Posts Tagged ‘Jack Brothers’

CULLEN: SALES BAN ONLY THE BEGINNING

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

By Ray Paulick
Know and Trust is a 2-year-old filly owned by some former clients of bloodstock agent Jim Cullen and trained by Cullen’s childhood friend and college roommate William Denzik Jr.

The filly’s name is something of an inside joke: “know and trust” is an expression Cullen often used when communicating with his clients. Today, many of those clients and a variety of others in the Thoroughbred industry feel they have been betrayed or misled by the man who operates Cullen Bloodstock, the Oakland Group advertising and marketing firm, and the now-defunct Four Board Stables. Cullen is currently licensed as a trainer by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission. He trains a string of horses for his wife under the name Florence Racing Stable and recently claimed a horse on behalf of Margaux Farm’s Steve Johnson. He also sells horse insurance for Old Colony Insurance Company of Lexington.

“We named the filly as an homage to Cullen,” said John Trumbulovich of Chicago, who first got involved with the Kentucky native in 2006. “Obviously we didn’t know him and certainly shouldn’t have trusted him.”

Cullen was recently given a one-year banishment from participation at Keeneland Association auctions, based on violation of a Code of Conduct written by the Sales Integrity Task Force, an initiative of the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association. Fasig-Tipton is also enforcing the one-year suspension, which runs through 2010, and other sales companies around the country are considering taking the same action. The sanctions came earlier in November, nine months after Trumbulovich, Kevin Geiger of Colorado and Vincent Colbert of Massachusetts contacted the Task Force with complaints about their former bloodstock adviser. “We could easily have turned our back on this, walked away and say we got screwed,” Colbert said. “We talked it over and decided we didn’t want this to happen to somebody else.”

But that is just the beginning of Cullen’s troubles. He has been sued by several parties, including horse owner Cam Horton, the stallion season firm Early Season Income, National City Bank, and Wells Fargo Bank. The Internal Revenue Service says Cullen owes $233,143.72 in taxes from 2003-05. He agreed in 2007 to pay Cam Horton $333,000 for not reimbursing Horton for a season to A.P. Indy after Horton’s mare aborted, and has not met that obligation. A Fayette County judge has ordered him to pay National City Bank $348,181.65. Wells Fargo is in the process of foreclosing on Cullen’s home.

Cullen has acknowledged under oath that he hasn’t paid stud fees to a number of farms with which he’s done business, that he may have misstated his ownership or equity in horses used as collateral for a line of credit, and that, at the time of the deposition in March 2009, he couldn’t even examine his own books because “I owe my accountant $1,800.”

Several other parties claim Cullen owes them money, but they’ve given up trying to collect. “I lost quite a bit of money but I just had to get away from him, said Banshee Farm’s Scott Mallory, who “inherited” Cullen as a business partner following the 2006 crash of the Comair flight in Lexington that killed his father, Dan Mallory. “You can’t squeeze blood out of a turnip, so I just decided to leave it alone. He’s always promised ‘I’ll get you paid one of these days,’ but it gets to the point that you want to get as far away from him as you can. That’s what most people have done”

Cullen calls the ban by Keeneland the result of “a banking situation…I understand that two of my clients did not receive my proceeds (from sales of horses),” he told the Paulick Report. “The difficulty is that at least one of the people who filed complaints against me (with the Sales Integrity Task Force) owes me money. This has nothing to do with unscrupulous behavior on my part.”

“Everyone’s always gotten what they paid for,” Cullen continued. “I have not held stud fees. I have had trouble with ESI (Early Season Income)—two separate situations that are not applicable to this decision by Keeneland. I have been working in good faith with ESI and everything, for all intents and purposes, is satisfied.”

A number of people would dispute that statement, including an official at Early Season Income. Cullen’s deposition in the National City lawsuit contradicts what he told the Paulick Report about holding stud fees and everyone he’s done business “always” getting what they paid for.

FROM JOURNALISM TO PINHOOKING

Cullen is a former journalist who worked for Thoroughbred Times as a news reporter, then served as editor of the Texas Thoroughbred magazine while contributing to the Blood-Horse as a free-lance correspondent. He also was employed for a short time by the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association based in Lexington. As recently as August of this year, he was a guest speaker at a new owners’ seminar Blood-Horse Publications sponsored in conjunction with the Texas Thoroughbred Association prior to a Fasig-Tipton yearling sale.

He went to work for Terry Finley’s West Point Thoroughbreds in 2001, operating out of a Lexington office until parting ways in 2003. (Finley opted not to comment on Cullen to the Paulick Report, saying only that he strongly urged Cullen not use Finley as a reference in future job applications.) He also worked briefly selling stallion seasons for Adena Springs in 2006. That ended, according to Jack Brothers, a longtime bloodstock adviser to farm owner Frank Stronach, because of “misappropriated funds.” Cullen claims that Adena owes him money.

A $40,000 purchase of an El Prado yearling in 2003 that turned into a $360,000 pinhooking success the following year put Cullen on the map as a bloodstock agent, and he was able to establish a significant line of credit with National City Bank.

Cullen bought horses at public auction and formed syndicates to race or breed and charged administrative or management fees. Among the partners were Trumbulovich, Geiger and Colbert. Geiger first started asking questions of Cullen about some of the financial aspects of the partnership, among them: how were purse earnings or sales proceeds being distributed? When he didn’t get satisfactory answers Geiger started networking with some of the other partners, including Trumbulovich and Colbert. “It opened a floodgate,” Trumbulovich said.

“Nobody that dealt with him knew who owned what,” said Mallory.

‘I’M A GOOD HORSEMAN. I’M OBVIOUSLY NOT A GOOD BUSINESS PERSON’

A number of mares in the partnerships were bred, and the partners were billed for stud fees, which they subsequently paid for, according to Cullen’s sworn testimony in the March 2009 deposition involving the National City Bank lawsuit. Under questioning from attorney Emily Cowles of Morgan & Pottinger (representing National City) and Mike Meuser of Miller Griffin and Marks (representing Trumbulovic, Colbert and Geiger), Cullen admitted that on numerous occasions he did not use the money billed to clients for stud fees to pay those fees. Many of the fees were never paid to the farms.

Here is an excerpt regarding Cullen’s purchase of stallion seasons, the billing of clients and non-payment to farms:

 

MEUSER: Okay, and I can show you the other invoices. But on each occasion that you billed Mr. Colbert or Mr. Geiger or Mr. Trumbulovic for these stud feeds you labeled them specifically on your invoice that that’s what they were being billed for.

CULLEN: Correct. Yes, sir.

MEUSER: All right. And you had made the contractual arrangements with the farms to obtain those seasons?

CULLEN: Correct.

MEUSER: And you knew that when you received those monies from my clients you were obligated to to use them to satisfy those obligations?

CULLEN: See, I didn’t know that. I thought like I, like I’ve made clear, I thought that the whole protection of an LLC was designated to give you license to use that to the best benefit of the company as provided you satisfied what this obligation was for.

MEUSER: Well, you can certainly understand…

CULLEN: I can understand. Yes, sir.

MEUSER: … that a client who received this bill and paid it would have the expectation that their agent who they trusted would use those monies properly?

CULLEN: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. I, I agree to that. I mean.

MEUSER: That’s all I have.

CULLEN: Okay.

Meuser and Cowles coaxed out of Cullen admissions that sale proceeds from horses had not been distributed to partners, that stud fees to stallions had not been paid, and that farms often attached liens to the horses being sold, at times without the knowledge of the partners who had paid the stud fees to Cullen. He called the incidents inadvertent errors, and at one point said, “I’m a good horseman. I’m obviously not a good business perso.”

Cullen also admitted that he had not paid Fasig-Tipton for at least two horses he had purchased from the company, including a $100,000 yearling by Yankee Gentleman out of Silver Spool, later named Patsy Ann. Cullen said in his deposition that he has a signed agreement with Fasig-Tipton to pay for the horses because, as he told Fasig-Tipton executive Boyd Browning, “I don’t have it,” when asked for the money to pay for them. He had made no payments on the agreement as of March 2009. “There isn’t a hard schedule…basically it’s open-ended,” he told Cowles under questioning.

“Wow,” was all Cowles could say in response.

“Again,” said Cullen, “I think he’s (Browning)—given the economic climate and the fact he knows I’m a good pay I think he’s—well there’s been one payment made of $4,000….”

“So do you still owe Fasig-Tipton a hundred grand for Patsy Ann,” Cowles asked.

“I do,” said Cullen. “I, I owe them. Technically when we discussed it, and I hope, I don’t think Boyd would mind me sharing, he was willing to basically write it off. And I’m the one that said no. I bought it. I owe you. I will pay you. Just give me the time to pay it off. Anybody that I, I again, I haven’t declared bankruptcy. I’m not running. Any of the accounts I’ve made I’ve been—I will acknowledge and be responsible for. And Boyd knows me and knows that my word is good and I think that’s why he’s allowing me to pay this off.”

When I called Browning at Fasig-Tipton and asked if Cullen owes money to the company, he said, “I’m not going to answer that question. I’m uncomfortable answering that question. It wouldn’t be prudent. His banning (from participation in sales) is not related for any failure to pay money.”

I then told Browning that Cullen said in the deposition that Browning thought Cullen was “good pay.” If put under oath, I asked, would Browning agree with that statement?

There was a pause, followed by a long, slow chuckle. “If I was under oath I would have to answer that question, but I’m not under oath,” Browning said. “I would rather not have Mr. Cullen speak for me.”

Cullen’s relationship with homebuilder Cam Horton began in Dec. 2005 when Horton agreed to buy a season to A.P. Indy through Cullen Bloodstock for $318,000 to use to breed to his mare, Private Pursuit. Cullen would receive a $15,000 fee. The agreement called for the fee to be refunded if the mare did not get in foal or lost her pregnancy. On Oct. 12, 2006, after being pregnant to the cover of A.P. Indy, Private Pursuit aborted, but Horton didn’t get his money back from Cullen.  Cullen wrote a letter to Horton in February 2007, saying he was owed $105,000 from Adena Springs for his commissions in “selling $21 million in stud fees,” would sell some horses. In addition, he wrote, he was owed $42,000 in stallion fees and $34,000 was “owed to me by a multi-millionaire who just refuses to pay me even though he acknowledges the debt.”

Horton never got paid and took him to court. In July 2007, Cullen agreed to pay $333,000, with $25,000 payable at the time of the agreement, $75,000 due on or before Aug. 1, 2007, $100,000 due on or before Oct. 1, 2007 andd the balance due by Dec. 31, 2007. Horton’s attorney, Phillip Scott, said Cullen didn’t meet the obligation. “The agreement wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on,” Scott said.

‘YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH A LOT IN THIS BUSINESS’

Of all those who have dealt with Cullen in recent years, no one knows him better than trainer Denzik, who went to grade school, middle school and high school with Cullen, then roomed with him in college. He trained several horses for Cullen’s Four Board Stable partnership until their relationship went sour a couple of years ago.

“We were best friends,” Denzik told the Paulick Report, “but I haven’t talked to him for a year and a half. He wasn’t paying his bills. He was collecting the money from the people in the partnerships and kept it. I know most of the clients and they were a bunch of good people. He owes me over $20,000. We spent about $10,000 on an attorney, but once I got that bill I said this is ridiculous. We probably lost $30,000, but it may be the best $30,000 I ever lost, just to get him out of my life.”

Denzik, like many of the others who have been involved with Cullen, said he has an engaging personality and is a smooth talker.

“He did some acting when he was younger, and he can pull a different personality out when he needs too,” said Denzik. “When I look at him now and look back I can see he was well prepared to do what he’s been doing. People love him at first. He uses his acting ability, his writing ability and he’s personable…but it’s a bunch of b.s. He steals from people. The big questions we’ve all got is where the money went.

“There was always a little bit of a shady side to him,” Denzik said. “As we’ve gotten older it brought out the crook in him that probably has been in him a long time. He figured out you can get away with a lot in this business. I hope he gets put in jail."

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value.
Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

(UPDATED JUNE 3) PAULICK ENDORSES BREEDERS’ CUP CANDIDATES

Monday, June 1st, 2009
By Ray Paulick

(UPDATED JUNE 3 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN RECOMMENDATION FOR GEORGE ISAACS)

The 25 candidates running for election to the Breeders’ Cup board of Members and Trustees may have different backgrounds, income levels and positions within the Thoroughbred industry, but I think they all share a common thread: a desire to help the Breeders’ Cup grow. All are to be commended for their interest in helping achieve that goal, even if their philosophies do not follow the same path.

There are, however, only 13 positions for these 25 individuals on the board of Members and Trustees, whose principal role within the Breeders’ Cup organization is to elect the 13 members of the board of Directors at an annual meeting, scheduled this year for July 9. The smaller board of Directors makes all major decisions regarding the operations and governance of the Breeders’ Cup and elects a chairman and vice chairman each year. 

So who nominators elect to the board of Members and Trustees is critical in shaping the smaller, operating board of Directors. The six individuals whose two-year terms on the board of Directors expire in July of this year are: Reynolds Bell, Donald Dizney, Tracy Farmer, Don Robinson (who served out the remainder of B. Wayne Hughes’ term after Hughes’ resignation), G. Watts Humphrey Jr., and Robert T. Manfuso. Only elected Members and Trustees may run for the smaller board of Directors.

Fifteen of those running for the board of Members and Trustees submitted answers to questions from the Paulick Report or statements about their candidacy (click here to see their responses in an easy-to-read or print PDF document). Biographies of all the candidates can be viewed here at the Breeders’ Cup election web site.

I have covered the Thoroughbred industry for nearly 30 years and have seen a number of these candidates in board-room settings, talked with others about issues of interest to the Breeders’ Cup and Thoroughbred racing and breeding in general, and consider many of them friends. Some are or have been advertisers of this web site. In making the following comments and voting recommendations to nominators, I have done my best to remain objective in rating the various candidates without regard to friendships or business relationships.

Here is my summary of each candidate, along with a voting recommendation:

JOHN AMERMAN: Skilled businessman who as retired chairman and CEO of Mattel certainly understands consumer products and traditional marketing. I’ve not seen great leadership or fresh ideas spring from Amerman in his various industry roles and cannot recommend a vote for him on the board of Members and Trustees.

NADIA SANAN BRIGGS: Daughter of the outspoken but highly successful businessman Satish Sanan, who has played a major role in the Breeders’ Cup as chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee. Briggs has her own independent streak and would bring a fresh, young perspective to the board. She is bright, totally committed to the industry, and would make an outstanding member of the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.

JACK BROTHERS: Has played a major if understated role in the success of Frank Stronach’s Adena Springs breeding and racing operation after virtually growing up in the horse business. Doesn’t claim to have all the answers for resolving the challenges at the Breeders’ Cup, but I doubt there would be a more fair-minded or harder-working individual on the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.

BILL CASNER: Few people in the industry have shown the courage to stand up to the failed, old-guard industry leadership like Bill Casner has. He understands racing from the standpoint of the blue-collar horseman and now plays the game at the highest level while not forgetting his humble beginnings. Recommend for election.

CASE CLAY: One of the up-and-coming “next generation” industry leaders, Clay is the son of Three Chimneys Farm owner Robert Clay but was not heavily involved in the farm’s operation or the industry until the last five to seven years. I do have concerns that as one of three candidates with close ties to Three Chimneys (see below), there may be an effort to “stack the deck” for a future agenda, and for that reason cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees at this time.

LINCOLN COLLINS: One of three individuals (along with Case Clay and Tracy Farmer) closely allied with Three Chimneys Farm. Collins has a good reputation for honesty and integrity in his Kern Thoroughbreds bloodstock agency, though seems light on service and industry experience. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

DONALD R. DIZNEY: A member of both the board of Members and Trustees and the smaller Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, Dizney has done little to distinguish himself as more than a rubber-stamp voter for the status quo. There have been suggestions among some at the Breeders’ Cup that Dizney has not been as engaged through his board or committee attendance as others, but a request for attendance records of board meetings from Breeders’ Cup secretary Jim Philpott was ignored. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

TRACY FARMER: Politically powerful in Kentucky through his work and fund-raising with the Democratic Party, Farmer has been a close ally of Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and was appointed to the Kentucky Racing Commission, on which he serves as vice chairman. Farmer serves on both the board of Members and Trustees and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, where sources say he has not distinguished himself as an independent voice. The Paulick Report requested minutes of Breeders’ Cup board meetings to analyze the involvement of each board member, but secretary Jim Philpott denied the request. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

H. GREG GOODMAN: Houston native has been a partner with Lane’s End Farm’s Will Farish, which doesn’t necessarily suggest he will be a “yes” vote for a potential Farish-orchestrated board of Directors slate. However, his non-response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and his vague personal statement on the Breeders’ Cup voting web site does not build confidence in his independence. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

GEORGE ISAACS:(UPDATED JUNE 3, FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF RESPONSE TO PAULICK REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE) Veteran horseman is well respected throughout the industry for his work as general manager at Bridlewood Farm in Florida. Relatively new to national industry organizations, but in his responses to the Paulick Report questionnaire demonstrated a commitment to adding value to Breeders’ Cup nominations and increasing accountability and transparency within the organization. i believe it is also important to have representation among Florida breeders. Recommend for election.

TOM LUDT: One of the most independent-minded, cut-to-the-chase people I’ve seen in this industry in recent years. Has distinguished himself on the Kentucky Racing Commission, having been appointed by both a Republican and Democratic governor (and without being a major financial contributor to either of their campaigns), on committees at the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors. Recommend for election.

REILEY McDONALD: Has many years of experience in the auction arena, most prominently as co-owner of Eaton Sales. Has not been as involved in industry leadership positions as I would like to see for someone with his knowledge and insight, though it is encouraging to see him step up at this critical time. However, I cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

MICHAEL McMAHON: One of the individuals running who is completely invested in the Thoroughbred industry and its future, McMahon may lack in national industry organizational experience but more than makes up for it in passion. My instinct is he will add a truly independent voice who takes his responsibilities seriously. In his reply to the Paulick Report questionnaire, McMahon repeatedly spoke of the importance of increasing participation at the grass-roots level among breeders, by adding value to the program for nominators. Recommend for election.

CLEM MURPHY: Coolmore principals and associates are often guarded in what they say to the media, but I’ve found Murphy to be accessible and a source of innovative thinking when it comes to both the Breeders’ Cup and the racing industry. Recommend for election.

OGDEN MILLS PHIPPS: The phrase “lead, follow, or get out of the way” comes to mind. The Jockey Club chairman has had his opportunities to lead (New York Racing Association declined during his years of power), has not shown much interest in following, and that leaves one alternative. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

DAN PRIDE: Believes in accountability and transparency, and has brought fresh ideas and enthusiasm to Fasig-Tipton since joining the auction company from Darley. Pride does a good job representing a younger generation of leaders that have real-world experience. Recommend for election.

ANDRE REGARD: For a relatively young man, Regard has a broad base of knowledge, and I think there is little doubt that he will be a growing influence in future years as he gains experience in the industry and its various organizations. One to keep an eye out for in the future, but at this time cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

RICHARD SANTULLI: An enormously successful businessman, Santulli is a no-nonsense kind of guy who brings independence, integrity and a serious commitment to the Breeders’ Cup because of his passion for the Thoroughbred game,first as a fan and horseplayer and later as an owner and breeder. Last year’s effort by the old guard to keep Santulli off the smaller board of Directors represented a low point in the history of the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

JOSEPH V. SHIELDS JR. Has served on the board of Members and Trustees and board of Directors, but has not publicly articulated a clear vision for how the Breeders’ Cup can grow. Closely associated with old-guard Members and Trustees who have lacked innovation. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

JOHN SIKURA:
Fiercely independent and driven to build his own business, Sikura has a vision to grow the Breeders’ Cup to become an even more important world championship by incorporating horses from different parts of the globe. He is one of those “all in” horsemen who do not look at the Thoroughbred industry as a part-time hobby but as a full-time commitment of his time and financial resources, and his personal success is tied to the growth of events like the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

OLIVER TAIT: Represents Darley USA, one of the most important contributors to the Breeders’ Cup in terms of nominations and participation in the world championships. Tait may not be a household name in the U.S. at this stage of his career, but he has accumulated extensive international experience in Europe and Australia. Recommend for election.

DUNCAN TAYLOR: Listening to your customers seems like a logical approach to any business, but I don’t think that has been a strong suit of the Breeders’ Cup board of Directors or management in the past. Taylor Made has developed into the industry’s leading sales agency because of its customer-centric approach, an approach that can only help the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.

ROBERT TRUSSELL JR.: Was a member of the Gainesway Farm team when John Gaines created the Breeders’ Cup in the early 1980s, so he has a great depth of knowledge and history of the organization. However, it is difficult to grasp where he stands on issues of importance given his lack of response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and the absence of a personal statement accompanying his biography on the Breeders’ Cup election web site. (In the original version of this article, I reported the Breeders’ Cup web site did not include a biography of Trussell; that has since been added here.) Cannot recommend a vote at this time for election to the board of Members and Trustees.

ROB WHITELEY: If you are in favor of maintaining the status quo, Whiteley is not your candidate. He was an outspoken critic of the decision last December to suspend the stakes supplement program, and I believe his leadership on that issue led to a quick reversal by the board of Directors. Strongly believes in accountability, transparency and fiscal responsibility. Recommend for election.

JACK WOLF: Knowledgeable about the importance of the Breeders’ Cup in the industry and bullish on the role the organization can play to increase the popularity of the sport, something it has not yet been able to do. Refreshingly candid, independent and with outstanding credentials both in racing and in the outside business world. Recommend for election.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

(UPDATED JUNE 3) BREEDERS’ CUP CANDIDATES: WHERE THEY STAND

Monday, June 1st, 2009

By Ray Paulick
The 25 candidates for the 13 open positions on the Breeders’ Cup Board of Members and Trustees were asked by the Paulick Report last week to respond to six questions about themselves, their priorities and recommendations for the organization, and their thoughts on Breeders’ Cup governance issues.

Thirteen individuals responded in time for inclusion in this report to be published on Monday, June, 1, the first day Breeders’ Cup nominators had the opportunity to cast their ballots in the 2009 Members and Trustees election. Additional comments, from John Sikura, Clem Murphy and George Isaacs have been added; we hope other candidates who have not had the opportunity to respond will do so and the Paulick Report will publish any of their answers in the coming days.

In addition, I have offered my thoughts on the various candidates, along with recommendations on how I think nominators should vote in this election.

Click here to see the comments of the candidates in a chart form (UPDATED JUNE 3) that allows easy comparison.

Click here to read or print out a PDF document with all the responses (UPDATED JUNE 3), which are listed alphabetically.

Additionally, click here to access the biographies supplied to the Breeders’ Cup by each of the candidates. Nominators who have not received a customer number and passcode with voting instructions should e-mail the Breeders’ Cup nominations department or call (859) 514-9423.

Click here for a listing of all nominators and the number of votes they are eligible to cast in the election. Each vote can be used for up to 13 different candidates (for example, an individual entitled to 10 votes may cast 10 votes for as many as 13 individuals, but may not used 130 times  for one individual). There are a total of 40,258 eligible votes. Breeders’ Cup has not published tabulated results of previous elections, but approximately 12,000 votes were required to be elected, according to sources in the organization.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick