Archive for the ‘State Government’ Category

DAMON THAYER CLAIMS ‘IT IS NEVER TOO LATE TO LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE’

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Republican State Senator Damon Thayer submits the next installment in a series of editorials regarding the ever long push for slots in Kentucky. Senator Thayer claims the best way forward is a ballot initiative that would leave the vote to the people.

Last week, the Paulick Report presented the reasons why a ballot initiative, especially the type that Sen. Thayer is submitting, will not happen in Kentucky. In what we find to be a vapid platitude, Sen. Thayer proclaims, “…it is never too late to let the people decide.”

Where do you stand?


For too long, casino gambling has dominated the debate in Frankfort to the detriment of all other issues.   Governor Steve Beshear has advocated very little, if anything, beyond the expansion of gambling.  Attorney General opinions throughout the years are divided.  The Governor campaigned on “letting the people decide.”  As recently as last year, members of House Democratic Leadership promoted a constitutional amendment to expand gambling.

The constitutional amendment that I have proposed will take the issue off the table so the Governor can focus on working with the General Assembly in a bipartisan manner to address the serious public policy issues facing Kentucky.  If passed, it would allow video-lottery terminals in counties that have horse racing, with a local referendum vote.  The proceeds would go to purses, breeders incentives and marketing for horse racing, and the facility operators, with the remainder sent to the state for capital projects and debt service reduction.

Members of the horse industry say that it is too late for a constitutional amendment; that it would take too long for relief to arrive.  I say that time-consuming litigation is assured with “slots by statute.”  A constitutional amendment is the only way that the horse industry will be able to “lock-in” the percentage of slots revenue that goes to purses.  There are examples of state after state with slot-subsidized purses whose legislatures have gone back and shifted funds away from the horsemen.  My proposal combined with the legislation similar to what the Senate passed during the special session in a bipartisan manner would give the horse industry not only purse protection but also immediate relief.

No constitutional amendment has ever reached the House floor, much less the Senate’s.  After considerable Democratic Party infighting, the amendment that finally passed a House committee in 2008 never got a floor vote.  Did the Governor never really care about letting the people decide?  We shall never know because he declared the bill “dead” for the session and declined to push for a vote.

Finally, the question that needs to be answered is: do you believe that increased purses and improved wagering products and marketing can save tracks, or will it be necessary to permanently subsidize tracks?  Track officials reveal themselves when my friend, Turfway’s CEO Bob Elliston, said that my proposal would “help make Kentucky racing more competitive by increasing purses but it doesn’t help reinvigorate racetracks.”

It seems that it’s not about the horse-racing, the “show,” it’s about the companies that own the tracks.  They don’t want just a minimal approach to beef up purses – which they had argued previously would bring more fans and help everyone – they want rampant slots to create gambling empires.  It will not be long before the horses are marginalized.  My amendment would prevent this.

Some may say, too little, too late.

I say that it is never too late to let the people decide.

KY SENATE PRESIDENT WILLIAMS RESPONDS TO FARISH

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

Earlier this week, we were the first to publish Bill Farish’s editorial on why slots were an important step in give aid to Kentucky’s horse industry. Claiming that as a Republican this shouldn’t be a partisan issue but instead a Kentucky issue, Farish took Senate President David Williams to task over his divisive tactics of pitting Republicans against Republicans.

Late last night, the Paulick Report received an email response to Farish’s editorial from Williams. While 7:45 on a Friday night is generally a slot relegated for the announcement of John Edwards’ love child, we felt it important to give both sides of this issue a proper hearing. What follows is the counter argument to the pro-slots lobby. Where do you stand? -

Bradford Cummings

 


By David L. Williams,
(R-Burkesville), president, Kentucky Senate

I never cease to be amazed by the manner in which slot interests and their spokesmen such as Bill Farish continue to mislead Kentuckians. The proposed expansion of gambling in Kentucky is bad economic policy for the state and for the horse industry.  Those tied to the slots may do their best to raise the specter of false divisions and false hope, but the reality of the situation is unchanged.
 
Fact #1: Expanded gambling will flood Kentucky with funds that will skew our body politic.
Bill Farish failed to mention his family’s financial affiliation with the tracks as well as to the 527 “issues” group formed by the tracks and their supporters to circumvent campaign finance laws in order to intimidate legislators to support slots.  During the recent special election, his pro-slots 527 ran negative ads that never even once mentioned slots.  State after state with gambling in the mix has been rife with stories of political corruption.
 
Fact #2: Once slots arrive, horse-owners and trainers will get the short end of the stick.
In Florida, horsemen have complained that their promised doubling of purses has never materialized.  In Ohio, under the Governor’s executive orders, owners were left to their own devices to negotiate purses with the slots people.  In West Virginia, purse money was shifted back to state government to make up for shortfalls.  And in Kentucky, have we forgotten the bitter battle waged by Churchill Downs attempting to force our horsemen to accept a smaller slice of the revenue from Internet bets?  Or the fact that Churchill Downs pays to transport horses to its own Arlington Park in Chicago in direct competition with Ellis Park?  Once slots come in the picture, players will thrill to the speed of the machine and ignore the speed of our ponies.
 
Fact #3: Slots will not “save” Kentucky’s budget.
Gambling is an unstable source of revenue.  In spite of gambling, Illinois raised taxes.  Hardly a session has passed without Indiana’s casinos and racinos asking for yet another tax break. And gambling revenues are in a decline nationwide sending governments addicted to them scurrying for additional funds.
 
Fact #4: The horse business is beset with problems endemic to the industry itself.
The horse industry acknowledges that it breeds too many horses and runs too many races in a national economy that is fragile.  Racing fans are growing older.  The industry’s weak marketing has done little to help.  Very few people these days have the discretionary cash to plunk down a cool million for a horse, or even tens of thousands of dollars.
 
During the Special Session in June, Senate Democrats and Republicans unanimously passed legislation that would have nearly doubled funding for the Kentucky Thoroughbred Development Fund and actually doubled funding for the Kentucky Breeders’ Incentive Fund without slots.  Our plan would have kept the KEES scholarship program whole and not hurt charitable gaming.  It would not have used any General Fund dollars.
 
The House plan would have forked over more than 50% of the revenue to the tracks and massively undervalued the license fees the tracks would have had to pay.  All businesses are suffering in this economy, yet the tracks insist that they and they alone deserve special treatment.
 
When the House introduced its gambling bill during the 2008 session, committee members were mysteriously replaced in order to ensure passage.  The 2009 version was heard in a committee that didn’t even allow the opposition to testify.  Finally, with the addition of over $1 billion worth of projects the bill barely passed during the Special Session. It was a far cry from the fair hearing the bill received in the Senate committee where both sides were allowed to air their views.
 
The House plan relied on Kentuckians gambling a whopping $11.9 billion – a figure that represents five times more than what is currently wagered at the tracks, at out-of-state casinos, and through charitable gaming.  Where are these players going to come from?  With gambling already in many of our sister states, slots will only cannibalize our own people — our most vulnerable sacrificed for what a horse industry insider, Ray Paulick, calls a “band-aid” solution.
 
We need to explore all the ways Kentucky horsemen can control their own future because as Churchill Downs trainer Michael Lauer recently noted, “…once the tracks get the slots, the horsemen become secondary citizens.”  I respectfully would amend that quote to include all Kentuckians.

CHUTZPAH AWARD WINNERS DON AND MIRA BALL

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009
By Ray Paulick
The Paulick Report is giving its first annual
Chutzpah Award to Don and Mira Ball of Donamire Farm near Lexington, Ky. The Balls, well, they have the balls to be hosting a fundraising reception at their farm July 28, one week from tonight, “honoring Kentucky’s Senate Republican Caucus and benefiting the Republican Party of Kentucky’s Senate Trust.”

The Senate Republican Caucus the Balls want us to “honor” is the same one that killed legislation desperately needed by the Kentucky horse industry during a special session of the general assembly last month. Don Ball is a good friend of Senate President David “Blackjack” Williams, who orchestrated the death of House Bill 2, which would have permitted slot machines at racetracks and substantially increased purses. The bill was approved by the House of Representatives but killed by the Republican-controlled Appropriations and Revenue Committee in the Senate, denying it a vote before the full Senate.

Williams is the guy who enjoys visiting casino boats in Indiana and Mississippi, according to numerous sources. We don’t know if Ball likes to gamble on the riverboats or in Las Vegas casinos, but we do know he is adamantly opposed to Kentucky racetracks and horsemen having the ability to compete on a level playing field with tracks in states like Indiana, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, New Mexico, New York, Maryland and others, where slot machines are in operation or have been approved to benefit purses and breeding programs.

And because Don Ball is one of Kentucky’s largest political donors (he and his wife have given $243,317 to state and federal Republican causes since 2002), folks in office tend to listen to him. So in some ways, he may be the person most responsible for killing House Bill 2.

The state’s Republican Party shares in this award, because it had the nerve to send the invitation addressed to “GOP Friends” to numerous people in the Thoroughbred industry. Included in the invitation was an urging to “help us to strengthen the Senate Republican Majority and maintain balance in Frankfort.” Can I get an amen on that?

For $500, you, too, can attend. It may actually be worth the money, just to tell the Balls and the Republican State Senators likely to be there what you thought of their opposition to House Bill 2. To RSVP, contact Brittany Dowell at the Republican Party of Kentucky, at (502) 875-5130, or send her an email at Brittany@rpk.org.

On second thought, why not just call that number and send an email explaining why you won’t be supporting most Republican candidates for Kentucky’s state Senate in the near future—even if you’ve been a lifelong Republican. (Please note: Tom Buford of Nicholasville was the only Senate Republican to support the bill in the A&R Committee vote; he deserves industry support.)

This outrageous invitation comes to Kentucky breeders and owners at a time when they are just learning how much of an economic beating they may be taking in the yearling marketplace. The first day of the Fasig-Tipton Kentucky yearling sale on Monday saw 49% of the yearlings catalogued go unsold as buy-backs or withdrawals. Prices for the horses that sold, despite being buoyed by significant spending from Sheikh Mohammed of Dubai (whose associate bought Fasig-Tipton last year), were down 33.3% in median and 23.8% in average. And it’s only the first inning of a long ball game.

Keep in mind breeders are selling yearlings in 2009 that were conceived through 2007 stud fees based on an “up” market. In many cases, the yearlings were produced from mares purchased by breeders in more bullish times.

But the Balls and their Senate guests at the Donamire shindig probably will be oblivious to the pain many Kentucky breeders are feeling. The Senate Republicans will marvel at the architectural beauty of Donamire and its 13,000-square-foot residence. They’ll wonder how the horse business can possibly be struggling when it has such a beautiful showplace farm. Of course, they’ll have no idea that Donamire is the antithesis of a typical Kentucky Thoroughbred farm that is struggling to get through difficult economic times and facing an even tougher economic climate down the road as the industry continues to be weakened by external forces (i.e., states that can offer higher purses and better breeding incentives through slots revenue).

Donamire Farm and its owners do not depend on a healthy Thoroughbred industry to survive; the farm was funded through the thousands of homes built by their Ball Homes LLC. In fact, some suggest Ball Homes will be even more profitable if the Thoroughbred industry fails and farm land is sold cheaply for residential development.

Now a final word about our Chutzpah Award winners, Don and Mira Ball. They’ve won many other, more prestigious awards for the good work they’ve done in the Central Kentucky community. Mira Ball has been active in supporting higher education, substance abuse programs, Kentucky Educational Television, and medical research, among other endeavors. Don Ball is a former president of the Kentucky Thoroughbred Association and is a director emeritus of that organization. They breed to race and support Kentucky racing that way. They’ve opened their farm to many, many other worthwhile causes and fundraisers over the years.

Don and Mira Ball are not bad people, but when it comes to Kentucky politics and the horse industry, you have to give them credit: they have a lot of chutzpah.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value.
Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

SAY WHAT? STATE REGULATORS ARE HERE TO STAY

Monday, July 20th, 2009
Ed Martin, president of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, took exception to horse owner Barry Irwin’s guest commentary published here last week (Hey, states…take a hike!) that suggested racing would be better off if it managed to get states out of the regulatory business and allow the industry to police itself. The former executive director of the New York Racing and Wagering Board believes regulators are not part of racing’s problems but of its solutions. He also said regulators are working on an interstate compact that could bring states much closer to uniformity in rules and regulations governing the sport.By Ed Martin
Every now and then someone pops off out of frustration, raising the prospect of trying to figure out how racing can self-police its gambling enterprises. Such was the case with last week’s commentary by Team Valor president Barry Irwin suggesting the possibility that the independent state racing commissions can somehow be eliminated and the industry will just foot the bill and take care of everything, bringing all sorts of fans, new and old, back to the sport.

Yes, it is true state governments are facing hard economic times. So are the American people, including most racing participants and fans. The elimination of the government regulation of this form of gambling will destroy this sport in ways that I am sure Mr. Irwin does not intend or envision. Perhaps if there were no gambling, then his idea might make sense. So, unless he seeks a private club with no gambling everyone’s time is wasted contemplating the insane idea that elected officials are going to allow gambling enterprises to self police themselves. It’s a bad idea that will not pass the smell test.

To bolster his case, Irwin cites how the New York Racing Association in New York was victimized by the state. Excuse me, but NYRA did have to march in front of a federal judge and admit to a conspiracy to defraud the government. The “we have great racing and we know what we’re doing” defense wasn’t going to work given the magnitude of the felony that cheated the public regardless of whether they were racing fans or not. This was a terrible black eye on racing by an entity governed by some of the most prominent individuals in American Thoroughbred racing and it would not be in racing’s future interest for people to minimize the seriousness of that situation.

As one who worked on that case, it was amazing that NYRA refused to do a daily cash count and reconciliation in the mutuel department. They do that at the corner grocery store, but somehow this was something to be resisted when suggested by the state. I will never forget the day when NYRA sent in a team of some of the most politically connected trustees to argue against a daily cash count. One of those present was the president of my bank. I stopped using that man’s bank.

Sure, let’s open some champagne and make those nasty state regulators go away. After all they were the ones who investigated and cracked the case that exposed how a tote company’s computer programmer could access a live wagering file and turn a losing Breeders’ Cup Pick 6 wager into a winning one. The New York Racing and Wagering Board partnering with the New York State Police cracked that case within 48 hours of Valponi’s Classic win. What was amazing in doing the investigation was that this activity had gone on undetected for some time and no internal controls, self auditing or self policing program had safeguarded the industry’s interests. We unearthed a problem plaguing the industry and regulators alike.

Mr. Irwin seems to like the Stewards, who for the most part are employees of the state commissions. Well, we must be doing something right. But he does not appear to tolerate due process. Commissions are as frustrated with this as anyone, but perhaps if Mr. Irwin had been around in the days of Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, things might be different. In a system of due process, allegations must be proven based on solid evidence. People have a right to appeal and we are always open to solid suggestions as to how to minimize the ability of some to “play the system”. The concept of a Monarch was rejected in the revolution and we have no choice but to accept the constitutional guarantees that we all enjoy, including the scoundrels.

At no point in the almost five years I have been at RCI or the preceding nine at the New York Racing and Wagering Board did Mr. Irwin ever make a suggestion directly to either entity as to how to more effectively tackle racing’s integrity challenge. Things can always be done better but racing should never forget that when it comes to drugs, we test for more substances at deeper levels than any other professional sport. There is a lot that is done right, but you’d never know it as some explain their loss by leveling undocumented charges against winners. Perhaps if racing stopped casting aspersions on those who are successful on the track or at the betting windows we might be able to generate some excitement and attract new fans. But no, if you hit a lucky streak you must be cheating.

The only entities that sort out what is real and what is not are the state racing commissions. Those who cheat will do it for the money and the initiatives of RCI and the state regulators to track the money through independent real-time wagering monitoring have met with nothing but unexplained resistance or foot dragging from key industry entities. Some of those barriers are coming down, but oh so slowly. I agree with Mr. Irwin that cheaters can kill this sport, but why do we devote all our attention to following the drugs and virtually none to following the money? The money path will help identify the real drug problem or fraud by collusion. It is unexplainable to me that people resist when the regulators want to chase the money in addition to chasing the drugs.

The state regulators have been calling for reforms and could really use some help from the industry in terms of either money, commitment, or support in state capitals to protect commission budgets that pay for drug testing, pre-race exams, backstretch investigators, the officials, the background checks, name it. In these tough times racing regulatory commissions are vulnerable targets for state budget offices looking to fill potholes rather than test more horses for drugs or monitor betting activity. We’re not perfect, no institution or person is. But every regulator that I know is committed to trying to do the job as best as possible, despite the lack of budgetary or industry support.

There are those who want to create a federal regulator which would just create another layer that would have to be paid for. An alternative is to explore the concept of creating a national regulatory body through a new interstate compact, a mechanism for state regulators to act as one in certain instances. Just this week, 15 state regulatory commissions held a joint discussion on how a proposal working its way through the New York legislature might work in their states. There is progress being made and the impetus is coming from the RCI member staffs, vets, labs and vendors who form the backbone of the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium’s drug initiative.

When I started with RCI in 2005, we called for a new public private partnership and a restructuring of our collective “integrity efforts”. I reiterated that at this year’s Racing Congress. No takers. Rather than partner with the regulators, pool resources and improve the status quo, new entities are formed, funded and promoted by hired guns. Dump on us all you want but state racing commissions are a given and we will not stop in trying to raise the bar.

Please join with us Mr. Irwin. Perhaps together we can break the negative energy that is sinking this sport.

In the spirit of providing equal time to an opposing point of view, following is Ed Martin’s rebuttal to Barry Irwin. – Ray Paulick

HEY COMMISH! YOUR CHANCE TO BE HEARD

Monday, April 20th, 2009

By Ray Paulick
Are you happy with the job racing regulators are doing? Could these individuals who serve on commissions, boards, or government agencies, many of them as unpaid political appointees, be doing a better job? What about the paid staff at the commission level, or the racing commission stewards or veterinarians?

That’s what Ed Martin, the president of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, wants me to sound off about during a panel discussion tomorrow at the RCI’s annual convention in Lexington: what’s working and what isn’t working on the regulatory side of this struggling industry.

I’ve got my own opinions to be sure, mostly about things that aren’t working. But I want to know what you think. If you’re an owner, breeder, trainer, horseplayer, industry employee or casual fan, I’d like to know what message you think I should carry to this gathering of racing commissioners. Pretend you’re racing commissioner for a day: what are the issues most important that racing regulators can act upon? What needs addressing now?

Please use the comment section below to make your voice heard. (If you have something to say you would prefer not be seen publicly, please send me an email at ray@paulickreport.com).

 

 

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

BOOGITY BOOGITY BOOGITY BESHEAR

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

By Ray Paulick
Where is the outrage?

Kentucky legislators seem to be getting in each other’s way to grease the skids for a tax break of up to $36.75 million to Bruton Smith, the ultra-rich chairman and chief executive officer of Speedway Motorsports, which owns seven NASCAR racetracks and last year purchased Kentucky Speedway from a partnership that included Jerry Carroll, the former owner of Turfway Park. Smith also is founder of Sonic Automotive, which owns 200 automobile dealership across the United States.

Smith’s net worth has been estimated as high as $1.5 billion by Forbes magazine in its annual list of the world’s billionaires. Admittedly, poor ol’ Bruton has fallen on hard times with the economic crisis and subsequent fall in the stock market. His net worth today is probably less than $500 million. Can you blame him for seeking a government handout?

Nevertheless, it’s a little cheeky for this good old boy octogenarian from North Carolina (pictured, left) to wander, hat in hand, into Kentucky, a state facing a serious budget crisis, and ask for a tax break so that he can renovate Kentucky Speedway and maybe, just maybe, bring a NASCAR race to the Bluegrass State. That’s something Carroll wasn’t able to accomplish when he built the Northern Kentucky car track, a failure that led to his pending lawsuit against NASCAR.

Smith wants Kentucky to pay him 25% for expansion costs at Kentucky Speedway. He has proposed spending $75 million to renovate and expand the Sparta, Ky., track. And no one in state government is outraged.

Where are the legislators who are quick to criticize pleas for financial help from the horse industry, the state’s No. 1 agribusiness and one that employs upwards of 100,000 individuals, simply because there are some wealthy Thoroughbred farm owners?

Where is Gov. Steve Beshear, who came into office with widespread support from horse farmers throughout the state on the promise that he was going to help them be more competitive with neighboring states that are getting subsidized by slot machines or video lottery terminals?

Where are they? Well, they’re probably making plans for some boogity boogity boogity while attending the next NASCAR race. According to the Lexington Herald-Leader, Beshear and cabinet secretary Larry Hayes have already been to NASCAR events in Charlotte, N.C., and Bristol, Tenn., at tracks owned by Smith, “to learn how big an attraction the events are.”

There are, undoubtedly, some future fact-finding missions for members of Kentucky’s august legislative body. Perhaps a trip this weekend to the Atlanta Motor Speedway, another track owned by Smith’s Speedway Motorsports, or two weeks later to Bristol, where our NASCAR-lovin’ pols can be wined and dined on chicken wings and Bud Lights in one of the track’s luxury suites.

There are no two ways about it: this deal stinks. Call Gov. Beshear’s office at (502) 564-2611 and tell him to just say no to tax breaks for billionaires. If Kentucky is meant to host a NASCAR race, a welfare check for someone like Bruton Smith should not be part of the bargain. He doesn’t need the money nearly as much as Kentucky does.

UPDATE: On Wednesday morning, Beshear announced that  because of the state’s budget crisis he is cutting $200,000 from the annual Derby morning breakfast traditionally given by Kentucky’s governor. This year’s guests will be asked to pay $1 for each food item purchased (Kentucky state employees will prepare the food), as opposed to previous free breakfasts for guests. The state won’t be renting tents for this year’s breakfast, so let’s hope for clear skies on Derby morning. Click here for details.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Sign up for our Email flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick

Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.