000, entered ineligible horse at Turf Paradise, $100 fine

January 2000, entered ineligible horse at Turf Paradise, $100 fine

January 2000, dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO) positive at Turf Paradise, $250 fine

January 2000, dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO) positive at Turf Paradise, $250 fine

January 2000, failure to appear, $250 fine

March 1999, unlicensed employee at Turf Paradise, $100 fine

November 1994, dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO) positive at Turf Paradise, $250 fine

April 1992, failure to have owner’s license at Turf Paradise, $50 fine

January 1990, failure to take care of business in proper manner (no foal papers in racing office), causing late scratches in two races, $200 fine

August 1988, positive tests for poly-ethylene glycol in two horses at Wyoming Downs (no fine or suspension listed)

September 1986, prednisolone positive at Wyoming Downs, suspended one year and fined $1,500

Copyright © 2009,

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our
Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

WHO’S MINDING THE RULINGS?

Monday, March 2nd, 2009
By Ray Paulick
It may not be searchable, completely accurate or as comprehensive as it could be, but the Association of Racing Commissioners International has put together a web site that includes publication of recent rulings from various racing commissions and stewards throughout North America. It’s the kind of thing the Daily Racing Form did years ago in print when it enjoyed a monopoly on past performance information and was the de facto publication of record for the pari-mutuel industry (not to mention one of the most profitable newspapers in the country).

In those days, you could find out who was fined for having a loose dog, smoking in the shedrow, or parking illegally in the stable area. You could also read what jockeys have been suspended or fined for rules violations, what trainers got positive tests for prohibited drugs or overages for permitted medications, and what owners hadn’t paid their bills.

But as profits and news space shrunk, the Form cut out many of its “service to the industry” features, and one of the things to hit the editor’s cutting-room floor was stewards and racing commission rulings. It became increasingly difficult to keep up with why certain jockeys weren’t riding, why some red-hot trainers suddenly went ice-cold, or why a horse was now being trained by someone we hadn’t heard of (usually an assistant to a suspended trainer).

Some tracks post their stewards and commission rulings in public areas or in the racing office; big name suspensions or fines might get picked up in the trade press or local newspapers. But, by and large, it’s been a hit or miss proposition to try and keep up with who has run afoul of racing officials.

Enter the RCI, an organization formed in 1934 under the name National Association of State Racing Commissioners whose name was changed to Association of Racing Commissioners International in 1988. Whether under the NASRC or RCI banner, this has traditionally been viewed as one of the most useless organizations the industry has ever had, mostly because it lacks authority to get anything done. The RCI is an association that can make all kinds of recommendations to its members, but lacks the authority to enforce anything. Some years ago, the RCI threatened to sanction members that didn’t adopt its guidelines on such issues as medication regulations, but those efforts were laughed off. To make matters worse, then RCI president Tony Chamblin was under fire from many commissioners, and a number of states quit RCI and in 1997 formed a splinter group, the North American Pari-Mutuel Regulators Association.

Thus, until the two groups merged back together in 2006, racing had the ultimate absurdity: two competing national associations of regulators, both of them relatively toothless and useless. It’s no wonder we are in such dire straits today regarding the lack of national rules and regulations for the sport.

Fortunately, RCI and NAPRA did merge, and for the past few years RCI president and CEO Ed Martin has been putting the pieces back together. The RCI remains toothless, and some would suggest they are still useless. However, there are things that RCI can do in the way of communications to the public and education to its members, and it’s good to see the organization is focusing on those areas.

One thing RCI can’t control is the quality of its membership. For the most part, racing commissioners continue to be political appointees of governors who in many cases are returning favors for campaign contributions or other types of assistance. Many of those appointees are absolutely clueless when it comes to racing, but RCI can help educate them.

From the standpoint of communicating to the public, there is no greater role for RCI to play than to be a clearinghouse of current and past information from all of its members. That means all rulings from stewards and racing commissions against licensees should be easily accessed at the RCI website, and in a perfect world those rulings would be completely searchable. That’s not the case yet, because RCI is yet another one of those cash-strapped racing organizations that has a bigger mission budget.”

However, what the RCI has (click here to view recent rulings) is a pretty good start. Looking at the rulings posted today, for example, I learned that jockey Gabriel Saez (who was under fire from animal rights groups last year after the death of Eight Belles) was fined $500 for striking his mount with the whip after dismounting from a Feb. 8 race at Fair Grounds. I also learned that a Kentucky licensee named David L. Kirk has been suspended six months for “possession of injectable medications and hypodermic needles” on association grounds.

There are clearly some errors and omissions on the RCI rulings page. One ruling involving Monticello harness track in New York is listed as under the jurisdiction of the California Horse Racing Board. There are numerous rulings missing from California, and none from Arizona, among other states.

But it’s a start.

Why is it important for this information to be public? From the perspective of racing fans, their money supports this game and they deserve to know who among the state licensees has been sanctioned for any and all rules violations. Owners who make a significant investment in the game also have a right to know who is following the rules and who isn’t. Access to this information should be seamless and completely transparent for all jurisdictions.

Some state regulatory bodies, including the California Horse Racing Board, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, and Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, among others, have focused on making their own websites searchable for rulings and infractions. But their time and money might be better spent helping the RCI build a comprehensive, user friendly and completely searchable web site so that racing could have a dependable clearinghouse of information. It’s something the industry deserves, and the RCI is the best-positioned group to deliver it.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

BREAKING: CURLIN BANNED IN NEW YORK - A PAULICK REPORT SPECIAL REPORT

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

A spokesman for the New York State Racing and Wagering Board said Wednesday that 2007 Horse of the Year Curlin would not be allowed to race in New York until all of his owners are licensed in the state. The license for one of the partners in the Midnight Cry Stable that owns 20% of Curlin, jailed attorney Shirley Cunningham, expired last August. Cunningham has been in custody since August while being tried on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in a case involving a class-action lawsuit over a diet drug. One of the other defendents in the case is William Gallion, another partner in Midnight Cry.

The case is expected to go to the jury on Friday.

The licensing issue came to light days before the Belmont Stakes, when Einstein, one of the top runners in the grass division this year, was pointed for the Manhattan Handicap on the Belmont undercard June 7. The New York board told Einstein’s connections Cunningham’s license had expired and that the horse would not be able to enter the race. Andre Regard, attorney for Midnight Cry, said efforts were made to renew Cunningham’s license in New York but was told by an attorney representing the New York board the application would be denied “in the best interests of racing.”

The application was withdrawn, because an official denial by the board would have jeopardized the horse from running in states with licensing reciprocity rules. Einstein ran one week later on the dirt, finishing second to Curlin in the Stephen Foster at Churchill Downs. Cunningham is still licensed in Kentucky.

Under the current circumstances, Curlin would be denied entry in any race in New York, according to Dan Toomey, a spokesperson for the New York board. In his last start in New York, Curlin won the Jockey Club Gold Cup Sept. 30, more than a month after Cunningham’s license had expired.

Another horse in the race, Proudinsky, is owned by Gary Tanaka, who has been under house arrest in New York since 2005 after being arrested on charges of securities fraud with his partner in Amerindo Investment Advisors, Alberto Vilar.

The Manhattan was won by the Phipps Stable’s Dancing Forever, who was beaten a neck by Einstein in the Gulfstream Park Turf earlier this year.

By Ray Paulick

Copyright ©2008, The Paulick Report