THAYER: IT’S MY BILL OR THE HIGHWAY
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009By Ray Paulick
Every Kentuckian’s favorite piñata, Republican state Sen. Damon Thayer, was Mike Penna’s guest last Saturday on the Horse Racing Radio Network’s “Equine Forum,” discussing, naturally, the issue of slot machines at Kentucky racetracks.
(To listen to a rebroadcast of the interview, click here.)
Thayer is feeling his oats these days, following the drubbing Republican Jimmy Higdon gave the horse industry-backed candidate, Jodie Haydon, in the recent special election for a Senate seat in the 14th district made available when the Republican incumbent accepted a judgeship offered by Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear. Had Haydon defeated Higdon, the Republican majority in the state Senate would have been wafer thin and the heavy-handed rule of Senate president David “Blackjack” Williams might have been in jeopardy.
But Williams and, I would assume, Mitch McConnell, the U.S. Senate’s minority leader from Kentucky, devised a brilliant last-minute scheme targeting prominent Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as Higdon’s real opponents. It was enough to turn the election in Higdon’s favor in this rural, conservative district, where Democrats in name only outnumber Republicans in voter registration rolls by a wide margin. Higdon won despite being heavily outspent by Haydon, thanks in large measure to a 527 organization, Keep Our Jobs in Kentucky, formed by prominent members of the horse industry who backed Haydon because of his position in favor of video lottery terminals or slot machines at Kentucky racetracks.
Thayer is feeling much maligned these days as a result of his non-support of a bill permitting racetrack VLTs that died in a Senate committee last summer and his more recent proposal for a constitutional amendment on the issue. That proposal fell on deaf ears during an October meeting with horsemen who called the measure “too little, too late.” (click here for details). In the wake of the horse industry’s recent setback at the polls, Thayer said he plans to push his proposal forward in the legislative session that begins in January and urged leaders of Kentucky’s horse industry to get behind it, or at the very least work with him on the bill.
“It’s not beneficial to the horse industry that despite the election loss they keep speaking out on my bill,” Thayer said during his radio appearance. “I have some Republican votes for this bill. I think you’ll be surprised by the number of Republicans who would vote for this. Democrats said they would block vote against this, which I think is fraught with peril.”
Thayer repeated his stand that he believes “slots by statute”–as he called the bill that was passed by the House but stopped in a Senate committee last summer—is not constitutional and would be held up by a lengthy legal challenge if it passed. Kentucky’s current attorney general said the statute would not be unconstitutional, though previous attorneys general opinions have gone the other way. “And by the way,” he added, “it is dead for the foreseeable future, OK, because there are not the votes in the Senate.”
A horse industry consultant who formerly worked for Jerry Carroll at Turfway Park and as an executive with the Breeders’ Cup, Thayer said he understands the economic pressure the horse industry is facing from the slumping economy and gaming in other states that is subsidizing tracks and purses. “There is no doubt, absolutely no doubt, the horse industry in Kentucky is suffering from not only the downturn in the economy, as is the horse industry throughout the United States, but also from an uneven playing field. I get it. I worked at Turfway Park when casino boats landed in Indiana.”
Thayer said many in the horse industry misunderstood the challenge those casino boats presented at the time. “No, no we don’t need to worry about those riverboats in Indiana, we don’t need to worry about casinos and slot machines in surrounding states” he cited as the prevailing opinion. “We’re Kentucky. We can withstand that. All those people changed their opinion.”
Penna challenged Thayer on the timeline a constitutional amendment would present, along with language in the bill that would open bidding on VLTs to businesses other than racetracks in the seven Kentucky counties were tracks exist. Thayer’s proposal, if it is approved by the legislature and passed by a simple majority of Kentucky voters in November, would then require local referendums, followed by a bidding process. Opponents have said implementation could stretch out until 2012 or ’13 if approved, but Thayer said slots could be up and operating as early as mid-2011. He also thinks the statewide referendum “could pass…my personal opinion is it’s probably a tossup. I believe the horse industry has made progress convincing people of the importance of this industry to every county. I think you shouldn’t be afraid of having a statewide debate on this issue. It would be huge. Huge. The press would cover it. You would get an opportunity to make your case like you’ve never done before in a statewide debate, and I think it would have a chance of passing.”
As for opening the bidding process to non-racetracks, Thayer said, “These slot licenses are things of value to the Commonwealth.” One of the things he said he heard during last summer’s failed effort to pass legislation was, “Why do the racetracks get a monopoly on this?”
Thayer chided the horse industry to work with him on the legislation calling for a constitutional amendment, which he said the Kentucky Equine Education Project and pro-slots Gov. Beshear previously supported. “Somewhere along the way in the last 12 months they changed their positions and decided they wanted to pursue what I call slots by statute,” he said. “People see (Beshear) has flip-flopped on the issue…and he has egg on his face.”
“My bill is the only bill that has the potential of passing the next legislative session,” he said. “A hundred million dollars would go into purses and breeders incentives in Kentucky…I guess I’m struggling to find out what part of $100 million doesn’t benefit the horse industry…
“I’ve had this proposal out since September. That’s three months ago. I put it out there early so we could have a discussion about it and people could talk to me about what they have issues with in the bill. Since then all that’s happened is people have criticized me and questioned my motives. If they really want to pursue this they need to come talk with me. This is a very controversial issue that’s been debated since 1993. It’s time to move the bill.”
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Savvy businesses recognize value. Advertise in the Paulick Report.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

The story of these wild horses – “America’s animal” she calls them – hit Madeleine Pickens’ radar screen at a time when she was putting considerable personal resources of time and money into efforts to end the slaughter of all horses. She studied the issue, then hired a polling company to gauge public opinion on the slaughter of horses for human consumption, finding out that seven in 10 Americans oppose the practice. She then paid for anti-slaughter advertisements in the New York Times, lobbied members of Congress and worked with other groups and individuals. Ultimately, however, those efforts ended in frustration because, she said, the pro-slaughter lobby, assisted by the cattle industry, was simply too entrenched with Washington, D.C., powerbrokers. Anti-slaughter bills passed by the U.S House of Representatives were stopped in the Senate. And she was outraged that so many Thoroughbred industry leaders failed to help.
“I think this will work because I came up with a private-sector solution rather than trying to put a bill through Washington where politicians could have their way and destroy it. When the bureaucrats do it, it costs too much and doesn’t work. With private individuals, you’re not indebted to every group or compromised by lobbyists.”