Posts Tagged ‘kentucky horse racing commission’
Sunday, May 31st, 2009
By Ray Paulick
So Kentucky’s governor, Democrat Steve Beshear, has called a special session of the state’s legislature, beginning June 15, to deal with what he said was a budget crisis. The news landed with a rather indifferent thud in many regions of Kentucky, in part because David Williams, the Republican Senate president, said Beshear’s reasons for the session weren’t valid.
Beshear was elected in 2007 largely on the platform of expanding gambling to ease Kentucky’s budget shortfalls and to help the struggling horse industry. Since then, he seems to have spent a majority of his time hiding in an undisclosed location, peering out occasionally to issue proclamations and reassure Kentucky residents that he is still alive and well. He looks to be no match for Williams, who has managed to bully many members of his own party to the point that they cower in a corner of indecision on important issues until hearing from their anointed leader. If Williams says nothing is going to happen in a special session, it’s a pretty safe bet nothing is going to happen—unless someone has the courage to take him on.
The third leg of Kentucky’s political stool is Democratic House leader Greg Stumbo, who has been the point person for carrying out Beshear’s election promise to help Kentucky’s horse industry compete with neighboring states Indiana, West Virginia and Illininois, by proposing legislation permitting slot machines at racetracks. Stumbo hopes the slots issue will be addressed during the special session but painted a bleak picture for the prospects of that happening with these words: “The governor’s leadership is critical.”
Asking Steve Beshear to show leadership at this stage of his governorship is a bit like asking Calvin Borel to send Kentucky Derby winner Mine That Bird to the early lead in a six-furlong race. I guess anything is possible, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. Sure, he talked a good game when he spoke at the Kentucky Derby Trainers’ Dinner in Louisville during Derby week, saying he didn’t want to be the governor who was presiding over the death of the Thoroughbred industry, but that was like throwing red meat into a pack of starving lions.
The Kentucky Equine Education Project (KEEP) has been quietly laying the groundwork for this special session, sending out hundreds of thousands of brochures to Kentuckians about the fast-declining state of the horse industry and placing radio ads and newspaper op-ed pieces around the state. But KEEP can’t do it on their own. They need help in the state capital of Frankfort.
Meanwhile, other states are having Kentucky’s racing industry for lunch. West Virginia, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and other slots-enriched racing programs are attracting horses from the Bluegrass State because higher purses are being offered. Breeding stock is beginning to leave Kentucky, too. The Illinois Senate approved a racetrack slots bill (it’s unclear whether the House will OK the measure), but that state already has riverboat casinos where Kentuckians are spending their gambling dollars.
It’s time Beshear man-up and take on David Williams in this issue that is critical to the horse industry and Kentucky. The governor should ask Williams about his trips to gambling boats in Indiana, and whether or not the Senate president is ever “comped” on those trips or given special treatment by the casino companies who will fight tooth and nail to keep slot machines away from Kentucky tracks. He should ask if Williams has something against the horse business, the signature industry in Kentucky.
I doubt we’ll see that happen, if recent events are any indication. After Eclipse Award-winning writer Billy Reed’s blog post on his web site about Williams’ opposition to the horse industry (Williams is enemy no. 1 to racing in Kentucky) was distributed by a staffer for the Kentucky Horse Racing Racing Commission to all of its members, the Paulick Report learned that Beshear apologized to Williams and castigated the commission staffer for daring to send out anything that was critical of the Senate president.
If that’s the kind of leadership we can expect in the upcoming special session, we can kiss any slots legislation goodbye, Kentucky’s signature industry will continue its downward spiral, and the state’s budget crisis will go unresolved.
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: Billy Reed, billyreedsays.com, david williams, greg stumbo, kentucky horse industry, kentucky horse racing commission, kentucky legislature, kentucky special session, Paulick Report, racetrack slots, Ray Paulick, slots at racetracks, steve beshear, Thoroughbred industry Posted in Kentucky, Slot machines | 16 Comments »
Monday, April 20th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
UPDATED 1:10 P.M.:
If Jeff Mullins serves a seven-day suspension from New York authorities scheduled to begin May 3, he could be the first winning trainer in Kentucky Derby history who isn’t able to go to the stable area at Churchill Downs to check on his horse the morning after the race.
I Want Revenge, trained by Mullins, is the likely favorite in this year’s Kentucky Derby, to be run May 2. Mullins’ suspension is in connection with New York Racing Association detention barn rules he was found to have violated while administering an herbal product to Gato Go Win prior to the Bay Shore Stakes April 4, necessitating that the horse be scratched by stewards. It was at least the 22nd ruling by racing officials against Mullins since 2000.
UPDATE: After this report was published, we were reminded that Larry Jones, trainer of Louisiana Derby winner Friesan Fire, also will begin a seven-day suspension on May 3. That suspension resulted from a positive test for the bronchodilator Clenbuterol in a horse that won a June 8, 2008, allowance race at Delaware Park. It was the first ruling of any kind against Jones, according to the Association of Racing Commissioners International.
Suspensions generally prohibit licensed personnel from having access to secure areas of a racetrack, including the stable area. It is expected the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (and Delaware Racing Commission) ruling will be recognized by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.
If I Want Revenge (or Friesan Fire) wins the Kentucky Derby, perhaps Churchill Downs will schedule a press conference at Wagner’s Pharmacy, a popular breakfast spot for trainers just down the road from the stable gate. Dozens of reporters and camera crews traditionally flock to the barn of the winning Kentucky Derby trainer the morning after the race to get quotes for follow-up coverage. This year, they might be able to get some scrambled eggs to go with their stories.
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: bay shore stakes, churchill downs, gato go win, I Want Revenge, jeff mullins, kentucky derby, kentucky horse racing commission, khrc, New York Racing Association, new york state racing and wagering board, nyra, nysrwb, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, srwb Posted in New York Racing Association, People, Regulatory Issues, kentucky derby | 16 Comments »
Wednesday, March 11th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
Kentucky’s signature horse industry is in a battle for survival, but its enemy is not the army of slot machines in neighboring Illinois, Indiana, Missouri or West Virginia, or a few hundred miles north in Pennsylvania or south in Louisiana. It is the commonwealth’s own elected officials, beginning with Gov. Steve Beshear, whose bumbling leadership in Frankfort has enabled a gang of hapless legislators to begin the process of euthanizing the state’s No. 1 industry.
The mercy killing may not take that long. Ron Geary, the owner of Ellis Park, told the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission yesterday that 2009 will be the Western Kentucky track’s final season unless Kentucky legislators give tracks the tools to compete with other states: slot machines. Turfway Park in Northern Kentucky has cut purses and may be forced to reduce the number of racing dates next year. The only reason the track has not been closed and sold for development is that Keeneland is part owner, and officers of the Lexington racetrack and auction house understand how important a racing circuit that extends beyond Keeneland and Churchill Downs is to Kentucky.
How desperate is Kentucky’s racing business? When Churchill Downs general manager Jim Gates asked the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission for approval to add a single race to this year’s Kentucky Oaks and Derby day cards, there was a lengthy discussion about whether or not the Louisville track would have enough horses to fill those additional races.
And the racing commission itself is all but tapped out. Forget about heightening integrity of pari-mutuel pools, improving backstretch security and launching out-of-competition drug testing. The commission is having a hard enough time making payroll for existing staff, let alone filling new, vital positions and creating programs to boost public confidence in Kentucky’s horse racing product. Other states may have permanent funding for their racing commissions to do what’s required to maintain integrity, but this is Kentucky, where the horse industry is viewed by some legislators as “the sport of kings” when in reality it is becoming a poor, forgotten stepchild.
Click here to take a look at the distressing presentation Ellis Park owner Geary made to the commission when he explained why he won’t have enough horses for this year’s meeting and will likely cut back to three days of racing per week, or perhaps just open for live racing on weekends. The reversals of fortune in purses being offered at Ellis Park and Turfway are frightening. Tracks in Indiana with purses enriched by slot machine revenue are taking an in-your-face, competitive posture against southern neighbor Kentucky. Pennsylvania, with a booming racing and breeding program fueled by gambling devices, is boasting that it is the future horse capital of the world. Vans are transporting racehorses and breeding stock in every direction – away from the Blue Grass State.
“Kentucky’s signature industry is fading away…100,000 jobs, and they are at risk right now,” Geary told the racing commissioners.
Yet Kentucky’s governor, who made expanded gaming his signature campaign platform and had the wholehearted support of the horse industry, suffered a severe case of memory loss in 2008 after his election, failing to bring up the issue in his “state of the state” address or make it a legislative priority. This year, Beshear has apparently gone into the witness protection program or is hiding out in a bunker until the legislative session comes to an end. He has shown a complete lack of leadership.
Legislators in some parts of Kentucky understand the importance the horse industry plays to the state’s economy, but too many House and Senate members from outlying areas simply don’t see the connection between those 100,000 jobs at racetracks, training centers and breeding farms and their own districts.
What’s not to understand? Jobs provide for payroll taxes to the state and revenue to local communities. Racetracks and breeding farms promote tourism throughout Kentucky. Without racing and breeding, Kentucky’s already bleak budget crisis would only be worse. Can you imagine how much the state would have to invest to create 100,000 new jobs? Kentucky must move forward on a plan to provide video lottery terminals, slots machines or casino wagering at the state’s racetracks for the industry to compete.
But if Kentucky’s governor and legislators can’t even provide funding for its own racing commission, how can we realistically expect them to approve a plan to provide economic stimulus to the racetracks and breeding farmers who are struggling?
“We’re essentially going to be broke at the end of this fiscal year,” said Robert Beck, chairman of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission. “I’ve got an economics degree, and I can’t figure it out. Our source of funding is not going to go through the legislature, and I’m very disappointed by this.”
The lack of support from the state, which Beck called a “travesty,” will, he said, “directly affect the integrity of the game.”
Beshear appears to be well on his way to becoming a one-term governor, and while there is hope Kentucky’s next chief executive will provide more leadership than Beshear has, the damage to the horse industry will be severe – if not fatal — when his time is up.
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world
Sign up for our Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: beshear, churchill downs, ellis park, jim gates, Keeneland, kentucky derby, kentucky horse racing commission, kentucky horse racing industry, kentucky oaks, kentucky thoroughbred industry, Paulick Report, racinos, Ray Paulick, robert beck, ron geary, Slot machines, steve beshear, turfway park Posted in Keeneland, Kentucky, Race Tracks, Regulatory Issues, Slot machines, Thoroughbred Business, ellis park, turfway park | 37 Comments »
Monday, March 2nd, 2009
By Ray Paulick
It may not be searchable, completely accurate or as comprehensive as it could be, but the Association of Racing Commissioners International has put together a web site that includes publication of recent rulings from various racing commissions and stewards throughout North America. It’s the kind of thing the Daily Racing Form did years ago in print when it enjoyed a monopoly on past performance information and was the de facto publication of record for the pari-mutuel industry (not to mention one of the most profitable newspapers in the country).
In those days, you could find out who was fined for having a loose dog, smoking in the shedrow, or parking illegally in the stable area. You could also read what jockeys have been suspended or fined for rules violations, what trainers got positive tests for prohibited drugs or overages for permitted medications, and what owners hadn’t paid their bills.
But as profits and news space shrunk, the Form cut out many of its “service to the industry” features, and one of the things to hit the editor’s cutting-room floor was stewards and racing commission rulings. It became increasingly difficult to keep up with why certain jockeys weren’t riding, why some red-hot trainers suddenly went ice-cold, or why a horse was now being trained by someone we hadn’t heard of (usually an assistant to a suspended trainer).
Some tracks post their stewards and commission rulings in public areas or in the racing office; big name suspensions or fines might get picked up in the trade press or local newspapers. But, by and large, it’s been a hit or miss proposition to try and keep up with who has run afoul of racing officials.
Enter the RCI, an organization formed in 1934 under the name National Association of State Racing Commissioners whose name was changed to Association of Racing Commissioners International in 1988. Whether under the NASRC or RCI banner, this has traditionally been viewed as one of the most useless organizations the industry has ever had, mostly because it lacks authority to get anything done. The RCI is an association that can make all kinds of recommendations to its members, but lacks the authority to enforce anything. Some years ago, the RCI threatened to sanction members that didn’t adopt its guidelines on such issues as medication regulations, but those efforts were laughed off. To make matters worse, then RCI president Tony Chamblin was under fire from many commissioners, and a number of states quit RCI and in 1997 formed a splinter group, the North American Pari-Mutuel Regulators Association.
Thus, until the two groups merged back together in 2006, racing had the ultimate absurdity: two competing national associations of regulators, both of them relatively toothless and useless. It’s no wonder we are in such dire straits today regarding the lack of national rules and regulations for the sport.
Fortunately, RCI and NAPRA did merge, and for the past few years RCI president and CEO Ed Martin has been putting the pieces back together. The RCI remains toothless, and some would suggest they are still useless. However, there are things that RCI can do in the way of communications to the public and education to its members, and it’s good to see the organization is focusing on those areas.
One thing RCI can’t control is the quality of its membership. For the most part, racing commissioners continue to be political appointees of governors who in many cases are returning favors for campaign contributions or other types of assistance. Many of those appointees are absolutely clueless when it comes to racing, but RCI can help educate them.
From the standpoint of communicating to the public, there is no greater role for RCI to play than to be a clearinghouse of current and past information from all of its members. That means all rulings from stewards and racing commissions against licensees should be easily accessed at the RCI website, and in a perfect world those rulings would be completely searchable. That’s not the case yet, because RCI is yet another one of those cash-strapped racing organizations that has a bigger mission budget.”
However, what the RCI has (click here to view recent rulings) is a pretty good start. Looking at the rulings posted today, for example, I learned that jockey Gabriel Saez (who was under fire from animal rights groups last year after the death of Eight Belles) was fined $500 for striking his mount with the whip after dismounting from a Feb. 8 race at Fair Grounds. I also learned that a Kentucky licensee named David L. Kirk has been suspended six months for “possession of injectable medications and hypodermic needles” on association grounds.
There are clearly some errors and omissions on the RCI rulings page. One ruling involving Monticello harness track in New York is listed as under the jurisdiction of the California Horse Racing Board. There are numerous rulings missing from California, and none from Arizona, among other states.
But it’s a start.
Why is it important for this information to be public? From the perspective of racing fans, their money supports this game and they deserve to know who among the state licensees has been sanctioned for any and all rules violations. Owners who make a significant investment in the game also have a right to know who is following the rules and who isn’t. Access to this information should be seamless and completely transparent for all jurisdictions.
Some state regulatory bodies, including the California Horse Racing Board, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, and Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, among others, have focused on making their own websites searchable for rulings and infractions. But their time and money might be better spent helping the RCI build a comprehensive, user friendly and completely searchable web site so that racing could have a dependable clearinghouse of information. It’s something the industry deserves, and the RCI is the best-positioned group to deliver it.
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Tags: association of racing commissioners international, California Horse Racing Board, daily racing form, david l. kirk, ed martin, eight belles, gabriel saez, horse racing officials, horse racing stewards, kentucky horse racing commission, national association of state racing commissioners, new york state racing and wagering board, north american pari-mutuel regulators association, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, RCI, stewards rulings, tony chamblin Posted in Industry Organizations, Regulatory Issues | 7 Comments »
Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Under questioning by an attorney representing Rodney Stewart, the veterinarian appealing a five-year suspension for his possession of cobra venom and other banned substances at Keeneland in June 2007, John Veitch, chief steward for the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission and a retired Hall of Fame trainer, admitted that his racing star Alydar was treated with cobra venom after suffering an injury in September of his 3-year-old season.Attorney Mike Meuser asked Veitch about the use of the now-banned substance during an appeal of Stewart’s suspension before racing commission hearing officer Bob Layton on Wednesday in Lexington, Ky. “Did Dr. Charles Allen give cobra venom to Alydar during the time you trained him?” Meuser asked.
“On one occasion,” Veitch confirmed, saying it came after Alydar had fractured the coffin bone in a foot while training up to the 1978 Marlboro Cup Handicap. “It wasn’t effective,” Veitch said. “We would not have run him again if it had worked. We treated him at the time. He was not in training. We experimented with Dr. Chuck Allen, who was an expert on venom. At the time, cobra venom was legal for use in the United States for treating Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS). We tried it and it didn’t work. We didn’t use it as therapy so he could race, but only to see if we could relieve some pain.”
Technically, cobra venom, a powerful blocking agent, is not an illegal substance. It is not approved for use in humans or animals by the FDA and is prohibited in most racing jurisdictions, including Kentucky, which classifies it as a "Class A" drug, one that can be abused as an illegal performance enhancing substance.
Three vials of venom and other prohibited substances were found during a search of three barns on Keeneland property used by trainer Patrick Biancone and in a vehicle registered to Stewart. Most of the substances were found in a soft-sided cooler kept in a refrigerator in Barn 74, located in the barn area known as the Keeneland training center off Keeneland’s main property across Rice Road. Stewart admitted to officials the substances were his and that he was only using a refrigerator in Biancone’s barn because he and his wife were in the process of moving from Kentucky to New York. Stewart said his wife had packed the bag with medications usually kept in a refrigerator at their rented home, but that he had been living in temporary quarters. He said he wasn’t aware of everything that was in the bag. Biancone was suspended for six months and agreed not to seek reinstatement for another six months. Stewart received a five-year ban. As chief steward of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, Veitch was in charge of the investigation involving the banned substances and the hearing that led to the suspensions.
Bob Watt, an attorney representing the racing commission, called several witnesses in addition to Veitch, including one of the investigators who conducted the search, commission veterinarian Mary Scollay and Keeneland executive Harvie Wilkinson.
Scollay called cobra venom an "exceedingly dangerous" substance that could cause a loss of sensation in a horse’s foot and block pain. She said there is no known test to detect cobra venom in urine or blood.
During cross-examination of Wilkinson, who among other things oversees security at Keeneland, Meuser asked whether Keeneland officials ever sought approval from the racing commission to have the Rice Road training facility recognized as part of Keeneland’s racetrack grounds. Wilkinson said he was not aware that they had sought approval.
The purpose of that question came to light later in the day when Stewart himself was testifying and Meuser asked if he believed Barn 74 was part of the racetrack property. "I thought it was a private barn," Stewart replied.
"I thought it was Patrick’s private barn. He’d always referred to it that way."
Records showed that Stewart had purchased four vials of the cobra venom in July 2006 from BioToxins, a Saint Cloud, Fla., company. The veterinarian testified that he had used one of the vials on a former racehorse that had been rescued from a farm and was being used as a stable pony. The other vials remained in their shrinkwrap packaging. The vials contain a powder which is then mixed in a salilne solution before injection.
Among the other substances seized was a container of Carbidopa-Levodopa, a human medication used to treat Parkinson’s disease. Scollay testified that the drug could act as a stimulant and reduce fatigue in humans. In later testimony, Stewart said he did not use the drug on any horses but did not recall why he had it. Another bottle with an unknown honey-like substance inside was labeled "For Mythical Elmo," according to the testimony, but it was more likely meant for the Biancone-trained filly Mythical Echo. Its contents remain unknown.
Another bottle found was labeled with the lettering "R.T.H.." When asked about the "R.T.H." substance, Stewart said "a fellow from South Africa had given it to me. It was used there to treat bleeding." When pressed he said he had no idea what pharmacological agents were contained in the liquid. .Stewart said he has had his license to practice on "competition animals" (including horses, greyhounds and camels) suspended in Australia, where he earned his veterinary degree in 1997. He is banned from racetracks but is allowed to continue his veterinary practice in the United States.
The hearing will continue Dec. 9. Among the issues to be covered area the contents of Stewart’s personal computer, which has been sent to a business that conducts forensic searches on computer hard drives to extract any information related to his veterinary practice for a period of time prior to his suspension.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: als, alydar, biotoxins, bob watt, carbidopa-Levodopa, cobra venom, cobratoxin, dr. charles allen, dr. churck allen, drugs in racing, harvie wilkinson, john veitch, Keeneland, kentucky horse racing commission, lou gehrig's disease, Mary Scollay, mike meuser, mythical echo, mythical elmo, parkinson's, patrick biancone, Paulick Report, r.t.h., Ray Paulick, rodney stewart Posted in Medication, Regulatory Issues | 14 Comments »
Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Attorneys for Rodney Stewart, the veterinarian suspended for five years by Kentucky racing authorities in the 2007 “cobra venom” case that also implicated trainer Patrick Biancone, said in opening statements in an appellate hearing on Wednesday morning the suspension against their client was excessive and should be lifted.
Mike Meuser and Karen Murphy are representing Stewart, who received a four-year ban for possession of prohibited substances and a one-year suspension for failure to cooperate in the investigation. The appeal is being heard by Bob Layton, a hearing officer for the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, which is represented by attorney Bob Watt.
Click here to see the original ruling.
In his opening statements, Meuser said Stewart had no intention of using the prohibited substances found in a refrigerator and packed in a soft-sided cooler in one of three barns Biancone occupied and that they had been packed by Stewart’s wife in preparation for the couple’s move to New York. In fact, Meuser contended, Stewart wasn’t even aware of the cooler’s contents, which the attorney said were placed in the refrigerator because it was a “hot June day.”
Meuser said, the three vials of prohibited cobra toxin found in the bag were still shrink-wrapped. Another prohibited substance found, Carbidopa-Levodopa (a human drug to treat Parkinson’s disease), was still in its original container, Meuser said, and its usage date had expired. “There is no evidence there was any attempted use of any of these substances,” said Meuser, who added that the cooler also contained rabies vaccines for dogs and cats.
Watt, in his statement, said the cobra venom, a powerful painkiller, had been purchased from BioToxins, a Florida-based company that specialized in snake venom. Watt referred to other substances discovered in the June 22, 2007, barn searches conducted by investigators with the racing commission (then known as the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority) and Keeneland security, including Ketoconazole, “something called Throat RX, and one injectable honey colored solution marked ‘For Mythical Elmo.’”
Meuser did not address the latter substances in his opening statement.
Watt said Stewart and his attorneys failed to properly respond to requests that were made to Stewart for billing and computer records, which resulted in the one-year suspension for failure to cooperate. Murphy countered that the ban should be lifted because the commission failed to give Stewart a hearing within 48 hours of a request for a stay of the suspension. She also complained that the request for a home computer was unreasonable and that the commission “was fishing for further violations,” even going so far, she said, as conducting tests in Hong Kong.
Biancone, who recently returned to training in California, was out of racing about one year, accepting a six-month suspension and agreeing not to apply for his trainer’s license for another six months.
A number of witnesses are being called in the case. Layton is expected to make a ruling within 60 days of the completion of the hearing.
To read about some of the testimony in the hearing, click here.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: biotoxins, bob layton, bob watt, carbidopa-Levodopa, cobra venom, karen murphy, Keeneland, kentucky horse racing authority, kentucky horse racing commission, ketokonazole, michael meuser, mike meuser, mythial elmo, mythical elmo, parkinson's, patrick biancone, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, rodney stewart, snake venom, throat rx Posted in Horse Welfare, Medication, Regulatory Issues | 5 Comments »
Friday, October 10th, 2008
The 15-day suspension against Kentucky Derby-winning trainer Rick Dutrow for an alleged Clenbuterol positive in Salute the Count, a horse that ran at Churchill Downs on May 2, should be overturned by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, hearing officer James Robke has ruled.
Clenbuterol has a permissible threshold level of 25 picograms per ml of serum, according to state guidelines. Iowa State Laboratory reported a finding of 41 picograms; the documentation packet was labeled: “Confirmation for Clenbuterol in Plasma.” But the hearing officer ruling said there was no evidence presented by Iowa State or a secondary, confirmatory lab at Louisiana State University that confirmed the presence of Clenbuterol in serum. “Neither was there any evidence to explain the difference between serum and plasma,” the hearing officer recommendation states. Because of this, the administrative officer said the commission had "not met its burden" to prove the allegations against Dutrow were true.
The recommendation (click here to read the complete ruling) said the commission “failed to prove that the amount of Clenbuterol was above the threshold of ‘25 picograms per ml of serum.’ The commission proved that the amount of Clenbuterol in Salute the Count was indeed 41 picograms per ml of plasma. No evidence was presented to explain the difference (between plasma and serum). When dealing with two amounts … it is imperative that there is specificity as to the amounts.”
Lisa Underwood, executive director of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, issued the following statement: “The staff of the KHRC has reviewed the hearing officer’s recommendations to the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission regarding the steward’s ruling against trainer Richard Dutrow Jr. We have concluded that we have a strong basis for filing exceptions to the recommended order, and we intend to do so promptly.”
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Tags: Big Brown, clenbuterol, Horse Racing, horse racing regulations, iowa state lab, james robke, kentucky horse racing commission, lisa underwood, louisiana state university lab, Medication, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, richard dutrow jr., rick dutrow, salute the count, withdrawal guidelines Posted in Big Brown, Horse Racing, Kentucky, Medication, Regulatory Issues | 4 Comments »
Tuesday, October 7th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
People are making and cancelling bets on horses after races have begun. Let me repeat that: PEOPLE ARE MAKING AND CANCELLING BETS ON HORSES AFTER RACES HAVE BEGUN. Does anyone have a problem with that?
Apparently, several members appointed to a subcommittee on integrity that is part of a Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing in Kentucky aren’t all that concerned about the issue. The integrity subcommittee couldn’t even muster a quorum when three of its six voting members failed to show up for the panel’s first meeting at the offices of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission on Monday afternoon.
At the outset of the meeting, subcommittee chairman Ned Bonnie (a member of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission) said the panel was poised to take action on integrity issues until he was reminded by the commission’s executive director, Lisa Underwood, that a quorum wasn’t present.
Bonnie was joined by subcommittee members Robert Beck Jr. (an attorney and chairman of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission) and Robert Vance, the secretary of Kentucky’s Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet. But missing were racing commission vice-chairman Tracy Farmer (chairman of the Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing and a Thoroughbred owner and breeder), Louisville real estate developer Brian Lavin and Paducah, Ky., attorney Duncan Pitchford.
It’s no wonder that some are referring to this entire exercise proposed by Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear as a “task farce.”
Bonnie was disappointed at the no-shows, to be sure, but how do you think horseplayers feel? They are the ones, after all, whose confidence has been eroded by an archaic totalizator system with flaws that are being exploited by techno-savvy thieves; off-shore rebate shops that are virtually unregulated; a patchwork network of simulcast sites that answer to 38 different regulatory bodies; and ineffective rules, many of which were written for the good old days when the only bets made took place on track with a live teller.
For anyone not paying attention, the volume of pari-mutuel handle on horse racing is down this year by roughly 5%. It’s not just a Kentucky problem. By year’s end, total pari-mutuel handle in the United States may very well dip below $14 billion for the first time since 1999. That’s 10 years of stagnation.
We can blame the economy or competition from other forms of entertainment and gambling. Or we can ask our customers, which the National Thoroughbred Racing Association recently did, as to why they are not pushing as many dollars into the pari-mutuel pools as they used to. According to Keith Chamblin, the NTRA executive who outlined the consumer research at an industry conference, the attitudes of racing’s best customers can be summed up in five words: “Our core fans are pissed.”
Consumers are pissed because they feel cheaters continue to win races at an alarming rate by using performance enhancing drugs. They are convinced people are making or cancelling bets after races begin. And they see racing commissions and task forces and blue ribbon panels as pointless exercises conducted by mindless political appointees who are too out of tune to understand the problems or too apathetic to fix them.
That may or may not be the case with Kentucky’s Task Force and its various subcommittees. It should be noted that a majority of the ex officio non-voting members of the integrity subcommittee were on hand, including owner-breeder Gary Biszantz, professional horseplayer Mike Maloney and businessman Frank Kling, who spent a great deal of time and effort working on wagering integrity issues as a member of the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority, a panel dissolved by Beshear earlier this year and replaced with the current racing commission. All three spoke up in ways that indicate they understand the problems and sense the urgency in addressing them.
But the ex officio members can’t vote on any action items addressed by the integrity subcommittee. That’s up to the six voting members to do – if and when they show up for a meeting.
In the meantime, the entire Task Force should remember those five chilling words repeated by Chamblin: “Our core fans are pissed.”
The ball is in the court of the Kentucky Task Force and regulators, track operators, account wagering companies and others throughout this country.
What are they going to do address the concerns of racing’s best customers?
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Tags: brian lavin, duncan pitchford, frank kling, gary biszantz, Horse Racing, integrity subcommittee, keith chamblin, kentucky horse racing, kentucky horse racing commission, kentucky racing, lisa underwood, mike maloney, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, ned bonnie, NTRA, pari-mutuel betting, pari-mutuel handle, pari-mutuel wagering, pari-mutuels, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, robert beck jr., robert vance, steve beshear, task force on the future of horse racing, totalizator, Tote System, tracy farmer Posted in Horse Racing, Industry Organizations, Industry Reform, Kentucky, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, Regulatory Issues, Simulcasting, Wagering | 16 Comments »
Monday, October 6th, 2008
Ray Paulick is live blogging the Task Force on the Future of Horse Racing’s subcommittee on integrity of racing and pari-mutuel activities from the offices of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission Monday afternoon, beginning at 1 p.m.
Edward (Ned) Bonnie, a member of the racing commission, is chairing the meeting, which is called to order at 1 p.m. "Hopefully we are going to be able to move this peanut down the sidewalk and take some action, however modest, by the end of this meeting."
1:05 p.m. … Hold your horses, Ned! There are six members of the subcommittee and four are needed for a quorum to take any action, acccording to racing commission executive director LIsa Underwood. Unfortunately, there are only three "voting members" of the task force on hand at the beginning of the meeting. Does that say anything about the task force’s commitment to integrity? Hmmmmmmm.
1:10 p.m. …Sounds like Ned Bonnie may be filibustering till someone else shows up to give this group a quorum. Bonnie is talking about various white papers he has written on integrity issues in Kentucky. Earth to Ned: No one with authority has acted on those white papers. Try a different color.
Bonnie states that Keeneland employs the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau (TRPB), the so-called “security arm” of the Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America (not to be confused with the National Thoroughbred Racing Association). However, it is revealed Turfway Park, which is owned in part by Keeneland, does not use the TRPB. Is no one on this task force subcommittee curious why Keeneland doesn’t use TRPB at Turfway?
Bonnie says Kentucky’s racing regulators have been understaffed for many years in the area of security. “Feet on the ground is the most effective way to produce security on the backside,” he says. Bonnie says New York has 12 investigators. When vets show up at the back gate at a New York track, Bonnie says, the security chief for the New York State Racing and Wagering Board assigns an investigator to ride with them. New York’s security arm recommends that each state have a good security staff, well paid, but that the industry also needs a group, not unlike the Big Event Team that provides stable area security at major events. “If we are going to have the integrity the industry accepts the need for, then we are going to have to have the tools to get that done," Bonnie says.
1:20 p.m. … First up is Isidore Sobkowski, an entrepreneur who said he has developed a system for wagering security in conjunction with the Association of Racing Commissioners International Integrity Services. Sobkowski said he used to nail insider traders on Wall Street and was an interim consultant to the NTRA on wagering integrity back when the organization hoped to have an Office of Wagering Security. Sobkowski told Bonnie he spent two years trying to sell his pari-mutuel security system to the NTRA, but it “became clear” they weren’t going to buy it. As of Jan. 1, 2009, Sobkowski said, totes will be subject to a rule in New York State for “independent monitoring.” He said California, Oregon and other states will follow suit. Totes may be able to pass on costs TO THE CUSTOMER (see 2:15 p.m. update), Sobkowski added.
Izzy (easier to type than his full name) has some proprietary software called MonitorPlus that he said detects “potentially inappropriate activity in the transactional stream and security database.”
1:25 p.m. … Bad guys who want to break into the tote systems are getting smarter, Izzy says. Reminds me of "when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns." He is offering a "turn-key solution. " Izzy says, "Plug it in, it works, take the plug out, it stops working."
1:30 p.m. … Still no quorum for this meeting.
1:35 p.m. … Sobkowski and RCI president Ed Martin came up with the idea of RCI Integrity Services at a diner outside of Saratoga. Now he is filibustering, talking about "artificial intelligence" and all the people who were too stupid to buy his services until now.
1:40 p.m. ,,, Denny Oelschluger (an associate of Izzy’s … can’t they hire someone with an easy name to type?) talks about some of the actual results the MonitorPlus system has detected. Examples: an advance deposit wagering account with computer assisted wagearing that has a rate of return of 1.5 on all bets (the normal is less than 0.80); in looking at 862 races (5,800 wagering pools, over six days), Monitor Plus detected multiple instances of cancel delays (bets canceled after the close of wagering). The canceled bets are losers, suggesting a similar pattern to past post wagering on winning bets; win pool odds are being manipulated by canceled transactions. The system also picks up suspicious wagering on "fixed" or "boat" races, Denny says.
1:50 p.m. … "How do we stop this?" Bonnie asks. I believe that’s why we are here, sir. I assume he is talking about the illegal wagering, but maybe he is talking about the presentation of MonitorPlus (see below).
2:00 p.m. … "We are not going to serve dinner here tonight," Bonnie says. In other words, isn’t 45 minutes enough time to deal with this issue of integrity? Please sir, just a little more time, Izzy begs after that remark. To her credit, Lisa Underwood steps in to say that it would be a good idea if the system could be explained further for the members of the task force subcommittee.
2:05 p.m. … It just occurred to me that this MonitorPlus system does not have the stamp of approval of the Jockey Club (no Jockey Club officials are at the meeting), which in my opinion is going to severely impact its chances of approval. Those Jockey Club tentacles have a long reach.
2:08 p.m. … Izzy does a quick "how the system works" presentation. It includes a national database that analyzes wagers everywhere. Bonnie questions whether a national data base has jurisdiction on account wagering systems based off-shore in places like St. Kitts (where many of the rebate shops are located). Izzy says on Oct. 18 those off-shores are going to be "read the riot act" in a meeting in Oregon. Not sure why. Again, it looks like this could meander down the path of "lack of national authority." Izzy says national legislation would help but then adds that the industry doesn’t seem to want that.
2:10 p.m. … "Clustering" is explained by Izzy as unusual things that happen in a betting stream. Once clusters are found, they are analyzed with such things as a SNA or social network analysis that looks at who is involved (jockeys, trainers, owners), what is their record, who are their associates …a who, what, when, and maybe a why the unusual cluster of betting activity occurred.
2:15 p.m. … Customers will be paid by the month; fees will be assessed by how much the MonitorPlus system is used, and its price is based on the handle. Mike Maloney, the horseplayer on the task force, asks how costs are passed on to customers. Industrywide it would cost $6 million, Izzy says, with the increase to be added to takeout (approximately .0004% of handle, based on $15 billion in national handle). Maloney says takeout is too high already, but that the small additional amount doesn’t bother him. A lot cheaper than the $50 million IBM wanted to charge a few years ago, Izzy says.
2:25 p.m. … Frank Kling, a member of the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority talks about the work his committee had done regarding problems related to the tote system before Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear disbanded the authority and replaced it with the racing commission and mostly filled it with people who helped get him elected. Sounds like any good work that committee may have done will soon be forgotten.
2:35 p.m. … Horseplayer Mike ($10 million in bets a year) Maloney takes the floor. "I’ll rely on my 30 years of hard knocks at the racetrack to help expalin this." Maloney refers to a white paper he wrote for the commission and says a year ago no one was talking about wagering integrity. "We’re at the very beginning of this process," Maloney says. "This is an opportunity for Kentucky to take the lead. No one has really stepped forward." Maloney believes that increased wagering security will lead to greater confidence among bettors, who may bet more in the future. "Our wagering system is flawed," he says. "I hope everyone on this task force agrees with that. … Any reasonable person would have to agree with that." Maloney sees problems with past posting (accidental, part of a sophisticated plan, larceny, incompetence, human error). There are delayed cancellations. "When they are used to take advantage at the racetrack, it’s basically stealing," he says. "Since we don’t have a national authority, every bettor, every participant depends on the state racing commission to protect their interests. Today we fall far short of that mark, and it’s in the hands of the racing commission. The racing commission is the protector of the bettor’s rights."
"Tracks don’t record (in minutes and seconds) when their races begin," Maloney says. "Betting sites are allowed to participate in our wagering pools without proper oversight. In order to protect all bettors’ rights, no one should be allowed to participate in any Kentucky racing pool unless they agree to a certain level of oversight."
2:45 p.m. … Maloney is stunned that no American track (until recently) records the actual start time of a race, in order to compare it to when the betting is cut off, then says an average group of eighth graders would make that as a requirement if they were to set basic rules for racing. Tote companies do record when the betting stops, Maloney said. Kling said that Nick Nicholson of Keeneland added the start time to television monitors for Keeneland’s races. The times between tote companies and racetracks are not currently synchronized. "Lacking a national body of oversight I don’t know where we start on this," Maloney says. "How hard is it to do that?" Maloney asks. "You’d think we could do that with a conference call in an hour. We’re not asking to reinvent the wheel or split the atom."
2:50 (at least according to my clock) p.m. … Maloney is still stuck on time. He relates how Sunday at Keeneland a clock on Keeneland’s monitor showing the time in hours/minutes/seconds and a monitor with a Belmont Park race showing hours/minutes/seconds each had a different time of day. He relates to how the Nevada Gaming Control Board closely monitors the game of Keno and how that regulatory agency would crack down on the kinds of problems that horse racing has. "In racing we know we have these problems," he said, "we just let it go on. Nobody pays a fine, nobody loses their license. Who takes the brunt of that? The bettor. And the game of racing. The industry is hurting itself by not policing itself."
2:58 p.m. … Maloney still going after them, saying that past-posting incidents only come up when they are discovered by the press. The tracks and the tote companies won’t admit it until they have to, he says. It’s up to the commissions he repeats. His solutions: 1) "invest in technology to make the longest wagering cycle no more than 15 seconds" (he refers to a five-year old study done in the wake of the 2002 Pick Six scandal at the Breeders’ Cup that called for the 15-second cycle, and said it hasn’t been done yet); 2) "use technology to directly link the pressing of the starter’s button to the closing of the wagering system" (currently stewards push a button to close betting); 3) "require tracks to record when their races start. I would like to see that be in the regulations"; 4) "require all tracks and tote companies to synch their time systems to one industry standard." Maloney said he is "so encouraged" after years of banging his head against the wall on these issues.
3:05 p.m. … Bonnie looks a bit deflated when he says the subcommittee can’t take action on anything today for lack of a quorum.
3:10 p,m. … Bonnie asks Maloney why something hasn’t been done yet. "The industry lacks oversight," Maloney tells him. Duh.
3:13 p.m. … Owner/breeder Gary Biszantz, a member of the subcommittee speaks up. "I’m not sure why I’m here today," he says, then goes on to tell the story of how he told officials at the New York Racing Association five years ago that there was past posting going on and they said he was crazy. Biszantz pushes for a non-technological solultion. Close the pools at post time, before the horses are loaded into the gate, he says. "As a bettor, I’d have absolutely no problem with that," Maloney said. "But the tracks wouldn’t go for that," Biszantz answers back, then goes on about all the problems the industry faces because of the lack of oversight at nearly every level. "It’s total chaos," Biszantz emphasizes.
3:18 p.m. … Bonnie calls for a break. Maybe he can round up another committee member and get a quorum.
3:30 p.m. … Frank Fabian and Curtis Linnell from TRPB are introduced. Fabian, a former G-man who worked in the terrorism division of the FBI, is a smooth talker. He applauded the TRPB’s own wagering analysis program that the TRA funded to the tune of $600,000 and eventually fell into the lap of the Jockey Club. "For two years now, we have been doing quite a bit," he told Maloney. "We’ve been quite successful," Fabian said, adding the TRPB has the full support of all the Kentucky racetracks. Fabian said wagering anomalies have been identified and "reports have been filed" with the racetracks where those anomalies occurred. Maloney doesn’t look very convinced, and I am reminded of the reaction of one industry leader to Fabian’s similar presentation at a Jockey Club Round Table a couple of years ago in Saratoga Springs, N.Y. "That was total b.s." this person said to me after Fabian’s Round Table presentation.
"I think TRPB is doing all it can to bring the engagement of wagering integrity in the environment we are in now," Fabian told the commission subcommittee. Fabian said the TRPB has analyzed off-shore wagering activities and is putting these betting shops through a due diligence process, but would not comment when questioned on whether or not anything found in that analysis was "alarming." Malone presses Fabian on whether or not RGS (a major rebate shop) has agreed to a due diligence process. Fabian employs an artful dodge, then introduces Linnell.
3:45 p,m. … Linnell gives a history lesson about how the NTRA blew through $3 million after the Pick Six scandal of 2002 without solving the wagering problems it was charged to examine.
3:50 p.m. … Linnell focuses his report on "stop betting," showing the varous ways and times betting can be stopped. As a representatiive of the racetracks (it should be remembered), he reminds the commission that betting should be left open as long as possible. A nifty bar graph on the close of betting shows that 23% of the entire win pool of a race is wagered between the "off time" when a race is scheduled to go and the final close. Linnell calls it "counterproductive" to close wagering pools early because "betting device technology is improving."
4:00 p.m. … During a Q&A session on some of Linnell’s presentation, Biszantz complains that we are listening too much to the tote companies instead of doing the right thing. Malone shakes his head in agreement. Linnell returns to his presentation and focuses on factors that slow down the posting of final odds (which infuriate horse players who see the odds change midway through a race). One factor is the cancel-delay — the time that bets can be cancelled after betting has closed. Cancel delays are sometimes allowed for pari-mutuel clerks to make. Double hops from betting hub to betting hub can also slow odds, Linnell said, as can tracks who are not on-board an "almost final" tote update. (It’s all too complicated, which is probably the point of his presentation.)
4:05 p.m. The TRPB is investigating past-post incidents, Linnell said, using its wagering analysis tools. Those investigations are launched as a result of multiple points of contact, whether from tracks, commissions, major horseplayers and even England’s BetFair betting exchange, which takes bets on U.S. races. Linnell then explained several reasons for how past-post betting can occur, including human error or technology and hardware or software failure. Linnell is losing me again, talking about master systems, slave systems, and clones. It must mean something to someone.
The committee then discusses mistakes by tote companies that allow past posting and how they should be penalized in some way if the tote companies make a mistake similar to the kind that occurred several months ago when past-post wagering took place at Tampa Bay Downs on a race at Philadelphia Park that had already been run. "Every bet made was a winning bet!" Linnell joked.
4:20 p.m. … Linnell gave his solutions to the problems of the stop-betting issue: conduct daily testing of stop betting system; have a back-up to the stewards/judges function that currently stops betting; have a second stop-betting command; get rid of all cancel delays; and have tote time recorded on the video feed from every track.
4:25 p.m. … Maloney wants more accountability and transparency regarding the public disclosure of past-posting incidents and their causes. "I see this as a big problem with the confidence of bettors," he said. Linnell didn’t disagree, laying out a series of actions that TRPB recommends in the event of past-posting incidents, including more disclosure and transparency on the incidents, and the extent of wagering that took place after a race began.
4:35 p.m. … Linnell wraps up his presentation, and I’m afraid that Bonnie didn’t live up to his promise to move the peanut up the sidewalk. No quorum, no peanuts, and no sidewalks are in sight.
4:50 p.m. … Bonnie asks Fabian how Kentucky can improve its backstretch integrity related to the use of performance enhancing drugs in horses. "It’s through (on-track) investigators that helps us focus (TRPB’s) scant resources to work with commissions to have targeted investigations and targeted searches," Fabian said "We have to get back to some of the basics for our investigatve techniques. We have fallen short on having quality investigators."
5:00 p.m. … After a meandering discussing about the need for backstretch security to deal with catching cheaters who use performance enhancing drugs, Bonnie closes the meeting. "When we have a quorum we’ll take some action," he says.
Let’s hope someone holds the commission to that.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Tags: association of racing commissioners international, bob beck, ed martin, edward bonnie, frank kling, gary biszantz, Horse Racing, isidore sobkowski, Keeneland, kentucky horse racing commission, lisa underwood, mike maloney, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, ned bonnie, nick nicholson, pari-mutuel wagering, past-post betting, Paulick Report, pick six scandal, Ray Paulick, RCI, subcommittee on integrity of racing and pari-mutuel act, task force on future of horse racing, thoroughbred racing associations, thoroughbred racing protective bureau Posted in Kentucky, Regulatory Issues | 11 Comments »
Thursday, October 2nd, 2008
By Ray Paulick
The Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, stung by the recent disclosure by its former chief veterinarian that no testing for TCO2 loading (also known as milkshakes) was conducted at the Ellis Park Thoroughbred meeting this summer, is facing another embarrassment involving its impotence over positive tests for blood-doping agents in four horses at the Red Mile harness track in Lexington, the Paulick Report has learned.
High-placed sources at the horse racing commission and Kentucky’s Equine Drug Research Council told the Paulick Report that out-of-competition testing on at least four horses detected a form of erythropoietin, which helps increase the production of red blood cells and has been used in both human and equine sports to illegally enhance performance. It is virtually impossible to detect in normal post-race tests because the drug is given up to two weeks before a race and can only be detected for about 48 hours thereafter. Cycling and other human sports rely on out-of-competition testing to catch blood-doping cheaters.
Because the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission has no rules on the book regulating the results of out-of-competition testing, it is unable to prosecute any of the positive tests or penalize those involved. Officials at the Red Mile, according to sources, have merely barred the horses from further competition at the current meeting, which ends on Saturday. Rules concerning out-of-competition testing at the Red Mile can be found here.
Red Mile president Joe Costa could not be reached for comment.
“The state does not have rules for out-of-competition testing,” said Jim Carroll, a communications officer for Kentucky’s Public Protection Cabinet. “I would refer you to the Red Mile. The track has authority.”
Carroll would not confirm whether the indefinite suspensions announced on Thursday of two veterinarians, Rick Mather and Rick Rothfuss of Columbus, Ohio, were related to the alleged positive blood-doping tests. A press release from the commission said two Kentucky Horse Racing Commission investigators searched two trucks owned by the veterinarians and seized records and unidentified substances, which are being sent to a laboratory for testing. Richard Williams, the commission’s presiding judge for Standardbred racing, imposed the suspension after reviewing the physical evidence. A hearing on the suspension is pending.
“It’s gotten ridiculous,” one prominent Standardbred horsemen told the Paulick Report. “We have more vets driving around on the backstretch than we have horses back there.”
One state that takes a harsher view of blood-doping positive tests and possession of illegal blood-doping agents is New Jersey, whose racing commission routinely conducts out-of-competition testing. The New Jersey Commission has issued bans of more than 15 years for horsemen and veterinarians caught in blood-doping schemes, and in one case criminal charges have been filed.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: aranesp, bicarbondate loading, blood doping, blood-doping agents, drugs in racing, ellis park, epo, epogen, erythropoietin, horse doping, Horse Racing, jim carroll, joe costa, kentucky horse racing commission, Medication, milkshakes, new jersey racing commission, out of competition testing, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, red mile, richard williams, rick mather, rick rothfuss, standardbred racing, tco2 Posted in Industry Reform, Medication, Regulatory Issues | Comments Off
|
|