Archive for the ‘Bookmaking’ Category

BETFAIR, BREEDERS’ CUP STRIKE DEAL

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009
By Ray Paulick
Betfair, which revolutionized betting nearly a decade ago through the creation of exchanges pitting one person against another, has reached a breakthrough agreement with the Breeders’ Cup, providing Betfair’s two million-plus worldwide customers access to commingled pari-mutuel pools and allowing the company to offer live video streaming of the Nov. 6-7 world championships to its exchange betting players. The deal was announced in London Thursday by Breeders’ Cup president and CEO Greg Avioli and Betfair director of horseracing Stephen Burn.

The Breeders’ Cup will receive an undisclosed fee from Betfair as a result of the agreement, and the deal promises to bring international wagering on the event to a new level. Betfair, along with other exchange betting companies and overseas bookmakers, has previously offered wagering on Breeders’ Cup and other American races of interest (though supposedly not to residents of the U.S.), but the wagering or live video streaming has never been officially sanctioned by the host racetrack or association, and no revenue has ever flowed back to America.

This agreement also permits Betfair to use Breeders’ Cup logos and marks and to advertise and promote the championships to its customers.

Betfair already had a relationship with Breeders’ Cup through TVG, the American-based racing network and wagering company itbought for $50 million in January 2009, but that agreement did not permit live video streaming to Betfair’s customers, sanction exchange wagering or allow Betfair’s international customers access to commingled Breeders’ Cup pools.

Betfair recently signed a deal with many American tracks, permitting the company to offer commingled pari-mutuel wagering to its exchange betting customers and paying a fee to tracks from Betfair revenue on exchange betting.

“Our agreement with Betfair is an important milestone in our ongoing effort to grow the international simulcast wagering market for the Breeders’ Cup World Championships,” Avioli said in a statement. “As more and more international horses participate in our championships, interest levels and wagering handle from around the world continue to increase, allowing us to maintain the highest possible purse levels for the event.”

“Our partnership with the Breeders’ Cup is the beginning of what we intend to be a mutually beneficial partnership with U.S. racing,” said Betfair’s Burn.

According to a press release, international handle bet directly into the Breeders’ Cup pools on the 2008 Breeders’ Cup World Championships was $17.6 million, up 16% from 2007 and 34% from 2006 (the last year the event was held on one day). The Breeders’ Cup has targeted international wagering as an important revenue stream for future growth.

Betfair has revolutionized wagering through cutting-edge technology that enables players to choose their own odds and even make a bet after a race has started (those bets would not go into the commingled pari-mutuel pools). A press release said the company processes over six million transactions per day on a variety of sports and other events and games.

Typically, deals between horse racing associations and Betfair pay 10% to the racing industry from the company’s profits on horse racing bets. That’s a far cry from the percentage of betting horsemen and tracks get from the traditional pari-mutuel division of revenue, but Betfair offers the hope of dramatically increasing the amount of money wagered, thereby significantly lowering the effective takeout. It’s a balancing act, and only time will tell if a deal with betting exchanges like Betfair are a net win for the racing industry.

The Paulick Report took an in-depth at Betfair in January when the company acquired TVG. Click here for that article.

QUESTIONS REMAIN ABOUT BUSTED BOOKIE OPERATION

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009
By Ray Paulick
Jeffrey and Michael Jelinsky are scheduled to turn themselves in to authorities and report to jail by noon Friday and the U.S. Attorney’s office in Las Vegas has officially closed the case against them after guilty pleas earlier this year in a case involving bookmaking, money laundering and running an illegal gambling operation, much of it out of the Palms Casino and Poker Palace Casino in Las Vegas. The operation involved millions of dollars of illegal bets made on horse racing that, according to the plea agreement, were either booked by the brothers or laid off at the casino racebooks, offshore bookmakers or through the since-closed rebate shop IRG, which was owned by the publicly traded company Youbet.com.

Jeffrey Jelinsky was sentenced to 21 months in prison and Michael Jelinsky 15 months. (Click to see the sentencing forfeitures for Michael Jelinsky and Jeffrey Jelinsky and here for a plea agreement.)

Though the case against the Jelinsky brothers is completed, some questions remain.

Who were the unindicted co-conspirators and customers of this large operation (the U.S. attorney said they lived in Nevada, California, Texas, New Jersey, Colorado, Connecticut and Florida)? Were any of the customers licensed horse owners or trainers? Has racing’s top cop, Frank Fabian, head of the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau, or individual state racing commissions fulfilled their responsibilities and checked with federal prosecutors to see if any licensed participants in horse racing were involved as associates or customers of Jeffrey and Michael Jelinsky?

Fabian did not return a phone call from the Paulick Report inquiring about the Jelinsky matter.

Federal wiretaps were involved in this case, and the feds almost certainly have names and numbers of the players. Incidentally, neither the Palms Hotel and Casino nor the Poker Palace Casino were said to have done anything wrong, according to the documents from the case. (UPDATE: A Paulick Report reader points out in a comment below that Poker Palace was fined $250,000 for failing to properly manage its employees, some of whom permitted an illegal bookmaking operation to lay off some bets and receive prohibited rebates in return for their action. Click here for details on the Nevada Gaming Control Board’s sanctions.)

Why does it matter who may have been betting through an illegal bookmaker?

For starters, money bet with bookmakers on horseracing doesn’t go into the pari-mutuel pools. That means these illegal bets that otherwise might have gone through the mutuel pools are stealing revenue from racetracks and horsemen. Second, knowingly associating with bookmakers is a serious matter that, at least in some states, can disqualify someone from a racing license as owner or trainer. (In California, for example, Rule No. 1902 reads: “No licensee shall engage in any conduct prohibited by this Division nor shall any licensee engage in any conduct which by its nature is detrimental to the best interests of horse racing including, but not limited to: (a) knowing association with any known bookmaker, known tout, or known felon.”

The federal government and the casinos in Las Vegas take this kind of thing seriously. I hope the TRPB and racing commissions do, too.

Copyright © 2009, The Paulick Report

Savvy businesses recognize value.
Advertise in the Paulick Report.

Support the Paulick Report. Make a
donation today.

Sign up for our
Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary from Ray Paulick