(UPDATED JUNE 3) PAULICK ENDORSES BREEDERS’ CUP CANDIDATES
(UPDATED JUNE 3 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN RECOMMENDATION FOR GEORGE ISAACS)
The 25 candidates running for election to the Breeders’ Cup board of Members and Trustees may have different backgrounds, income levels and positions within the Thoroughbred industry, but I think they all share a common thread: a desire to help the Breeders’ Cup grow. All are to be commended for their interest in helping achieve that goal, even if their philosophies do not follow the same path.
There are, however, only 13 positions for these 25 individuals on the board of Members and Trustees, whose principal role within the Breeders’ Cup organization is to elect the 13 members of the board of Directors at an annual meeting, scheduled this year for July 9. The smaller board of Directors makes all major decisions regarding the operations and governance of the Breeders’ Cup and elects a chairman and vice chairman each year.
So who nominators elect to the board of Members and Trustees is critical in shaping the smaller, operating board of Directors. The six individuals whose two-year terms on the board of Directors expire in July of this year are: Reynolds Bell, Donald Dizney, Tracy Farmer, Don Robinson (who served out the remainder of B. Wayne Hughes’ term after Hughes’ resignation), G. Watts Humphrey Jr., and Robert T. Manfuso. Only elected Members and Trustees may run for the smaller board of Directors.
Fifteen of those running for the board of Members and Trustees submitted answers to questions from the Paulick Report or statements about their candidacy (click here to see their responses in an easy-to-read or print PDF document). Biographies of all the candidates can be viewed here at the Breeders’ Cup election web site.
I have covered the Thoroughbred industry for nearly 30 years and have seen a number of these candidates in board-room settings, talked with others about issues of interest to the Breeders’ Cup and Thoroughbred racing and breeding in general, and consider many of them friends. Some are or have been advertisers of this web site. In making the following comments and voting recommendations to nominators, I have done my best to remain objective in rating the various candidates without regard to friendships or business relationships.
Here is my summary of each candidate, along with a voting recommendation:
JOHN AMERMAN: Skilled businessman who as retired chairman and CEO of Mattel certainly understands consumer products and traditional marketing. I’ve not seen great leadership or fresh ideas spring from Amerman in his various industry roles and cannot recommend a vote for him on the board of Members and Trustees.
NADIA SANAN BRIGGS: Daughter of the outspoken but highly successful businessman Satish Sanan, who has played a major role in the Breeders’ Cup as chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee. Briggs has her own independent streak and would bring a fresh, young perspective to the board. She is bright, totally committed to the industry, and would make an outstanding member of the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.
JACK BROTHERS: Has played a major if understated role in the success of Frank Stronach’s Adena Springs breeding and racing operation after virtually growing up in the horse business. Doesn’t claim to have all the answers for resolving the challenges at the Breeders’ Cup, but I doubt there would be a more fair-minded or harder-working individual on the board of Members and Trustees. Recommend for election.
BILL CASNER: Few people in the industry have shown the courage to stand up to the failed, old-guard industry leadership like Bill Casner has. He understands racing from the standpoint of the blue-collar horseman and now plays the game at the highest level while not forgetting his humble beginnings. Recommend for election.
CASE CLAY: One of the up-and-coming “next generation” industry leaders, Clay is the son of Three Chimneys Farm owner Robert Clay but was not heavily involved in the farm’s operation or the industry until the last five to seven years. I do have concerns that as one of three candidates with close ties to Three Chimneys (see below), there may be an effort to “stack the deck” for a future agenda, and for that reason cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees at this time.
LINCOLN COLLINS: One of three individuals (along with Case Clay and Tracy Farmer) closely allied with Three Chimneys Farm. Collins has a good reputation for honesty and integrity in his Kern Thoroughbreds bloodstock agency, though seems light on service and industry experience. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
DONALD R. DIZNEY: A member of both the board of Members and Trustees and the smaller Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, Dizney has done little to distinguish himself as more than a rubber-stamp voter for the status quo. There have been suggestions among some at the Breeders’ Cup that Dizney has not been as engaged through his board or committee attendance as others, but a request for attendance records of board meetings from Breeders’ Cup secretary Jim Philpott was ignored. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
TRACY FARMER: Politically powerful in Kentucky through his work and fund-raising with the Democratic Party, Farmer has been a close ally of Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and was appointed to the Kentucky Racing Commission, on which he serves as vice chairman. Farmer serves on both the board of Members and Trustees and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors, where sources say he has not distinguished himself as an independent voice. The Paulick Report requested minutes of Breeders’ Cup board meetings to analyze the involvement of each board member, but secretary Jim Philpott denied the request. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
H. GREG GOODMAN: Houston native has been a partner with Lane’s End Farm’s Will Farish, which doesn’t necessarily suggest he will be a “yes” vote for a potential Farish-orchestrated board of Directors slate. However, his non-response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and his vague personal statement on the Breeders’ Cup voting web site does not build confidence in his independence. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
GEORGE ISAACS:(UPDATED JUNE 3, FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF RESPONSE TO PAULICK REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE) Veteran horseman is well respected throughout the industry for his work as general manager at Bridlewood Farm in Florida. Relatively new to national industry organizations, but in his responses to the Paulick Report questionnaire demonstrated a commitment to adding value to Breeders’ Cup nominations and increasing accountability and transparency within the organization. i believe it is also important to have representation among Florida breeders. Recommend for election.
TOM LUDT: One of the most independent-minded, cut-to-the-chase people I’ve seen in this industry in recent years. Has distinguished himself on the Kentucky Racing Commission, having been appointed by both a Republican and Democratic governor (and without being a major financial contributor to either of their campaigns), on committees at the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, and Breeders’ Cup board of Directors. Recommend for election.
REILEY McDONALD: Has many years of experience in the auction arena, most prominently as co-owner of Eaton Sales. Has not been as involved in industry leadership positions as I would like to see for someone with his knowledge and insight, though it is encouraging to see him step up at this critical time. However, I cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
MICHAEL McMAHON: One of the individuals running who is completely invested in the Thoroughbred industry and its future, McMahon may lack in national industry organizational experience but more than makes up for it in passion. My instinct is he will add a truly independent voice who takes his responsibilities seriously. In his reply to the Paulick Report questionnaire, McMahon repeatedly spoke of the importance of increasing participation at the grass-roots level among breeders, by adding value to the program for nominators. Recommend for election.
CLEM MURPHY: Coolmore principals and associates are often guarded in what they say to the media, but I’ve found Murphy to be accessible and a source of innovative thinking when it comes to both the Breeders’ Cup and the racing industry. Recommend for election.
OGDEN MILLS PHIPPS: The phrase “lead, follow, or get out of the way” comes to mind. The Jockey Club chairman has had his opportunities to lead (New York Racing Association declined during his years of power), has not shown much interest in following, and that leaves one alternative. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
DAN PRIDE: Believes in accountability and transparency, and has brought fresh ideas and enthusiasm to Fasig-Tipton since joining the auction company from Darley. Pride does a good job representing a younger generation of leaders that have real-world experience. Recommend for election.
ANDRE REGARD: For a relatively young man, Regard has a broad base of knowledge, and I think there is little doubt that he will be a growing influence in future years as he gains experience in the industry and its various organizations. One to keep an eye out for in the future, but at this time cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
RICHARD SANTULLI: An enormously successful businessman, Santulli is a no-nonsense kind of guy who brings independence, integrity and a serious commitment to the Breeders’ Cup because of his passion for the Thoroughbred game,first as a fan and horseplayer and later as an owner and breeder. Last year’s effort by the old guard to keep Santulli off the smaller board of Directors represented a low point in the history of the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.
JOSEPH V. SHIELDS JR. Has served on the board of Members and Trustees and board of Directors, but has not publicly articulated a clear vision for how the Breeders’ Cup can grow. Closely associated with old-guard Members and Trustees who have lacked innovation. Cannot recommend a vote for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
JOHN SIKURA: Fiercely independent and driven to build his own business, Sikura has a vision to grow the Breeders’ Cup to become an even more important world championship by incorporating horses from different parts of the globe. He is one of those “all in” horsemen who do not look at the Thoroughbred industry as a part-time hobby but as a full-time commitment of his time and financial resources, and his personal success is tied to the growth of events like the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.
OLIVER TAIT: Represents Darley USA, one of the most important contributors to the Breeders’ Cup in terms of nominations and participation in the world championships. Tait may not be a household name in the U.S. at this stage of his career, but he has accumulated extensive international experience in Europe and Australia. Recommend for election.
DUNCAN TAYLOR: Listening to your customers seems like a logical approach to any business, but I don’t think that has been a strong suit of the Breeders’ Cup board of Directors or management in the past. Taylor Made has developed into the industry’s leading sales agency because of its customer-centric approach, an approach that can only help the Breeders’ Cup. Recommend for election.
ROBERT TRUSSELL JR.: Was a member of the Gainesway Farm team when John Gaines created the Breeders’ Cup in the early 1980s, so he has a great depth of knowledge and history of the organization. However, it is difficult to grasp where he stands on issues of importance given his lack of response to the Paulick Report questionnaire and the absence of a personal statement accompanying his biography on the Breeders’ Cup election web site. (In the original version of this article, I reported the Breeders’ Cup web site did not include a biography of Trussell; that has since been added here.) Cannot recommend a vote at this time for election to the board of Members and Trustees.
ROB WHITELEY: If you are in favor of maintaining the status quo, Whiteley is not your candidate. He was an outspoken critic of the decision last December to suspend the stakes supplement program, and I believe his leadership on that issue led to a quick reversal by the board of Directors. Strongly believes in accountability, transparency and fiscal responsibility. Recommend for election.
JACK WOLF: Knowledgeable about the importance of the Breeders’ Cup in the industry and bullish on the role the organization can play to increase the popularity of the sport, something it has not yet been able to do. Refreshingly candid, independent and with outstanding credentials both in racing and in the outside business world. Recommend for election.
Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report
Support the Paulick Report. Make a donation today.
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick
Tags: andre regard, Bill Casner, Breeders' Cup, Breeders' Cup board of directors, breeders' cup board of members and trustees, breeders' cup election, Case Clay, Clem Murphy, Dan Pride, donald dizney, duncan taylor, George Isaacs, H. Greg Goodman, Jack Brothers, Jack Wolf, John Amerman, John Sikura, Joseph V. Shields, Lincoln Collins, Michael McMahon, Nadia Sanan Briggs, Ogden Mills Phipps, Oliver Tait, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, Reiley McDonald, richard santulli, rob whiteley, Robert Trussell Jr., tom ludt, tracy farmer
June 1st, 2009 at 3:12 pm
how about nuckolls. he is a great guy. would he make a good member ?
June 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Gino…Charles Nuckols III was elected to a three-year term on the board of Members and Trustees in 2008.
June 1st, 2009 at 4:10 pm
Vote early and often! Hopefully, this is the time where visionaries take the place of a mentality - “crisis, what crisis?” - that believes it’s 1969 and not 2009…with a presence on TV less than taped national cheerleading contests.
June 1st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Sounds okay to me with the exception of Casner. He comes to California and gives press conferences about how great the synthetics are. These surfaces have caused a frightening attrition rate among young horses. They are in part directly responsible for California’s current problems. Remember they were to be safer, consistent, and enlarge field size. They are none of the above.
June 1st, 2009 at 4:48 pm
On June 28, 2008, following last summer’s congresssional hearing on Thoroughbred welfare and safety, the Blood Horse published a Letter to the Editor by John Sikura in which he enumerated a list of what he called “inconvenient truths.”
#1 on Mr. Sikura’s inconvenient truths list was a complaint about the US Humane Society’s opposition to horse slaughter. Only he didn’t call it slaughter. He said the USHS was trying to “reform our industry and abolish ‘putting horses to sleep’” - those were his exact words.
His argument appeared to be that the USHS has no business telling the horse industry to stop slaughtering horses because the USHS approves the euthanasia of household pets.
Obviously, there’s a HUGE difference between humane euthanasia and the barbaric scenes played out at kill auctions and slaughterhouses, as I’m sure Mr. Sikura must know.
In the same letter, he also recommended mandatory contributions to horse rescue groups, so I’m puzzled as to what position he actually takes on this issue.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Mr Paulick
As a very small breeder of record this is very helpful and a great public service to the industry that goes the extra furlong
My question is: How in the heck do you vote? Can you decode the process for us who aren’t sophisticated in the process. And do small breeder votes amount to anything?
You can count on me to support your endorsements to the maximum if I can just figure out the process.
Thank you.
June 1st, 2009 at 7:32 pm
Ray Paulick wrote
The 25 candidates running for election to the Breeders’ Cup board of Members and Trustees …
_______________________________
The Breeders Cup needs 25 (gasp) talking heads to get things done for what is merely a two day annual festival.
With that line of reasoning…
How many talking heads would we need to lead the entire racing industry 365 days a year?
June 1st, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Knight Sky Racing (client #7)
25 hmmm. Try this math. 25 candidates for 13 trustee positions on top of the 26 already elected plus the six standing trustees-for-life founders.
Let’s see 25 - 12 = 13 + 13 + 13 + 6 = 45. A lot of ego and not much achieved in the interest of racing over control.
You can’t make this stuff up…..
Out with the old (so to speak), in with the new.
June 1st, 2009 at 7:59 pm
The below is exerpted from a prior post:
————————————————————————————–
I just ran the numbers quickly of a sample stud farm — Lane’s End — and the result is that Lane’s End/Farish will be able to cast 2,671 votes for its stallions.
That’s over 18% of the total number of foals nominated in 2008 (14,602).
It’s easy to see that Farish and a handful of Lexington stud farms control this vote.
————————————————————————————–
Ray,
Can you tell us how many votes the stud farms placed in the last election? If every single foal nomination vote was cast, won’t they still be outvoted by a dozen or so Lexington stud farm owners?
June 1st, 2009 at 8:23 pm
I don’t care how many of them there are. Do you think just one could stand up and say that
dressing all the horses in the same colored saddle cloths is STUPID!?! I can not make out
numbers on saddle cloths but I know the standard color scheme. My vision is fair; imagine if it were poor. Ruins the whole day for me…each and every year. Is that the 3, no it’s the 8.
Go 1! Wait, that’s not 1, it’s 7 or maybe 11……
June 1st, 2009 at 8:48 pm
The way the Breeders Cup was handled last year. How about , NON OF THE ABOVE.
June 1st, 2009 at 9:27 pm
I don’t disagree with your selections…
(But not one of Three Chimneys “three” candidates gets a nod? Hm, but no bias at all, right?;)
Totally agree that smart young guys like Ludt and Pride might make a difference.
But as long as the stallion farms get “votes” for horses they don’t even own, not much will change, will it?
June 1st, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Barbara (12.) Says: I don’t disagree with your selections… (But not one of Three Chimneys
“three” candidates get a nod? Hm, but no bias at all, right;)
Barbara, perhaps the better observation is that not one of the Three Chimney’s “three” candidates (Case Clay, Lincoln Collins and Tracy Farmer) bothered to take the time to fill out a questionnaire from a major industry publication regarding their intentions for the Breeders Cup positions of trust and confidence they are seeking.
Actions, it seems, speak larger than words (or innuendos in your case).
June 1st, 2009 at 10:30 pm
For once it would be nice to see some fresh faces running these organizations. What I don’t get is why the same old boys insist on staying in charge. It’s like there fighting to keep their hands on the wheel of the Titanic.
June 1st, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Silly questions:
1. Does this organization (B’s Cup) fall into the category of needing to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests?
2. Has anyone ever done an opinion piece like this that just lays it all out on the table? None comes to my mind (immediately). Thanks for doing it.
June 2nd, 2009 at 9:59 am
How can you reccomend Nadia Sana when it’s rumord her father believes in outsourcing jobs to India. Did he outsource jobs when he got on the main board? I heard they let go of some good people because of him. Talking about only worrying about your own needs. Three Chimneys needs to be on board. Ray , do they need to send a check to Paulick report to to get the recomendation? This whole thing smells a little funny. Maybe I’m wrong.
June 2nd, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Hi Ray… I did not respond to your questionaire because I was concerned about that chip-on-the-shoulder, biased brand of reporting you have sometimes exhibited since you started the PR. I really appreciate and I am complemented by your citing my “knowledge and insight” in your analysis. As for the contention that I have “not been involved in industry leadership positions, I take exception. I have attempted to be involved where I thought my qualifications would benefit and, frankly, where I was welcome. To set the record straight, in addition to managing Eaton Sales ( without a passel of brothers mind you), running two farms(one of them filled with my own mares) and maintaining a racing stable of 5-10 horses, I have been involved the following industry positons to name a few: Vice-Chair, Gluck Foundation, current member Keeneland Board of Directors, a founding member of the CBA and co-drafter of it’s by-laws, Board member-TRF, TCA, KY Horse Park, and active proponent of race horse rehabilitation and adoption. I am running for election to the BC Board as a totally independent, forward thinker with 30 years of experience in this business. For my views regarding the Breeder’s Cup please read the TDN tomorrow. Thanks Ray, Reiley
June 2nd, 2009 at 2:54 pm
Noelle, I read an article or an interview John Sikura did too - I think it might have been the same article. I do know I gleamed from his statements that he was not anti-slaughter. I can’t remember his exact words, but I remember being extremely disappointed in his response to the slaughter issue. I think that is a pretty important issue - what happens to these horses after we’re done racing them. So, to me, I would like some clarification on that issue also.
June 2nd, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Eagle, what part did you miss about my “innuendo”? The point blank question about bias as I cannot see how it is fair to ding all three of the 3C “candidates” when one of the reasons cited by Ray is that they are stacking the deck?
June 2nd, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Reiley, why would you take the time to reply here yet not answer the PR query? Wouldn’t you want to be consistent in your dismissal of the “biased brand”?
Besides, you seem too busy to me to focus on the BC board duties? Or maybe you just replied to take a swipe at the Taylors and I failed to see the humor;)
June 2nd, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Barbara 1
Reiley 0
A TK0!
You are spot on.
Thank you also for your clarification on our earlier jag. Point taken.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:12 am
Ray,
All of your recommendations except two transplants are from Kentucky. The last time I checked there are actually foals being born and nominated in some other states. You talk a good game about standing up to the old guard, yet you endorse the same people that will just rotate the parking spaces. There are horsemen outside Kentucky. Maybe you should get out more often. it tends to clear the head.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:16 am
Small attempt at humor. I admire the Taylor family and their work ethic as much as any in this business… and they know that.
June 3rd, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Would still give credit to those who submitted replies before RP’s deadline. It seems the bush telegraph kicked in and many candidates were informed or seen the negative pub they were receiving as a result of ignoring the initial opportunity.
The first reaction or lack thereof probably speaks volumes about the true personalities and intentions of those involved.
June 3rd, 2009 at 6:03 pm
13 is way too many. There should only be 3. Three that really put in the time and will face the music if things don’t pan out.
June 4th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Just to set the record straight, in response to Surfer Joe’s comments:
1) Yes, I am my father’s daughter, but I am also an independant thinker and industry participant who would like to stand and be elected on my own merits and contributions
2) Surfer Joe’s comments about outsourcing have nothing to do with the Breeder’s Cup Election or the merits of the candidates under discussion
3) In defense of my father, while he was involved with IT outsourcing overseas in the past, he also created $100’s of millions of new business in the US and over 10,000 jobs in the US in addition to jobs overseas
4) Satish Sanan is a stakeholder in this industry having invested over $150 million, owns a major breeding and racing operation, and is a seroius reformist and proponent for positive change in our industry. I am proud to be his daughter and hope to carry on his legacy and promote continued positive change for the next generation of industry participants!
June 4th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Those who have voted don’t need to read this. Those still undecided may wish to consider these thoughts and comments.
While some of Ray’s recommendations have solid footing, several are “shaky” insofar as Independent (no stallion interests) Mare Owners’ interests are at stake.
How many seats should the Sanan Family hold? Is Father Sanan a real reformer or actually against ‘rocking the boat’? It is one thing to talk, but talking does not make an activist. Recommending consultants is pretty much like appointing a committee. It is NOT action.
Anyway, the Sanan equine enterprises appear to be run by 3 Chimneys. So why not elect someone running under their own colors?
How many seats should Stronach (Magna ‘Manynames’) hold? if one is enough (some may say “Too many”) why vote for Jack Brothers?
Same question applies to Sheikh M/Darley/Fasig-Tipton? Boyd Browning, Dan Pride, Ollie Tait - all work for the same guy. Should the Sheikh have three seats?
Should there be ‘mouthpiece Trustees’ instead of the real parties at interest? How can a mouthpiece be independent? It must represent the person who pays it. So , to the three just mentioned add Clem Murphy and Tom Ludt.
Question for Ray about the latter. In what way has Ludd distinguished himself on KHRA/KHRC? Being appointed by two governors (one of whom you have just given a “F” grade) without being a ‘major contributor’ is not a distinguishing feature. Do we know how much his boss, Tom Simon, contributed?
If Bobby Trussell gets in, Walmac Farm will hold three seats. Too many?
A miscellaneous question. As Robert McNair is out of the business, why was his seat not up to be filled in this election? My guess? Any absentee Trustee is as good as a vote for the status quo. (I shall stand corrected if his term expired concurrently, but I cannot find that kind of useful info on BC website.)
To any voter who gives a hoot, to my mind only Bill Casner and Rob Whiteley deserve to be elected and will do us any good. Casner has a foot in both Stallion and Mare camps, but he is not in favor of the status quo.
June 5th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Miss Nadia, you just got my vote.
June 6th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Just kidding. If one Sanan can’t get anything done how are two going to help? The Breeders Cup is heading the wrong way and we need instant good leadrship.
June 9th, 2009 at 7:26 am
The BC is one of the most important contributions to publicity, pedigree and purity of the sport. And notice that I state “sport”. This connotation requires a great portion of protection in this current culture shock that we are undergoing. Slots managers and mutuel managers should not take precedence over the original purposes of the BC creation. Yes, it should make money but not at the expense of its policies and presentation. It is not a giant pic six! It should not be moved to Europe. It should not continue to expand and encroach on existing graded stakes. It should include divisions of mediocrity. It should be led by true horsemen, not lawyers and neophytes attempting to learn on the job. It should never be run over current synthetic surfaces. It should focus on pedigree. It should create and demand policies of conduct and presentation that exhibit the highest standards of horsemanship, equipment and attire. These are the standards that create examples for all of racing that will help lead us out of our current lethargic state of un-discipline.
June 9th, 2009 at 7:56 am
correction
The BC is one of the most important contributions to publicity, pedigree and purity of the sport. And notice that I state “sportâ€. This connotation requires a great portion of protection in this current culture shock that we are undergoing. Slots managers and mutuel managers should not take precedence over the original purposes of the BC creation. Yes, it should make money but not at the expense of its policies and presentation. It is not a giant pic six! It should not be moved to Europe. It should not continue to expand and encroach on existing graded stakes. It should not include divisions of mediocrity. It should be led by true horsemen, not lawyers and neophytes attempting to learn on the job. It should never be run over current synthetic surfaces. It should focus on pedigree. It should create and demand policies of conduct and presentation that exhibit the highest standards of horsemanship, equipment and attire. These are the standards that create examples for all of racing that will help lead us out of our current lethargic state of un-discipline.
September 16th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Criminals engaged in, offer tickets when?Frightening austerity that, You can waste.Dogs with short, in mid brain.Now you have job interview questionaire, British publisher with a little help.School ultima online, Without clearly defined.,