http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rci-rulings-asmussen-nips-dutrow-74-to-72/ An independent voice for news, analysis and commentary on the Thoroughbred racing and breeding industry Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:34:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rci-rulings-asmussen-nips-dutrow-74-to-72/comment-page-1/#comment-1278 Christine A JUbic Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:32:24 +0000 http://www.paulickreport.com/?p=95#comment-1278 Duh, you would think that after being fined so many times, after awhile the fines would be increased.....much like our penal laws require harsher penalties for repeat offenders. If tracks are so money hungry as we know they are, WHY o WHY o WHY dont they start increasing their fines for repeat offenders?? Makes too much sense, I guess. Duh, you would think that after being fined so many times, after awhile the fines would be increased…..much like our penal laws require harsher penalties for repeat offenders.
If tracks are so money hungry as we know they are, WHY o WHY o WHY dont they start increasing their fines for repeat offenders?? Makes too much sense, I guess.

]]> http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rci-rulings-asmussen-nips-dutrow-74-to-72/comment-page-1/#comment-794 Ed Martin Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:27:22 +0000 http://www.paulickreport.com/?p=95#comment-794 Some, not all, of the data in the RCI database is public information available from the individual racing commissions. The RCI database is the only national database maintaining such collective information. The database exists to facilitate the investigations, licensing or otherwise, of the regulatory members of the association. Limited access to otherwise public information is available to the public for a fee ($25 per record check) to help offset the cost of maintaining the database and responding to the request. RCI associate member organizations can upgrade their membership to include access to otherwise public information by paying a flat technology fee. Sorry, RCI is a not for profit and maintaining trhe database is a bear of a project. Some, not all, of the data in the RCI database is public information available from the individual racing commissions. The RCI database is the only national database maintaining such collective information. The database exists to facilitate the investigations, licensing or otherwise, of the regulatory members of the association. Limited access to otherwise public information is available to the public for a fee ($25 per record check) to help offset the cost of maintaining the database and responding to the request. RCI associate member organizations can upgrade their membership to include access to otherwise public information by paying a flat technology fee. Sorry, RCI is a not for profit and maintaining trhe database is a bear of a project.

]]> http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rci-rulings-asmussen-nips-dutrow-74-to-72/comment-page-1/#comment-752 S Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:16:38 +0000 http://www.paulickreport.com/?p=95#comment-752 Why is the database of the Association of Racing Commissioners International not publicly accessible? This should be public information( on all trainers) for anyone who is interested in getting into the industry. Why is the database of the Association of Racing Commissioners International not publicly accessible? This should be public information( on all trainers) for anyone who is interested in getting into the industry.

]]> http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rci-rulings-asmussen-nips-dutrow-74-to-72/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Deb Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:25:26 +0000 http://www.paulickreport.com/?p=95#comment-191 This sport should be ashamed for allowing such behavior to continue on this level. Bring on the oversight to initiate drug-free racing and penalties that make a difference. This sport should be ashamed for allowing such behavior to continue on this level. Bring on the oversight to initiate drug-free racing and penalties that make a difference.

]]>