Archive for December, 2008
Wednesday, December 31st, 2008
While attending sales and major events throughout the racing world over the last 25 years, I would often run into the Italian bloodstock agent, Eugenio Colombo, who has as much passion and enthusiasm for the sport and the Thoroughbred breed as anyone I’ve ever known.
Colombo (pictured, left) got his start in the business in 1969, when he sold to an American syndicate an Italian-bred horse named Bacuco, who came to the United States and finished third in the now-defunct Washington, D.C., International. Ten years later, Colombo himself became a U.S. import, moving his international bloodstock agency first to New York, then to Southern California, and most recently to the Ocala, Fla., area.
His client list reads like a Who’s Who of international racing and breeding. It includes some of the most respected owners and breeders in Europe, North America, Asia and Australia. It’s no surprise that Colombo’s philosophy is to establish and build long-term relationships with his clients.
Like so many of us who love Thoroughbred racing and breeding, Colombo is deeply concerned about the current state of the industry. He doesn’t claim to be an expert on simulcasting or Advance Deposit Wagering and isn’t offering to mediate the ongoing disputes involving horsemen’s organizations, racetracks and wagering companies.
What he does know is horses, and the brief commentary that follows serves as an appropriate reminder of the noble, living and breathing animal that is at the center of this global, multi-billion-dollar business of Thoroughbred racing and breeding. Without the horse, we have nothing.
Colombo’s comments seem appropriate as we reflect back on the last 12 months and look ahead to 2009. As this will be the final post from the Paulick Report for 2008, I’d like to take this opportunity to wish our friends around the racing world a new year filled with good health for themselves, their families and their equine and human friends. – Ray Paulick
One of the most important factors in the decline of racetrack attendance is the disappearing culture of the horse in our society, and it is a worldwide issue.
My generation, a 1944 model, and those who came before me, had the opportunity to see horses up close in their everyday lives. This helped develop an admiration for these beautiful animals that I, and so many others, have always loved.
Unfortunately for the more recent generations, horses are no longer part of mainstream society. They no longer are a major part of our culture. Today’s kids grow up in front of the television, and even sadder, playing video games.
With few exceptions, such as the “HorseFair” program that the New York Racing Association presented during the week of the Belmont Stakes some years back, the culture of the horse has been overlooked in our sport for far too long. It is our responsibility to help bring the horses back into our society and culture, in every possible way. We should combine racing and other equestrian activities at the racecourse, whether it’s polo, show jumping, rodeos, or wagon train races – anything and everything that can motivate people to rediscover the beauty of the horse and enjoy the time they spend at the racecourse. After all, the racecourse should be the horse’s kingdom, not just a gambling facility.
While I’m on my soapbox, I have a few other thoughts about the racing and breeding industry.
RACING DAYS. Five racing days a week is too much for any city and it becomes boring and monotonous to many people — not to mention that an empty racecourse is a depressing place to be and short fields are even more depressing. In my opinion, two racing days a week, as Japan and Hong Kong offer, will be a winning formula; we will have full fields with the same handle of five racing days, more attendance and a more enjoyable racing atmosphere, with 12 races a day. Quality versus quantity was and is the name of the game.
THE BREED: The over-commercialization of the last 30 years, along with the culture of speed, has weakened the breed. Overmedication has worsened the selection; horses don’t stay or last long enough to create a real lasting champion who can captivate and fascinate the public. We need to make a transition to a long-term racing calendar with more emphasis on races of a mile and a quarter and longer.
MEDICATION: Medication has reached the point of no return, producing obscene veterinary bills, and a very negative image on our society of a sport filled with cheaters and animal abusers. The rest of the world runs on ZERO medication. We must line up with them.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: commercial breeding, eugenio colombo, Horse Racing, horses, Paulick Report, racing days, Ray Paulick, thoroughbred racing and breeding Posted in Horse Welfare, Industry Reform, People | 11 Comments »
Monday, December 29th, 2008
NTRA PRESS RELEASE
December 29, 2008
MATT GOINS WINS SECOND MEDIA ECLIPSE AWARD
FOR PHOTOGRAPHY
The National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA), Daily Racing Form and the National Turf Writers Association announced today that Matt Goins of Lexington, Ky., has won the 2008 Media Eclipse Award for Photography for his picture “Frankie’s Flying Dismount” of jockey Frankie Dettori leaping off the 2-year-old Donativum in the winner’s circle following his victory in the Grey Goose Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Turf at Santa Anita Park on October 25. The photograph appeared in Al-Adiyat, the Dubai-based racing publication, on November 6.
The winning photo (pictured, left) can also be viewed at www.ntra.com
This is the second Media Eclipse Award for Photography for the 38 year-old Goins, who won his first bronze statue in 2006 for a photo published in the Lexington Herald-Leader of Jockey Julien Leparoux.
"I am so fortunate to have the opportunity to work in such an exciting industry, and to be awarded the sport’s highest honor on two occasions is extremely humbling," said Goins. "I’ve had a front row seat for some of the greatest moments in racing history while being surrounded by the beauty that is the Thoroughbred."
Dettori is a champion jockey in Europe and known around the world for his flying dismounts after important victories. In Goins’s winning photo, he captures a delighted Dettori, arms and legs in the air, over the gray Donativum, owned by Princess Haya of Jordan and Darley Stable. The full frame, shot with a Canon 70-200mm zoom lens at 75mm, captured palm trees to the left of the winner’s circle and the San Gabriel Mountains in the background.
Honorable mention is the Photography category went to Alexander Barkoff, whose photo of a morning sunrise on the Fair Grounds backstretch was published in the New Orleans Times Picayune on November 9, and to Matt Wooley, whose photo of Big Brown winning the Kentucky Derby appeared in Daily Racing Form on May 6.
The panel of judges in the Photography category was comprised of Ed Reinke, The Associated Press, Louisville; Jim Gensheimer, San Jose Mercury News and Dan Farrell, former photographer for New York Daily News.
Eclipse Awards are given to recognize members of the media for outstanding coverage of Thoroughbred racing. Eclipse Awards are bestowed upon horses and individuals whose outstanding achievements have earned them the title of Champion in their respective categories. Awards also are given to recognize members of the media for outstanding coverage of Thoroughbred racing.
The Eclipse Awards are named after the great 18th-century racehorse and foundation sire Eclipse, who began racing at age five and was undefeated in 18 starts, including eight walkovers. Eclipse sired the winners of 344 races, including three Epsom Derbies.
The 2008 Eclipse Awards ceremony will be held on Monday, January 26, 2009 at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach in Miami Beach, Fla. For hotel accommodations and Eclipse Awards dinner reservations, contact Michele Ravencraft the NTRA’s Lexington office, (800) 792-6872, or e-mail mravencraft@ntra.com
NTRA is a broad-based coalition of horse racing interests consisting of leading thoroughbred racetracks, owners, breeders, trainers and affiliated horse racing associations, charged with increasing the popularity of horse racing and improving economic conditions for industry participants. The NTRA has offices in Lexington, Ky., and in New York. NTRA press releases appear on the NTRA web site, NTRA.com.
-30-
Tags: al-adiyat, alexander barkoff, Breeders' Cup, breeders' cup world champioonships, canon 70-200mm, daily racing form, dan farrell, darley stable, donativum, dubai, eclipse, eclipse award for photography, eclipse awards, ed reinke, flying dismount, frankie dettori, grey goose breeders' cup juvenile turf, jim gensheimer, julien laparoux, lanfranco dettori, lexington herald-leader, matt goins, matt wooley, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, national turf writers association, NTRA, Paulick Report, princess haya Posted in Racing Media, eclipse awards | 4 Comments »
Monday, December 29th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
One of the first projects that landed on my desk when I joined the Thoroughbred Times as managing editor in 1988 was a feature story on the Jockey Club, the organization historically entrusted with registering Thoroughbreds and being the keeper of the Stud Book. The article was accompanied by a lengthy mail-in survey of Thoroughbred Times readers. The story and the survey results were of great interest, for at the time I had no idea how broadly the Jockey Club reached across the entire industry and how unhappy rank and file breeders then were with the organization’s service, pricing and activities.
It should be noted that there was an agenda to the article. The Thoroughbred Times was then owned by Richard F. Broadbent, whose Bloodstock Research Information Services was facing new competition from a subsidiary of the Jockey Club. There were questions about whether a tax-exempt breed registry like the Jockey Club should create a subsidiary to compete with a private enterprise company like BRIS, which supplied statistical data to breeders, owners and various publications. A few years later, the Jockey Club helped form another for-profit company, Equibase, which competed with the Daily Racing Form to collect racing results (the Form eventually closed its track and field operations and became Equibase’s biggest customer). The Jockey Club has since started other for-profit businesses.
One of the things that struck me was the comparison between how the Jockey Club and the American Quarter Horse Association conduct their business. The Jockey Club is clearly a breed apart from its Quarter Horse counterpart. The AQHA, then and now, is a relatively transparent organization, one whose membership is open and whose leadership is democratically elected through regional and national elections. There is a board of directors, from which comes an executive committee and elected officers. The AQHA has term limits that prevent individuals from maintaining longstanding control of the organization. The AQHA web site publishes a great deal of information about its governance and membership rules, which can be read here.
By comparison, membership in the Jockey Club has always been by invitation only. Click here for an explanation about membership. It is "governed" by a rotating board of stewards, though that term is used loosely since the Jockey Club has been under the firm control of just two men since 1982, when Ogden Mills “Dinny” Phipps was named chairman and William S. Farish became vice chairman (pictured left). Click here to see the current list of Jockey Club members, stewards, and officers.
The AQHA is a huge organization that maintains the registration of more than five million Quarter Horses, with 135,000 registered in 2007 alone. There are nearly 350,000 AQHA members. According to Internal Revenue Service Form 990 for tax exempt organizations, the AQHA generated $54.4 million in revenue in the 2005-06 fiscal year, the most recent year available. At that time it had $73 million in total assets, including nearly $49 million in investment securities. Click here for the AQHA Form 990.
The AQHA, like the Jockey Club, maintains pedigree records, but also promotes the Quarter Horse breed through horse shows and publishes three magazines (the Quarter Horse Journal, the Quarter Horse Racing Journal, and America’s Horse) that had total circulation of over 400,000 in 2006.
The AQHA charges as little as $25 to register a Quarter Horse foal if done within seven months of birth. The organization is based in Amarillo, Texas, and its highest-paid officer, longtime executive vice president Billie G. Brewer, earned an annual salary of $424,928; treasurer Lee Callaway was paid $221,965 (both figures are from the IRS Form 990.) The two executive salaries represented 5.5% of the AQHA’s total payroll of $11,725,124.
The Jockey Club is also a rich organization, one that is exempt from federal taxes but also has several wholly owned for-profit subsidiaries. The Jockey Club’s 2006 IRS Form 990 states that it registered 37,300 foals that year. The Jockey Club generated $13.2 million in revenue in 2006, the most recent year the figures are available. It claimed $32 million in total assets, including $21.6 million in investment securities. Click here for the Jockey Club Form 990.
In addition, the Jockey Club claimed that its subsidiaries generated over $25.7 million in income for 2006 ($13.7 million by TJC Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries, which is engaged in information services and software solutions; $4.9 million by The Jockey Club Racing Services, for the collection of Thoroughbred racing data; and $7.1 million by The Jockey Club Technology Services, Inc., for its technology services). Click here for more information on those subsidiaries, which include shared ownership in the data collection company Equibase, and full ownership of TJCIS (The Jockey Club Information Systems and data supplier Equineline), and InCompass Solutions, which provides software systems for racetracks.
The Jockey Club’s IRS Form 990 lists its annual Round Table Conference in Saratoga Springs, N.Y., publication of its Fact Book, and providing financial support to other industry organizations among reasons for its tax-exempt status, in addition to its breed-registry responsibilities.
The Jockey Club charges $200 to register a Thoroughbred foal, considerably higher than the AQHA’s fee. Its last increase was in 2000, when it was upped from $175. The Jockey Club, which for many years was known as the “New York Jockey Club,” relocated its registration department from New York to Kentucky in 1988.
Its highest-paid officer is president Alan Marzelli (pictured, left), who earned $672,796 in 2006, 58% more than the AQHA’s top executive. The Jockey Club has three executive vice presidents: James Gagliano, with a salary of $256,885; Daniel Fick, $243,546; and Laura Banllaro, $243,804. IRS Form 990 also lists but does not itemize another $542,776 in 2006 pension plan contributions for those officers. The salaries represented 39.1% of the Jockey Club’s total payroll of $3,626,092 (exclusive of its subsidiaries, each of which have its own executive staff and employees).
The Jockey Club’s 2006 tax return came to light recently when an entity called “CTBA Boardwatch” (which generally concerns itself with the inner workings of the California Thoroughbred Breeders Association) distributed IRS Form 990 to numerous individuals. A number of those people contacted the Paulick Report and were outraged over the salaries paid to Marzelli and his three executive vice presidents.
I don’t know the going rate of executive compensation for a tax-exempt company in New York, where three of the four Jockey Club officers are based (only Dan Fick, a former AQHA executive, is located in the Lexington offices of the Jockey Club). Perhaps those numbers are perfectly in line with other non-profits. I would imagine, though, that the going rate for an executive staff is higher in New York than it would be in Kentucky.
It does seem strange to me that the Jockey Club continues to maintain a nicely appointed office in the high-rent district of midtown Manhattan, on 52nd Street just off Park Avenue. I doubt that it’s gotten many walk-in customers seeking to register their foals since the registration department was moved to Lexington more than 20 years ago. It is conveniently located near the headquarters of Bessemer Trust, the Phipps family-run wealth management firm whose offices are just a few blocks away on Fifth Avenue.
I asked Jockey Club communications officer Bob Curran why the Jockey Club continues to have a New York office 20 years after the organization’s primary function was relocated to Lexington. A few days later I received the following statement from Jockey Club president Marzelli: “Beginning in 1989, when the first of our commercial subsidiaries was incorporated, The Jockey Club has created and developed a group of for-profit subsidiaries and strategic partnerships, each designed to serve specific segments within the industry by utilizing highly efficient, state-of-the-art technology platforms. We have built and managed this growing list of technology-based companies with a corporate office based in New York and operations centers in Lexington, Ky., and Mountain View, Calif.”
That didn’t really answer the question “why a New York office is necessary” although it did tell me something I didn’t know; namely, that the Jockey Club now has a division in California’s high-tech Silicon Valley town of Mountain View.
The bigger question is who is the Jockey Club accountable to. Is it simply Phipps and Farish and their hand-picked stewards? Is the breeders who have paid registration fees over the 100-plus years of its existence? Is the Thoroughbred industry at large? If there is accountability to the industry, why isn’t there more transparency in the operational and financial activities of the Jockey Club and its various subsidiaries? Why is its membership so restrictive and its governance so secretive?
James Gagliano, one of the aforementioned executive vice presidents, touched on some of these questions, during the Jockey Club Round Table in August in which he discussed some of the activities of the Jockey Club and its affiliate for-profit companies. Click here to read Gagliano’s remarks.
Are you satisfied that the Jockey Club is properly and responsibly representing the best interests of the Thoroughbred industry? Let us know in the comment section below, or take the Daily Paulick Poll about the Jockey Club and its activities, located on the left-hand column of the Paulick Report home page.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Alan Marzelli, american quarter horse association, aqha, bessemer, bessemer trust, billie brewer, billie g. brewer, bloodstock research information services, bob curran, breed registry, bris, california thoroughbred breeders association, ctba, ctba boardwatch, daily racing form, dan fick, Dinny Phipps, equibase, Horse Racing, incompass, james gagliano, Jockey Club, jockey club racing services, jockey club round table, jockey club steward, jockey club survey, jockey club technology services, laura banllaro, Ogden Mills Phipps, Paulick Report, phipps family, quarter horse, Ray Paulick, richard f. broadbent, the jockey club information systems, thoroughbred, Thoroughbred breeding, thoroughbred times, tjc, tjc holdings, tjcis, Will Farish, William S. Farish Posted in Breeding, Industry Organizations, Jockey Club, daily racing form | 27 Comments »
Wednesday, December 24th, 2008
It has been just over six months since the inception of the Paulick Report, and in the year-end spirit of Top Ten Lists and Best Of proclamations; we have decided to put our own spin on a Year That Was wrap-up. Instead of showing our personal narcissistic tendencies by deciding which were the top stories of the year, we have decided to venture into our traffic numbers and determine the ten stories you read most. Enjoy this flashback into the recent past and let us know how this list strikes you in the comments section below.
10. Priority 1: Racing’s Business Model – We start our list with the most commented story of the year with 107 and still counting. Fred Pope’s speech from the University of Arizona’s Symposium on Racing sparked some serious controversy between horseplayers and horsemen as to how to deal with the issue of takeout from simulcasting and ADW wagering. At its core, this sort of back and forth is what the Paulick Report is all about.
9. Free Money: Past-Post Betting – Have you ever wished you could bet on a race after the results came in? Well that is precisely what happened for several horseplayers at Tampa Bay Downs betting on a race from Philadelphia Park. For ten minutes, players took advantage of the ultimate sure thing
The culprit? Most of the blame goes to the tote, a patchwork, less-than-state-of-the-art wagering network that handles $15 billion in bets each year. But most shockingly, this story didn’t see the light of day for several days afterwards. This made way for the Paulick Report’s first exclusive story and wrestling match with the mainstream media. More on that later.
Oh, and the big losers? Those who bet on the 8-1 winner Magical American. Because of the skewed betting results, those who legitimately bet on the winner only got paid $9.20 on a $2 win bet. It just goes to show that nothing in life is truly free, not even a sure thing.
8. Major Breeder Calls For Breeders’ Cup Resignations – Imagine you had thousands of dollars in the stock market and the NYSE sent out a press release announcing they are cancelling the market in 2009. When the Breeders’ Cup announced they were suspending the stakes program for 2009, a lot of breeders across the country felt they were getting a similar short end of the stick. But Liberation Farm’s Rob Whiteley was the only one so bold as to write an editorial about the subject, going as far as to call for the resignation of the Breeders’ Cup board members.
Again, much conversation ensued and all sides of the issue were heard. Interestingly enough, two days later the Breeders’ Cup made a complete turnaround and guaranteed the stakes program would continue in 2009. We would never be so bold as to claim victory, but the Paulick Report is proud to be a small part of the discussion that led to this appropriate outcome.
7. Minor Takes On Magna – In case you missed it, Halsey Minor is not a big fan of Magna Entertainment, Frank Stronach and John Brunetti. But perhaps his least favorite person in the Thoroughbred industry is unknown Magna CFO Blake Tohana. Or perhaps we should say previously unknown after our number seven story hit the pages of the Paulick Report.
Never one to mince words, Minor holds nothing back in his description of his conversation with Tohana. Not surprisingly, Tohana didn’t have a glowing opinion of Minor and let us know about it.
Since then, Minor has continued in his quest to buy a racetrack as he tries to help the sport he loves. As for Tohana? Well, we haven’t heard much from him recently and we imagine that’s the way he prefers it.
6. Bloodhorse President Hits Below The Belt – Sundays are usually slow news days in the world of the Paulick Report, especially in December. However, all of that changed when we received an email from an old friend. Stacy Bearse, President of the Blood-Horse and Ray’s former boss, expressed his “concerns” about the accuracy of his reporting when it came to recent Blood-Horse layoffs. While we encourage dissent on our pages, the language Mr. Bearse used was too colorful not to share and the consensus among our readers determined it language unbecoming the president of the largest trade publication in the business.
Regardless of his less than courteous tone with Ray, we have yet to receive a list of facts we got wrong in the stories at question. We are big enough to admit when we are wrong.
5. Thoroughbred Times Rip Off – So a funny thing happened on the way to breaking the past post betting scandal. The Thoroughbred Times just happened to write a piece on the same subject a few hours after we broke a story that had been in hiding for several days. Much to our dismay, the Paulick Report was not mentioned or given attribution credit. One thing Ray doesn’t like is when someone steals his scoop and he let Frank Angst and the Thoroughbred Times know all about it. And you let them know that you were interested in the behind the scenes aspect of Thoroughbred journalism by making this one of the most trafficked stories of 2008.
4. Guest Editorial Ed Whitfield – A companion piece to Fred Pope’s aforementioned speech, Congressman Ed Whitfield of Kentucky contacted the Paulick Report to help get its message out to our industry. Much like Pope, Congressman Whitfield wants to amend the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978. Unlike Pope, he proposes using the IHA to impose ethical standards on each state racing body or else revoke their simulcast rights. Whether you agree with him or not, it is clear that Congressman Whitfield understands that solving any problem starts by hitting people where it really hurts…in the pocketbook.
3. Banned Trainer "Suffolk Done Me Dirty" – The closest our pages have come to the Jerry Springer Show, this crazy web of he said/she said ended in the lives of five horses being saved by the Thoroughbred Retirement Fund which is all that really matters. However, we aren’t sure that’s why you enjoyed this story so much.
To give a synopsis of the twists and turns and very questionable explanations in a few sentences would be an impossible task. Instead, we just quote the title again. When trainer in question Pam Pompell was asked how she felt about Suffolk Downs, she said in an interview to the Paulick Report “Suffolk done me dirty.” Do you really need anything more?
2. Sadler Mullins Take Leave From Trainers Board – With drug use being the top issue of 2008, John Sadler and Jeff Mullins’ voluntary leaves of absence from the California Thoroughbred Trainers board raised more than a few eyebrows.
The CHRB phased in a new steroids testing program in July. For the first month, positive tests would not be treated as violations and for the second month, positives would be reported as violations but not penalized. It was during these two months that according to the Thoroughbred Times, Sadler had accounted for 18 of the 38 positive tests and Mullins’ hands were sullied as well. They became poster boys for an industry trying to change its ways when it comes to drug use. Only time will tell if the sins of the past will be washed away.
1. Ray Paulick Live From Capitol HIll – In only our second week of existence, the Paulick Report flew Ray economy class to Washington DC and put him up in a fancy Motel 6 so he would be rested and ready to report on what was likely the biggest non-racing event of the year.
While there were other journalists reporting on the daily happenings, the Paulick Report was the only platform giving up to the second updates on the hearings. It was the beginning of what has become a regular feature here as we have live blogged several events since. Unfortunately, we are unable to refund the productivity lost by companies all across the country whose employees were following the hearing online instead of working. Fortunately, all of racing’s problems were solved in those two sessions and 2009 will be the best year ever in racing. (We can hope, can’t we?)
Finally, tomorrow is Christmas and whether you celebrate that holiday or you have other plans, it is definitely a universal time for reflection. The last six months have been quite a ride for the Paulick Report. We have more than doubled our daily audience, anonymous donors have stepped up to fill the gaps and advertisers have jumped onboard even in the first few months when the traffic wasn’t near what it is today.
To our advertisers, we would like to thank you from the bottom of our hearts for stepping out and lending the Paulick Report your good name as well as trusting that your investment would pay off. Please be sure to frequent Liberation Farm, North American Trainer Magazine, Team Valor, M & M Thoroughbreds, TVG, Stonestreet Farms, Lost In The Fog, BetFastNow, That’s Racing and BetAmerica. They have stepped up by publicly supporting us and for that they deserve your support.
To our donors, your generous support has also helped us fill in the gaps and make it possible to bring the consistent quality you have come to expect on the pages of the Paulick Report. We would not be here today without you. (Plus, our families would not have received any Christmas presents this year!)
And finally, we would like to give a big thank you to those of you who check in on a daily or weekly basis to see what is going on in the industry. We hope you have found the Paulick Report to offer a brand of reporting not very often seen in the Thoroughbred industry. Please continue to tell your friends about the breaking news and hard journalism found on our pages each and every week.
I would also like to thank Ray for his unrelenting pursuit for truth and his thirst for strong, ethical journalism. Whether you agree with his viewpoints or not, he is relentless in his passion to help the sport he loves through this difficult time. His work ethic is unmatched and we are all fortunate to have a person of his integrity and skill willing to take a chance with the Paulick Report.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year,
Brad Cummings
Associate Publisher
Paulick Report
Tags: Paulick Report, PaulickReport.com, Ray Paulick, ray paulick paulick report, Year In Review Posted in Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, Uncategorized, Year In Review | 8 Comments »
Monday, December 22nd, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Though Tom Meeker hasn’t been directly involved with the Thoroughbred industry since stepping down as CEO of Churchill Downs Inc. in August 2006 after 22 years at the helm, he has been an interested sidelines observer. Never one to mince words, Meeker said he doesn’t like what he sees right now, particularly the battle going on between racetracks and horsemen over advance deposit wagering. At the center of the fight on the racetrack side is the man who replaced him at Churchill Downs, Bob Evans.
“The squabbling that is going on right now could not have occurred at a more inopportune time,” Meeker told the Paulick Report. “Throwing grenades back and forth while the industry is crumbling around them does no one any good.”
Meeker said he doesn’t side with either party in the dispute. “In the cold light of day I side with horsemen on a couple of things, but track management is investing their capital and trying to put together a system. I’m not sure there’s a whole lot of money in the ADW business, and the margins can’t be great. I don’t think TVG and Youbet have done that well.
“Racing needs to get much more aggressive about marketing, and there needs to be a consolidation of racetracks and a number of functions so you can run the business in a more orderly manner. With the economic downturn and the squabbling that’s going on, it’s not a good thing. Everyone is just trying to whack up a smaller and smaller pie.
“The fighting makes no sense. There may be irrational people on the racetrack side or among the horsemen, but at some point even the most ill-informed or most radical will have to realize that we can’t keep doing this.
“And I don’t see any sense of urgency on anybody’s part,” he added. “I could think of 10 different things that can be done. Let’s agree that we don’t know the answer today, but let’s come to an agreement and have a reopener in a year or two years. We can’t afford not to have this thing out in the marketplace right now because we are losing customers. It takes five times as much energy and money to regain customers that you’ve lost than it does to keep them.”
Meeker said it’s important for racetracks to get into the ADW business . “They will use it as their primary marketing tool, whether it’s ADW or the various deployment devices – interactive television, telephone , the internet, whatever. That’s going to be the marketing arm of racing.”
Meeker sees other issues that have plagued the industry for decades. “We need consolidation in so many areas,” he said. “We have all these racing commissions, horsemen’s groups, what have you. There’s no sense of coordination at all on racing programs among different tracks. If Churchill were to cut out a few days of racing, somebody else would jump in and add more days. We need to cut back on the number of racing days."
He seems happy to let someone else deal with those issues. “For the last few years I’ve just been a mere mortal. I get online now and then and read the racing rags and other things, but I haven’t spoke to Evans since the day I left.”
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Account Wagering, adw advance deposit wagering, bob evans, churchill downs, Horse Racing, pari-mutuel wagering, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, tom meeker, tvg, youbet Posted in Account Wagering, Churchill Downs Inc., People, Simulcasting, Wagering | 14 Comments »
Saturday, December 20th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Fred Pope touched a nerve throughout the Thoroughbred industry with his commentary about what he called an “upside down” business model for simulcasting, where the track and horse owners putting on the live race get one-fifth of the takeout, the remainder going to the simulcast site, OTB or ADW taking the bet. If the bet taker/simulcast site is affiliated with a racetrack, its share is usually split with the local horsemen.
The article, published in the Paulick Report on Friday, was a reprint of a speech Pope gave earlier this month at the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing in Tucson, Ariz. The Lexington advertising executive wants to see racing adopt a new business model, one that pays the lion’s share of simulcast revenue to the track and horse owners putting on the live race. Pope has long been an advocate for horse owners to exert greater control over the terms of simulcast contracts.
Though his widely-read article has elicited nearly 90 comments from horse owners, breeders and gamblers whose opinions fall on all sides of the issue, participants in the Daily Paulick Poll voiced overwhelming disapproval of the current business model. To date, only 6% of those who voted say the current model is the right one. Sixty-five percent believe the lion’s share of the simulcast proceeds should go to the track and owners putting on the race, while 27% feel it should be divided evenly between the live track and horsemen and the simulcast site, OTB or ADW and affiliated horsemen at that end.
Comments from horseplayers focused largely on what they believe is an onerous level of takeout, but many of them also feel disenfranchised or taken for granted by an industry that once had a monopoly on gambling and has not done a very good job of competing in this new world of Indian casinos, riverboats, and online gaming, whether it be poker or sports betting through offshore bookmakers. Not many of the horseplayers who commented seem to have much sympathy for horse owners who spend at least $2 billion a year on training costs and compete for half that amount in purses.
Many of those horseplayers want to see takeout reduced, especially on exotic bets such as exactas, trifectas, superfectas or multi-race wagers where the takeout often exceeds 25%. Some of them feel ADW companies should get a large enough share of the takeout so they can be profitable and still offer rebates to their best customers.
The problem with that, as I see it, is that the stronger position the ADW companies have, the greater a percentage of handle will migrate from on-track business to phone or internet wagering. We’re already seeing horseplayers at the track making wagers through ADW companies because some of them will offer rebates. As handle moves from on-track to ADWs, there is less retained revenue for the tracks and local horsemen to put on the show. Less revenue means lower budgets for marketing, capital improvements and technology advancement for tracks, and less incentive for horse owners to stay in the game.
Pope’s proposal may not be without flaws, but the current model clearly is upside down, and any business structure that puts more power in the hands of the bet takers is going to make it even worse.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Account Wagering, advance deposit wagering, ADW, daily paulick poll, fred pope, Horse Racing, horseplayers, off-track betting, otb, pari-mutuel wagering, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, symposium on racing, takeout, university of arizona symposium on racing Posted in Account Wagering, Industry Reform, Simulcasting, Wagering | 56 Comments »
Friday, December 19th, 2008
Fred Pope is one of those rare individuals in racing who does more than identify problems and complain about them; he actually spends a great deal of time working on solutions. Whether it’s the National Thoroughbred Association, an owners-driven organization he created more than a decade ago, or pushing for a "major league" of racing, the Lexington advertising executive has been a strong proponent of horse owners and their rights to get a greater share of simulcasting revenue.
Pope’s current proposal, which he outlined recently at the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing, is for a change in the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, the federal law that governs interstate simulcasting. By providing for more rights to the racehorse owners where the live race is run, Pope believes purses and bloodstock prices will greatly increase and the sport of racing will grow. The complete text of his speech follows.
What is your opinion on this subject? Do you believe the lion’s share of takeout from simulcast wagers should go to the business taking the bet (simulcast site, OTB, or ADW company), or to the track and horsemen’s organization where the live race is run? Take the Daily Paulick Poll (located on the left-hand column of the Paulick Report home page) or leave a comment at the bottom of Pope’s article. — Ray Paulick
Correcting the Interstate Horseracing Act
Racing’s Off-Track Business Model Favors Bet Takers. It Should Favor Host Tracks Putting on the Show.
Speech by Fred Pope at Univ. of Arizona Racing Symposium, December 11, 2008
Let’s start off today with a show of hands. Be honest. How many of you feel that Government should be involved in Thoroughbred racing? I see just one or two hands, so perhaps we should work to get government completely out of Thoroughbred racing.
First, let’s tell government we want them to take back the laws that make it legal to bet on racing. Why should government intrude and force our sport to have a monopoly on legal wagering?
Next, let’s ask Jay Hickey when he returns to Washington to see if we can get the federal government to rescind the Interstate Horseracing Act. Why did government feel the need to give our host tracks expanded distribution across state lines?
And third, for good measure, let’s tell government that we don’t want the exemption they gave us in 2000 from the law that prohibits gambling on the Internet. That ought to do it.
Ladies and gentlemen, the truth is racing is more involved with government than any other sport. Government involvement is at the core of racing’s existence. If it weren’t for government involvement in racing, the only place we would enjoy our sport would be at the County Fair.
I understand why most of you didn’t raise your hand today. Government involvement comes with strings doesn’t it? There’s a yin and a yang to government and politics.
It seems when government steps in and passes a law to do one thing; it inadvertently winds up hurting something else.
That’s why I am here today, to talk about how government’s gift of the Interstate Horseracing Act (IHA), has inadvertently resulted in an Upside Down business model that is killing Thoroughbred racing.
We are all aware of how our once-healthy American automakers are suddenly on the verge of collapse because they failed to take action and correct their business model.
Talking about off-track betting and business models isn’t a very sexy subject. It causes a lot of people to get a glassy look in their eyes; however, that is where 90% of all the money in racing is today. If you want to have a future in racing, or breeding, you need to understand where the money from off-track wagering is going now, and where it needs to start going.
Here’s how wagering under the IHA should have worked. The regulated host tracks and racehorse owners putting on the show would have licensed and paid a small commission to those taking off-track bets on their product. For example, if someone bet $100, the host track and purse account would get about 15% and perhaps pay a 5% commission to the bet takers.
That’s the model used by lotteries. Lotteries pay a 5% commission to the convenience stores punching in the numbers on the lottery bets. It is a very straightforward distribution model. The lotteries and the IHA in racing kicked in about the same time, but last year the lotteries grossed $50 billion and paid out about $2.5 billion to their bet takers. Racing could have used that same distribution model, instead racing invented its own model.
Now, here’s how wagering under the IHA actually happens today. The host track and racehorse owners putting on the show contract and receive only 3% from the people taking bets on their product. The bet takers keep 15% or more for just taking the bet.
Whether the bet takers are other racetracks, or OTBs, or ADWs, or casinos, they keep the majority of the takeout on the host track and racehorse owners’ live racing product.
Why? The short answer is because the bet-takers felt they owned their betting customers. If the bettor was going to wager on other tracks’ races, the bet-taker was going to get the lion’s share. Today, bettors can bypass the receiving tracks and pick up the phone or go online. The genie is out of the bottle and won’t ever go back in again.
The 3% going to the host track is split between the track and its purse account. It isn’t enough to pay for the live show, but 3% is the going rate established by the receiving racetracks taking the bets. Since the Interstate Horseracing Act has a provision that requires approval by the group representing horsemen in the receiving state, the host track has no option, but to accept the going rate of 3%.
Bet Takers Keeping All the Off-Track Money
If you bet $100, only $1.50 goes to purses at the track putting on the live show, but more than $15 stays with the place taking your bet.
You might think the cumulative effect of 3% from lots of sources totals more than the bet-takers receive, but it doesn’t. If $3 million is bet off-track, the host track and purse account split 3%, or $45,000 each, while the off-track bet takers keep $450,000 or more and many have no connection to racing.
This upside down, business model impacts 90% of the handle and it is the reason Thoroughbred racing is dying in America.
The bet-takers are gaming the IHA to the effect that there is no incentive for the host track to produce the live racing show. Just like the American automakers; racing has to correct this model or risk a total collapse of the business.
The potential closing of Hollywood Park is the new reality that no matter how large the market, a host track cannot overcome the upside down business model that is enabled by the wording in the IHA.
The IHA is supposed to help racing by simply expanding the distribution of the host tracks’ product. That is all it was supposed to do. Racing was relatively healthy in 1978 and this new distribution should have seen the sport and business revenue explode. If we had used the normal distribution model like the lotteries, racing too could have $50 billion in handle.
Now that it has been identified, this is a problem we can fix. With the stroke of a pen, the promise of the IHA can be realized. We can turn the upside down business model, right side up.
Racing has a monopoly on legal sports betting. We have virtually national distribution of a wagering product. We have a monopoly on Internet gambling. All we are missing is a real world business model and that comes quickly by correcting the Interstate Horseracing Act.
The American automakers’ business model doesn’t work because labor costs are too high. Even if a labor official knew the business was going to collapse, you can image how hard it would be convince the members to go from $70 an hour to $40 an hour.
And the same in our business, even if receiving track horsemen know the off-track business model means major tracks will fail, it would be hard for them to voluntarily give up making 15% as a bet-taker in order to save the host tracks.
That’s why it will take responsible people who have a national interest in racing to get involved, because few people will ever agree to a haircut in the interest of the sport.
That’s the beauty of correcting the Interstate Horseracing Act. Without state by state turf battles, the national law will fix the problem. Racing’s upside down business model will be turned right side up.
At a time when everything in racing and breeding is heading south, correcting the IHA would see $1 Billion going to the host tracks in the first year. Half, $500 million, would go into racehorse owners’ purses at the host tracks. For breeders it should be noted, that $500 million in racehorse owners’ purses is more than all yearling sales in 2008, and it is reasonable to expect racehorse owners would reinvest that purse money into new racing prospects.
So, here’s what we need to do to correct the Interstate Horseracing Act and have a normal business model for off-track wagering that will restore the business of Thoroughbred racing.
1) Change from the term “horsemen” to “racehorse owners”. There is no reason for trainers to be making business decisions for racehorse owners. This should never have been written into the original legislation. Like in California, the HBPA should be funded for benevolent activities in every state.
2) Eliminate the provision in the IHA requiring approval of horsemen in the receiving state taking the bets. This provision, while well intentioned in 1978, is obsolete today and is responsible for the upside down business model that has evolved over the past thirty years. Approval of racehorse owners at the host track should remain in the IHA.
3) Mandate the host racetrack and host purse account receive a minimum of 50% of the takeout on interstate bets. This will allow the host track and a receiving track taking the bet to share the same amount. All other bet takers, like ADWs and OTBs, will need to contract with the host track and racehorse owners who approve the host track agreements under the IHA.
The Interstate Horseracing Act is business distribution legislation and these corrections, that must be made, are relatively minor amendments. I do not support using the IHA as a vehicle for non-business issues like safety and medication.
Once this new business model for off-track wagering is law, racetracks and racehorse owners putting on the show will have great incentive to package, present and yes, promote their Thoroughbred races.
Under the new business model, the host track will be free to go direct to the betting customers in every racing state. Racing can be a leader in the new economy and take advantage of technology that can deliver the same business model we enjoy with on-track wagering.
The problem is today a bettor can be standing in the paddock at the host track putting on the show and make a phone bet that results in very little money going to that host track and its purses.
After these corrections to the IHA, it will not matter where the bettor happens to be at the moment, the majority of the money will go to the host track putting on the show.
That means if even small tracks, like Turfway Park or Tampa Bay Downs, puts on a good day of racing and attracts wagers of $10 million, they could split up to $2,000,000 with the purse account. That’s how you bring Thoroughbred racing back. And, when racehorse owners start winning these purses, that’s when the breeding business has a firm foundation for the future.
Every track in America will have the opportunity to provide their races to every wagering jurisdiction, with no gatekeepers, or middlemen siphoning-off the fruits of their labor.
This philosophy of owning the bettor and giving the majority of the money to the entity taking the bet is a worldwide problem. We have the technology for live racing to be sold to a worldwide audience, yet because of protectionism and old economy thinking, we do not have a business model to grow the live racing product. Everything today favors who takes the bet, not who produces the live show. Change that premise and you assure the international future of racing.
Leaving the Old-Economy Model and Moving to the New Economy
The day of the franchise that values bet taking is over. It has no place in the new economy.
When racing’s business model moves away from the old economy thinking of we own the bettor, to the new economy realization that we own the show, then our sport has a bright future.
Changing economies are frightening things, particularly with the realization that if you don’t change you die. The new economy for racing, under a business model that favors those putting on the show, will bring innovation and opportunities that are unimaginable today.
Nothing succeeds like a profit motive and corrections to the IHA will bring solid incentives to package, present and promote its races. The sky is the limit for our host tracks.
The unfair advantage racing has been given, time and again by government, has never been realized because of the stranglehold bet-takers have had over the sport.
The Holy Grail of Sports Marketing
A monopoly on gambling, with national distribution and a solid profit margin is the holy grail of sports marketing. How we have screwed this up all these years is a crying shame.
Five years ago, I was hired by a racetrack company to do the most extensive consumer research ever done on Thoroughbred racing. I reviewed the research done by the NTRA, and then set out to find more in-depth answers using a top research firm.
I’m restricted from telling you the results, however, I can tell you this: The research did not support other entertainment or alternative gambling at the tracks. The facilities are not the problem and they are not the solution.
The research did show there is nothing wrong with Thoroughbred racing that cannot be fixed by packaging and presenting a better racing product. The first step though, is to change the business model to make it all possible.
The Kentucky Derby and the Breeders’ Cup have shown us the daily market for racing exceeds $100 million. That’s a good goal for host tracks to aspire to each week.
This current ADW problem is a symptom of how upside down our business model has become. ADW’s should be simple businesses that just handle transactions. Not companies trying to game the IHA with schemes and kickbacks called source market fees. When we correct the IHA, the ADW’s will no longer be a problem.
The real problem that must be solved is between the bet-takers, and the host tracks and racehorse owners putting on the show. Everything else at this time is just noise.
We have the opportunity for a new golden age of Thoroughbred racing, in full partnership with government. This industry is all about jobs and a way of life we all love. This is how we take action and reclaim our sport.
To those who might say we should not risk correcting the Interstate Horseracing Act, I say how can we not risk correcting it? Do we, like the automakers, risk total collapse of our business because we’re afraid to change and act?
We cannot fail to correct the Interstate Horseracing Act now.
Thank you.
© Fred A. Pope 2008
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Account Wagering, advance deposit wagering, ADW, Breeders' Cup, fred pope, Horse Racing, horsemen's organization, iha, interstate horseracing act, jay hickey, kentucky derby, national thoroughbred association, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, nta, NTRA, off-track betting, otb, pari-mutuel wagering, Paulick Report, pope advertising, Ray Paulick, Simulcasting, symposium on racing, university of arizona racetrack industry program Posted in Account Wagering, Industry Reform, Regulatory Issues, Simulcasting | 112 Comments »
Thursday, December 18th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Breeders’ Cup chief financial officer Matthew Lutz has responded to recent questions about the organization’s investment fund in a memo distributed to the Breeders’ Cup board of members and trustees and posted on the Breeders’ Cup Web site, www.breederscup.com.
The questions arose after last week’s board of directors vote to suspend the $6-million stakes supplement program because of a projected $10-million budget shortfall in 2009. That decision was reversed this week after Breeders’ Cup president and CEO Greg Avioli and individual board members heard from numerous stallion and foal nominators protesting the suspension of the stakes supplements.
In reporting on the original decision to suspend the program and in a follow-up article after the reversal, the Paulick Report revealed that the Breeders’ Cup had lost approximately $11 million from its cash reserve fund in 2008. Lutz’s memo does not address the 2008 losses, but does indicate that the investment fund has outperformed the S&P 500 for the first 11 months of 2008. It also said the Investment Committee, headed by G. Watts Humphrey Jr., moved a portion of the fund into fixed income securities at the beginning of the third quarter in 2007 to reduce exposure to market declines.
Below is the Breeders’ Cup memo, in its entirety:
TO: Breeders’ Cup Board of Members and Trustees
FROM: Matthew Lutz
DATE: December 18, 2008
RE: Investment Performance
There has been much discussion within the industry in the past week regarding the performance of Breeders’ Cup’s invested assets. The purpose of this memo is to respond to a number of the questions raised by individual Trustees on these matters. The following points below provide details on investment performance both historically and more recently.
- Since May 1989 Breeders’ Cup’s investments have yielded an average annual return of over 7 percent and generated more than $26 million in investment gains.
- For the 10-year period ending November 30, 2008, Breeders’ Cup’s portfolio has yielded a return that exceeded the S&P 500’s performance by more than 3 percentage points.
- On a more recent note, the portfolio outperformed the S&P 500 by more than 11 percentage points on a year-to-date basis though November 30, 2008.
- A contributor to the outperformance of the major indices this year was the decision by the Investment Committee to overweight fixed income securities beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2007 thereby reducing the portfolio’s exposure to the market’s declines in equity values in 2008.
- The current balance in reserves is $30.3MM. The Investment Committee is currently maintaining an allocation with 55% of reserves invested in high quality bonds and cash. The bond portfolio is managed by Neuberger Berman. The 45% of reserves currently invested in equities are managed by well respected firms including Blackrock, T. Rowe Price and Chase Investment Counsel.
The portfolio continues to be managed by the Investment Committee consisting of the following Board members: G. Watts Humphrey (Committee Chairman), Bill Farish, Don Dizney, Antony Beck and Satish Sanan who was recently appointed. Two former Trustees, Dinny Phipps (former Chairman of Bessemer Trust) and Jerry Shields (Managing Director and Chairman of Shields & Company), remain on the Committee by invitation of the Committee Chairman given their significant investment expertise. The Committee met on eight occasions in 2008 and will continue to meet regularly in 2009 to review performance and make adjustments to the allocation based on circumstances in the markets.
I hope this information is helpful. Please call me at 859-422-2650 if you have any additional questions.
Regards
Matthew Lutz
Visit the Paulick Report for all the latest news throughout the racing world.
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Antony Beck, bessemer trust, Bill Farish, blackrock, Breeders' Cup, Breeders' Cup board of directors, breeders' cup investment committee, chase investment counsel, Dinny Phipps, donald dizney, G. Watts Humphrey, jerry shields, Joseph Shields, matthew lutz, neuberger berman, Ogden Mills Phipps, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, satish sanan, shields & company, t. rowe price Posted in Breeders' Cup, Industry Organizations | 10 Comments »
Wednesday, December 17th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
While the Breeders’ Cup board of directors acted swiftly to reverse last week’s suspension of the $6-million stakes supplement program for 2009, somewhat overlooked in the swirl of controversy was the organization’s loss of $11 million in the stock market this year. Breeders’ Cup president and CEO Greg Avioli said the losses were not as severe as those suffered by endowments and funds related to other industries (i.e., the Harvard and Yale endowments have lost billions), but some Thoroughbred breeders are questioning why so much of the money from foal and stallion nominations and other revenue was tied up in a volatile equities market in the first place.
The losses, first reported by the Paulick Report on Monday, have dropped Breeders’ Cup cash reserves from $40 million to less than $30 million. The board of directors originally had voted unanimously not to use those cash reserves to plug any of the projected $10-million revenue hole in the 2009 budget, a move that led to the brief suspension of the stakes supplements as well as deep cuts in the marketing and television budget.
Avioli said the market losses, which exceeded the size of the budgeted deficit for 2009, were unrelated to the board’s original decision.However, an examination of the Breeders’ Cup 2007 annual report shows $2.7 million of unrealized and realized gains on investments were reported as revenue. Total revenue for the year was $56.5 million against expenses of $56.3 million. Without that $2.7 million capital gains reported as income, it appears the Breeders’ Cup would have had an operating deficit of $2.5 million in 2007. It’s unclear to me what becomes of the reported income, now that potential “paper gains” in the equities market have been wiped out in the tumultuous economic climate of 2008. It will also be interesting to examine the 2008 financials to see whether unrealized or realized gains in stock holdings exist or are reported as revenue.
The 2009 operating budget before last week’s cuts were announced was projected to be down $10 million, from $50 million to $40 million. Critics have complained the company should have first undergone more corporate belt tightening (which it has been doing since 2006, when Avioli replaced D.G. Van Clief Jr. as CEO) before cutting out the stakes supplements and marketing expenses.
The supplements have been part of the Breeders’ Cup program since its inaugural year in 1984, when $10 million was put into championship purses and $10 million into other stakes. That was done to give the Breeders’ Cup broad appeal to potential nominators across the country, and the supplemental money was dispersed at both large and small racetracks.
In his statement about the decision to use cash reserves to reinstate some portion of the stakes supplements in 2009, Breeders’ Cup board chairman said the board is “not in a position to commit to the stakes program beyond 2009.” The Breeders’ Cup board and executive team have discussed elimination of the stakes supplements in recent years, citing research that shows the money has not been a great incentive for breeders to nominate their foals.
Farish also said in his statement that “the Board still believes, as I do personally, that it’s critical to maintain sufficient reserves to allow for the long-term viability of the Breeders’ Cup.” Avioli said the cash reserves are viewed by the board as a catastrophic fund in the event the Breeders’ Cup is canceled because of unforeseen circumstances (equine disease outbreak, fire, earthquake or other disaster) or a multi-year financial crisis. Business interruption insurance would cover a great deal of any potential losses if the event had to be cancelled – in which case the current $25.5 million in championship purses would not have to be distributed.
The odds against holding the event, which can be moved from one venue to another in the event of a crisis, would appear to be slim. The Kentucky Derby has been run continuously since 1875 despite two World Wars and the great flood of 1937 that covered much of Churchill Downs.
IRS Form 990 for the Breeders’ Cup shows $28.3 million in stocks and bonds holdings in 2006 with another $7.8 million in U.S. treasuries and $2.5 million in Breeders’ Cup properties (the 2007 Form 990 is not yet available). Earlier this year, the Paulick Report has been told, members of the Breeders’ Cup board and its Investment Committee were urged by at least two individuals on the larger board of members and trustees not to keep such a high percentage of the organization’s reserves in the equities market. The Investment Committee, chaired by G. Watts Humphrey Jr. (its other members are Farish, Antony Beck, Donald Dizney, Ogden Mills “Dinny” Phipps, Joseph Shields, and Satish Sanan, who recently was appointed), opted to keep a substantial part of the assets in stocks. By year’s end, the assets have fallen sharply.
A number of breeders told the Paulick Report the money should never have been invested in the market because they view the Breeders’ Cup as a pass-through organization. “It’s our money,” one breeder said. “I didn’t pay $500 to nominate my foal so the Breeders’ Cup could buy stock in Coca-Cola. An emergency fund should be kept, but the rest of the money should go into purses.”
Cash reserves were an important part of the program 25 years ago, one founding member of the Breeders’ Cup said, because putting together and keeping a coalition of stallion farms was not an easy task, and there was the threat that if one or two major farms pulled out it could cause the whole concept to collapse. Keeping enough reserves to fund the program for a full year was considered a strategic defense against any boycott.
The coalition has held together, however, despite some bumps in the road along the way. The Breeders’ Cup has expanded from the $10 million championship day of seven races to a two-day event worth $25.5 million. The stakes supplement program has been reduced several times over the years from its original $10-million budget, and it now appears to be in jeopardy beyond 2009.
Farish said in his statement the board is looking at other ways to provide benefits to nominators of the program, though gave no further specifics. One benefit would be to continue to do what the board has done in the last five days: listen to those who support the program through their stallion and foal nominations. Beyond that, the board should provide greater transparency and disclosure about financial matters, committee appointments and board activities. The production of a 2007 annual report, something that had not been done in the early years of the Breeders’ Cup, was a good first step.
The Breeders’ Cup is designed to promote Thoroughbred racing and enhance public awareness of the entire industry. But it should always be remembered that the foundation and single biggest stakeholders remain the breeders who have financially supported the program since it was nothing more than a vision in the creative mind of the late John Gaines.
Copyright © 2008, The Paulick Report
Sign up for our Email Flashes to get the latest news, analysis and commentary.
Tags: Antony Beck, Bill Farish, Breeders' Cup, breeders' cup annual report, Breeders' Cup board of directors, breeders' cup cash reserves, breeders' cup stakes program, Breeders' Cup World Championships, churchill downs, D.G. Van Clief Jr., Dinny Phipps, donald dizney, G. Watts Humphrey, Greg Avioli, John Gaines, Joseph Shields, kentucky derby, Ogden Mills Phipps, Paulick Report, Ray Paulick, satish sanan Posted in Breeders' Cup, Industry Organizations | 23 Comments »
Monday, December 15th, 2008
By Ray Paulick
Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear’s Task Force on the Future of Racing reported its findings in a hearing in the state capitol in Frankfort on Monday. The Task Force, chaired by Tracy Farmer, vice chairman of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, made the following recommendations through various subcommittees:
INDUSTRY FINANCIAL MATTERS RECOMMENDATIONS:
1-Kentucky needs increased purses to remain The Horse Capital of the World.
2-Kentucky’s Breeders’ Incentive Fund must remain competitive in order to retain the best stallions and mares.
3-Kentucky needs to expand the Kentucky Thoroughbred Development Fund to retain high-quality racehorses.
Keeneland president Nick Nicholson, who chaired the financial matters subcommittee, said his committee dug into a great deal of research comparing Kentucky’s breed programs with other states. “The stark reality is this,” Nicholson said. “The more we dug, the worse it looks. … Other states are trying to reach out and take what Kentucky has. The threat (to Kentucky) is very real, and it’s not long term – it’s imminent.” Nicholson said he has “100% certainty” that “if we maintain the status quo our position vis a vis other states will deteriorate.”
FUNDING AND STAFFING RECOMMENDATIONS:
1-Hire 10 new full-time staff members, consisting of two state stewards, two auditors, one paralegal, a staff attorney, two investigators, a racing veterinarian, and a veterinarian technician. Hire additional interim personnel as needed.
2-Put all three Thoroughbred stewards and Standardbred judges on the KHRC payroll.
3-Submit a budget request for a pari-mutuel information monitoring system as a capital project.
4-Require the various participants in the industry to share in funding the regulatory body.
The following funding mechanisms are proposed:
1-Dedicate to the KHRC a specific dollar amount from the General Fund from the pari-mutuel tax.
2-Increase takeout on exotic bets and win-place-show bets, and dedicate the increase to funding the KHRC.
3-Require the owners of the top three finishers to contribute toward the cost of drug testing in any race in which the purse is $10,000 or more.
4. Require the racetracks to continue to pay any cost of drug testing not covered by the owners.
5. Increase the pari-mutuel tax on racetracks with an average daily handle of $1 million or more and dedicate the increase to funding the KHRC.
6-License tote companies and advance deposit wagering (ADW) companies.
7-The subcommittee recommended that if other funding sources are not found, the amount of the reimbursements from tracks for the compensation of KHRC employees be increased and that tracks continue to pay for drug testing charges.
INTEGRITY OF RACING AND ALL PARI-MUTUEL ACTIVITIES RECOMMENDATIONS:
Short-term (end of fiscal year 2010)
1-Fill current vacancies in the positions of pari-mutuel wagering supervisor, director of enforcement and investigator.
2-Obtain CHRIMS system (Comprehensive Horse Racing Information Management System).
3-Require all racetracks and off-track betting sites to notify KHRC of communications, reports, or investigations by any state or federal regulatory agencies.
4-Require a track to record the exact time of races on all video feeds originating from Kentucky, require a tote company to certify the exact time of the closing of betting windows, require all tracks, tote companies and video providers to synchronize their time systems, and require tracks to provide a tote company with written permission for KHRC to receive handle and wagering information directly from the tote company.
5-License and regulate tote companies.
6-Establish a Kentucky Horse Racing Integrity Hotline.
7-License and regulate advance deposit wagering companies.
8-Develop a method to license and supervise all vendors of products sold to trainers, veterinarians and grooms for use at tracks.
9-Hire and train additional security personnel to investigate alleged violations of Kentucky laws and regulations.
Long-term
1-Direct the pari-mutuel wagering supervisor to review available wagering monitoring systems and programs and obtain an appropriate system.
2-Develop career paths for investigators, auditors and stewards.
3-Continue efforts to verify and regulate wagering into Kentucky pools.
4-Monitor the progress of national efforts regarding the early closing of pools.
5-Establish regulations regarding past posting, cancel delay, late odds changes and unusually low payoffs.
LABORATORY FACILITIES RECOMMENDATIONS:
1-Establish a nonprofit, world-class research and drug testing institute with a significant accreditation status.
2-Solidify, through further research, the cost estimates and identify potential additional revenue and funding sources.
3-Establish a foundation to begin raising a $10-million endowment for operating expenses.
4-Establish an executive board of up to five members, including a chief executive officer, one member of the KHRC, and one member of the Equine Drug Research Council to guide the institute. The executive board would develop goals and a detailed business plan, collaborate with financing partners, work with the University of Kentucky on organization structure and facility development, and hire a labor directory, among other functions. The Task Force did not address the issue of expanded gambling in Kentucky.
The full Task Force voted to approve the report, which will be sent to Gov. Beshear.
Tags: Kentucky Task Force, steve beshear, steve beshear task force on the future of horse racing Posted in Kentucky, Task Forces | 12 Comments »
|
|